Re: Bugzilla scanned by robots for Spam adress

2016-10-17 Thread Dave Fisher
This is from pre-Apache days and an older version of bugzilla. I think closing 
it makes sense.

Regards,
Dave

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 17, 2016, at 5:24 PM, Peter Kovacs  wrote:
> 
> see Bug: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=62733
> 
> Is this still an issue?
> 
> i see it more as Infra Issue then as one for Open Office.
> 
> 
> All the best
> 
> Peter
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



[Issue58861] Bugzilla to intimidating ?

2016-10-17 Thread Peter Kovacs
There is this Bug where people request to make it simpler to file a 
Problem...


I dont know. I find it intimidateing to file a bug at all.


Should we close this?

https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=58861


Or would we keep this as a link to maybe switch to Jira. (I personly 
prefer Jira over Bugzilla. But I think it is a huge effort to switch the 
tracker.)



All the best

Peter


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: This can not be true

2016-10-17 Thread Hagar Delest

French translation on-line: 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.3+est+disponible

Hagar


Le 17/10/2016 à 13:38, Jörg Schmidt a écrit :

Page created at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.3
+Announcement
; people interested in translating it can add a child page for their
language.

the german translation is ready:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65876043

@Marcus:
Can you please check your quotations in the translation



Jörg


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Writing up the release process

2016-10-17 Thread Marcus

Am 10/17/2016 11:16 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:

On 15/10/2016 Marcus wrote:

Am 10/14/2016 09:01 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:

Keith N. McKenna wrote:

Pedro wrote:

Currently version 4.1.2 still reports that it "is up to date" ...

The change to the update script is usually done several days after...

I plan to update script data during the weekend.

+1


This is now done, only for 4.1.2 to 4.1.3;


it's working.

Check via "Tools - Options - OpenOffice - Online Update" and click on 
[Check now]. In the following dialog my 4.1.2 installation shows an 
update notice for 4.1.3 and the [Downlod] button refers to the download 
webpage.


> I'll later do all 4.x.y to

4.1.3, but this is likely to be a minority of users. So all OpenOffice
4.1.2 users are now expected to receive a notification depending on
their OpenOffice settings (monthly notification, weekly notification,
daily notification, never).


Yes, that can be set later. But it should be done to really reach every 
user.



The delay was caused by a need for updating the Release notes to explain
better how to circumvent Gatekeeper in the new Mac OS X Sierra - the
instructions we had applied to older versions only.


You may want to review the text as there are some typos in the last 
sentence. ;-)


Thanks for the update work.

Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Writing up the release process

2016-10-17 Thread Andrea Pescetti

On 15/10/2016 Marcus wrote:

Am 10/14/2016 09:01 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:

Keith N. McKenna wrote:

Pedro wrote:

Currently version 4.1.2 still reports that it "is up to date" ...

The change to the update script is usually done several days after...

I plan to update script data during the weekend.

+1


This is now done, only for 4.1.2 to 4.1.3; I'll later do all 4.x.y to 
4.1.3, but this is likely to be a minority of users. So all OpenOffice 
4.1.2 users are now expected to receive a notification depending on 
their OpenOffice settings (monthly notification, weekly notification, 
daily notification, never).


The delay was caused by a need for updating the Release notes to explain 
better how to circumvent Gatekeeper in the new Mac OS X Sierra - the 
instructions we had applied to older versions only.


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



4.1.4_release_blocker granted: [Issue 127137] configure does not recognize Xcode 8

2016-10-17 Thread bugzilla
Ariel Constenla-Haile  has granted  4.1.4_release_blocker:
Issue 127137: configure does not recognize Xcode 8
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127137
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Download Stats

2016-10-17 Thread Matthias Seidel
No, I meant the Google+ Forum, as linked on the official site at "I want
to stay in touch with OpenOffice":

https://plus.google.com/+openoffice/posts

Until last year it was managed by Rob Weir (?). 4.1.2 was announced on
29.10.2015, since then there was no other post.

Associated is a community, where every google+ user (like me) can post:

https://plus.google.com/communities/103683488250592271079

regards, Matthias


Am 17.10.2016 um 22:30 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> I'll post such blogs on the Google+ Community until we have access to
>> the official forum...
>
> What do you mean by "official forum" here? The official site
> http://www.openoffice.org/ or something else?
>
> Regards,
>   Andrea.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: may be duplicate but More to say

2016-10-17 Thread Mathias Röllig

Maybe my english is not good enough, but maybe …


Example Two--When I make a list of my
passwords using ODT, any hyperlink shows up as a type my email
address.  I used to stop before the ".net"  but now I type it and
select it and remove hyperlink.  Still difficult because of mouse
communicating to s/w which can re-arrange my typing.


… you are searching for
Format → AutoCorrect → AutoCorrect Options…
Tab: Options
[_] URL Recognition

If so, than it would be better to discuss your issues at a user forum.

https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Download Stats

2016-10-17 Thread Andrea Pescetti

Matthias Seidel wrote:

I'll post such blogs on the Google+ Community until we have access to
the official forum...


What do you mean by "official forum" here? The official site 
http://www.openoffice.org/ or something else?


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



may be duplicate but More to say Re: Suggestion for software please

2016-10-17 Thread mjt bs cap-om
On second thought I didn't explain well.  GLAD to learn about F5--to me it is a 
cute little box.
  
My specific inquiry, same subject.  Example One--You copy your bank statement 
of credits into a ODT (your document s/w).  I still MUST select (Ctrl+A) in 
order to right click and REMOVE HYPERLINK for EACH ONE!!

Now, selecting All (Ctrl+A) is difficult (s/w stalls and typing looks like 
uneven) and I believe it is due to the hyperlinks (Ctrl+M).  So I still 
suggest, and I don't like re-inventin' ANY THING but you decide the importance 
of this suggestion.  

Again, right click to remove all hyperlinks would be great--as it is now each 
hyperlink must be selected and Ctrl+M'd.  I am not zipping this document 
anywhere.  Example Two--When I make a list of my passwords using ODT, any 
hyperlink shows up as a type my email address.  I used to stop before the 
".net"  but now I type it and select it and remove hyperlink.  Still difficult 
because of mouse communicating to s/w which can re-arrange my typing.

Typing to me is like printing or writing--I recall best.  Thank you again for 
your time.

MT
**


-Original Message-
>From: Marcus 
>Sent: Oct 15, 2016 9:57 PM
>To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>Cc: volley86...@mypacks.net
>Subject: Re: Suggestion for software please
>
>Am 10/16/2016 09:39 AM, schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>> Maybe it is worth about thinking to have a Link Manager of some kind. So
>> you can review the Links within your document.
>
>please don't re-invent the wheel. ;-)
>
>Such manager is already existing with the Navigator. Here you can see 
>all links, rearrange, edit, or even delete them.
>
>IMHO This should be enough.
>
>Marcus
>
>
>
>> Rory O'Farrell  schrieb am So., 16. Okt. 2016, 09:07:
>>
>>> On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 12:16:53 -1000 (GMT-10:00)
>>>   wrote:
>>>

 When I have a personal document (odt) with hyperlinks in it (copied from
>>> another personal on-line document), I suggest software capability increase
>>> to allow a person to click on the document (odt) and then right-click to
>>> show the added software to remove all hyperlinks.

 That's it.

>>>
>>> To globally remove all links might in many circumstances be dangerous as
>>> it would remove everything, wanted or unwanted.  Navigator (F5) allows one
>>> to click on an unwanted link; hitting Delete then removes that link.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Rory O'Farrell

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: This can not be true

2016-10-17 Thread Jörg Schmidt

> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] 

> thanks for your translation. Please exchange the quoted text 
> parts into 
> the following:
> 
> "... ist eine gelegentliche Stille nicht ungewöhnlich ..."
> 
> "... Das war bis vor kurzem auch bei OpenOffice der Fall ..."


done


Jörg


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Download Stats

2016-10-17 Thread Matthias Seidel
Am 17.10.2016 um 19:41 schrieb Marcus:
>
> Sourgeforce told me now close to 700,000. :-)
>
> Marcus
>

That is downloads per week, including older versions?

Anyway, the download rates are constant and that even without
notification from the program...

(I have one PC left with 4.1.2 to test the upgrade notification and
download)

Matthias

>
>
>> Am 16.10.2016 um 23:34 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> Looking at the download counter on scourceforge :-), am I the only one
>>> interested in an updated chart on:
>>>
>>> http://www.openoffice.org/stats/downloads.html ?
>>>
>>> BTW, I thing the graphic cuts off at 160.000.000...
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: Download Stats

2016-10-17 Thread Marcus

Am 10/17/2016 05:30 PM, schrieb Matthias Seidel:

Answering myself... ;-)

The python-script on that page should be updated to include version
4.1.3. And I think it must be run manually for updated data.


I've tried this before the release and was surprised that it took hours 
for just a single week. So, it needs much time to update all the missing 
weeks.


We should split this task into parts, so that more people can process 
the script and get the numbers.



The problem with the graphs is that both are defined with a height of 150px.
That's OK for the daily downloads, but at 160.000.000 total downloads
the graph is cut off in a flat line.
(We now must be at about 200.000.000 total downloads)


Let's analyze this when we have the missing numbers.


(P.S.: Downloads on scourceforge are close to half a million for 4.1.3)


Sourgeforce told me now close to 700,000. :-)

Marcus




Am 16.10.2016 um 23:34 schrieb Matthias Seidel:

Looking at the download counter on scourceforge :-), am I the only one
interested in an updated chart on:

http://www.openoffice.org/stats/downloads.html ?

BTW, I thing the graphic cuts off at 160.000.000...


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Download Stats

2016-10-17 Thread Matthias Seidel
Am 17.10.2016 um 19:25 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 10/17/2016 06:58 PM, schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>> I say to them that the team has received  one mail that congrats them to
>> the successful release of 4.1.3 and add the link.
>
> yes, I've put this online to the blog yesterday but didn't mentioned
> it until now.
>
> Marcus
>

Good to know!
I'll post such blogs on the Google+ Community until we have access to
the official forum...

Matthias

>
>> Matthias Seidel  schrieb am Mo., 17. Okt.
>> 2016,
>> 17:58:
>>
>>> Call it a marketing number...
>>>
>>> That number is for those people who insist on their opinion that no one
>>> ever downloads AOO and nobody uses it.
>>> And believe me, there are people who repeat this since 2011
>>> constantly! ;-)
>>>
>>> BTW, a page should be up to date or it should be deleted. But never
>>> outdated!
>>>
>>> regards, Matthias
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 17.10.2016 um 17:46 schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
 I'm not certain what the point of the aggregate count is, apart
 from it
>>> being
 a larger number.  While pride is taken in it, it is not clear how
>>> meaningful
 it is.

 The current rate of downloads averages out to around 3 million per
 month.
 That was true for 4.1.1 and for 4.1.2.  It is likely that 4.1.3 will
>>> achieve a
 comparable take-up.

 But of course, this does not tell you how many users.  In
 particular, we
>>> don't
 know what downloads are for new users and what downloads are for
 updates
 (including re-downloading) by existing users.

 Here's a recent summary:

 Although US destinations account for 16% of downloads, about 40% of
 all
 downloads are of an English localization.

   - Dennis




> -Original Message-
> From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de]
> Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 08:30
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Download Stats
>
> Answering myself... ;-)
>
> The python-script on that page should be updated to include version
> 4.1.3. And I think it must be run manually for updated data.
>
> The problem with the graphs is that both are defined with a height of
> 150px.
> That's OK for the daily downloads, but at 160.000.000 total downloads
> the graph is cut off in a flat line.
> (We now must be at about 200.000.000 total downloads)
>
> regards, Matthias
>
> (P.S.: Downloads on scourceforge are close to half a million for
> 4.1.3)
>
>
> Am 16.10.2016 um 23:34 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Looking at the download counter on scourceforge :-), am I the
>> only one
>> interested in an updated chart on:
>>
>> http://www.openoffice.org/stats/downloads.html ?
>>
>> BTW, I thing the graphic cuts off at 160.000.000...
>>
>> regards
>>
>> Matthias
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: Download Stats

2016-10-17 Thread Marcus

Am 10/17/2016 06:58 PM, schrieb Peter Kovacs:

I say to them that the team has received  one mail that congrats them to
the successful release of 4.1.3 and add the link.


yes, I've put this online to the blog yesterday but didn't mentioned it 
until now.



That's all that is needed to keep the project alive. 1 happy user.


... and it is very likely that there are many, many more users than just 
1 when we have millions of downloads. ;-)



I am sure they get out of concept.


Marcus




Matthias Seidel  schrieb am Mo., 17. Okt. 2016,
17:58:


Call it a marketing number...

That number is for those people who insist on their opinion that no one
ever downloads AOO and nobody uses it.
And believe me, there are people who repeat this since 2011 constantly! ;-)

BTW, a page should be up to date or it should be deleted. But never
outdated!

regards, Matthias


Am 17.10.2016 um 17:46 schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:

I'm not certain what the point of the aggregate count is, apart from it

being

a larger number.  While pride is taken in it, it is not clear how

meaningful

it is.

The current rate of downloads averages out to around 3 million per month.
That was true for 4.1.1 and for 4.1.2.  It is likely that 4.1.3 will

achieve a

comparable take-up.

But of course, this does not tell you how many users.  In particular, we

don't

know what downloads are for new users and what downloads are for updates
(including re-downloading) by existing users.

Here's a recent summary:

Although US destinations account for 16% of downloads, about 40% of all
downloads are of an English localization.

  - Dennis





-Original Message-
From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de]
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 08:30
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Download Stats

Answering myself... ;-)

The python-script on that page should be updated to include version
4.1.3. And I think it must be run manually for updated data.

The problem with the graphs is that both are defined with a height of
150px.
That's OK for the daily downloads, but at 160.000.000 total downloads
the graph is cut off in a flat line.
(We now must be at about 200.000.000 total downloads)

regards, Matthias

(P.S.: Downloads on scourceforge are close to half a million for 4.1.3)


Am 16.10.2016 um 23:34 schrieb Matthias Seidel:

Looking at the download counter on scourceforge :-), am I the only one
interested in an updated chart on:

http://www.openoffice.org/stats/downloads.html ?

BTW, I thing the graphic cuts off at 160.000.000...

regards

Matthias


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: This can not be true

2016-10-17 Thread Marcus

Am 10/17/2016 01:38 PM, schrieb Jörg Schmidt:



Page created at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.3
+Announcement
; people interested in translating it can add a child page for their
language.


the german translation is ready:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65876043

@Marcus:
Can you please check your quotations in the translation


thanks for your translation. Please exchange the quoted text parts into 
the following:


"... ist eine gelegentliche Stille nicht ungewöhnlich ..."

"... Das war bis vor kurzem auch bei OpenOffice der Fall ..."

Thanks

Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Download Stats

2016-10-17 Thread Matthias Seidel
Count me in and you have 2 happy users! ;-)


Am 17.10.2016 um 18:58 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> I say to them that the team has received  one mail that congrats them to
> the successful release of 4.1.3 and add the link.
> That's all that is needed to keep the project alive. 1 happy user.
>
> I am sure they get out of concept.
>
> Matthias Seidel  schrieb am Mo., 17. Okt. 2016,
> 17:58:
>
>> Call it a marketing number...
>>
>> That number is for those people who insist on their opinion that no one
>> ever downloads AOO and nobody uses it.
>> And believe me, there are people who repeat this since 2011 constantly! ;-)
>>
>> BTW, a page should be up to date or it should be deleted. But never
>> outdated!
>>
>> regards, Matthias
>>
>>
>> Am 17.10.2016 um 17:46 schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
>>> I'm not certain what the point of the aggregate count is, apart from it
>> being
>>> a larger number.  While pride is taken in it, it is not clear how
>> meaningful
>>> it is.
>>>
>>> The current rate of downloads averages out to around 3 million per month.
>>> That was true for 4.1.1 and for 4.1.2.  It is likely that 4.1.3 will
>> achieve a
>>> comparable take-up.
>>>
>>> But of course, this does not tell you how many users.  In particular, we
>> don't
>>> know what downloads are for new users and what downloads are for updates
>>> (including re-downloading) by existing users.
>>>
>>> Here's a recent summary: 
>>>
>>> Although US destinations account for 16% of downloads, about 40% of all
>>> downloads are of an English localization.
>>>
>>>  - Dennis
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
 -Original Message-
 From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de]
 Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 08:30
 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
 Subject: Re: Download Stats

 Answering myself... ;-)

 The python-script on that page should be updated to include version
 4.1.3. And I think it must be run manually for updated data.

 The problem with the graphs is that both are defined with a height of
 150px.
 That's OK for the daily downloads, but at 160.000.000 total downloads
 the graph is cut off in a flat line.
 (We now must be at about 200.000.000 total downloads)

 regards, Matthias

 (P.S.: Downloads on scourceforge are close to half a million for 4.1.3)


 Am 16.10.2016 um 23:34 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Looking at the download counter on scourceforge :-), am I the only one
> interested in an updated chart on:
>
> http://www.openoffice.org/stats/downloads.html ?
>
> BTW, I thing the graphic cuts off at 160.000.000...
>
> regards
>
> Matthias
>
>
>>
>> --
> Disclaimer: Diese Nachricht stammt aus einem Google Account. Ihre Antwort
> wird in der Google Cloud Gespeichert und durch Google Algorythmen zwecks
> werbeanaöysen gescannt. Es ist derzeit nicht auszuschließen das ihre
> Nachricht auch durch einen NSA Mitarbeiter geprüft wird. Durch
> kommunikation mit diesen Account stimmen Sie zu das ihre Mail, ihre
> Kontaktdaten und die Termine die Sie mit mir vereinbaren online zu Google
> konditionen in der Googlecloud gespeichert wird. Sollten sie dies nicht
> wünschen kontaktieren sie mich bitte Umgehend um z.B. alternativen zu
> verhandeln.
>




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: Download Stats

2016-10-17 Thread Peter Kovacs
I say to them that the team has received  one mail that congrats them to
the successful release of 4.1.3 and add the link.
That's all that is needed to keep the project alive. 1 happy user.

I am sure they get out of concept.

Matthias Seidel  schrieb am Mo., 17. Okt. 2016,
17:58:

> Call it a marketing number...
>
> That number is for those people who insist on their opinion that no one
> ever downloads AOO and nobody uses it.
> And believe me, there are people who repeat this since 2011 constantly! ;-)
>
> BTW, a page should be up to date or it should be deleted. But never
> outdated!
>
> regards, Matthias
>
>
> Am 17.10.2016 um 17:46 schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
> > I'm not certain what the point of the aggregate count is, apart from it
> being
> > a larger number.  While pride is taken in it, it is not clear how
> meaningful
> > it is.
> >
> > The current rate of downloads averages out to around 3 million per month.
> > That was true for 4.1.1 and for 4.1.2.  It is likely that 4.1.3 will
> achieve a
> > comparable take-up.
> >
> > But of course, this does not tell you how many users.  In particular, we
> don't
> > know what downloads are for new users and what downloads are for updates
> > (including re-downloading) by existing users.
> >
> > Here's a recent summary: 
> >
> > Although US destinations account for 16% of downloads, about 40% of all
> > downloads are of an English localization.
> >
> >  - Dennis
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de]
> >> Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 08:30
> >> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: Download Stats
> >>
> >> Answering myself... ;-)
> >>
> >> The python-script on that page should be updated to include version
> >> 4.1.3. And I think it must be run manually for updated data.
> >>
> >> The problem with the graphs is that both are defined with a height of
> >> 150px.
> >> That's OK for the daily downloads, but at 160.000.000 total downloads
> >> the graph is cut off in a flat line.
> >> (We now must be at about 200.000.000 total downloads)
> >>
> >> regards, Matthias
> >>
> >> (P.S.: Downloads on scourceforge are close to half a million for 4.1.3)
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 16.10.2016 um 23:34 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> >>> Looking at the download counter on scourceforge :-), am I the only one
> >>> interested in an updated chart on:
> >>>
> >>> http://www.openoffice.org/stats/downloads.html ?
> >>>
> >>> BTW, I thing the graphic cuts off at 160.000.000...
> >>>
> >>> regards
> >>>
> >>> Matthias
> >>>
> >>>
>
>
> --

Disclaimer: Diese Nachricht stammt aus einem Google Account. Ihre Antwort
wird in der Google Cloud Gespeichert und durch Google Algorythmen zwecks
werbeanaöysen gescannt. Es ist derzeit nicht auszuschließen das ihre
Nachricht auch durch einen NSA Mitarbeiter geprüft wird. Durch
kommunikation mit diesen Account stimmen Sie zu das ihre Mail, ihre
Kontaktdaten und die Termine die Sie mit mir vereinbaren online zu Google
konditionen in der Googlecloud gespeichert wird. Sollten sie dies nicht
wünschen kontaktieren sie mich bitte Umgehend um z.B. alternativen zu
verhandeln.


Re: Download Stats

2016-10-17 Thread Matthias Seidel
Call it a marketing number...

That number is for those people who insist on their opinion that no one
ever downloads AOO and nobody uses it.
And believe me, there are people who repeat this since 2011 constantly! ;-)

BTW, a page should be up to date or it should be deleted. But never
outdated!

regards, Matthias


Am 17.10.2016 um 17:46 schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
> I'm not certain what the point of the aggregate count is, apart from it being 
> a larger number.  While pride is taken in it, it is not clear how meaningful 
> it is.
>
> The current rate of downloads averages out to around 3 million per month. 
> That was true for 4.1.1 and for 4.1.2.  It is likely that 4.1.3 will achieve 
> a 
> comparable take-up.
>
> But of course, this does not tell you how many users.  In particular, we 
> don't 
> know what downloads are for new users and what downloads are for updates 
> (including re-downloading) by existing users.
>
> Here's a recent summary: 
>
> Although US destinations account for 16% of downloads, about 40% of all 
> downloads are of an English localization.
>
>  - Dennis
>
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de]
>> Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 08:30
>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Download Stats
>>
>> Answering myself... ;-)
>>
>> The python-script on that page should be updated to include version
>> 4.1.3. And I think it must be run manually for updated data.
>>
>> The problem with the graphs is that both are defined with a height of
>> 150px.
>> That's OK for the daily downloads, but at 160.000.000 total downloads
>> the graph is cut off in a flat line.
>> (We now must be at about 200.000.000 total downloads)
>>
>> regards, Matthias
>>
>> (P.S.: Downloads on scourceforge are close to half a million for 4.1.3)
>>
>>
>> Am 16.10.2016 um 23:34 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> Looking at the download counter on scourceforge :-), am I the only one
>>> interested in an updated chart on:
>>>
>>> http://www.openoffice.org/stats/downloads.html ?
>>>
>>> BTW, I thing the graphic cuts off at 160.000.000...
>>>
>>> regards
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>>




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


RE: Download Stats

2016-10-17 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
I'm not certain what the point of the aggregate count is, apart from it being 
a larger number.  While pride is taken in it, it is not clear how meaningful 
it is.

The current rate of downloads averages out to around 3 million per month. 
That was true for 4.1.1 and for 4.1.2.  It is likely that 4.1.3 will achieve a 
comparable take-up.

But of course, this does not tell you how many users.  In particular, we don't 
know what downloads are for new users and what downloads are for updates 
(including re-downloading) by existing users.

Here's a recent summary: 

Although US destinations account for 16% of downloads, about 40% of all 
downloads are of an English localization.

 - Dennis




> -Original Message-
> From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de]
> Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 08:30
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Download Stats
>
> Answering myself... ;-)
>
> The python-script on that page should be updated to include version
> 4.1.3. And I think it must be run manually for updated data.
>
> The problem with the graphs is that both are defined with a height of
> 150px.
> That's OK for the daily downloads, but at 160.000.000 total downloads
> the graph is cut off in a flat line.
> (We now must be at about 200.000.000 total downloads)
>
> regards, Matthias
>
> (P.S.: Downloads on scourceforge are close to half a million for 4.1.3)
>
>
> Am 16.10.2016 um 23:34 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> > Looking at the download counter on scourceforge :-), am I the only one
> > interested in an updated chart on:
> >
> > http://www.openoffice.org/stats/downloads.html ?
> >
> > BTW, I thing the graphic cuts off at 160.000.000...
> >
> > regards
> >
> > Matthias
> >
> >
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: Download Stats

2016-10-17 Thread Matthias Seidel
Answering myself... ;-)

The python-script on that page should be updated to include version
4.1.3. And I think it must be run manually for updated data.

The problem with the graphs is that both are defined with a height of 150px.
That's OK for the daily downloads, but at 160.000.000 total downloads
the graph is cut off in a flat line.
(We now must be at about 200.000.000 total downloads)

regards, Matthias

(P.S.: Downloads on scourceforge are close to half a million for 4.1.3)


Am 16.10.2016 um 23:34 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Looking at the download counter on scourceforge :-), am I the only one
> interested in an updated chart on:
>
> http://www.openoffice.org/stats/downloads.html ?
>
> BTW, I thing the graphic cuts off at 160.000.000...
>
> regards
>
> Matthias
>
>




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: German release notes

2016-10-17 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de] 

> @Jörg Schmidt:
> 
> Small note for the german release notes at:
> 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?page
> Id=65873798
> 
> I found two occasions where it says "Openoffice" instead of 
> "OpenOffice".

OK, corrected


Jörg


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: This can not be true

2016-10-17 Thread Jörg Schmidt

> Page created at 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.3
> +Announcement 
> ; people interested in translating it can add a child page for their 
> language.

the german translation is ready:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65876043

@Marcus:
Can you please check your quotations in the translation



Jörg


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Assembly Error

2016-10-17 Thread Prattipati, Sai Teja (GE Appliances, Non-GE)
Dear Dev

I am getting an error near unoidl.com that assembly not added can you please 
help.



using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using unoidl.com.sun.star.uno;
using unoidl.com.sun.star.lang;
using unoidl.com.sun.star.frame;
using unoidl.com.sun.star.beans;
using unoidl.com.sun.star.sheet;
using unoidl.com.sun.star.container;
using unoidl.com.sun.star.table;
using unoidl.com.sun.star.text;

namespace TimeScanner {
class ReportGenerator {
private const string fileName =
@"file:///C:/Documents and Settings/My Documents/Hours Report.ods";

//Concrete Methods
internal XComponent openCalcSheet() {
XComponentContext oStrap = uno.util.Bootstrap.bootstrap();
XMultiServiceFactory oServMan = 
(XMultiServiceFactory)oStrap.getServiceManager();
XComponentLoader desktop = 
(XComponentLoader)oServMan.createInstance("com.sun.star.frame.Desktop");
string url = @"private:factory/scalc";
PropertyValue[] loadProps = new PropertyValue[1];
loadProps[0] = new PropertyValue();
loadProps[0].Name = "Hidden";
loadProps[0].Value = new uno.Any(true);
//PropertyValue[] loadProps = new PropertyValue[0];
XComponent document = desktop.loadComponentFromURL(url, "_blank", 
0, loadProps);
return document;
}

public void writeToSheet(XComponent document) {
XSpreadsheets oSheets = 
((XSpreadsheetDocument)document).getSheets();
XIndexAccess oSheetsIA = (XIndexAccess) oSheets;
XSpreadsheet sheet = (XSpreadsheet) oSheetsIA.getByIndex(0).Value;
XCell cell = sheet.getCellByPosition( 0, 0 ); //A1
((XText)cell).setString("Cost");
cell = sheet.getCellByPosition( 1, 0 ); //B1
cell.setValue(200);
cell = sheet.getCellByPosition( 1, 2 ); //B3
   cell.setFormula("=B1 * 1.175");
}

public void saveCalcSheet(XComponent oDoc) {
PropertyValue[] propVals = new PropertyValue[1];
propVals[0] = new PropertyValue();
propVals[0].Name = "FilterName";
propVals[0].Value = new uno.Any("calc8");
((XStorable)oDoc).storeToURL(fileName, propVals);
}
}
}