Whether we will actually release a 4.1.5 is not yet decided. We do need
to do some testing with a version that only has a limited set of changes
relative to 4.1.4, so we are using the 4.1.5 branch for that purpose.
On 11/19/2017 7:38 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
Isn’t the next version 4.1.5? Of
Isn’t the next version 4.1.5? Of course this just came up today!
Thanks,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 19, 2017, at 4:24 PM, msei...@apache.org wrote:
>
> Author: mseidel
> Date: Mon Nov 20 00:24:38 2017
> New Revision: 1815764
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1815764=rev
> Log:
Hi Jim,
I saw that you updated the metadata for 4.1.5.
One file is still missing, see:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127552#c2
Regards, Matthias
Am 18.11.2017 um 22:20 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> We do have the AOO415 branch! :)
>
>> On Nov 18, 2017, at 2:11 PM, Patricia Shanahan
Now that I have a bit more time, I wanted to thank Jim for raising the
question. I really want people to review my code and question anything
that seems dubious.
On 11/19/2017 7:21 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
The null check inside the mAutoAskUpdateAllLinks test is something of an
On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I think I will spend some time creating some 4.1.5-dev builds for people to
> play with...
>
> > On Nov 19, 2017, at 10:40 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
> >
> > Jim,
>
That would be great. :)
>
> > I am
I think I will spend some time creating some 4.1.5-dev builds for people to
play with...
> On Nov 19, 2017, at 10:40 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
>
> Jim,
>
> I am going to be away from computers for most of the day. If you have
> everything you want tested in 4.1.5 checked in,
Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Important dates:
- Submission deadline: 4 Dec 2017
- FOSDEM: [3-]4 Feb 2018, Brussels, Belgium.
Just to avoid confusion about dates: FOSDEM is 3-4 February 2018 and
runs for the full day both days. The Open Document Editors (including
OpenOffice) devroom is on Saturday
Jim,
I am going to be away from computers for most of the day. If you have
everything you want tested in 4.1.5 checked in, I would like you to
trigger a request for general testing.
In particular, anyone who is working a bug report that is a regression
between 4.1.3 and 4.1.4 should test it
The null check inside the mAutoAskUpdateAllLinks test is something of an
over-reaction on my part, in the direction of defensive programming.
mAutoAskUpdateAllLinks is only true in two specific cases, both of which
I have reviewed. The bug was doing the parent look-up outside that if block.
I
Just to be clear:
SetUserAllowsLinkUpdate(pLink, GetUserAllowsLinkUpdate(parent));
is OK if parent == NULL? That is, does GetUserAllowsLinkUpdate()
work OK if passed NULL? Or, if parent is NULL, should we skip
calling SetUserAllowsLinkUpdate()?
> On Nov 18, 2017, at 3:49 PM, Patricia
I think together is best. :)
> On Nov 18, 2017, at 6:01 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
>
> I see you have checked in some Mac building changes. Would it be better to
> keep the two fixes separate, or encourage testing both of them together?
>
> On 11/18/2017 1:20 PM, Jim Jagielski
Hi Andrea,
Am 19.11.2017 um 11:25 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> ...
> Remember that we have funding available for events, and we should
> really spend it. More detailed information will come.
> ...
Great!
I am in the process of building a new demo PC for FOSDEM. ;-)
Regards, Matthias
> Regards,
>
+1 for testing together. If it doesn't work we can go into analysis.
Am 19. November 2017 00:01:35 MEZ schrieb Patricia Shanahan :
>I see you have checked in some Mac building changes. Would it be better
>
>to keep the two fixes separate, or encourage testing both of them
The Call for talks for the Open Document Editors (such as OpenOffice) is
open. I'll republish the full call on the OpenOffice blog later today to
have a reference URL.
Important dates:
- Submission deadline: 4 Dec 2017
- FOSDEM: 4 Feb 2018, Brussels, Belgium.
I encourage everybody who plans
14 matches
Mail list logo