Re: Difficulty with dmake

I am not sure. My changes definitely didn't affect that. I think it might have always been the case, that "source ..." is necessary before ./bootstrap. On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > Thanks. That worked. > > The step-by-step puts winenv.set.sh after

Re: Difficulty with dmake

Thanks. That worked. The step-by-step puts winenv.set.sh after ./bootstrap, and that used to work. Do you expect it to work again, or do we need to edit the instructions? On 1/25/2017 8:25 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: Try "source winenv.set.sh" between ./configure and ./bootstrap. Damjan

Re: Difficulty with dmake

Try "source winenv.set.sh" between ./configure and ./bootstrap. Damjan On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 2:20 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > I am trying to set up a new debug environment, incorporating the recent > changes to how debug works. Unfortunately, my configure-and-bootstrap >

Re: svn commit: r1780202 - /openoffice/trunk/main/README

Hi Marcus; On 01/25/17 23:41, Marcus wrote: In general the addition is OK. However, there is not yet agreement what "supported" means. So, just to add FreeBSD to the list doesn't work as it's not the same as for Win, Linux, Mac where we have a different definition. Marcus I avoided making

Difficulty with dmake

I am trying to set up a new debug environment, incorporating the recent changes to how debug works. Unfortunately, my configure-and-bootstrap cannot find dmake. It looks for it in a different URL from the one specified as DMAKE_URL from configure. run_configure.sh contains my configure

Re: svn commit: r1780202 - /openoffice/trunk/main/README

In general the addition is OK. However, there is not yet agreement what "supported" means. So, just to add FreeBSD to the list doesn't work as it's not the same as for Win, Linux, Mac where we have a different definition. Marcus Am 25.01.2017 um 16:07 schrieb p...@apache.org: Author: pfg

Re: Chromebook Compatibility

FWD to OP, not subscribed to the list. Hagar Le 24/01/2017 à 16:51, FR web forum a écrit : https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6=78706=chromebook - Mail original - De: "Conner Holt" À: dev@openoffice.apache.org Envoyé: Mardi 24 Janvier

Re: AOO debugging revamp

On 25 Jan, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > Hi > > For a while I've noticed how gbuild modules don't have debug symbols unless > built with the maximum debug level ("./configure --enable-debug" globally > or "build debug=true" per module) which also produces oceans of log > messages we usually don't

AOO debugging revamp

Hi For a while I've noticed how gbuild modules don't have debug symbols unless built with the maximum debug level ("./configure --enable-debug" globally or "build debug=true" per module) which also produces oceans of log messages we usually don't want. In r1780246, I've finally changed debugging

Re: [lazy consensus] FreeBSD as a new supported platform?

Am 24.01.2017 um 23:02 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > > I see some risk of confusion here. I mean, there is surely a set of > "privileged" platforms that are those for which we build and make > available releases from our download page: Windows, MacOS X, and Linux > variants. Then there is a set of

Re: Community building: give our User a chance to contribute!

> -Original Message- > From: Simon Phipps [mailto:si...@webmink.com] > In fact Go-OO was started by Ximian in 2003, long before Novell bought > them, as a convenient build system for developers not working > within Sun. > The difficulty of getting the Sun team to accept patches, and