I've had some things pop up so I'm just starting the test4 build now... this
will be on 27aafff9ac690db20ff7d9edf69a595216b2386e (right before the libxml
updates)
> On Oct 22, 2020, at 5:51 PM, André Pereira wrote:
>
> I can confirm test3 open documents without any error messages on Debian
Am 23.10.20 um 00:25 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
What I understand is that Peter wants to contribute the code to Apache
OpenOffice:
"It can be used as an alternative input language for your math editor."
We can already import MathML from the clipboard, so maybe this could
enhance Math in form of
Hi Marcus,
What I understand is that Peter wants to contribute the code to Apache
OpenOffice:
"It can be used as an alternative input language for your math editor."
We can already import MathML from the clipboard, so maybe this could
enhance Math in form of an extension?
Regards,
Matthias
Hi Peter,
thanks for your interest in Apache. Please note that Apache is more than
just OpenOffice. ;-)
Therefore please get in contact with the Incubator team [1] and read
about a need proposal [2] when you want to contribute your code to
Apache in general.
Thanks for your understanding.
I can confirm test3 open documents without any error messages on Debian 10.
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 4:22 PM Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Yep!
>
> > On Oct 22, 2020, at 3:11 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
> >
> > Confirmed!
> >
> > So we are now at August 22nd?
> >
> > Am 22.10.20 um 21:04 schrieb Jim
Yep!
> On Oct 22, 2020, at 3:11 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Confirmed!
>
> So we are now at August 22nd?
>
> Am 22.10.20 um 21:04 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Wow. I had just uploaded test3 ! :)
>>
>>
>>> On Oct 22, 2020, at 2:53 PM, Pedro Lino
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Jim
>>>
>>> Good
Confirmed!
So we are now at August 22nd?
Am 22.10.20 um 21:04 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Wow. I had just uploaded test3 ! :)
>
>
>> On Oct 22, 2020, at 2:53 PM, Pedro Lino
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jim
>>
>> Good news!
>> Test 3 has no problems and check for Update also works (it didn't in test2)
>>
>>
Wow. I had just uploaded test3 ! :)
> On Oct 22, 2020, at 2:53 PM, Pedro Lino
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim
>
> Good news!
> Test 3 has no problems and check for Update also works (it didn't in test2)
>
> Apparentely we have a good one! :)
>
> (Downloading at 500Mbit means 3 seconds to download
Hi Jim
Good news!
Test 3 has no problems and check for Update also works (it didn't in test2)
Apparentely we have a good one! :)
(Downloading at 500Mbit means 3 seconds to download 150MB :) )
Regards,
Pedro
> On 10/22/2020 5:58 PM Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>
> YEAH! I am now building from
YEAH! I am now building from 21aebe28dbe5d985add2fadc46e6217b148303bb which is
right after the OpenSLL upgrade(s). If test3, to be provided ASAP, fails, then
we know the problem. If not, I'll start a full git bisect with
21aebe28dbe5d985add2fadc46e6217b148303bb as 'git bisect good'
> On Oct
Hi Jim,
test2 is OK for me.
Am 22.10.20 um 18:33 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Via
>
> http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/
>
>> On Oct 22, 2020, at 10:38 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>> OK... just did a co of 787546a0bd53c78489200311961fb621d00e1e69. This is
>> before the openssl upgrade and
Via
http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/
> On Oct 22, 2020, at 10:38 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> OK... just did a co of 787546a0bd53c78489200311961fb621d00e1e69. This is
> before the openssl upgrade and is dated Aug 12, 2020. Give me a few hours and
> we'll see if this one works.
>
But 4.1.x is specifically targeted for older hardware... Anyway, this all may
be moot and that change matters not a whit. I'm just going through all commits
that touch Linux, no matter how softly.
> On Oct 22, 2020, at 11:27 AM, Don Lewis wrote:
>
> On 22 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
On 22 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Regarding this commit:
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/8d4c92f789718b2f73ea62d487811a0c9d476739
>
> why the change
>
> - CONFIGURE_ACTION=Configure linux-generic64
> + CONFIGURE_ACTION=Configure linux-x86_64 no-dso no-shared $(NO_ASM)
Hi Jim,
Am 22.10.20 um 16:42 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Regarding this commit:
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/8d4c92f789718b2f73ea62d487811a0c9d476739
>
> why the change
>
> - CONFIGURE_ACTION=Configure linux-generic64
> + CONFIGURE_ACTION=Configure linux-x86_64 no-dso
Regarding this commit:
https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/8d4c92f789718b2f73ea62d487811a0c9d476739
why the change
- CONFIGURE_ACTION=Configure linux-generic64
+ CONFIGURE_ACTION=Configure linux-x86_64 no-dso no-shared $(NO_ASM)
that seems a major change to how we build
OK... just did a co of 787546a0bd53c78489200311961fb621d00e1e69. This is before
the openssl upgrade and is dated Aug 12, 2020. Give me a few hours and we'll
see if this one works.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
I don't know...
All I can say is that the error still occurs.
But let's wait for some others to test.
Am 22.10.20 um 16:32 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Well, it wouldn't, would it? It's a checkout of an old snapshot in the tree.
>
>> On Oct 22, 2020, at 10:25 AM, Matthias Seidel
>> wrote:
>>
>>
Well, it wouldn't, would it? It's a checkout of an old snapshot in the tree.
> On Oct 22, 2020, at 10:25 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Still "General Error"
>
> However, I really don't trust this one. ;-)
> It even hasn't got the 20th anniversary logo.
>
> Time for a clean build based on
Still "General Error"
However, I really don't trust this one. ;-)
It even hasn't got the 20th anniversary logo.
Time for a clean build based on
https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/0fcbebe32b625eb8407ad802b613e5da54be96c3
?
Am 22.10.20 um 16:10 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> With that in
With that in mind, can you test the ones marked "en_US-test1.".. Thx!
> On Oct 22, 2020, at 9:53 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> The ID part is due to how git co works, and how we are grabbing some various
> details... it's OK.
>
> Thx for the quick test... I have an idea that the issue may be
The ID part is due to how git co works, and how we are grabbing some various
details... it's OK.
Thx for the quick test... I have an idea that the issue may be w/ nss and that
hardware acceleration stuff.
> On Oct 22, 2020, at 9:43 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> I have now installed:
>
>
I have now installed:
https://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.8_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US-24fc9f6e46.tar.gz
However, for me it identifies as:
AOO417m1(Build:9801) - Rev. a67c1b1833
2020-10-21 14:23 - Linux x86_64
Something is wrong here?
BTW: The "General Error"
These builds are now available via:
http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/
Thx again for testing!
> On Oct 22, 2020, at 6:02 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> OK, great! So we know now it's not a build system issue. I am starting a git
> bisect triage, starting with co 24fc9f6e46. I hope to
Hello,
I'm interested in contributing the source code of my application to Apache. The
application name is LTX2MathML, which converts a subset of LaTeX math to
MathML. It is written in C++. It can be used as an alternative input language
for your math editor.
I have just uploaded it to CTAN
And thanks to you Jim for your hard work as well!!
On 10/22/20 6:02 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
OK, great! So we know now it's not a build system issue. I am starting a git
bisect triage, starting with co 24fc9f6e46. I hope to have a test build ready
in a couple hours.
If I haven't mentioned
Hi Don,
Am 22.10.20 um 07:55 schrieb Don Lewis:
> On 22 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> Am 21.10.20 um 20:48 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> In the meantime, please review
>>> main/writerfilter/source/doctok/resources.xsl on trunk and AOO42X
>> Windows Buildbot (AOO42X) just stopped with
OK, great! So we know now it's not a build system issue. I am starting a git
bisect triage, starting with co 24fc9f6e46. I hope to have a test build ready
in a couple hours.
If I haven't mentioned already THANK YOU for everyone taking their time out to
test these builds..!
> On Oct 21, 2020,
Hi Don
> On 10/22/2020 9:30 AM Don Lewis wrote:
> If I build the same git revision of AOO418 on Ubuntu 16, then install
> and run it there, I do *not* see the General Error problem.
Can you please post a link to the tar.gz to test if installing on Ubuntu 18.04
has problems?
Thanks!
Pedro
On 21 Oct, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 21 Oct, Don Lewis wrote:
>> On 21 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Oct 21, 2020, at 4:21 PM, Andrea Pescetti
wrote:
It looks like we are getting closer I mean, we have a commit that
is only relevant to CentOS 5 and we know that
Thanks to respond on this mailing list and not directly to me.
Could you host a sample document to reproduce?
- Mail original -
> De: "Delio Orozco Gonzalez"
> À: "dev" , ooofo...@free.fr
> Envoyé: Jeudi 22 Octobre 2020 01:03:32
> Objet: Re: Test to
On 21 Oct, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 21 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Oct 21, 2020, at 4:21 PM, Andrea Pescetti
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> It looks like we are getting closer I mean, we have a commit that
>>> is only relevant to CentOS 5 and we know that Jim's builds are done
>>> on CentOS 5
32 matches
Mail list logo
