Re: [openoffice] 02/02: i123947 - fix stlport emulation when compiling in C++11 mode
I've run into quite a few issues in C++11 mode. On FreeBSD, I'm forcing gnu++98 mode with modern compilers. That matches the long time gcc default. On 27 Oct, arie...@apache.org wrote: > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > arielch pushed a commit to branch trunk > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice.git > > commit 1828d080320011efd486c973e80e3eec3ad241f7 > Author: Ariel Constenla-Haile > AuthorDate: Sun Oct 27 03:51:33 2019 -0300 > > i123947 - fix stlport emulation when compiling in C++11 mode > --- > main/stlport/systemstl/list| 2 ++ > main/stlport/systemstl/map | 2 ++ > main/stlport/systemstl/numeric | 2 ++ > main/stlport/systemstl/set | 2 ++ > main/stlport/systemstl/vector | 2 ++ > 5 files changed, 10 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/main/stlport/systemstl/list b/main/stlport/systemstl/list > index 1fa1dc5..36f5d86 100644 > --- a/main/stlport/systemstl/list > +++ b/main/stlport/systemstl/list > @@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ > #pragma warning(disable:4555) > #include <../../VC/include/list> > #pragma warning(pop) > +#elif defined(__cplusplus) && (__cplusplus >= 201103L) > +#include_next > #else // fall back to boost/tr1 > #include > #endif > diff --git a/main/stlport/systemstl/map b/main/stlport/systemstl/map > index 13f783b..ec1c3db 100644 > --- a/main/stlport/systemstl/map > +++ b/main/stlport/systemstl/map > @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ > #ifdef HAVE_STL_INCLUDE_PATH > // TODO: use computed include file name > #include_next > +#elif defined(__cplusplus) && (__cplusplus >= 201103L) > +#include_next > #elif defined(_MSC_VER) > #include <../../VC/include/map> > #else // fall back to boost/tr1 > diff --git a/main/stlport/systemstl/numeric b/main/stlport/systemstl/numeric > index 975612b..5bd6b90 100644 > --- a/main/stlport/systemstl/numeric > +++ b/main/stlport/systemstl/numeric > @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ > #ifdef HAVE_STL_INCLUDE_PATH > // TODO: use computed include file name > #include_next > +#elif defined(__cplusplus) && (__cplusplus >= 201103L) > +#include_next > #elif defined(_MSC_VER) > #include <../../VC/include/numeric> > #else // fall back to boost/tr1 > diff --git a/main/stlport/systemstl/set b/main/stlport/systemstl/set > index 2d99053..674cab0 100644 > --- a/main/stlport/systemstl/set > +++ b/main/stlport/systemstl/set > @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ > // TODO: use computed include file name > #include "utility" > #include_next > +#elif defined(__cplusplus) && (__cplusplus >= 201103L) > +#include_next > #elif defined(_MSC_VER) > #include <../../VC/include/set> > #else // fall back to boost/tr1 > diff --git a/main/stlport/systemstl/vector b/main/stlport/systemstl/vector > index 8b4e86f..3275372 100644 > --- a/main/stlport/systemstl/vector > +++ b/main/stlport/systemstl/vector > @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ > #ifdef HAVE_STL_INCLUDE_PATH > // TODO: use computed include file name > #include_next > +#elif defined(__cplusplus) && (__cplusplus >= 201103L) > +#include_next > #elif defined(_MSC_VER) > #include <../../VC/include/vector> > #else // fall back to boost/tr1 > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [openoffice] 01/02: Avoid comparison between pointer and integer
On 27 Oct, arie...@apache.org wrote:
> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> arielch pushed a commit to branch trunk
> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice.git
>
> commit 958717d596e223826fa78462155b4447d227e5d3
> Author: Ariel Constenla-Haile
> AuthorDate: Sun Oct 27 03:43:35 2019 -0300
>
> Avoid comparison between pointer and integer
> ---
> main/vcl/unx/headless/svptext.cxx | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/main/vcl/unx/headless/svptext.cxx
> b/main/vcl/unx/headless/svptext.cxx
> index 21e5546..e58b65f 100644
> --- a/main/vcl/unx/headless/svptext.cxx
> +++ b/main/vcl/unx/headless/svptext.cxx
> @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ void SvpGlyphPeer::RemovingFont( ServerFont& )
>
> void SvpGlyphPeer::RemovingGlyph( ServerFont&, GlyphData& rGlyphData,
> sal_GlyphId /*aGlyphId*/ )
> {
> -if( rGlyphData.ExtDataRef().mpData != Format::NONE )
> +if( rGlyphData.ExtDataRef().mpData != NULL )
> {
> // release the glyph related resources
> DBG_ASSERT( (rGlyphData.ExtDataRef().meInfo <= Format::MAX),
> "SVP::RG() invalid alpha format" );
>
This code is actually more deeply broken. A while ago I started
investigating a patch, but I have absolutely no idea of how to test it.
I think I sent a message to the list at the time.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Mac system Catalina
Hi - There is an offer from Microsoft for Apache committers to get a free MSDN license. If that gives access to the proper signing keys then that would be the way to go. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 28, 2019, at 3:22 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > I do not want to spend money on this service, without having tried with > infra or Microsoft directly. > I am sure the ASF has something. And if not I am sure Microsoft gives us > access at better conditions then the 3rd party offer. > > Am 28. Oktober 2019 20:59:15 MEZ schrieb Pedro Lino : >> Hi Peter >> >> >>>For Windows it would help in a first step if someone can search >> the resources on MSN and post links of the validation process described >> by MS. >>> >> >> This is what is needed for Windows Certification: a Code Signing >> Certificate >> https://www.ksoftware.net/code-signing-certificates >> >> Giving that this is a distributed project, I would say that the OV Code >> Signing is the most appropriate (otherwise only one person will have >> the encrypted hardware token) >> >> Hope this helps. >> >> Does Apache OpenOffice have any funds? >> >> Regards, >> Pedro >> >> >>>Am 28. Oktober 2019 17:45:35 MEZ schrieb Matthias Seidel < >> matthias.sei...@hamburg.de mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de >: Hi Pedro, > Am 28.10.19 um 17:40 schrieb Pedro Lino: > > Do you volunteer? Remember, we all are only volunteers... > ;-) > I believe these two issues should be enough > reason for a 4.1.8 release. > Welcome to the team! >> I don't understand the cynicism. >> I believe I have contributed quite a bit with translation, bug > reporting and build testing. Apparently that is not enough for >>> this > project? >> >> Too bad! > > Well, someone has to deliver... > > No cynicism, it was just an invitation. > >> >> Regards, >> Pedro >> >>> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Mac system Catalina
I do not want to spend money on this service, without having tried with infra or Microsoft directly. I am sure the ASF has something. And if not I am sure Microsoft gives us access at better conditions then the 3rd party offer. Am 28. Oktober 2019 20:59:15 MEZ schrieb Pedro Lino : >Hi Peter > > >> For Windows it would help in a first step if someone can search >the resources on MSN and post links of the validation process described >by MS. >> > >This is what is needed for Windows Certification: a Code Signing >Certificate >https://www.ksoftware.net/code-signing-certificates > >Giving that this is a distributed project, I would say that the OV Code >Signing is the most appropriate (otherwise only one person will have >the encrypted hardware token) > >Hope this helps. > >Does Apache OpenOffice have any funds? > >Regards, >Pedro > > >> Am 28. Oktober 2019 17:45:35 MEZ schrieb Matthias Seidel < >matthias.sei...@hamburg.de mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de >: >> >Hi Pedro, >> > >> >Am 28.10.19 um 17:40 schrieb Pedro Lino: >> >>> > > >> > Do you volunteer? Remember, we all are only volunteers... >> >;-) >> >>> > > I believe these two issues should be enough >> >reason for a 4.1.8 release. >> > Welcome to the team! >> >> I don't understand the cynicism. >> >> I believe I have contributed quite a bit with translation, bug >> >reporting and build testing. Apparently that is not enough for >this >> >project? >> >> >> >> Too bad! >> > >> >Well, someone has to deliver... >> > >> >No cynicism, it was just an invitation. >> > >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Pedro >> >> >>
Re: Mac system Catalina
Hi Peter > For Windows it would help in a first step if someone can search the > resources on MSN and post links of the validation process described by MS. > This is what is needed for Windows Certification: a Code Signing Certificate https://www.ksoftware.net/code-signing-certificates Giving that this is a distributed project, I would say that the OV Code Signing is the most appropriate (otherwise only one person will have the encrypted hardware token) Hope this helps. Does Apache OpenOffice have any funds? Regards, Pedro > Am 28. Oktober 2019 17:45:35 MEZ schrieb Matthias Seidel < > matthias.sei...@hamburg.de mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de >: > >Hi Pedro, > > > >Am 28.10.19 um 17:40 schrieb Pedro Lino: > >>> > > > > Do you volunteer? Remember, we all are only volunteers... > >;-) > >>> > > I believe these two issues should be enough > >reason for a 4.1.8 release. > > Welcome to the team! > >> I don't understand the cynicism. > >> I believe I have contributed quite a bit with translation, bug > >reporting and build testing. Apparently that is not enough for this > >project? > >> > >> Too bad! > > > >Well, someone has to deliver... > > > >No cynicism, it was just an invitation. > > > >> > >> Regards, > >> Pedro > >> >
Re: download does not work
Am 28.10.19 um 17:20 schrieb Doyle Phillips: Secure Connection Failed An error occurred during a connection to downloads.sourceforge.net. PR_CONNECT_RESET_ERROR The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because the authenticity of the received data could not be verified. I've downloaded a second ago and haven't seen a problem. So, in general it's working. When you have problems with specific mirror servers then just change them. On the SourceForge webpage there is a grey "Problems Downloading?" button. Just click on it and choose a different mirror from the popup dialog. Please contact the website owners to inform them of this problem. Then you should do so. But we are not Sourceforge.net. ;-) To contact them use this: https://sourceforge.net/support HTH Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Branch reminder
Am 28.10.19 um 16:26 schrieb Jim Jagielski: Just a reminder that in addition to trunk and AOO418, we also have the AOO42X branch... If you add stuff to trunk, please be sure to see if it is also applicable to 4.2.0-dev, especially if you also back port it to the 4.1.8 branch. Currently, trunk and AOO42X are functionally in-sync (only deltas are things like whitespace correction, typos, etc...) and we don't want them to diverge too much. when it's clear that everything should go into the trunk and AOO42X branches, then we need to define also which commits should go to AOO418 and - more important - which not. As I expect that you would play again the release manager role my fingers> for a possible 4.1.8 release would you limke to do this? Thanks Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: New computer
Thanks, but what I need is a magic wand of cable untangling I don't suppose you have one handy. In installing my new computer I found that the cables connecting various computers, displays, router, and printer are a mess. On 10/28/2019 9:51 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi Patricia, How are things going? If you are in need of something just let me know... Regards, Matthias Am 26.10.19 um 06:24 schrieb Patricia Shanahan: Any opinions on which I should do? On 10/25/2019 1:27 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi Patricia, If you want to build 4.1.x have a look at: https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-418-Test/ReadMe.txt For 4.2.x (and trunk) see: https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-420-Test/ReadMe.txt This is how I do my test builds. Regards, Matthias Am 24.10.19 um 22:09 schrieb Patricia Shanahan: Are the Windows 10 instructions up-to-date? I have just got a shiny new Windows 10 Pro computer, and am planning a clean start on AOO building. It will take a day or so for me to install and set up basic stuff, and then I'll need to install whatever I need for AOO building. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Mac system Catalina
Jim, Can you try notarization with xcode 10 or do we still need code changes? Am 28. Oktober 2019 17:33:26 MEZ schrieb Jim Jagielski : > > >> On Oct 28, 2019, at 12:16 PM, Pedro Lino >wrote: >> >> Hi Jim, all >> >> >>> On October 28, 2019 at 3:34 PM Jim Jagielski >wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Oct 28, 2019, at 11:29 AM, Branko Čibej >wrote: Even I saw reports on this very list to the tune that, without >proper notarization, apps won't work on Catalina. >>> >>> Not quite true. You can still run non-notarized apps on Catalina... >it is just harder than before to "bypass" GateKeeper. One way is to >alt-click Open the App. Another is to select it and then choose Open >from the Finder. >> >> That seems to be a workaround for advanced users. If you/we want >ordinary Apple users to continue to use OpenOffice then this >notarization of the x64 build needs to be solved ASAP. >> The same applies to the Windows installer validation. >> I believe these two issues should be enough reason for a 4.1.8 >release. >> > >We have, in fact, been setting things up to allow us to do such >Notarization... I have an Apache DevID now, in addition to my personal >one. > > >- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Mac system Catalina
Guys calm down. The notarization is no easy thing to do. It is complex process, involving updates of dependencies and involves code changes. I am trying to push the topic since 2016 for mac when I have joined. Now we are almost at it to solve this. It has been a team effort from the start where multiple people delivered bigger or smaller pieces to the puzzle. Fighting, claiming and other things do not bring us forward. For Windows it would help in a first step if someone can search the resources on MSN and post links of the validation process described by MS. Let's take this step by step. Please! Am 28. Oktober 2019 17:45:35 MEZ schrieb Matthias Seidel : >Hi Pedro, > >Am 28.10.19 um 17:40 schrieb Pedro Lino: >>> > > > Do you volunteer? Remember, we all are only volunteers... >;-) >>> > > I believe these two issues should be enough >reason for a 4.1.8 release. > Welcome to the team! >> I don't understand the cynicism. >> I believe I have contributed quite a bit with translation, bug >reporting and build testing. Apparently that is not enough for this >project? >> >> Too bad! > >Well, someone has to deliver... > >No cynicism, it was just an invitation. > >> >> Regards, >> Pedro >>
Re: Mac system Catalina
Yes please try. If you have issues we can check on solutions. :) Am 28. Oktober 2019 18:09:52 MEZ schrieb Jim Jagielski : >I will use Xcode11 to notarize it... It's worth a shot to see if that >works :) > >> On Oct 28, 2019, at 1:07 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: >> >> Am 28.10.19 um 18:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> It appears that one can notarize an App after bistro >(https://developer.apple.com/documentation/xcode/notarizing_your_app_before_distribution/customizing_the_notarization_workflow)... >>> >>> I will try w/ the current 4.1.7 dmgs >> >> That's interesting, but will they notarize it with XCode 7? >> >>> >- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> >> > > >- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Mac system Catalina
Am 28.10.19 um 18:09 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > I will use Xcode11 to notarize it... It's worth a shot to see if that works :) Yes, give it a try. ;-) I am curious if you get instant feedback or if we have to wait for a response. That would be a time factor to consider for our releases... > >> On Oct 28, 2019, at 1:07 PM, Matthias Seidel >> wrote: >> >> Am 28.10.19 um 18:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> It appears that one can notarize an App after bistro >>> (https://developer.apple.com/documentation/xcode/notarizing_your_app_before_distribution/customizing_the_notarization_workflow)... >>> >>> I will try w/ the current 4.1.7 dmgs >> That's interesting, but will they notarize it with XCode 7? >> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Mac system Catalina
I will use Xcode11 to notarize it... It's worth a shot to see if that works :) > On Oct 28, 2019, at 1:07 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Am 28.10.19 um 18:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> It appears that one can notarize an App after bistro >> (https://developer.apple.com/documentation/xcode/notarizing_your_app_before_distribution/customizing_the_notarization_workflow)... >> >> I will try w/ the current 4.1.7 dmgs > > That's interesting, but will they notarize it with XCode 7? > >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
download does not work
Secure Connection Failed An error occurred during a connection to downloads.sourceforge.net. PR_CONNECT_RESET_ERROR The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because the authenticity of the received data could not be verified. Please contact the website owners to inform them of this problem.
Re: Mac system Catalina
Am 28.10.19 um 18:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > It appears that one can notarize an App after bistro > (https://developer.apple.com/documentation/xcode/notarizing_your_app_before_distribution/customizing_the_notarization_workflow)... > > I will try w/ the current 4.1.7 dmgs That's interesting, but will they notarize it with XCode 7? > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Mac system Catalina
It appears that one can notarize an App after bistro (https://developer.apple.com/documentation/xcode/notarizing_your_app_before_distribution/customizing_the_notarization_workflow)... I will try w/ the current 4.1.7 dmgs - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: New computer
Hi Patricia, How are things going? If you are in need of something just let me know... Regards, Matthias Am 26.10.19 um 06:24 schrieb Patricia Shanahan: > Any opinions on which I should do? > > > On 10/25/2019 1:27 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> Hi Patricia, >> >> If you want to build 4.1.x have a look at: >> https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-418-Test/ReadMe.txt >> >> For 4.2.x (and trunk) see: >> https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-420-Test/ReadMe.txt >> >> This is how I do my test builds. >> >> Regards, >> >> Matthias >> >> Am 24.10.19 um 22:09 schrieb Patricia Shanahan: >>> Are the Windows 10 instructions up-to-date? >>> >>> I have just got a shiny new Windows 10 Pro computer, and am planning a >>> clean start on AOO building. It will take a day or so for me to >>> install and set up basic stuff, and then I'll need to install whatever >>> I need for AOO building. >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> >>> >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Mac system Catalina
Hi Pedro, Am 28.10.19 um 17:40 schrieb Pedro Lino: >> > > >>> > Do you volunteer? Remember, we all are only volunteers... ;-) >> > > I believe these two issues should be enough reason for a >> 4.1.8 release. >>> > Welcome to the team! > I don't understand the cynicism. > I believe I have contributed quite a bit with translation, bug reporting and > build testing. Apparently that is not enough for this project? > > Too bad! Well, someone has to deliver... No cynicism, it was just an invitation. > > Regards, > Pedro > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Mac system Catalina
> > > > > > > > > Do you volunteer? Remember, we all are only volunteers... ;-) > > > > I believe these two issues should be enough reason for a > 4.1.8 release. > > > > > Welcome to the team! > I don't understand the cynicism. I believe I have contributed quite a bit with translation, bug reporting and build testing. Apparently that is not enough for this project? Too bad! Regards, Pedro
Re: Mac system Catalina
> On Oct 28, 2019, at 12:16 PM, Pedro Lino wrote: > > Hi Jim, all > > >> On October 28, 2019 at 3:34 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> >> >> >>> On Oct 28, 2019, at 11:29 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: >>> >>> Even I saw reports on this very list to the tune that, without proper >>> notarization, apps won't work on Catalina. >> >> Not quite true. You can still run non-notarized apps on Catalina... it is >> just harder than before to "bypass" GateKeeper. One way is to alt-click Open >> the App. Another is to select it and then choose Open from the Finder. > > That seems to be a workaround for advanced users. If you/we want ordinary > Apple users to continue to use OpenOffice then this notarization of the x64 > build needs to be solved ASAP. > The same applies to the Windows installer validation. > I believe these two issues should be enough reason for a 4.1.8 release. > We have, in fact, been setting things up to allow us to do such Notarization... I have an Apache DevID now, in addition to my personal one. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Mac system Catalina
Hi Pedro, Am 28.10.19 um 17:16 schrieb Pedro Lino: > Hi Jim, all > > >> On October 28, 2019 at 3:34 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> >> >> >>> On Oct 28, 2019, at 11:29 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: >>> >>> Even I saw reports on this very list to the tune that, without proper >>> notarization, apps won't work on Catalina. >> Not quite true. You can still run non-notarized apps on Catalina... it is >> just harder than before to "bypass" GateKeeper. One way is to alt-click Open >> the App. Another is to select it and then choose Open from the Finder. > That seems to be a workaround for advanced users. If you/we want ordinary > Apple users to continue to use OpenOffice then this notarization of the x64 > build needs to be solved ASAP. > The same applies to the Windows installer validation. Do you volunteer? Remember, we all are only volunteers... ;-) > I believe these two issues should be enough reason for a 4.1.8 release. Welcome to the team! Matthias > > Just my 2 cents > Pedro > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Mac system Catalina
Hi Jim, all > On October 28, 2019 at 3:34 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > > > > On Oct 28, 2019, at 11:29 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: > > > > Even I saw reports on this very list to the tune that, without proper > > notarization, apps won't work on Catalina. > > Not quite true. You can still run non-notarized apps on Catalina... it is > just harder than before to "bypass" GateKeeper. One way is to alt-click Open > the App. Another is to select it and then choose Open from the Finder. That seems to be a workaround for advanced users. If you/we want ordinary Apple users to continue to use OpenOffice then this notarization of the x64 build needs to be solved ASAP. The same applies to the Windows installer validation. I believe these two issues should be enough reason for a 4.1.8 release. Just my 2 cents Pedro - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Mac system Catalina
Am 28.10.19 um 16:34 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > >> On Oct 28, 2019, at 11:29 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: >> >> Even I saw reports on this very list to the tune that, without proper >> notarization, apps won't work on Catalina. > Not quite true. You can still run non-notarized apps on Catalina... it is > just harder than before to "bypass" GateKeeper. One way is to alt-click Open > the App. Another is to select it and then choose Open from the Finder. And what is more important, people have to install a *64-bit* version. Downloading the latest release will be sufficient... > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Mac system Catalina
> On Oct 28, 2019, at 11:29 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: > > Even I saw reports on this very list to the tune that, without proper > notarization, apps won't work on Catalina. Not quite true. You can still run non-notarized apps on Catalina... it is just harder than before to "bypass" GateKeeper. One way is to alt-click Open the App. Another is to select it and then choose Open from the Finder. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Mac system Catalina
On 28.10.2019 07:40, Peter Kovacs wrote: > Hi Helen, > > AFAIK the current version 4.1.7 should work, as all other versions did work > before. > Can you describe your issue in more detail? Even I saw reports on this very list to the tune that, without proper notarization, apps won't work on Catalina. AOO is not notarized by Apple. Hence, user problems. -- Brane > Am 28. Oktober 2019 00:36:22 MEZ schrieb Helen Robson > : >> Could you tell me when OpenOffice will be updated to run on Mac System >> Catalina? >> Thank you >> H Robson >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Branch reminder
Just a reminder that in addition to trunk and AOO418, we also have the AOO42X branch... If you add stuff to trunk, please be sure to see if it is also applicable to 4.2.0-dev, especially if you also back port it to the 4.1.8 branch. Currently, trunk and AOO42X are functionally in-sync (only deltas are things like whitespace correction, typos, etc...) and we don't want them to diverge too much. Cheers! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Mac system Catalina
Hi Helen, AFAIK the current version 4.1.7 should work, as all other versions did work before. Can you describe your issue in more detail? All the best Peter Am 28. Oktober 2019 00:36:22 MEZ schrieb Helen Robson : >Could you tell me when OpenOffice will be updated to run on Mac System >Catalina? >Thank you >H Robson > >Sent from my iPad > >- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
