Re: OpenRheinRuhr war: Re: Moin, Moin!

Hallo Michael, Wieviele ProOO-Box-DVD willst Du haben? 10? Meinst Du ProOO-Box-Stcks loszuwerden, dann würden wir noch Einige kaufen? Flyer sind derzeitig noch ungeklärt, aber wir kümmern uns darum. Gruß Jörg - To

Re: Upload of 4.1.4-RC5 to SourceForge

Sounds like a great plan! > On Oct 11, 2017, at 5:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > I've removed the 4.1.4-RC4 files from the SourceForge distribution area (not > public yet: it is "staged" and only project members can see it). This is the > place where our official

Re: svn commit: r22218 - in /dev/openoffice/4.1.4-RC5: ./ binaries/ sources/

Will do... Give me ~1hr :) > On Oct 11, 2017, at 5:50 PM, Don Lewis wrote: > > On 11 Oct, j...@apache.org wrote: >> Author: jim >> Date: Wed Oct 11 16:07:28 2017 >> New Revision: 22218 >> >> Log: >> prep top level dir for 4.1.4-RC5 builds >> >> Added: >>

Re: Upload of 4.1.4-RC5 to SourceForge

On 11 Oct, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > I've removed the 4.1.4-RC4 files from the SourceForge distribution area > (not public yet: it is "staged" and only project members can see it). > This is the place where our official binaries are served from. > > Instead of waiting for a successful vote, I

Re: svn commit: r22218 - in /dev/openoffice/4.1.4-RC5: ./ binaries/ sources/

On 11 Oct, j...@apache.org wrote: > Author: jim > Date: Wed Oct 11 16:07:28 2017 > New Revision: 22218 > > Log: > prep top level dir for 4.1.4-RC5 builds > > Added: > dev/openoffice/4.1.4-RC5/ > dev/openoffice/4.1.4-RC5/binaries/ > dev/openoffice/4.1.4-RC5/sources/ > If you upload

Re: Upload of 4.1.4-RC5 to SourceForge

Am 11.10.2017 um 23:29 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: I've removed the 4.1.4-RC4 files from the SourceForge distribution area (not public yet: it is "staged" and only project members can see it). This is the place where our official binaries are served from. Instead of waiting for a successful

Upload of 4.1.4-RC5 to SourceForge

I've removed the 4.1.4-RC4 files from the SourceForge distribution area (not public yet: it is "staged" and only project members can see it). This is the place where our official binaries are served from. Instead of waiting for a successful vote, I will gradually upload 4.1.4-RC5 there in the

Re: Starting builds of 4.1.4-RC5

Uploads of AOO 4.1.4-RC5 for Linux 32 bit builds are being committed as we speak... > On Oct 11, 2017, at 1:51 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Official SVN rev will be: > >1811857. > > % svn info > Path: . > Working Copy Root Path: /Users/jim/src/asf/code/follow/aoo-414 >

RE: Moin, Moin!

Moin Matthias, > Habe jetzt erst entdeckt, dass es auch eine deutschsprachige > dev-Liste gibt. Willkommen. > Ich selber werde einen Kaffeebecher "spenden" > (https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-Mug.JPG) > Bei Bedarf wollte ich davon einige mehr produzieren lassen. Was kostet denn so ein

Java 9 on macOS

Neither Apache OpenOffice 4.1.2 or 4.2 can run Java (jdk-9.jdk) on macOS 10.12 (Sierra) or 10.13 (High Sierra). Both can run Java (jdk1.8.0_144.jdk). I also have the legacy Apple Java (1.6.0.jdk) installed. I have JavaAppletPlugin (Java 9 build 181) in my Internet Plug-ins folder. Note:

Re: issue 127553

Am 11.10.2017 um 15:19 schrieb Matthias Seidel: We can always change that later... @Marcus: Can you re-add 4.1.4 (also for Target Milestone)? done for milestone, version and lastest confirmation. Marcus Am 11.10.2017 um 14:24 schrieb Mathias Röllig: This is a very good description.

Re: Resigning as RM for 4.1.x

Am 11.10.2017 um 01:30 schrieb Dave Fisher: Hi Sent from my iPhone On Oct 10, 2017, at 2:23 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 10.10.2017 um 22:56 schrieb Dave Fisher: Hi - Sent from my iPhone On Oct 10, 2017, at 1:15 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 10.10.2017 um

Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

Am 11.10.2017 um 13:20 schrieb Jim Jagielski: After a night's sleep I decided that we should release the best possible version of AOO 4.1.x as possible. Releasing one w/ 2 known regressions just doesn't make sense. So the remaining question was/is: What do we call it? I decided that,

Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

Jim, you are the Boss! :) It is good you stay Release Manager! I appreciate that a lot! Am 11. Oktober 2017 18:27:55 MESZ schrieb Kay Schenk : > >On 10/11/2017 05:46 AM, Pedro Lino wrote: >> >>> On October 11, 2017 at 12:20 PM Jim Jagielski >wrote: >>>

Re: Starting builds of 4.1.4-RC5

OK, then I will start again with 1811857. Am 11.10.2017 um 19:51 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Official SVN rev will be: > > 1811857. > > % svn info > Path: . > Working Copy Root Path: /Users/jim/src/asf/code/follow/aoo-414 > URL: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO414 >

Starting builds of 4.1.4-RC5

Official SVN rev will be: 1811857. % svn info Path: . Working Copy Root Path: /Users/jim/src/asf/code/follow/aoo-414 URL: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO414 Relative URL: ^/openoffice/branches/AOO414 Repository Root: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf Repository UUID:

Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

On 10/11/2017 05:46 AM, Pedro Lino wrote: On October 11, 2017 at 12:20 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: After a night's sleep I decided that we should release the best possible version of AOO 4.1.x as possible. Releasing one w/ 2 known regressions just doesn't make sense. +1

Re: OpenRheinRuhr war: Re: Moin, Moin!

Hallo, > Deutschsprachige Flyer zu AOO mit aktuellem Inhalt wären nützlich (der > Vorrat ist zwar noch nicht aufgebraucht, geht aber bald zur Neige). Ich habe gerade an Detlef und Jan geschrieben und gebeten zu überlegen ob wir bereit wären 1000 Flyer rechtzeitig drucken zu lassen. Ich melde

Re: OpenRheinRuhr war: Re: Moin, Moin!

Hallo Michael , ich schau was ich an Flyern und Material habe und gebe es zur Post. Neueste Flyer haben wir nicht, wurden die letzten beiden Jahre nicht aktualisiert. -- Grüßle Detlef von der "Box" Am 11. Oktober 2017 3:37:58 nachm. schrieb "Dr. Michael Stehmann"

OpenRheinRuhr war: Re: Moin, Moin!

Hallo, Am 11.10.2017 um 14:25 schrieb Jörg Schmidt: >> P.S.: Am 5.11. bin ich kurz auf der OpenRheinRuhr an unserem >> OpenOffice-Stand anzutreffen. > > Auch das ist prima, noch besser wäre aber eine Info darüber das es diesen > Stand geben wird, denn bisher ist, zumindest mir, nichts bekannt

Re: Moin, Moin!

Hallo Mathias, > From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de] > Das mit den DVDs solltest du nochmal mit Michael Stehmann besprechen. > Hast du von den Flyern irgendwie Vorlagen? Ja, es muss eine Vorlage dasein, ich frage gleich mal. Gruß Jörg

Re: issue 127553

We can always change that later... @Marcus: Can you re-add 4.1.4 (also for Target Milestone)? Thanks, Matthias Am 11.10.2017 um 14:24 schrieb Mathias Röllig: >> This is a very good description. Mathias, have you already copied it >> to Bugzilla? (I've also tested with business cards, but this

Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

Path: . Working Copy Root Path: /Users/jim/src/asf/code/follow/aoo-414 URL: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO414 Relative URL: ^/openoffice/branches/AOO414 Repository Root: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf Repository UUID: 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 Revision:

Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

Jim, can you give a short hint when you start building RC5 and the revision#? Matthias Am 11.10.2017 um 14:02 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Lets go ahead and add those. Add the flag and request them and I'll review > and likely approve; at least we will doc them ;) > > Thx! >> On Oct 11, 2017, at

Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

I am starting on macOS and Linux-64 builds for 4.1.4-RC5 as we speak. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 07:20:53 -0400 Jim Jagielski wrote: > After a night's sleep I decided that we should release > the best possible version of AOO 4.1.x as possible. Releasing > one w/ 2 known regressions just doesn't make sense. > > So the remaining question was/is: What do

Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

> On October 11, 2017 at 12:20 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > After a night's sleep I decided that we should release > the best possible version of AOO 4.1.x as possible. Releasing > one w/ 2 known regressions just doesn't make sense. +1 > So the plan is to "re-open"

Re: Moin, Moin!

Am 11.10.2017 um 14:25 schrieb Jörg Schmidt: > Hallo Mathias, > >> Habe jetzt erst entdeckt, dass es auch eine deutschsprachige >> dev-Liste gibt. > da haben wir sehr drum gekämpft, eigentlich wollte man uns keine > deutschsprachige dev zugestehen, weil man wegen des mutmaßlich geringen >

review granted: [Issue 127553] update links doesn't work for sections in 4.1.4 : [Attachment 86222] Labels patch

Jim Jagielski has granted review: Issue 127553: update links doesn't work for sections in 4.1.4 https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127553 Attachment 86222: Labels patch https://bz.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=86222=edit --- Comment #1 from Jim Jagielski

4.1.4_release_blocker granted: [Issue 127553] update links doesn't work for sections in 4.1.4

Jim Jagielski has granted Patricia Shanahan 's request for 4.1.4_release_blocker: Issue 127553: update links doesn't work for sections in 4.1.4 https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127553 - To

Re: Moin, Moin!

Hallo Mathias, > Habe jetzt erst entdeckt, dass es auch eine deutschsprachige > dev-Liste gibt. da haben wir sehr drum gekämpft, eigentlich wollte man uns keine deutschsprachige dev zugestehen, weil man wegen des mutmaßlich geringen Traffic annahm das das nicht lohnt - schadet also nicht

issue 127553 (was: 4.1.4 show stopper!)

This is a very good description. Mathias, have you already copied it to Bugzilla? (I've also tested with business cards, but this one looks more generic). Done. https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127553 But 4.1.4 isn't available for version in bugzilla. Neither as »Version« nor as

4.1.4_release_blocker requested: [Issue 127553] update links doesn't work for sections in 4.1.4

Patricia Shanahan has asked for 4.1.4_release_blocker: Issue 127553: update links doesn't work for sections in 4.1.4 https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127553 - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

4.1.4_release_blocker granted: [Issue 127538] SV translation: "Basic" mistranslated as "grundläggande"

Jim Jagielski has granted Matthias Seidel 's request for 4.1.4_release_blocker: Issue 127538: SV translation: "Basic" mistranslated as "grundläggande" https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127538

4.1.4_release_blocker granted: [Issue 127141] Incorrectly translated text in Installer

Jim Jagielski has granted Matthias Seidel 's request for 4.1.4_release_blocker: Issue 127141: Incorrectly translated text in Installer https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127141 - To

4.1.4_release_blocker requested: [Issue 127538] SV translation: "Basic" mistranslated as "grundläggande"

Matthias Seidel has asked for 4.1.4_release_blocker: Issue 127538: SV translation: "Basic" mistranslated as "grundläggande" https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127538 - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

4.1.4_release_blocker requested: [Issue 127141] Incorrectly translated text in Installer

Matthias Seidel has asked for 4.1.4_release_blocker: Issue 127141: Incorrectly translated text in Installer https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127141 - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

Lets go ahead and add those. Add the flag and request them and I'll review and likely approve; at least we will doc them ;) Thx! > On Oct 11, 2017, at 7:50 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Am 11.10.2017 um 13:47 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Are these requested as 4.1.4

Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

Am 11.10.2017 um 13:47 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > Jim Jagielski wrote: >> I decided that, procedurally, the AOO414 tag was premature, >> and, as such, can be removed. I've gone ahead and done that. >> So the plan is to "re-open" branches/AOO414; I will then apply >> to it the 2 patches that have

Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

Am 11.10.2017 um 13:47 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Are these requested as 4.1.4 blockers in Bugz? No. >> On Oct 11, 2017, at 7:26 AM, Matthias Seidel >> wrote: >> >> Hi Jim, >> >> If time permits, could you have a look at: >> >>

Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

Are these requested as 4.1.4 blockers in Bugz? > On Oct 11, 2017, at 7:26 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > If time permits, could you have a look at: > > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127141 > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127538

Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

Jim Jagielski wrote: I decided that, procedurally, the AOO414 tag was premature, and, as such, can be removed. I've gone ahead and done that. So the plan is to "re-open" branches/AOO414; I will then apply to it the 2 patches that have been applied to branches/AOO415 (after adjusting the version

Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

Hi Jim, If time permits, could you have a look at: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127141 https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127538 Only small translation fixes, but they didn't make it into 4.1.4. Regards, Matthias P.S.: I am also OK, if we go "regression only" for RC5 Am

Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

After a night's sleep I decided that we should release the best possible version of AOO 4.1.x as possible. Releasing one w/ 2 known regressions just doesn't make sense. So the remaining question was/is: What do we call it? I decided that, procedurally, the AOO414 tag was premature, and, as such,

Re: Keep calm and don't over-react Was: Re: 4.1.4 show stopper!

As noted, the issue is that AOO414 is tagged. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Keep calm and don't over-react Was: Re: 4.1.4 show stopper!

Hi all > On October 10, 2017 at 8:47 PM Jörg Schmidt wrote: > imho: > Better to spend more time on a qualitatively good release than to release a > less good release overhasty. +1 > Please don't forget: the quality of AOO is the main argument for many users > to