Re: A 4.1.6 Release

[Matthias Seidel]

Am 15.09.2018 um 20:25 schrieb Peter kovacs:
> I do not have those rights. Probably because my bugzilla user is an account. 
> I tried to switch to my apache address but I failed.
> The account name is an leginee account at Google mail service.

Your account must be added to the appropriate groups. See:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/How+to+Cook+a+Release

I don't have the rights, so someone else has to do it.

Regards,
   Matthias

>
> Am 15. September 2018 10:34:31 MESZ schrieb Matthias Seidel 
> :
>> Am 15.09.2018 um 10:07 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> Am 15.09.2018 um 07:47 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
 Okay for granting I switch from '?' to none?
>>> No, you change to "+" if you think this should be in 4.1.6.
>>> And you change to "-" if you think it shouldn't.
>>>
>>> At least this is my understanding...
>> That said, can someone please ensure that Peter is in the group
>> "relman"
>> in our Bugzilla?!
>>
>> I would have a look myself but as I wrote several times before I don't
>> have sufficient rights...
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>>> Regards,
>>>    Matthias
>>>
 On 9/14/18 7:37 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Am 09.09.2018 um 18:03 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>> Okay I had a look now.
>>
>> I have a bit of an issue in filtering on the blocker flag.
>>
>> I filtered now on the Version 4.1.6-dev and 4.1.6 and found 6
>> reports.
>> Are these all of them?
>>
>>
>> - The Patch I had in mind i did not find again. Next time I have
>> to
>> note the issue number. :(
>>
>>
>> Thus I am fine with the Blockers so far. Anything that anyone
>> wants
>> still to add from the dev list?
> There are more to come... ;-)
> If you are OK with a blocker, just grant it, so we can move
>> forward.
> Regards,
>     Matthias
>
>> All the best
>>
>> Peter
>>
>> On 9/6/18 5:10 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>>>    I plan to have a look on the weekend, what we have now. I want
>> to
>>> add one patch concerning mailmerge.
>>> And then off we go, I Think.
>>>
>>>
>>> I agree with Jim in general. I see a possibility that the 4.1.x
>>> series gets maintenance till 2020, for centOS6 while every one
>> else
>>> is moving to 4.2.0.
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 6. September 2018 15:25:19 MESZ schrieb Jim Jagielski
>>> :
 Anyone can propose something as a blocker... it's up to the RM
>> on
 whether it really is one or not ;)

 BTW: I'm ready to go w/ Linux and macOS builds!

> On Sep 6, 2018, at 8:05 AM, Matthias Seidel
  wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> Am 03.09.2018 um 23:45 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> For some users, AOO 4.1.6 will be the "last" version of OO
>> that
>> they
 can use, since AOO 4.2.x will not provide some community build
>> for
 older platforms (eg: CentOS5,...). As such, I think we need to
>> make
 4.1.6 as good and as stable and as useful, with as many patches
>> and
 fixes, as feasible for those users.
> Definitely!
> We already have some release blocker asked for.
>
> How to proceed?
>
> Regards,
>  Matthias
>
>>> On Sep 3, 2018, at 4:49 PM, Matthias Seidel
  wrote:
>>> Hi Andrea,
>>>
>>> Am 03.09.2018 um 22:37 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
 Matthias Seidel wrote:
> How about this one:
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126736
> It fixes a typo in the build process.
 This one has zero impact for users and, if 4.1.6 was just a
 maintenance release and we had regular 4.x major releases,
>> it
 wouldn't
 make sense to include fixes like this one. Still, it is
>> zero-risk
 and
 (unfortunately) 4.2.0 is taking longer than expected, so I
 understand
 if we try to backport some fixes to 4.1.6. No objection.

 In general, release blockers should be:
 - important bugfixes for users
 - important build fixes (e.g., don't break with a new
>> compiler)
 - important infrastructure fixes (e.g., support newer JRE,
>> or a
 newer
 Windows release... just an example)
>>> This is why I didn't ask for release blocker. ;-)
>>>
>>> It is just "nice to have" and another resolved issue that
>> would
 finally
>>> find its way into a release.
>>> There are a lot of them, that do not qualify as "blocker"...
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>     Matthias
>>>
 Regards,
    Andrea.


>> -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 

Re: A 4.1.6 Release

[Peter kovacs]

I do not have those rights. Probably because my bugzilla user is an account. I 
tried to switch to my apache address but I failed.
The account name is an leginee account at Google mail service.

Am 15. September 2018 10:34:31 MESZ schrieb Matthias Seidel 
:
>Am 15.09.2018 um 10:07 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Am 15.09.2018 um 07:47 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>>> Okay for granting I switch from '?' to none?
>> No, you change to "+" if you think this should be in 4.1.6.
>> And you change to "-" if you think it shouldn't.
>>
>> At least this is my understanding...
>
>That said, can someone please ensure that Peter is in the group
>"relman"
>in our Bugzilla?!
>
>I would have a look myself but as I wrote several times before I don't
>have sufficient rights...
>
>Matthias
>
>>
>> Regards,
>>    Matthias
>>
>>> On 9/14/18 7:37 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
 Hi Peter,

 Am 09.09.2018 um 18:03 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> Okay I had a look now.
>
> I have a bit of an issue in filtering on the blocker flag.
>
> I filtered now on the Version 4.1.6-dev and 4.1.6 and found 6
>reports.
>
> Are these all of them?
>
>
> - The Patch I had in mind i did not find again. Next time I have
>to
> note the issue number. :(
>
>
> Thus I am fine with the Blockers so far. Anything that anyone
>wants
> still to add from the dev list?
 There are more to come... ;-)
 If you are OK with a blocker, just grant it, so we can move
>forward.

 Regards,
     Matthias

> All the best
>
> Peter
>
> On 9/6/18 5:10 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>>    I plan to have a look on the weekend, what we have now. I want
>to
>> add one patch concerning mailmerge.
>> And then off we go, I Think.
>>
>>
>> I agree with Jim in general. I see a possibility that the 4.1.x
>> series gets maintenance till 2020, for centOS6 while every one
>else
>> is moving to 4.2.0.
>>
>>
>> Am 6. September 2018 15:25:19 MESZ schrieb Jim Jagielski
>> :
>>> Anyone can propose something as a blocker... it's up to the RM
>on
>>> whether it really is one or not ;)
>>>
>>> BTW: I'm ready to go w/ Linux and macOS builds!
>>>
 On Sep 6, 2018, at 8:05 AM, Matthias Seidel
>>>  wrote:
 Hi Jim,

 Am 03.09.2018 um 23:45 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> For some users, AOO 4.1.6 will be the "last" version of OO
>that
> they
>>> can use, since AOO 4.2.x will not provide some community build
>for
>>> older platforms (eg: CentOS5,...). As such, I think we need to
>make
>>> 4.1.6 as good and as stable and as useful, with as many patches
>and
>>> fixes, as feasible for those users.
 Definitely!
 We already have some release blocker asked for.

 How to proceed?

 Regards,
  Matthias

>> On Sep 3, 2018, at 4:49 PM, Matthias Seidel
>>>  wrote:
>> Hi Andrea,
>>
>> Am 03.09.2018 um 22:37 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
>>> Matthias Seidel wrote:
 How about this one:
 https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126736
 It fixes a typo in the build process.
>>> This one has zero impact for users and, if 4.1.6 was just a
>>> maintenance release and we had regular 4.x major releases,
>it
>>> wouldn't
>>> make sense to include fixes like this one. Still, it is
>zero-risk
>>> and
>>> (unfortunately) 4.2.0 is taking longer than expected, so I
>>> understand
>>> if we try to backport some fixes to 4.1.6. No objection.
>>>
>>> In general, release blockers should be:
>>> - important bugfixes for users
>>> - important build fixes (e.g., don't break with a new
>compiler)
>>> - important infrastructure fixes (e.g., support newer JRE,
>or a
>>> newer
>>> Windows release... just an example)
>> This is why I didn't ask for release blocker. ;-)
>>
>> It is just "nice to have" and another resolved issue that
>would
>>> finally
>> find its way into a release.
>> There are a lot of them, that do not qualify as "blocker"...
>>
>> Regards,
>>     Matthias
>>
>>> Regards,
>>>    Andrea.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>-
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> 
>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> 
>>>
>-
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>-

Re: [Call for testing] Linux icons 128x128

[Rory O'Farrell]

On Sat, 15 Sep 2018 18:24:16 +0200
Matthias Seidel  wrote:

> Hi Pedro,
> 
> Am 15.09.2018 um 17:12 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> > Hi Matthias, all
> >
> >
> >> On September 15, 2018 at 10:21 AM Matthias Seidel 
> >> mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote:
> >>
> >> Test it on every Linux desktop manager you can get your hands on! ;-)
> >> And *please* give feedback!
> >>
> >
> > Please do include this in version 4.1.6 for Linux!
> >
> > For those who aren't convinced it makes a real difference, please go to
> >
> > https://imgur.com/a/5WoOqub
> >
> > or download these two separate images and compare them side by side
> >
> > AOO 4.1.5
> > https://i.imgur.com/P29Aoi6.jpg
> >
> > AOO 4.2.0
> >
> > https://i.imgur.com/zB8XcHm.jpg
> 
> Yes, they look so much better! I could test them on Ubuntu 16.04 (Unity)
> and 18.04 (Gnome).
> 
> I am pretty sure that they will also look nice on other desktop
> environments, but this is a point where the community can help...
> 
> To be clear:
> These icons were in our code since around 2012. But they never got
> copied over by the desktop integration.
> I only added two icons (printer admin and extension) and patched the script.
> 
> Regards,
>    Matthias
> 
> >
> >
> > (Unfortunately Imgur converts everything to jpg but the difference is still 
> > obvious even with jpg compression artifacts)
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Pedro
> >
> 
> 

They look well on xfce4 (Xubuntu 18.04.1 64 bit)

-- 
Rory O'Farrell 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [Call for testing] Linux icons 128x128

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Pedro,

Am 15.09.2018 um 17:12 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> Hi Matthias, all
>
>
>> On September 15, 2018 at 10:21 AM Matthias Seidel 
>> mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote:
>>
>> Test it on every Linux desktop manager you can get your hands on! ;-)
>> And *please* give feedback!
>>
>
> Please do include this in version 4.1.6 for Linux!
>
> For those who aren't convinced it makes a real difference, please go to
>
> https://imgur.com/a/5WoOqub
>
> or download these two separate images and compare them side by side
>
> AOO 4.1.5
> https://i.imgur.com/P29Aoi6.jpg
>
> AOO 4.2.0
>
> https://i.imgur.com/zB8XcHm.jpg

Yes, they look so much better! I could test them on Ubuntu 16.04 (Unity)
and 18.04 (Gnome).

I am pretty sure that they will also look nice on other desktop
environments, but this is a point where the community can help...

To be clear:
These icons were in our code since around 2012. But they never got
copied over by the desktop integration.
I only added two icons (printer admin and extension) and patched the script.

Regards,
   Matthias

>
>
> (Unfortunately Imgur converts everything to jpg but the difference is still 
> obvious even with jpg compression artifacts)
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Pedro
>




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [Call for testing] Linux icons 128x128

[Pedro Lino]

Hi Matthias, all


> On September 15, 2018 at 10:21 AM Matthias Seidel  mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote:
> 
> Test it on every Linux desktop manager you can get your hands on! ;-)
> And *please* give feedback!
> 


Please do include this in version 4.1.6 for Linux!

For those who aren't convinced it makes a real difference, please go to

https://imgur.com/a/5WoOqub

or download these two separate images and compare them side by side

AOO 4.1.5
https://i.imgur.com/P29Aoi6.jpg

AOO 4.2.0

https://i.imgur.com/zB8XcHm.jpg


(Unfortunately Imgur converts everything to jpg but the difference is still 
obvious even with jpg compression artifacts)


Regards,

Pedro

Re: [Call for testing] Linux icons 128x128

[Pedro Lino]

Hi Hagar

> On September 15, 2018 at 11:18 AM Hagar Delest  wrote:

> There was an error during the installation 
> (Apache_OpenOffice_4.2.0_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US_2018-09-12_16_19_52_1840718.tar.gz)
> Package in error: openoffice-core01_4.2.0-1_amd64.deb (--install)
> belonging to openoffice-gnome-integration 4.1.6-1
> Then in a terminal after soffice command: 
> /opt/openoffice4/program/soffice.bin: error while loading shared libraries: 
> libucbhelper4gcc3.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or 
> directory
> 
> Reverted to the 4.1.6 build that was installed (4.1.6-9790)...

You can overcome the error by executing
sudo dpkg -i openoffice-core01_4.2.0-1_amd64.deb after the error message

This is a regression in 4.2.0 so someone will have to worry about that when the 
project gets there (fortunately this does not affect the 4.1.x branch)

Meanwhile can you please change the bug status to confirmed and add some 
details on the OS where that occurred?
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127774

Thanks!

Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [Call for testing] Linux icons 128x128

[Matthias Seidel]

Correction:

That error has been discussed before, it has to do with the icons (they
are simply copied over)...

sholud be:

That error has been discussed before, it has *nothing* to do with the icons 
(they
are simply copied over)...

Regards,

   Matthias


Am 15.09.2018 um 12:27 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Hi Hagar,
>
> Am 15.09.2018 um 12:18 schrieb Hagar Delest:
>> Le 15/09/2018 à 11:21, Matthias Seidel a écrit :
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I called for testing two month ago... :-0
>>>
>>> *If* enough people test it, we would have a chance to include it in
>>> 4.1.6.
>>>
>>> So if you are still interested in having nice icons in the next release,
>>> please download a build from here:
>>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/linux64/
>>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/linux32/
>>>
>>> Test it on every Linux desktop manager you can get your hands on! ;-)
>>> And *please* give feedback!
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>     Matthias
>> There was an error during the installation
>> (Apache_OpenOffice_4.2.0_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US_2018-09-12_16_19_52_1840718.tar.gz)
>> Package in error: openoffice-core01_4.2.0-1_amd64.deb (--install)
>> belonging to openoffice-gnome-integration 4.1.6-1
>> Then in a terminal after soffice command:
>> /opt/openoffice4/program/soffice.bin: error while loading shared
>> libraries: libucbhelper4gcc3.so: cannot open shared object file: No
>> such file or directory
>>
>> Reverted to the 4.1.6 build that was installed (4.1.6-9790)...
> That error has been discussed before, it has to do with the icons (they
> are simply copied over)...
> Normally it installs fine if you try a second time.
>
> We even have a Bugzilla issue for it:
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127774
>
> Regards,
>    Matthias
>
>> Hagar
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [Call for testing] Linux icons 128x128

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Hagar,

Am 15.09.2018 um 12:18 schrieb Hagar Delest:
> Le 15/09/2018 à 11:21, Matthias Seidel a écrit :
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I called for testing two month ago... :-0
>>
>> *If* enough people test it, we would have a chance to include it in
>> 4.1.6.
>>
>> So if you are still interested in having nice icons in the next release,
>> please download a build from here:
>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/linux64/
>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/linux32/
>>
>> Test it on every Linux desktop manager you can get your hands on! ;-)
>> And *please* give feedback!
>>
>> Regards,
>>     Matthias
> There was an error during the installation
> (Apache_OpenOffice_4.2.0_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US_2018-09-12_16_19_52_1840718.tar.gz)
> Package in error: openoffice-core01_4.2.0-1_amd64.deb (--install)
> belonging to openoffice-gnome-integration 4.1.6-1
> Then in a terminal after soffice command:
> /opt/openoffice4/program/soffice.bin: error while loading shared
> libraries: libucbhelper4gcc3.so: cannot open shared object file: No
> such file or directory
>
> Reverted to the 4.1.6 build that was installed (4.1.6-9790)...

That error has been discussed before, it has to do with the icons (they
are simply copied over)...
Normally it installs fine if you try a second time.

We even have a Bugzilla issue for it:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127774

Regards,
   Matthias

>
> Hagar
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [Call for testing] Linux icons 128x128

[Hagar Delest]

Le 15/09/2018 à 11:21, Matthias Seidel a écrit :

Hi all,

I called for testing two month ago... :-0

*If* enough people test it, we would have a chance to include it in 4.1.6.

So if you are still interested in having nice icons in the next release,
please download a build from here:
https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/linux64/
https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/linux32/

Test it on every Linux desktop manager you can get your hands on! ;-)
And *please* give feedback!

Regards,
    Matthias

There was an error during the installation 
(Apache_OpenOffice_4.2.0_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US_2018-09-12_16_19_52_1840718.tar.gz)
Package in error: openoffice-core01_4.2.0-1_amd64.deb (--install)
belonging to openoffice-gnome-integration 4.1.6-1
Then in a terminal after soffice command: /opt/openoffice4/program/soffice.bin: 
error while loading shared libraries: libucbhelper4gcc3.so: cannot open shared 
object file: No such file or directory

Reverted to the 4.1.6 build that was installed (4.1.6-9790)...

Hagar

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [Call for testing] Linux icons 128x128

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi all,

I called for testing two month ago... :-0

*If* enough people test it, we would have a chance to include it in 4.1.6.

So if you are still interested in having nice icons in the next release,
please download a build from here:
https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/linux64/
https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/linux32/

Test it on every Linux desktop manager you can get your hands on! ;-)
And *please* give feedback!

Regards,
   Matthias

Am 12.09.2018 um 22:46 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Am 12.09.2018 um 22:42 schrieb Hagar Delest:
>> Le 10/09/2018 à 23:20, Rory O'Farrell a écrit :
>>> On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 16:31:12 -0400
>>> Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>>
 That should be fixed by now...
>>> Downloading now for me.  Try again, Hagar.
>>>
>>> Rory
>> Thanks, up and running. No big change with XFCE.
>> Tried the big icons on the desktop but forgot to check with 4.1.5 :-(
> To be clear: This was about "big" icons in trunk.
>
> They are *not* in 4.1.6.
>
> Thanks for hijacking this thread! ;-)
>
> Matthias
>
>> Hagar
>>
> On Sep 10, 2018, at 3:58 PM, Hagar Delest  wrote:
>
> I get that error:
>
> You don't have permission to access 
> /~jim/AOO-builds/4.1.6-dev-r1840476/en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.6_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gzon
>  this server.
>
> Hagar
>
>
>
> Le 10/09/2018 à 19:54, Jim Jagielski a écrit :
>>> On Sep 10, 2018, at 1:20 PM, Rory O'Farrell  wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 12:30:13 -0400
>>> Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>>
 Give me until the end-of-the day and I'll provide one...

 Lang pref?
>>> English (GB) or English (US) - not important.
>>>
>> They will be available in:
>>
>>http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/4.1.6-dev-r1840476/
>>
>> in ~1hr. Uploading as we speak.
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org


>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: A 4.1.6 Release

[Matthias Seidel]

Am 15.09.2018 um 10:07 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Am 15.09.2018 um 07:47 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>> Okay for granting I switch from '?' to none?
> No, you change to "+" if you think this should be in 4.1.6.
> And you change to "-" if you think it shouldn't.
>
> At least this is my understanding...

That said, can someone please ensure that Peter is in the group "relman"
in our Bugzilla?!

I would have a look myself but as I wrote several times before I don't
have sufficient rights...

Matthias

>
> Regards,
>    Matthias
>
>> On 9/14/18 7:37 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> Hi Peter,
>>>
>>> Am 09.09.2018 um 18:03 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
 Okay I had a look now.

 I have a bit of an issue in filtering on the blocker flag.

 I filtered now on the Version 4.1.6-dev and 4.1.6 and found 6 reports.

 Are these all of them?


 - The Patch I had in mind i did not find again. Next time I have to
 note the issue number. :(


 Thus I am fine with the Blockers so far. Anything that anyone wants
 still to add from the dev list?
>>> There are more to come... ;-)
>>> If you are OK with a blocker, just grant it, so we can move forward.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>     Matthias
>>>
 All the best

 Peter

 On 9/6/18 5:10 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>    I plan to have a look on the weekend, what we have now. I want to
> add one patch concerning mailmerge.
> And then off we go, I Think.
>
>
> I agree with Jim in general. I see a possibility that the 4.1.x
> series gets maintenance till 2020, for centOS6 while every one else
> is moving to 4.2.0.
>
>
> Am 6. September 2018 15:25:19 MESZ schrieb Jim Jagielski
> :
>> Anyone can propose something as a blocker... it's up to the RM on
>> whether it really is one or not ;)
>>
>> BTW: I'm ready to go w/ Linux and macOS builds!
>>
>>> On Sep 6, 2018, at 8:05 AM, Matthias Seidel
>>  wrote:
>>> Hi Jim,
>>>
>>> Am 03.09.2018 um 23:45 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
 For some users, AOO 4.1.6 will be the "last" version of OO that
 they
>> can use, since AOO 4.2.x will not provide some community build for
>> older platforms (eg: CentOS5,...). As such, I think we need to make
>> 4.1.6 as good and as stable and as useful, with as many patches and
>> fixes, as feasible for those users.
>>> Definitely!
>>> We already have some release blocker asked for.
>>>
>>> How to proceed?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>  Matthias
>>>
> On Sep 3, 2018, at 4:49 PM, Matthias Seidel
>>  wrote:
> Hi Andrea,
>
> Am 03.09.2018 um 22:37 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
>> Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> How about this one:
>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126736
>>> It fixes a typo in the build process.
>> This one has zero impact for users and, if 4.1.6 was just a
>> maintenance release and we had regular 4.x major releases, it
>> wouldn't
>> make sense to include fixes like this one. Still, it is zero-risk
>> and
>> (unfortunately) 4.2.0 is taking longer than expected, so I
>> understand
>> if we try to backport some fixes to 4.1.6. No objection.
>>
>> In general, release blockers should be:
>> - important bugfixes for users
>> - important build fixes (e.g., don't break with a new compiler)
>> - important infrastructure fixes (e.g., support newer JRE, or a
>> newer
>> Windows release... just an example)
> This is why I didn't ask for release blocker. ;-)
>
> It is just "nice to have" and another resolved issue that would
>> finally
> find its way into a release.
> There are a lot of them, that do not qualify as "blocker"...
>
> Regards,
>     Matthias
>
>> Regards,
>>    Andrea.
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>

Re: A 4.1.6 Release

[Matthias Seidel]

Am 15.09.2018 um 07:47 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> Okay for granting I switch from '?' to none?

No, you change to "+" if you think this should be in 4.1.6.
And you change to "-" if you think it shouldn't.

At least this is my understanding...

Regards,
   Matthias

>
> On 9/14/18 7:37 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> Am 09.09.2018 um 18:03 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>>> Okay I had a look now.
>>>
>>> I have a bit of an issue in filtering on the blocker flag.
>>>
>>> I filtered now on the Version 4.1.6-dev and 4.1.6 and found 6 reports.
>>>
>>> Are these all of them?
>>>
>>>
>>> - The Patch I had in mind i did not find again. Next time I have to
>>> note the issue number. :(
>>>
>>>
>>> Thus I am fine with the Blockers so far. Anything that anyone wants
>>> still to add from the dev list?
>> There are more to come... ;-)
>> If you are OK with a blocker, just grant it, so we can move forward.
>>
>> Regards,
>>     Matthias
>>
>>> All the best
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>> On 9/6/18 5:10 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
    I plan to have a look on the weekend, what we have now. I want to
 add one patch concerning mailmerge.
 And then off we go, I Think.


 I agree with Jim in general. I see a possibility that the 4.1.x
 series gets maintenance till 2020, for centOS6 while every one else
 is moving to 4.2.0.


 Am 6. September 2018 15:25:19 MESZ schrieb Jim Jagielski
 :
> Anyone can propose something as a blocker... it's up to the RM on
> whether it really is one or not ;)
>
> BTW: I'm ready to go w/ Linux and macOS builds!
>
>> On Sep 6, 2018, at 8:05 AM, Matthias Seidel
>  wrote:
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> Am 03.09.2018 um 23:45 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> For some users, AOO 4.1.6 will be the "last" version of OO that
>>> they
> can use, since AOO 4.2.x will not provide some community build for
> older platforms (eg: CentOS5,...). As such, I think we need to make
> 4.1.6 as good and as stable and as useful, with as many patches and
> fixes, as feasible for those users.
>> Definitely!
>> We already have some release blocker asked for.
>>
>> How to proceed?
>>
>> Regards,
>>  Matthias
>>
 On Sep 3, 2018, at 4:49 PM, Matthias Seidel
>  wrote:
 Hi Andrea,

 Am 03.09.2018 um 22:37 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> How about this one:
>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126736
>> It fixes a typo in the build process.
> This one has zero impact for users and, if 4.1.6 was just a
> maintenance release and we had regular 4.x major releases, it
> wouldn't
> make sense to include fixes like this one. Still, it is zero-risk
> and
> (unfortunately) 4.2.0 is taking longer than expected, so I
> understand
> if we try to backport some fixes to 4.1.6. No objection.
>
> In general, release blockers should be:
> - important bugfixes for users
> - important build fixes (e.g., don't break with a new compiler)
> - important infrastructure fixes (e.g., support newer JRE, or a
> newer
> Windows release... just an example)
 This is why I didn't ask for release blocker. ;-)

 It is just "nice to have" and another resolved issue that would
> finally
 find its way into a release.
 There are a lot of them, that do not qualify as "blocker"...

 Regards,
     Matthias

> Regards,
>    Andrea.
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

4.1.6_release_blocker requested: [Issue 127530] New policy: Sign releases with SHA-512 and no longer offer MD5

[bugzilla]

Matthias Seidel  has asked  for 4.1.6_release_blocker:
Issue 127530: New policy: Sign releases with SHA-512 and no longer offer MD5
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127530



--- Comment #5 from Matthias Seidel  ---
I know this is being worked on but we can not test until our CMS is working
again.

So I ask for "release blocker" just to track this issue.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org