Peter, that is fantastic! There's a wiki area about OpenOffice architecture
at that might also be a good place.
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Architecture
___
Sent from MzK's phone.
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019, 16:29 Marcus wrote:
> Am 30.09.19 um 21:51 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>
Am 30.09.19 um 21:51 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
I have made it to my first milestone in creating documentation. I have created
a draw document that shows all modules. Pointers point towards providers and
dependencies, from the configuration standpoint of the build system.
It is not really accurate,
Am 30.09.19 um 22:59 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 30.09.19 um 22:35 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
We had constant 7 votes on 4.1.7 and 4.1.6 release. However only 3 volunteers
voted in both releases.
These numbers are low in general. Maybe we need to organize test phases in
order to raize the numbers.
Am 30.09.19 um 17:31 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
No feedback=No interest?
Maybe I should stop providing test builds.
That would save me a lot of my spare time...
sorry for being silent for this topic. However, Java is not really my
favorite thing. ;-)
Marcus
Am 05.09.19 um 12:58 schrieb
On 9/5/2019 6:58 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Keith, all,
>
> Did you have time to test?
>
> Feedback is always welcome... ;-)
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias
>
I had done successful tests on both 4.1.7 and 4.2.0. Then got
concentrating on 4.1.7 release and forgot to get back here to report.
Hi Peter,
Am 30.09.19 um 22:35 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> We had constant 7 votes on 4.1.7 and 4.1.6 release. However only 3 volunteers
> voted in both releases.
> These numbers are low in general. Maybe we need to organize test phases in
> order to raize the numbers. This will still not raise
We had constant 7 votes on 4.1.7 and 4.1.6 release. However only 3 volunteers
voted in both releases.
These numbers are low in general. Maybe we need to organize test phases in
order to raize the numbers. This will still not raise test attendance for a
single feature.
How about we schedule a
Hi Jim,
Great!
One additional thought:
We use $Revision$ in main/solenv/bin/build.pl and a lot of other files.
That doesn't seem to work anymore since we switched from SVN to Git.
We have AC_REVISION( $Revision$ ) in configure.ac. Maybe we can replace
the logic [1].
Regards,
Matthias
[1]
Hello all,
I have made it to my first milestone in creating documentation. I have created
a draw document that shows all modules. Pointers point towards providers and
dependencies, from the configuration standpoint of the build system.
It is not really accurate, but it gives an idea on the
Hi Dave,
Am 30.09.19 um 18:53 schrieb Dave Fisher:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> I think that it is likely people were focused on 4.1.7 testing.
Where have all these people been when we voted for release? ;-)
> My personal opinion is that if switching does not require users to switch and
> they can use
I have an idea on how to include the git hash on the source distro... will try
to work on it this week.
> On Sep 26, 2019, at 7:58 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>
> On 26 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi Don,
>>
>> Am 20.09.19 um 06:47 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>> Prioritizing the publication of the source
Hi Matthias,
I think that it is likely people were focused on 4.1.7 testing.
My personal opinion is that if switching does not require users to switch and
they can use the Oracle JRE if that is what they have then the change make
sense.
Regards,
Dave
> On Sep 30, 2019, at 8:31 AM, Matthias
No feedback=No interest?
Maybe I should stop providing test builds.
That would save me a lot of my spare time...
Regards,
Matthias
Am 05.09.19 um 12:58 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Hi Keith, all,
>
> Did you have time to test?
>
> Feedback is always welcome... ;-)
>
> Regards,
>
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
