Hi Keith,
On 6/12/21 4:28 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
On 2021-06-12 09:13, Carl Marcum wrote:
Hi All,
cc'd qa@
I think it would be good to rework the test framework to not require
having just built the office.
Currently, to compile and run the tests, there are dependencies on
environment
On 2021-06-12 09:13, Carl Marcum wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> cc'd qa@
>
> I think it would be good to rework the test framework to not require
> having just built the office.
>
> Currently, to compile and run the tests, there are dependencies on
> environment settings created and files built into
Hello Matthias, all,
On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 08:00:52PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Pedro,
>
> Am 12.06.21 um 19:55 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> > Hi Carl
> >
> >> On 06/12/2021 6:45 PM Carl Marcum wrote:
> >> There is now a PR #132 if you're able to test it.
> > What do you mean test the PR?
Hi Pedro,
Am 12.06.21 um 19:55 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> Hi Carl
>
>> On 06/12/2021 6:45 PM Carl Marcum wrote:
>> There is now a PR #132 if you're able to test it.
> What do you mean test the PR? I already tested the resulting binary...
The Windows binary... ;-)
>
> The only action available for me
Hi Carl
> On 06/12/2021 6:45 PM Carl Marcum wrote:
> There is now a PR #132 if you're able to test it.
What do you mean test the PR? I already tested the resulting binary...
The only action available for me at github is "Merge pull request" :)
Cheers,
Pedro
Hi Pedro,
On 6/12/21 11:41 AM, Pedro Lino wrote:
Hi Carl, all
On 06/12/2021 2:13 PM Carl Marcum wrote:
The one big thing about this would be it would require a tester to have
the SDK installed in the office under test.
I think this is a much lower bar than building the office to get them.
Hi Pedro,
On 6/12/21 12:22 PM, Pedro Lino wrote:
Hi Carl, all
On 06/12/2021 2:47 AM Carl Marcum wrote:
Can anyone on windows confirm with the file [1]?
[1] http://home.apache.org/~cmarcum/hyperlink-tests/hyperlink-test-doc.odt
I confirm Francis' findings on AOO 4.1.11 running on Windows 7
Hi Carl, all
> On 06/12/2021 2:47 AM Carl Marcum wrote:
> Can anyone on windows confirm with the file [1]?
> [1] http://home.apache.org/~cmarcum/hyperlink-tests/hyperlink-test-doc.odt
I confirm Francis' findings on AOO 4.1.11 running on Windows 7 x64.
There is no problem reopening the
Hi Carl, all
> On 06/12/2021 2:13 PM Carl Marcum wrote:
> The one big thing about this would be it would require a tester to have
> the SDK installed in the office under test.
> I think this is a much lower bar than building the office to get them.
>
> Does anyone have an opinion one way or
I can't build the AOO from source on modern
linux system with gcc 10 for some time now,
maybe for two months, because of an issue with
boost.
In modules: xml2cmp and cosv (whichever's
reached first) I get the following:
Hi Arrigo,
On 6/12/21 9:25 AM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
Hello Carl, All,
On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 09:13:13AM -0400, Carl Marcum wrote:
Hi All,
cc'd qa@
I think it would be good to rework the test framework to not require having
just built the office.
It sounds like a very good idea to me.
Hello Carl, All,
On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 09:13:13AM -0400, Carl Marcum wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> cc'd qa@
>
> I think it would be good to rework the test framework to not require having
> just built the office.
It sounds like a very good idea to me.
> Currently, to compile and run the tests,
Hi All,
cc'd qa@
I think it would be good to rework the test framework to not require
having just built the office.
Currently, to compile and run the tests, there are dependencies on
environment settings created and files built into main/solver/.
Mostly things like idlc, regmerge, and
Hi Arrigo,
Am 12.06.21 um 15:01 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
> Hello all,
>
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 01:42:19PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>
>> Hi Carl,
>>
>> Am 12.06.21 um 13:26 schrieb Carl Marcum:
>>> Hi Matthias,
>>>
>>> On 6/12/21 5:10 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Hi Carl, all,
Hello all,
On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 01:42:19PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Carl,
>
> Am 12.06.21 um 13:26 schrieb Carl Marcum:
> > Hi Matthias,
> >
> > On 6/12/21 5:10 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> >> Hi Carl, all,
> >>
> >> Tests look great and we should think about merging the fix into
Hi Carl,
Am 12.06.21 um 13:26 schrieb Carl Marcum:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On 6/12/21 5:10 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi Carl, all,
>>
>> Tests look great and we should think about merging the fix into the
>> official AOO4111 branch.
> Yes merge it in AOO41X and branch from it.
>
> Yes I think it's
Hi Matthias,
On 6/12/21 5:10 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Hi Carl, all,
Tests look great and we should think about merging the fix into the
official AOO4111 branch.
Yes merge it in AOO41X and branch from it.
Yes I think it's ready for trunk and AOO42X also.
Maybe we wait for the other two
Hi Francis,
On 6/11/21 11:31 PM, F Campos Costero wrote:
I downloaded the test document and tried the links using 4.1.10. I saw the
expected warnings. Closing the file and reopening via the drop down list on
the Open button worked with no problem. I then installed the 4.1.11 linked
above
Hi Carl, all,
Tests look great and we should think about merging the fix into the
official AOO4111 branch.
Additionally we could need test builds for mac and Linux.
Regards,
Matthias
Am 12.06.21 um 03:47 schrieb Carl Marcum:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On 6/11/21 6:19 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>
19 matches
Mail list logo
