Re: Nightly Builds

2023-01-26 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 3:14 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > > Four weeks are a good period to have archived if a regression occurs. > > No. For old regressions, or to discover old fixes, we ideally want a build from every month in AOO's history.

Re: Nightly Builds

2023-01-26 Thread Marcus
Am 26.01.23 um 16:49 schrieb Carl Marcum: On 1/26/23 10:09 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: I think we can all agree on a 4 week  (30 days) period for archiving the binaries? 4 weeks max seems fine to me. for me also, when the build is always done, independent of a commit. And if possible only

Re: Nightly Builds

2023-01-26 Thread Carl Marcum
Hi Matthias and All, On 1/26/23 10:09 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi all, I think we can all agree on a 4 week  (30 days) period for archiving the binaries? 4 weeks max seems fine to me. And if possible only build one if there was a commit. For Linux I build my own anyway. I really need mac

Re: Nightly Builds

2023-01-26 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi all, I think we can all agree on a 4 week  (30 days) period for archiving the binaries? Looking at: https://nightlies.apache.org/openoffice/install/linux64/?C=M;O=D we should also think about shortening the filenames. For example the Git hash could be reduced to the first 10 digits.

Re: Forums: BBcode for [rel] links broken

2023-01-26 Thread Bidouille
[rel] is not a standard BBcode It would take someone with enough karma to go modify it in the ACP. - Mail original - > De: "Hagar Delest" > À: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Envoyé: Mercredi 25 Janvier 2023 21:54:28 > Objet: Re: Forums: BBcode for [rel] links broken > > Hi, > > I saw that