Re: Fwd: [Issue 20819] add polynomial regression type

Hello Peter, the extension is under which license? After this information we can discuss how to work further on it Kind regards Am 01.12.2017 um 06:16 schrieb Peter kovacs: > Hi all , > what we do with this report? > There is an extension that handled this but there is still the complain to >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Public Beta for 4.2

Hello I like this idea, too. it makes it visible that we aren't dead. Regards Mechtilde Am 01.12.2017 um 03:41 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > I like it. I already have Linux, Windows and macOS 4.2.0-dev builds available > (http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ >

Fwd: [Issue 20819] add polynomial regression type

Hi all , what we do with this report? There is an extension that handled this but there is still the complain to add this to the basic install. So do we want o implement another regression type? Or instead add the extention to our build? Or leave it as is and close the issue? All the Best Peter

Re: [PROPOSAL] Public Beta for 4.2

I like it. I already have Linux, Windows and macOS 4.2.0-dev builds available (http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ ) for some langs > On Nov 30, 2017, at 5:15 PM, Marcus wrote: > > Am 30.11.2017 um 21:26 schrieb Dave Fisher: >> In light of our curre

Re: AOO 4.2.0-dev builds

Installed 4.2.0-dev on my 2015 MacBook Pro, macOS Sierra 10.12.6, Java jdk-9.0.1. No legacy Java. Database works fine. On my 2013 MacBook Pro macOS High Sierra 10.13.1, Java jdk-9.0.1, AOO 4.2.0-dev the database is still working after uninstalling legacy Java 6. I have not clue why database w

Re: [PROPOSAL] Public Beta for 4.2

Am 30.11.2017 um 21:26 schrieb Dave Fisher: In light of our current situation with getting builds together but not having a lot of people doing more than simple QA what does the team think about releasing a Public Beta for 4.2.0? I think that this would be an advantage for the project and migh

Re: a more sane way to override optimization flags in gbuild

On 30.11.2017 20:44, Don Lewis wrote: On 30 Nov, Jim Jagielski wrote: I think for 4.2.x and later, we have deprecated CentOS5 as a supported build system... I ran into a LOT of issues. So, imo, any fix that is *specific* for CentOS5 should be discounted. I can't even do CentOS5 builds anymore.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Public Beta for 4.2

On 30.11.2017 21:26, Dave Fisher wrote: Hi - In light of our current situation with getting builds together but not having a lot of people doing more than simple QA what does the team think about releasing a Public Beta for 4.2.0? I think that this would be an advantage for the project and mi

[PROPOSAL] Public Beta for 4.2

Hi - In light of our current situation with getting builds together but not having a lot of people doing more than simple QA what does the team think about releasing a Public Beta for 4.2.0? I think that this would be an advantage for the project and might serve to bring in more of the communit

Re: a more sane way to override optimization flags in gbuild

On 30 Nov, Jim Jagielski wrote: > I think for 4.2.x and later, we have deprecated CentOS5 as a supported > build system... I ran into a LOT of issues. So, imo, any fix that is > *specific* for CentOS5 should be discounted. I can't even do CentOS5 builds anymore. My CentOS5 VM broke and CentOS mov

Re: AOO 4.2.0-dev builds

I uninstalled legacy Java 6 on my Mac (High Sierra). Database still works. Very weird. On 2017-11-30, 11:17 AM Larry Gusaas wrote: High Sierra (10.13.1). I'll test later today on my other Mac which is still on Sierra. On 2017-11-30, 8:23 AM Jim Jagielski wrote: What system? I am still on Sie

Re: AOO 4.2.0-dev builds

High Sierra (10.13.1). I'll test later today on my other Mac which is still on Sierra. On 2017-11-30, 8:23 AM Jim Jagielski wrote: What system? I am still on Sierra w/o legacy Java6 and 4.2.0-dev works fine. On Nov 28, 2017, at 12:08 AM, Larry Gusaas wrote: The 4.1.4 spreadsheet bug is fixe

Re: AOO 4.2.0-dev builds

Cool! > On Nov 30, 2017, at 8:31 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Just a FYI that so far, my 4.2.0 tests that haven't been uploaded > yet seem to work under 10.7.5! > > signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Re: security fixes in trunk

> On Nov 30, 2017, at 11:07 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > > The changes must not be committed as is, because that would undo some comment > translation. yes, of course. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.a

Re: AOO 4.2.0-dev builds

I think the current version wasn't built supporting 10.7... I think what I've uploaded just was for 10.8 and later. I'm working on getting 10.7 and 4.2.0 totally happy together. > On Nov 30, 2017, at 11:15 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > When I try the 4.2.0-dev build on Lion - 10.7.5 I

Re: AOO 4.2.0-dev builds

Hi Jim, When I try the 4.2.0-dev build on Lion - 10.7.5 I get the following error report. Process: launchd [304] Path:/Applications/OpenOffice.app/Contents/MacOS/soffice Identifier: org.openoffice.script Version: ??? (???) Code Type: X86-64 (Native) Parent

Re: security fixes in trunk

The changes must not be committed as is, because that would undo some comment translation. I have built a modified trunk and plan to test it today. If all goes well I'll commit later today. On 11/30/2017 7:38 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Thx! Looking over, I does appear to me that these need to b

Re: security fixes in trunk

Thx! Looking over, I does appear to me that these need to be committed to trunk. > On Nov 27, 2017, at 10:44 PM, Don Lewis wrote: > > When I diff the files that were changed for security reasons in 4.1.4 > (this is actually 4.1.5 since I have a fresh checkout handy) vs. the > same files in trun

Re: ImageURL

you always need to convert a system path to a URL (i think :-) ) use the "ConvertToUrl" function what will result in "file:///images/apple.png" Hope it helps Greetz Fernand On 30/11/2017 13:09, Rushna Jabi wrote: Hi all, I am working on OpenOffice plugin using NetBeans 8.0.2. I have created a

ImageURL

Hi all, I am working on OpenOffice plugin using NetBeans 8.0.2. I have created a dialog using XDialog and now I want add image on this dialog. but I am not getting image. My code is: //create the image model and set the properties Object imageModel = xMultiServiceFactory.createInstance("com.sun.

Re: a more sane way to override optimization flags in gbuild

I would put it a bit more strongly. I think 4.1.x should be strictly reserved for changes that are essential to fix urgent user-visible bugs. On 11/30/2017 5:59 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: I think for 4.2.x and later, we have deprecated CentOS5 as a supported build system... I ran into a LOT of is

Re: AOO 4.2.0-dev builds

What system? I am still on Sierra w/o legacy Java6 and 4.2.0-dev works fine. > On Nov 28, 2017, at 12:08 AM, Larry Gusaas wrote: > > The 4.1.4 spreadsheet bug is fixed in 4.2.0 > > At first, database wouldn't open at all. Had to reinstall the legacy Apple > Java 6. Database then worked. 4.1.4

Re: a more sane way to override optimization flags in gbuild

I think for 4.2.x and later, we have deprecated CentOS5 as a supported build system... I ran into a LOT of issues. So, imo, any fix that is *specific* for CentOS5 should be discounted. For 4.1.x, I'd prefer something which is a quick and easy fix, rather than something that touches a lot of build