Re: epm 5 not compiling on FreeBSD 13

2021-07-20 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi, I would have expected that someone creates a pull request? ;-) https://github.com/jimjag/epm Regards,    Matthias Am 08.07.21 um 07:53 schrieb Peter Kovacs: > Aye, Jim has taken over from the original author as maintainer. Plus he has > the FreeBSD changes saved as an additional patch. >

Re: catalina branch waiting for reviews

2021-07-20 Thread Arrigo Marchiori
Hello Jim, On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 11:19:16AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: > I thought that more recent systems were what the 4.2.x... branch was for. Yes, but an attempt to build today's stable AOO (i.e. 4.1.10) on today's hardware is probably the first thing a new developer would try. Or, at

Re: Some observations about AOO 4.1.10 and Windows 10 Pro 21H1

2021-07-20 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi all, Am 20.07.21 um 14:45 schrieb Rony G. Flatscher (Apache): > On 17.07.2021 10:42, Jörg Schmidt wrote: >> 2. >> JRE 1.8.0_291 is not recognized by OO and cannot be activated - even if I >> first install JRE and then AOO it is like this. >> (In the forum http://de.openoffice.info it is

RE: Some observations about AOO 4.1.10 and Windows 10 Pro 21H1

2021-07-20 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> -Original Message- > From: Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) [mailto:r...@apache.org] > Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2021 2:46 PM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Some observations about AOO 4.1.10 and Windows > 10 Pro 21H1 > > On 17.07.2021 10:42, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > > 2. > >

RE: Some observations about AOO 4.1.10 and Windows 10 Pro 21H1

2021-07-20 Thread Jörg Schmidt
Hello Mechtilde, > -Original Message- > From: Mechtilde [mailto:o...@mechtilde.de] > Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2021 3:02 PM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Some observations about AOO 4.1.10 and Windows > 10 Pro 21H1 > > Hello Jörg, > > please look under C:\Programme

Re: catalina branch waiting for reviews [Was: [Mini] Setup of development environment]

2021-07-20 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Jim, Am 20.07.21 um 17:21 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > >> On Jul 19, 2021, at 10:26 AM, Matthias Seidel >> wrote: >> >> Hi Jim, >> >> People need macOS builds more frequently to test. >> > Agreed. But every time I seem to encourage a test macOS build, it seems that > people want to hold off...

Re: catalina branch waiting for reviews [Was: [Mini] Setup of development environment]

2021-07-20 Thread Jim Jagielski
> On Jul 19, 2021, at 10:26 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > People need macOS builds more frequently to test. > Agreed. But every time I seem to encourage a test macOS build, it seems that people want to hold off...

Re: catalina branch waiting for reviews

2021-07-20 Thread Jim Jagielski
I thought that more recent systems were what the 4.2.x... branch was for. > On Jul 19, 2021, at 10:46 AM, Arrigo Marchiori > wrote: > > Hello Jim, > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 10:14:03AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> What is wrong w/ using the build stuff that we have used for years? > >

Re: Some observations about AOO 4.1.10 and Windows 10 Pro 21H1

2021-07-20 Thread Mechtilde
Hello Jörg, please look under C:\Programme (c86) or the corresponding directory for a directory java. Maybe the JRE is in anther directory depending where you get the windows binary from. Kind regards Mechtilde Am 19.07.21 um 16:55 schrieb Jörg Schmidt: > Hello, > >> -Original

Re: Some observations about AOO 4.1.10 and Windows 10 Pro 21H1

2021-07-20 Thread Rony G. Flatscher (Apache)
On 17.07.2021 10:42, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > 2. > JRE 1.8.0_291 is not recognized by OO and cannot be activated - even if I > first install JRE and then AOO it is like this. > (In the forum http://de.openoffice.info it is however reported by a user that > he uses 1.8.0_291 in AOO 4.1.10, perhaps

Re: Ubuntu 21.04 / dark mode

2021-07-20 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi all, It seems Windows 11 will also have dark mode as default: https://www.windowscentral.com/windows-11-will-enable-dark-mode-default-more-pcs So, starting to work on a new icon set would be great! Regards,    Matthias Am 13.06.21 um 09:51 schrieb Dean.Webber: > Yes, best to avoid Google