Re: Old AOO referencing in Google

On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 9:29 PM, Marcus wrote: > > > the 404 is now gone. But so is the usable table of downloads, which is completely lost. I believe that is an unwelcome step backwards. S.

Re: Old AOO referencing in Google

Am 11.05.2017 um 00:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Am 10.05.2017 um 23:21 schrieb Marcus: Am 10.05.2017 um 21:07 schrieb Hagar Delest: A user raised this strange result: when performing a Google search with "openoffice download", the 3.4.1 version is the 3rd choice, this tends to present the

Re: Old AOO referencing in Google

Am 11.05.2017 um 21:04 schrieb Hagar Delest: Le 10/05/2017 à 23:21, Marcus a écrit : So, there must be something special in the kind of seaching that the user is doing. I tried myself (see screenshot in the forum) with the standard search. So nothing special at all. I've deleted the

Re: Windows 10 S

On 5/11/2017 11:01 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > I cam across this thread on an Ubuntu forum > https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2360989 > > The gist of it is that Win 10 S (out of the box) will not run 32 bit > applications. > > I have not delved into the depths of Windows 10 and Microsoft

Re: Old AOO referencing in Google

On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 8:04 PM, Hagar Delest wrote: > Le 10/05/2017 à 23:21, Marcus a écrit : > > I've deleted the webpage that is mentioned in the result page the user has >> posted in the screenshot. As soon as Google is re-indexing our website I >> expect that this

Re: Old AOO referencing in Google

Le 10/05/2017 à 23:21, Marcus a écrit : So, there must be something special in the kind of seaching that the user is doing. I tried myself (see screenshot in the forum) with the standard search. So nothing special at all. I've deleted the webpage that is mentioned in the result page the

Re: Old AOO referencing in Google

Am 11.05.2017 um 00:02 schrieb Roberto Galoppini: On Wed, 10 May 2017 at 23:37, Simon Phipps wrote: On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:21 PM, Marcus wrote: However, it doesn't matter. There is no reason to provide download pages to offer outdated versions -

Re: ooowiki continuation (was: Re: OpenOffice)

> From: Simos Xenitellis [mailto:simos.li...@googlemail.com] > The text there says: > ... > ... does not harm the reputation of The Document Foundation;...» And this is not enough for me, because it can be arbitrarily interpreted. For example, I was reproached in the forum de.openoffice.info

Re: Windows 10 S

Maybe we could start with getting the BuildBots running on Windows 10 - 64bit with the new SDKs... Regards, Matthias Am 11.05.2017 um 10:24 schrieb Raphael Bircher: > Hi all > > We have anyway to move, because we use very old SDK's > > Regards Raphael > > Am .05.2017, 10:19 Uhr, schrieb FR web

Re: Windows 10 S

Hi all We have anyway to move, because we use very old SDK's Regards Raphael Am .05.2017, 10:19 Uhr, schrieb FR web forum : +1 With XP and Vista EoL, 32-bit systems are dead. Issue for AOO: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=46594 64-bit port has been done for LibO.

Re: Windows 10 S

+1 With XP and Vista EoL, 32-bit systems are dead. Issue for AOO: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=46594 64-bit port has been done for LibO. Process described here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/msvc-x86_64 - Mail original - De: "Rory O'Farrell"

Re: Windows 10 S

On 5/11/2017 11:01 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > I cam across this thread on an Ubuntu forum > https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2360989 > > The gist of it is that Win 10 S (out of the box) will not run 32 bit > applications. > > I have not delved into the depths of Windows 10 and Microsoft

Windows 10 S

I cam across this thread on an Ubuntu forum https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2360989 The gist of it is that Win 10 S (out of the box) will not run 32 bit applications. I have not delved into the depths of Windows 10 and Microsoft policy, being a contented linux user, but if the