On 2/24/19 12:59 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Hi Kay, Hi Keith,
Am 05.02.19 um 00:58 schrieb Kay Schenk:
On 2/2/19 11:07 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
On 2/2/2019 1:00 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
I'm assuming most of you know that Google+ is going away April 2. 2019.
I am one of the moderators for th
> On February 26, 2019 at 6:25 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
> On 26/02/2019 Matthias Seidel wrote:
> > For the moment I have created a landing page for this URI:
> > http://openoffice.org/extensions/description/2006
>
> This will work, but I confirm what you and others had guesses: this is
> n
On 26/02/2019 Matthias Seidel wrote:
For the moment I have created a landing page for this URI:
http://openoffice.org/extensions/description/2006
This will work, but I confirm what you and others had guesses: this is
not required to be an URI where some resources will be found. It is just
for
> From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 11:45 AM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: extensions description xml doesn't exist
>
> Hi all,
>
> For the moment I have created a landing page for this URI:
> http://openoffice.org/exten
Hi all,
For the moment I have created a landing page for this URI:
http://openoffice.org/extensions/description/2006
This should also "fix" the warnings in Netbeans.
Regards,
Matthias
Am 26.02.19 um 11:16 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Hi John,
>
> Am 26.02.19 um 00:12 schrieb John D'Orazio:
>>
Hi John,
Am 26.02.19 um 00:12 schrieb John D'Orazio:
> Not being an expert in xml structures, it does seem to me however that the
> url isn't really to be considered an actual url, I guess it's just a string
> (called a URI ) to identify the elements in this xml tree as belonging to
> this family
