Re: reference gcc compiler (wiki - Linux entry)
Niltze [Hello], Peter- On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > > On 23.10.2016 00:29, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> >> Peter Kovacs wrote: >>> >>> I try to build OpenOffice on my machine (yea!) >> >> >> Good! >> >>> However when working through the requirements I noticed that >>> gcc 4.2.3 is the current reference compiler >> >> >> Where? When you cite the wiki please always send the link, since there are >> a lot of outdated pages that are not marked as such (by the way, if you want >> to help in doing so while you go through the build you are welcome; just ask >> for a MWiki account here on the list in case). > > sure. I am sorry I thought its obvious which page I look at. > If I change something depends on the need to do it. I am open for helping > out on the wiki too. However I personally have currently no change I would > like to make. >> >> >>> I wonder if the release driven Distros are still 2 Versions behind, or >>> does this entry need an update? >> >> >> Give the precise URL and we can take a look. Note: using a search engine >> will often bring you to an outdated page. Always start from >> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO > > My appologies. I thought there is only one build guide - the one you > mention. And this leads you to the Linux section: > https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Building_on_Linux >> >> >>> Which Versions do our build bots use? I think they should be the >>> reference or? >> >> >> We build daily snapshots and releases. For daily snapshots we use what >> Infra wants to supply (usually a long-term-support Ubuntu); for releases we >> use our reference baseline (currently CentOS 5, a very old distribution; >> this guarantees that our binaries will run on all distributions that are the >> same age as CentOS 5 or later, so practically all Linux desktop machines in >> use). > > I am not sure if I was readable. At least you do not answer my question. > Please let me refrase: > Should the reference gcc Version mentioned in the wikipage be the same that > is used in CentOS 5? (In my Opinion yes...) > Which is the GCC Version that CentOS 5 is using ? > :-D > I am sorry. I am sometimes not paying attention what other people read. >> >> >> Regards, >> Andrea. > > All the best > Peter > I recently built Apache OpenOffice 4.1.3 RC prior to GA on Debian Sid (bleeding-edge ;-) for AMD64 architecture. I built DEB and RPM packages for Debian (and derivatives like Ubuntu) and RedHat (and derivatives, like CentOS, Oracle Unbreakable Linux, etc), respectively. GCC 6 will not build the OpeonOffice suite; however, GCC 5 will happily build the Apache professional office suite application. The following recent blog entry may provide insight on my procedure: Short link: < https://metztli.it/blog/index.php/aH9?blog=4 > Full link: < https://metztli.it/blog/index.php/build-apache-openoffice-4-1?blog=4 > Best professional Regards. -- Jose R R http://metztli.it - Try at no charge http://b2evolution.net for http://OpenShift.com PaaS - from our GitHub http://Nepohualtzintzin.com repository. Cloud the easy way! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: reference gcc compiler (wiki - Linux entry)
On 23.10.2016 00:29, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Peter Kovacs wrote: I try to build OpenOffice on my machine (yea!) Good! However when working through the requirements I noticed that gcc 4.2.3 is the current reference compiler Where? When you cite the wiki please always send the link, since there are a lot of outdated pages that are not marked as such (by the way, if you want to help in doing so while you go through the build you are welcome; just ask for a MWiki account here on the list in case). sure. I am sorry I thought its obvious which page I look at. If I change something depends on the need to do it. I am open for helping out on the wiki too. However I personally have currently no change I would like to make. I wonder if the release driven Distros are still 2 Versions behind, or does this entry need an update? Give the precise URL and we can take a look. Note: using a search engine will often bring you to an outdated page. Always start from https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO My appologies. I thought there is only one build guide - the one you mention. And this leads you to the Linux section: https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Building_on_Linux Which Versions do our build bots use? I think they should be the reference or? We build daily snapshots and releases. For daily snapshots we use what Infra wants to supply (usually a long-term-support Ubuntu); for releases we use our reference baseline (currently CentOS 5, a very old distribution; this guarantees that our binaries will run on all distributions that are the same age as CentOS 5 or later, so practically all Linux desktop machines in use). I am not sure if I was readable. At least you do not answer my question. Please let me refrase: Should the reference gcc Version mentioned in the wikipage be the same that is used in CentOS 5? (In my Opinion yes...) Which is the GCC Version that CentOS 5 is using ? :-D I am sorry. I am sometimes not paying attention what other people read. Regards, Andrea. All the best Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: reference gcc compiler (wiki - Linux entry)
Peter Kovacs wrote: I try to build OpenOffice on my machine (yea!) Good! However when working through the requirements I noticed that gcc 4.2.3 is the current reference compiler Where? When you cite the wiki please always send the link, since there are a lot of outdated pages that are not marked as such (by the way, if you want to help in doing so while you go through the build you are welcome; just ask for a MWiki account here on the list in case). I wonder if the release driven Distros are still 2 Versions behind, or does this entry need an update? Give the precise URL and we can take a look. Note: using a search engine will often bring you to an outdated page. Always start from https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO Which Versions do our build bots use? I think they should be the reference or? We build daily snapshots and releases. For daily snapshots we use what Infra wants to supply (usually a long-term-support Ubuntu); for releases we use our reference baseline (currently CentOS 5, a very old distribution; this guarantees that our binaries will run on all distributions that are the same age as CentOS 5 or later, so practically all Linux desktop machines in use). Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Reporting broken download link
Hello, please make sure you are downloading from the correct places. You can go here to find the correct package to download for your environment: http://www.openoffice.org/download/index.html . I have just tested once more on Windows 10 using IE Explorer 11 and it works correctly. It links to the sourceforge mirror and you get a notification from Internet Explorer if you want to run or save. Please make sure you are choosing one of these two options to continue with the download. On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 5:52 PM, wrote: > Open Office will not download. I am trying to download from IE Explorer > 10 on Windows 8. Microsoft Internet Explorer -- John R. D'Orazio
Reporting broken download link
Open Office will not download. I am trying to download from IE Explorer 10 on Windows 8. Microsoft Internet Explorer Sent from Windows Mail
4.1.4_release_blocker requested: [Issue 127165] Clicking "No" in Java dialog causes abnormal exit on FreeBSD
Matthias Seidel has asked for 4.1.4_release_blocker: Issue 127165: Clicking "No" in Java dialog causes abnormal exit on FreeBSD https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127165 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
reference gcc compiler (wiki - Linux entry)
Hello all, I try to build OpenOffice on my machine (yea!) However when working through the requirements I noticed that gcc 4.2.3 is the current reference compiler Since I use Arch (and I expect similar for gentoo) I have GCC 6.2.1 20160830 installed I wonder if the release driven Distros are still 2 Versions behind, or does this entry need an update? Which Versions do our build bots use? I think they should be the reference or? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Im new and i want to contribute
Contribute wrote: The email is hosted by me, so if you have a link on how to make the mail server friendly with apache mailing list that would be great Technical details are here: https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/dmarc_filtering_on_lists_that But there is no need to worry, you can perfectly interact with all Apache mailing lists; the address rewriting is meant to avoid bouncing. So, welcome and we can focus on how you can contribute! Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Im new and i want to contribute
The email is hosted by me, so if you have a link on how to make the mail server friendly with apache mailing list that would be great “i'm using postfix". > On Oct 22, 2016, at 10:17 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > Peter Kovacs wrote: >> your Email adress looks strange with invalid at the end. > > The .INVALID at the end is appended by some particular configuration that was > applied to all ASF mailing lists: when people write from some providers that > are known to have issues with our mailing list software (one notable example > is yahoo.com) a ".INVALID" is appended to avoid a sequence of events that > would lead the user to be auto-unsubscribed. There are details on the Infra > blog, but this should be enough. > > So when answering to such a mail and wishing to CC the sender, just remove > the .INVALID and everything will be fine. > > Regards, > Andrea. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Im new and i want to contribute
Im good at C++ and STL with some experience with Qt and MFC > On Oct 22, 2016, at 6:08 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > Hello, > > welcome. What do you want to contribute? > > your Email adress looks strange with invalid at the end. > > > Maybe a good start is the recruitemen list :) > > > All the best > > Peter > > > On 22.10.2016 00:37, Contribute wrote: >> I want to contribute >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Im new and i want to contribute
Peter Kovacs wrote: your Email adress looks strange with invalid at the end. The .INVALID at the end is appended by some particular configuration that was applied to all ASF mailing lists: when people write from some providers that are known to have issues with our mailing list software (one notable example is yahoo.com) a ".INVALID" is appended to avoid a sequence of events that would lead the user to be auto-unsubscribed. There are details on the Infra blog, but this should be enough. So when answering to such a mail and wishing to CC the sender, just remove the .INVALID and everything will be fine. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
