Re: Dev-m2 on macOS

2020-07-05 Thread Rory O'Farrell
On Sun, 5 Jul 2020 17:33:54 -0600
Larry Gusaas  wrote:

> Downloaded Apache_OpenOffice_Dev_4.2.0_MacOS_x86-64_install_en-US from 
> https://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/AOO-dev-50c544e5/
> 
> Spellcheck does not work. Nothing is marked incorrect. Checked using both 
> Canadian and US 
> language setting. Changed my user profile to the one I'm using with 4.1.7. 
> Still didn't work.
> 
> 
> -- 
> _
> 
> Larry I. Gusaas

The initial check: does the chosen language show in the middle of the status 
bar?

-- 
Rory O'Farrell 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



#

2020-07-05 Thread Anousak Koulamany


ส่งจาก iPhone X

Re: New Committer: Detlef Nannen

2020-07-05 Thread Patricia Shanahan
I got distracted, and forgot to post the only appropriate form of 
message for a "New Committer" thread:


Detlef, welcome to the AOO committer team.


--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Dev-m2 on macOS

2020-07-05 Thread Larry Gusaas
Downloaded Apache_OpenOffice_Dev_4.2.0_MacOS_x86-64_install_en-US from 
https://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/AOO-dev-50c544e5/


Spellcheck does not work. Nothing is marked incorrect. Checked using both Canadian and US 
language setting. Changed my user profile to the one I'm using with 4.1.7. Still didn't work.



--
_

Larry I. Gusaas
Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan Canada
Website: http://larry-gusaas.com

"An artist is never ahead of his time but most people are far behind theirs." - 
Edgard Varese



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Decisions and Behavior

2020-07-05 Thread Dave Fisher
Hi -

You were asked to start a new thread. I did it for you.

What do you hope to accomplish in these threads?

Please review the ASF code of conduct before continuing.

https://www.apache.org/foundation/policies/conduct

Regards,
Dave

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jul 5, 2020, at 2:34 PM, Jörg Schmidt  wrote:
> 
> Hello Michael, 
> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Dr. Michael Stehmann [mailto:anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de] 
>> Sent: Saturday, July 04, 2020 8:50 AM
>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: New Committer: Detlef Nannen
>> 
>> Hello Jan-Christian,
>> 
>>> Am 03.07.20 um 17:57 schrieb jan-christ...@wienandt.de:
>>> 
>>> I can speak my mind on my own.
>> 
>> That was also my guess.
>> 
>> And that means we do not need a "tribunus plebis".
> 
> When you make decisions, you should justify them meaningfully, then there 
> will be less criticism.
> 
> Remember that we made Günter(?) Feierabend a committer, even without any 
> previous performance, because it was technically useful and I didn't 
> disagree, but rather actively endorsed the approach.
> 
> 
> and on the edge:
> freedom is, for me, typically evidenced by a variety of different opinions. 
> It may be that even under conditions of freedom everyone has the same 
> opinion, but that is rather atypical and typical for completely different 
> circumstances.
> 
> 
> greetings,
> Jörg
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


Re: New Committer: Detlef Nannen

2020-07-05 Thread Detlef Nannen
Jörg,

When you wrote to me in a private mail about this matter, I had asked you not 
to continue this discussion by using my name.
You have started this thread, then make sure that it is continued with a 
different title. I have had enough of my name being associated with your 
discussion. Please respect this.

— 
Detlef

> Am 05.07.2020 um 23:34 schrieb Jörg Schmidt :
> 
> Hello Michael, 
> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Dr. Michael Stehmann [mailto:anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de] 
>> Sent: Saturday, July 04, 2020 8:50 AM
>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: New Committer: Detlef Nannen
>> 
>> Hello Jan-Christian,
>> 
>>> Am 03.07.20 um 17:57 schrieb jan-christ...@wienandt.de:
>>> 
>>> I can speak my mind on my own.
>> 
>> That was also my guess.
>> 
>> And that means we do not need a "tribunus plebis".
> 
> When you make decisions, you should justify them meaningfully, then there 
> will be less criticism.
> 
> Remember that we made Günter(?) Feierabend a committer, even without any 
> previous performance, because it was technically useful and I didn't 
> disagree, but rather actively endorsed the approach.
> 
> 
> and on the edge:
> freedom is, for me, typically evidenced by a variety of different opinions. 
> It may be that even under conditions of freedom everyone has the same 
> opinion, but that is rather atypical and typical for completely different 
> circumstances.
> 
> 
> greetings,
> Jörg
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



RE: New Committer: Detlef Nannen

2020-07-05 Thread Jörg Schmidt
Hello Michael, 

> -Original Message-
> From: Dr. Michael Stehmann [mailto:anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de] 
> Sent: Saturday, July 04, 2020 8:50 AM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: New Committer: Detlef Nannen
> 
> Hello Jan-Christian,
> 
> Am 03.07.20 um 17:57 schrieb jan-christ...@wienandt.de:
> 
> > I can speak my mind on my own.
> 
> That was also my guess.
> 
> And that means we do not need a "tribunus plebis".

When you make decisions, you should justify them meaningfully, then there will 
be less criticism.

Remember that we made Günter(?) Feierabend a committer, even without any 
previous performance, because it was technically useful and I didn't disagree, 
but rather actively endorsed the approach.


and on the edge:
freedom is, for me, typically evidenced by a variety of different opinions. It 
may be that even under conditions of freedom everyone has the same opinion, but 
that is rather atypical and typical for completely different circumstances.


greetings,
Jörg


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: should we conduct a 20 year anniversary online conference / meetup?

2020-07-05 Thread Keith N. McKenna
On 7/5/2020 7:39 AM, Carl Marcum wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
> 
> On 7/4/20 5:52 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi Carl,
>>
>> Am 04.07.20 um 18:16 schrieb Carl Marcum:
>>> Hi Matthias,
>>>
>>> On 7/4/20 11:32 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
 Hi all,

 Bumping up this one again...

 Additionally, we have a virtual ApacheCon this year:
 https://apachecon.com/acna2020/
 What about some talks about our project?

 Regards,

  Matthias
>>> I would definitely attend an online meetup unless the time of day was
>>> in the middle of my night or something.
>> We should be able to find a time frame (on a weekend) that is suitable
>> for all timezones.
>>> I was planning to attend ApacheCon now that is virtual.
>> I will definitely try to follow as much content as possible.
>>> Doing presentations is definitely not my strongest ability but I have
>>> a topic I've been thinking about putting a presentation together for.
>>>
>>> I'm finishing up the documentation before I announce it on dev@ but
>>> I've finished an new extension to add Apache Groovy to AOO as a macro
>>> language and another extension that recreates most of the built-in
>>> macro examples in Groovy.
>>> The third project is the Groovy UNO project that I've updated after a
>>> long while.
>>>
>>> These are more AOO ecosystem and developer tool topics than directly
>>> project related so I'm not sure.
>> Sounds great!
>> Indeed, it is very specific for AOO so maybe it fits better for our own
>> meeting?
> 
> Yes that sounds good.
> 
> 
>> Regards,
>>
>>     Matthias
>>
> 
> Regards,
> Carl

Carl & Mathias;

you can treat this as just 2¢ but I think those talks would fit well in
either venue, or in both. Yes they are tools specific to AOO, but they
also demonstrate that we are also "good citizens" of the ASF as well and
were applicable we will utilize content from other ASF projects within
our own. Given that I see a place for those presentations at both
ApacheCon and our own meetup. Both of which I plan to attend this year!

Regards
Keith



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: should we conduct a 20 year anniversary online conference / meetup?

2020-07-05 Thread Carl Marcum

Hi Matthias,

On 7/4/20 5:52 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:

Hi Carl,

Am 04.07.20 um 18:16 schrieb Carl Marcum:

Hi Matthias,

On 7/4/20 11:32 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:

Hi all,

Bumping up this one again...

Additionally, we have a virtual ApacheCon this year:
https://apachecon.com/acna2020/
What about some talks about our project?

Regards,

     Matthias

I would definitely attend an online meetup unless the time of day was
in the middle of my night or something.

We should be able to find a time frame (on a weekend) that is suitable
for all timezones.

I was planning to attend ApacheCon now that is virtual.

I will definitely try to follow as much content as possible.

Doing presentations is definitely not my strongest ability but I have
a topic I've been thinking about putting a presentation together for.

I'm finishing up the documentation before I announce it on dev@ but
I've finished an new extension to add Apache Groovy to AOO as a macro
language and another extension that recreates most of the built-in
macro examples in Groovy.
The third project is the Groovy UNO project that I've updated after a
long while.

These are more AOO ecosystem and developer tool topics than directly
project related so I'm not sure.

Sounds great!
Indeed, it is very specific for AOO so maybe it fits better for our own
meeting?


Yes that sounds good.



Regards,

    Matthias



Regards,
Carl

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



[GitHub] [openoffice] leginee commented on pull request #89: Use std::vector instead of fixed-size array of cffLocal objects

2020-07-05 Thread GitBox


leginee commented on pull request #89:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/89#issuecomment-653869909


   @ardovm 
   I searched a bit for CFF on our opengrok site ( 
http://opengrok.openoffice.org/search?project=trunk&full=CFF&defs=&refs=&path=&hist=&type=&si=full
 ). And it looks like this is something to do with Fonts. Searching for fonts 
and CFF brought up this explanation:
   https://www.linotype.com/8120/the-difference-between-cff-and-ttf.html
   
   I am not sure. But there is a cff.cxx file which has some fixed Array. I 
guess that they are linked.
   HTH. I will check later for further analysis if I can dig more Information 
out.
   
   Sorry that we have to do a bit of R&D and I can not give you a steight 
answer. 



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Fixes for bootstrap?

2020-07-05 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Don, all

> On 07/05/2020 10:08 AM Don Lewis  wrote:
>  
> On  5 Jul, Pedro Lino wrote:

> > 1) wouldn't it make sense to update to the most recent version
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/extras/vigra/vigra-1.11.0-src-clean.tar.gz/md5/e86d096099ccc8f139b6c6fff7b7557e/
> > (Same as situation 4 below)
> 
> As I recall, recent versions of vigra require a C++11 compiler, which
> isn't available on some of our older platforms.

Thank you for the fast answer!

Best regards,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Fixes for bootstrap?

2020-07-05 Thread Don Lewis
On  5 Jul, Pedro Lino wrote:
> Hi Matthias
> 
>> On 07/04/2020 10:55 PM Matthias Seidel  wrote:
> 
>> Am 04.07.20 um 21:55 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> 
>> > download from 
>> > http://hci.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de/vigra-old-versions/vigra1.6.0.tar.gz 
>> > failed (404 Not Found)
>> > download failed
>> >
>> > This folder no longer exists. Is this link declared somewhere in the build 
>> > system and could be corrected?
>> 
>> Fixed now, see:
>> 
>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/1f9c906e3dac41500b42db556cb26ed2c78558e0
> 
> Excellent! This raises three additional questions: 
> 
> 1) wouldn't it make sense to update to the most recent version
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/extras/vigra/vigra-1.11.0-src-clean.tar.gz/md5/e86d096099ccc8f139b6c6fff7b7557e/
> (Same as situation 4 below)

As I recall, recent versions of vigra require a C++11 compiler, which
isn't available on some of our older platforms.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Fixes for bootstrap?

2020-07-05 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias

> On 07/05/2020 9:41 AM Matthias Seidel  wrote:
> 
> Am 05.07.20 um 01:35 schrieb Pedro Lino:

> > 1) wouldn't it make sense to update to the most recent version
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/extras/vigra/vigra-1.11.0-src-clean.tar.gz/md5/e86d096099ccc8f139b6c6fff7b7557e/
> > (Same as situation 4 below)
> 
> Remember, I am not a developer! ;-)
> 
> But it is not done with simply downloading a newer version, most likely
> the build must be adapted and patches changed...

I do remember. Neither am I ;)
Maybe someone on this mailing list who is a developer can have a look into this 
and the jpeg v9d?

And maybe he/she can also provide some feedback on Situations 2 and 3 below?
 
> > 2) Can I approve your commit?
> I don't understand this one. My commit is in, I have write access on Git.

I saw some changes were approved by other people. Since this is a simple url 
switch I could approve it

> > 3) How can this be cherry picked to branch 4.2.x ?
> 
> I have already cherry-picked it for AOO42X.

Excellent. I will do a git pull origin AOO42X ;)

Regards,
Pedro

> > What about situations 2 and 3?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Pedro
> >
> >>> Second situation:
> >>>
> >>> Many libraries are downloaded from sourceforge (which frequently has 
> >>> mirror issues). Couldn't these libraries be hosted on the AOO server?
> >>>
> >>> E.g.
> >>> download from 
> >>> https://sourceforge.net/projects/dejavu/files/dejavu/2.37/dejavu-fonts-ttf-2.37.tar.bz2
> >>>  failed (302 Found)
> >>> download failed
> >>> download from 
> >>> https://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost/1.55.0/boost_1_55_0.tar.bz2
> >>>  failed (302 Found)
> >>> etc
> >>>
> >>> Third situation:
> >>>
> >>> Downloaded modules checksums are not verified
> >>>
> >>> downloading dmake-4.12.tar.bz2
> >>> downloading to /source/openoffice/ext_sources/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2.part
> >>> checksum not given, md5 of file is 266d817492d8259a640fad075461080e
> >>> downloading epm-3.7.tar.gz
> >>> downloading to /source/openoffice/ext_sources/epm-3.7.tar.gz.part
> >>> checksum not given, md5 of file is 3ade8cfe7e59ca8e65052644fed9fca4
> >>>
> >>> Can this be added? All other modules are verified
> >>>
> >>> Fourth situation:
> >>>
> >>> downloading to 
> >>> /source/openoffice/ext_sources/52654eb3b2e60c35731ea8fc87f1bd29-jpeg-8d.tar.gz.part
> >>> MD5 checksum is OK
> >>>
> >>> The current version is jpegsrc.v9d.tar.gz
> >>>
> >>> Would it make sense to update to this version for branch 42X? version 8d 
> >>> is from Jan 2012 and 9d from Jan 2020
> >>>
> >>> Thanks!
> >>> Pedro
> >>>
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Fixes for bootstrap?

2020-07-05 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Pedro,

Am 05.07.20 um 01:35 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> Hi Matthias
>
>> On 07/04/2020 10:55 PM Matthias Seidel  wrote:
>> Am 04.07.20 um 21:55 schrieb Pedro Lino:
>>> download from 
>>> http://hci.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de/vigra-old-versions/vigra1.6.0.tar.gz 
>>> failed (404 Not Found)
>>> download failed
>>>
>>> This folder no longer exists. Is this link declared somewhere in the build 
>>> system and could be corrected?
>> Fixed now, see:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/1f9c906e3dac41500b42db556cb26ed2c78558e0
> Excellent! This raises three additional questions: 
>
> 1) wouldn't it make sense to update to the most recent version
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/extras/vigra/vigra-1.11.0-src-clean.tar.gz/md5/e86d096099ccc8f139b6c6fff7b7557e/
> (Same as situation 4 below)

Remember, I am not a developer! ;-)

But it is not done with simply downloading a newer version, most likely
the build must be adapted and patches changed...

> Could I just go into github and fix occurrences of jpeg-8d to jpeg-9d (also 
> fixing the md5)?
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/search?q=jpeg-8d&unscoped_q=jpeg-8d
See above.
>
> 2) Can I approve your commit?
I don't understand this one. My commit is in, I have write access on Git.
> 3) How can this be cherry picked to branch 4.2.x ?

I have already cherry-picked it for AOO42X.

Regards,

   Matthias

>
> What about situations 2 and 3?
>
> Regards,
> Pedro
>
>>> Second situation:
>>>
>>> Many libraries are downloaded from sourceforge (which frequently has mirror 
>>> issues). Couldn't these libraries be hosted on the AOO server?
>>>
>>> E.g.
>>> download from 
>>> https://sourceforge.net/projects/dejavu/files/dejavu/2.37/dejavu-fonts-ttf-2.37.tar.bz2
>>>  failed (302 Found)
>>> download failed
>>> download from 
>>> https://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost/1.55.0/boost_1_55_0.tar.bz2
>>>  failed (302 Found)
>>> etc
>>>
>>> Third situation:
>>>
>>> Downloaded modules checksums are not verified
>>>
>>> downloading dmake-4.12.tar.bz2
>>> downloading to /source/openoffice/ext_sources/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2.part
>>> checksum not given, md5 of file is 266d817492d8259a640fad075461080e
>>> downloading epm-3.7.tar.gz
>>> downloading to /source/openoffice/ext_sources/epm-3.7.tar.gz.part
>>> checksum not given, md5 of file is 3ade8cfe7e59ca8e65052644fed9fca4
>>>
>>> Can this be added? All other modules are verified
>>>
>>> Fourth situation:
>>>
>>> downloading to 
>>> /source/openoffice/ext_sources/52654eb3b2e60c35731ea8fc87f1bd29-jpeg-8d.tar.gz.part
>>> MD5 checksum is OK
>>>
>>> The current version is jpegsrc.v9d.tar.gz
>>>
>>> Would it make sense to update to this version for branch 42X? version 8d is 
>>> from Jan 2012 and 9d from Jan 2020
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> Pedro
>>>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature