OpenOffice on KDE 4 issues

[Damjan Jovanovic]

Hi

I am busy porting fpicker to gbuild, and needed to test its KDE 4 version,
and ended up fixing a bug there, and a VCL bug on KDE that stopped AOO from
starting.

However we still have this duplicate text issue in the menu, and dialog
corruption:


​

Any KDE users? Any thoughts?

Thank you
Damjan

Re: SVN broken and unable to revert bad commit

[Damjan Jovanovic]

Thank you. I fixed it and committed again.

On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 12:58 AM, Pedro Giffuni  wrote:
> Hi Damjan;
>
> Strange ... I just made the revert for you, without any problem.
>
> Pedro.
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Fwd: no access

[Marcus]

Am 12/20/2016 09:17 PM, schrieb Brian Barker:

At 19:20 20/12/2016 +0100, Marcus Noname wrote:

Am 12/20/2016 04:55 AM, schrieb Martin Groenescheij:

Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 20:52:15 + (UTC)
From: corby white 

Hello, I was on the Template page trying to download a template.
"Access Denied" was the message, however there is no "Login"
required for downloads, is there something I need to do to access
these templates?


Can someone of the developers correct this problem?

The issue is that the template gives the message "Access denied"
instead of "Page not Found"


I've no problem to download templates. Please try again. Maybe it was
a temporary problem that is now solved.


Sorry, but there clearly is a problem. For example, on
http://templates.openoffice.org/ there is a template "CD Jewel Case
Front Insert Template - ClearEyesMedia.com". The link is to
http://templates.openoffice.org/en/template/cd-jewel-case-front-insert-template-2
, which delivers "Access denied / You are not authorized to access this
page."


@Dave:
Please can you help us here? There seems to be templates/webpages that 
make problems.


Thanks

Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Fwd: no access

[Brian Barker]

At 19:20 20/12/2016 +0100, Marcus Noname wrote:

Am 12/20/2016 04:55 AM, schrieb Martin Groenescheij:

Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 20:52:15 + (UTC)
From: corby white 
Hello, I was on the Template page trying to download a template. 
"Access Denied" was the message, however there is no "Login" 
required for downloads, is there something I need to do to access 
these templates?


Can someone of the developers correct this problem?

The issue is that the template gives the message "Access denied" 
instead of "Page not Found"


I've no problem to download templates. Please try again. Maybe it 
was a temporary problem that is now solved.


Sorry, but there clearly is a problem. For example, on 
http://templates.openoffice.org/ there is a template "CD Jewel Case 
Front Insert Template - ClearEyesMedia.com". The link is to 
http://templates.openoffice.org/en/template/cd-jewel-case-front-insert-template-2 
, which delivers "Access denied / You are not authorized to access this page."


Brian Barker 



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Pootle server admins (was Re: create a Pootle account for me)

[Andrea Pescetti]

Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:

On 19/12/16 13:58, Andrea Pescetti wrote:

Would you like me to try with your account?

Yes, please do so.


You are a "superuser" in Pootle now. Please check if you see an "ADMIN" 
link top right next to your username (logout/login might be needed).



I already have https://translate.apache.org/accounts/arielch/, not sure
how I got it, it was a long time ago; it's using my arie...@apache.org
mail account, but the password is not the same I use on the ASF. Is
Pootle using ASF's LDAP? It does not seem to do so.


Initially it was not using LDAP. Then we plugged LDAP in it but in a 
non-exclusive way, so we now have a mix of local users and LDAP users. 
If the above works, I can rename the "old" user to something like 
"arielch.local" and change the e-mail address into something else, so 
that you can recreate "arielch" by simply logging in with your ASF 
credentials (and then I, or yourself with the "old" user, can give admin 
privileges to the "new" arielch).


But for the moment it's enough to check that privileges are attributed 
correctly. Privileges apply regardless of you being using local 
credentials or your ASF credentials.


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Community shirts for FOSDEM

[Mechtilde]

Hello Peter,

Michaela, Michael and I (Mechtilde) will wear the "Ask-Me-"Bauuton with
the old Apache feather. I think we have enough for other people of the
Apache community.

You will meet us at the booth (Apache software foundation and Apache
OpenOffice).

Kind regards

Mechtilde

Am 20.12.2016 um 10:47 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> Hello,
> 
> Not sure if this has been already asked.
> But do we have some Apache OpenOffice shirts, sleeve or something to wear
> on FFOSDEM?
> 
> Propagating my opinion is usually not my thing, but it makes it easier to
> connect our community there.
> At least that's my thinking.
> 
> If not I would like to create a fosdem shirt so people recognise me.
> 
> All the best
> Peter
> 

-- 
Mechtilde Stehmann
--
## Apache OpenOffice.org
## Freie Office Suite für Linux, MacOSX, Windows
## Debian
## Loook, calender-exchange-provider, libreoffice-canzeley-client
## PGP encryption welcome
## Key-ID 0x141AAD7F



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Fwd: no access

[Marcus]

Am 12/20/2016 04:55 AM, schrieb Martin Groenescheij:

Can someone of the developers correct this problem?

The issue is that the template gives the message "Access deied" in stead
of "Page not Found"


I've no problem to download templates. Please try again. Maybe it was a 
temporary problem that is no solved.


Marcus




 Forwarded Message 
Subject: no access
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 20:52:15 + (UTC)
From: corby white 
Reply-To: us...@openoffice.apache.org, corby white 
To: us...@openoffice.apache.org 



Hello, I was on the Template page trying to download a template. "Access
Denied" was the message, however there is o "Login" required for
downloads, is there something I need to do to access these templates?
Thank youCorby


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

RE: SSDLC Compliance - OpenOffice

[Dennis E. Hamilton]

Comments in-line.

> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:legi...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2016 01:41
> To: dev ; gan.kokleong.adr...@stee.stengg.com
> Subject: Re: SSDLC Compliance - OpenOffice
> 
> As usual I forgot to add people probably not subscribed to the list.
> 
> Peter Kovacs  schrieb am Di., 20. Dez. 2016, 10:39:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > Can you elaborate on this?
> > Do you simply want to know or do you need this as an official
> statement?
> > I think you are Query the wrong Project if you need an official
> response.
> > Open Office 3.3.1 and older were maintained by Oracle. I am not sure
> if
> > Apache Foundation has the right to speak for this time. As libre
> office we
> > are a successor to Oracle OpenOffice Project.
> >
> > This is of course my personal opinion. I am not sure if Apache
> Foundation
> > has the same opinion like me on this.
> >
> > All the best
> > Peter
> >
> > GAN Kok Leong, Adrian  schrieb am
> > Di., 20. Dez. 2016, 08:50:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to find out whether OpenOffice version 3.3 and 3.3.1 is
> > developed and comply with Secure Software Development Life Cycle?
[orcmid] 

I am confident that there were no Capability Maturity Model or related 
assurance processes applied when OpenOffice.org was developed under the 
umbrella of Sun Microsystems and then Oracle Corporation.

At Apache OpenOffice, there is no such process, including for the Secure 
Software Development Life Cycle, if you are referring to 
.

There is no means for assessment of Trusted CMM for Apache OpenOffice, since 
there is no process management in the sense involved in the Capability Maturity 
Model.  Lacking process management, there is also no accountability concerning 
processes in the sense considered in the CMM.  Those with a sense of humor 
would consider this to be somewhere less than CMM Level 1.

It is not clear to me how open-source governance, providing software free to 
the public without warranty and entirely driven by a meritocracy of unpaid 
volunteers who choose what and how they work on something, would accomplish 
this.  In any case, it is not a consideration at Apache OpenOffice.  I cannot 
recall ever seeing anything recognizable as the activities identified at 
.

I cannot speak for LibreOffice.  There might be more management structure than 
for Apache projects.  I believe there is a core engineering team.  Whether 
there is much attention to SSDLC processes and the necessary accountability and 
concrete assessment is something that needs to be discussed with the 
LibreOffice team.  Speculations here on dev@ oo.a.o are useless.  Most of the 
claims I see about dependability or lack-thereof are anecdotal and based on 
sparse evidence.  

Although the Microsoft Security Development Lifecycle (SDL) is a security 
assurance process that might be adaptable, I am not aware of any effort to 
investigate that for open-source projects such as OpenOffice and my suspicion 
is that there is no such interest (more likely, that there be hostility) 
despite the good reputation of that process, 
.  I have never seen threat 
modeling performed at Apache OpenOffice, for example.

Thanks for asking.  It is a great question.

 - Dennis


> >
> > Regards
> > Adrian Gan
> >
> >
> > [This e-mail is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the
> > intended recipient, please kindly notify us immediately and delete the
> > message
> > from your system; please do not copy or use it for any purpose, nor
> > disclose
> > its contents to any other person. Thank you.]
> > ---ST Electronics Group---
> >
> > --
> >
> > Disclaimer: Diese Nachricht stammt aus einem Google Account. Ihre
> Antwort
> > wird in der Google Cloud Gespeichert und durch Google Algorythmen
> zwecks
> > werbeanaöysen gescannt. Es ist derzeit nicht auszuschließen das ihre
> > Nachricht auch durch einen NSA Mitarbeiter geprüft wird. Durch
> > kommunikation mit diesen Account stimmen Sie zu das ihre Mail, ihre
> > Kontaktdaten und die Termine die Sie mit mir vereinbaren online zu
> Google
> > konditionen in der Googlecloud gespeichert wird. Sollten sie dies
> nicht
> > wünschen kontaktieren sie mich bitte Umgehend um z.B. alternativen zu
> > verhandeln.
> >
> --
> 
> Disclaimer: Diese Nachricht stammt aus einem Google Account. Ihre
> Antwort
> wird in der Google Cloud Gespeichert und durch Google Algorythmen zwecks
> werbeanaöysen gescannt. Es ist derzeit nicht auszuschließen das ihre
> Nachricht auch durch einen NSA Mitarbeiter geprüft wird. Durch
> kommunikation mit diesen Account stimmen Sie zu das ihre Mail, ihre
> Kontaktdaten und die Termine die Sie mit mir vereinbaren online zu
> Google
> konditionen in der Googlecloud gespeichert wird. Sollten sie dies nicht
> wünsch

Re: Pootle server admins (was Re: create a Pootle account for me)

[Ariel Constenla-Haile]

On 19/12/16 13:58, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>> Do you have access to add more admins?
> 
> Yes, very likely (I can mark a web user as an admin, and I think it's
> all that is needed).
> 
> Would you like me to try with your account?

Yes, please do so.

> In that case, please login with your ASF (id.apache.org) credentials
> on Pootle, so that it can see your account in case you haven't
> already done so. And then I can try to make you an admin.

I already have https://translate.apache.org/accounts/arielch/, not sure
how I got it, it was a long time ago; it's using my arie...@apache.org
mail account, but the password is not the same I use on the ASF. Is
Pootle using ASF's LDAP? It does not seem to do so.


Regards
-- 
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Community shirts for FOSDEM

[Peter Kovacs]

Hello,

Not sure if this has been already asked.
But do we have some Apache OpenOffice shirts, sleeve or something to wear
on FFOSDEM?

Propagating my opinion is usually not my thing, but it makes it easier to
connect our community there.
At least that's my thinking.

If not I would like to create a fosdem shirt so people recognise me.

All the best
Peter
-- 

Disclaimer: Diese Nachricht stammt aus einem Google Account. Ihre Antwort
wird in der Google Cloud Gespeichert und durch Google Algorythmen zwecks
werbeanaöysen gescannt. Es ist derzeit nicht auszuschließen das ihre
Nachricht auch durch einen NSA Mitarbeiter geprüft wird. Durch
kommunikation mit diesen Account stimmen Sie zu das ihre Mail, ihre
Kontaktdaten und die Termine die Sie mit mir vereinbaren online zu Google
konditionen in der Googlecloud gespeichert wird. Sollten sie dies nicht
wünschen kontaktieren sie mich bitte Umgehend um z.B. alternativen zu
verhandeln.

Re: SSDLC Compliance - OpenOffice

[Peter Kovacs]

As usual I forgot to add people probably not subscribed to the list.

Peter Kovacs  schrieb am Di., 20. Dez. 2016, 10:39:

> Hi,
>
> Can you elaborate on this?
> Do you simply want to know or do you need this as an official statement?
> I think you are Query the wrong Project if you need an official response.
> Open Office 3.3.1 and older were maintained by Oracle. I am not sure if
> Apache Foundation has the right to speak for this time. As libre office we
> are a successor to Oracle OpenOffice Project.
>
> This is of course my personal opinion. I am not sure if Apache Foundation
> has the same opinion like me on this.
>
> All the best
> Peter
>
> GAN Kok Leong, Adrian  schrieb am
> Di., 20. Dez. 2016, 08:50:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to find out whether OpenOffice version 3.3 and 3.3.1 is
> developed and comply with Secure Software Development Life Cycle?
>
> Regards
> Adrian Gan
>
>
> [This e-mail is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the
> intended recipient, please kindly notify us immediately and delete the
> message
> from your system; please do not copy or use it for any purpose, nor
> disclose
> its contents to any other person. Thank you.]
> ---ST Electronics Group---
>
> --
>
> Disclaimer: Diese Nachricht stammt aus einem Google Account. Ihre Antwort
> wird in der Google Cloud Gespeichert und durch Google Algorythmen zwecks
> werbeanaöysen gescannt. Es ist derzeit nicht auszuschließen das ihre
> Nachricht auch durch einen NSA Mitarbeiter geprüft wird. Durch
> kommunikation mit diesen Account stimmen Sie zu das ihre Mail, ihre
> Kontaktdaten und die Termine die Sie mit mir vereinbaren online zu Google
> konditionen in der Googlecloud gespeichert wird. Sollten sie dies nicht
> wünschen kontaktieren sie mich bitte Umgehend um z.B. alternativen zu
> verhandeln.
>
-- 

Disclaimer: Diese Nachricht stammt aus einem Google Account. Ihre Antwort
wird in der Google Cloud Gespeichert und durch Google Algorythmen zwecks
werbeanaöysen gescannt. Es ist derzeit nicht auszuschließen das ihre
Nachricht auch durch einen NSA Mitarbeiter geprüft wird. Durch
kommunikation mit diesen Account stimmen Sie zu das ihre Mail, ihre
Kontaktdaten und die Termine die Sie mit mir vereinbaren online zu Google
konditionen in der Googlecloud gespeichert wird. Sollten sie dies nicht
wünschen kontaktieren sie mich bitte Umgehend um z.B. alternativen zu
verhandeln.

Re: SSDLC Compliance - OpenOffice

[Peter Kovacs]

Hi,

Can you elaborate on this?
Do you simply want to know or do you need this as an official statement?
I think you are Query the wrong Project if you need an official response.
Open Office 3.3.1 and older were maintained by Oracle. I am not sure if
Apache Foundation has the right to speak for this time. As libre office we
are a successor to Oracle OpenOffice Project.

This is of course my personal opinion. I am not sure if Apache Foundation
has the same opinion like me on this.

All the best
Peter

GAN Kok Leong, Adrian  schrieb am Di.,
20. Dez. 2016, 08:50:

> Hi,
>
> I would like to find out whether OpenOffice version 3.3 and 3.3.1 is
> developed and comply with Secure Software Development Life Cycle?
>
> Regards
> Adrian Gan
>
>
> [This e-mail is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the
> intended recipient, please kindly notify us immediately and delete the
> message
> from your system; please do not copy or use it for any purpose, nor
> disclose
> its contents to any other person. Thank you.]
> ---ST Electronics Group---
>
-- 

Disclaimer: Diese Nachricht stammt aus einem Google Account. Ihre Antwort
wird in der Google Cloud Gespeichert und durch Google Algorythmen zwecks
werbeanaöysen gescannt. Es ist derzeit nicht auszuschließen das ihre
Nachricht auch durch einen NSA Mitarbeiter geprüft wird. Durch
kommunikation mit diesen Account stimmen Sie zu das ihre Mail, ihre
Kontaktdaten und die Termine die Sie mit mir vereinbaren online zu Google
konditionen in der Googlecloud gespeichert wird. Sollten sie dies nicht
wünschen kontaktieren sie mich bitte Umgehend um z.B. alternativen zu
verhandeln.