On 24 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
>
>> On 08/24/2020 3:18 PM Don Lewis wrote:
>
>> Is this a parallel build? Has the offuh module been built and
>> delivered? Seems oa little dd that offuh is not listed as a dependency
>> in sax/prj/build.lst, but it is listed as a dependency of cppuhelper and
>>
On 24 Aug, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 24 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
>> Hi Don, all
>>
>>> On 08/24/2020 3:18 PM Don Lewis wrote:
>>
>>> Is this a parallel build?
>>
>> Switched to single thread building
>>
>> build --all
>>
>> when it stopped I followed the suggestion by Rigo and deleted
>> /source/op
DonLewisFreeBSD merged pull request #93:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/93
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
On 24 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
> Hi Don, all
>
>> On 08/24/2020 3:18 PM Don Lewis wrote:
>
>> Is this a parallel build?
>
> Switched to single thread building
>
> build --all
>
> when it stopped I followed the suggestion by Rigo and deleted
> /source/openoffice/main/solver/418/unxlngx6.pro/lib/
Hi Jim
> On 08/18/2020 12:09 PM Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>
> Should we think of doing a 4.1.8 beta?
Can you please provide some Linux builds (Beta or not) to test the recent
improvements?
Unfortunately I can not compile branch 418 under Ubuntu 18.04 x64
Thanks!
Pedro
--
On 24 Aug, Carl Marcum wrote:
> Hi Don,
>
> On 8/23/20 2:58 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>> On 23 Aug, Carl Marcum wrote:
>>> I'm setting up a new CentOS 5.5 VM that I can build 4.1.x series on.
>>>
>>> First hurdle was figuring out out how to point to the vault.centos.org
>>> archived rpms.
>>> Unfortuna
Hi Don
> On 08/24/2020 4:58 PM Don Lewis wrote:
> The actual error should show up as "error: " in the build output.
The error messages and compiling stop at a completely different step on each
run even if I do a dmake clean and repeat the exact same 3 steps.
Adding --enable-verbose did not ma
On 24 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
> Hi Don, all
>
>> On 08/24/2020 3:18 PM Don Lewis wrote:
>
>> Is this a parallel build?
>
> Switched to single thread building
>
> build --all
>
> when it stopped I followed the suggestion by Rigo and deleted
> /source/openoffice/main/solver/418/unxlngx6.pro/lib/
On 24 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
> Hi Don, all
>
>> On 08/24/2020 3:18 PM Don Lewis wrote:
>
>> Is this a parallel build?
>
> Switched to single thread building
>
> build --all
>
> when it stopped I followed the suggestion by Rigo and deleted
> /source/openoffice/main/solver/418/unxlngx6.pro/lib/
Hi Don, all
> On 08/24/2020 3:18 PM Don Lewis wrote:
> Is this a parallel build?
Switched to single thread building
build --all
when it stopped I followed the suggestion by Rigo and deleted
/source/openoffice/main/solver/418/unxlngx6.pro/lib/libgcc_s.so.1
and restarted with build --all:icu
> On 08/24/2020 3:18 PM Don Lewis wrote:
> Is this a parallel build? Has the offuh module been built and
> delivered? Seems oa little dd that offuh is not listed as a dependency
> in sax/prj/build.lst, but it is listed as a dependency of cppuhelper and
> cppuhelper is listed as a dependency
Hi Don,
Am 24.08.20 um 04:04 schrieb Don Lewis:
> I've got a bunch of cherry picks that I'm planning to merge into AOO418.
> There are two categories:
> * Fixes from the FreeBSD port that have been upstreamed to the trunk
> and AOO42X branches, but I'm still carrying around in the FreeBSD
>
On 24 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
> Ciao Rigo
>
>> > /source/openoffice/main/solver/418/unxlngx6.pro/lib/libgcc_s.so.1: invalid
>> > ELF header
>> >
>
> Now it stopped at expat, but the issue was the same: libgcc_s.so.1: invalid
> ELF header
>
>> > I'm wondering why there is a copy of libgcc_s.so.
Ciao Rigo
> > /source/openoffice/main/solver/418/unxlngx6.pro/lib/libgcc_s.so.1: invalid
> > ELF header
> >
Now it stopped at expat, but the issue was the same: libgcc_s.so.1: invalid ELF
header
> > I'm wondering why there is a copy of libgcc_s.so.1 here. That should be
> > a system library.
Hello All,
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 12:13:49PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 21 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
> > Hi Don
> >
> >> Hmn, I don't know about the extras failure, but all of the other errors
> >> are failures to build various third party packages that we bundle. This
> >> should be independent
On 24 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
> Hi Don, all
>
> I'm still trying to compile 418 on Ubuntu 18.04 x64
> I updated the 418 code but I get stuck at module graphite with the following
> error (log file at https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/config.log)
>
> Any ideas?
The error is happening during the co
On 24 Aug, Carl Marcum wrote:
> Hi Don,
>
> On 8/23/20 2:58 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>> On 23 Aug, Carl Marcum wrote:
>>> I'm setting up a new CentOS 5.5 VM that I can build 4.1.x series on.
>>>
>>> First hurdle was figuring out out how to point to the vault.centos.org
>>> archived rpms.
>>> Unfortuna
Hi Don, all
I'm still trying to compile 418 on Ubuntu 18.04 x64
I updated the 418 code but I get stuck at module graphite with the following
error (log file at https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/config.log)
Any ideas?
Thanks!
configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
See `config.log
Hi Don,
On 8/23/20 2:58 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
On 23 Aug, Carl Marcum wrote:
I'm setting up a new CentOS 5.5 VM that I can build 4.1.x series on.
First hurdle was figuring out out how to point to the vault.centos.org
archived rpms.
Unfortunately no git was available then.
Was this done for the
19 matches
Mail list logo
