Re: is it possible to build trunk with system OpenSSL?

Hi, Thanks for answering. What fails in IMPL_LINK( SvxSecurityTabPage, MacroSecPBHdl, void*, EMPTYARG ) is that check: if ( xD.is() ) And the xD object is non-null at that. Somehow I can't set a breakpoint to that IMPL_LINK call. Neither variants with SvxSecurityTabPage:: nor

Re: is it possible to build trunk with system OpenSSL?

On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 6:53 AM Yury Tarasievich wrote: > Hi all, > > Regarding the matter in the Subject, I've found > I can just build with internal OpenSSL (which's > rather old, btw), then rename libcrypto.so and > libssl.so, and so actually use the system libraries. > > But as to why I

Re: is it possible to build trunk with system OpenSSL?

On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 6:52 PM Yury Tarasievich wrote: > Hi, > > Yeah, the linux build. AFAIU the build process > is a bit wilful, maybe it's fluking again. > > I am pretty sure I've always used --with-system-openssl on FreeBSD successfully, but I am retrying from a clean build now. And it's

Re: is it possible to build trunk with system OpenSSL?

Hi, Yeah, the linux build. AFAIU the build process is a bit wilful, maybe it's fluking again. Anyway, I sort of went around the issue, but what about macros security button (see my neighbouring post)?? What does it want, a new set of certificates, or what? I literally lose half of my

Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.15-RC2 as GA

Hi All, The Release Candidate is good for production/GA: [X] yes / +1 [ ] no / -1 My vote is based on: [X] binding (member of PMC) [X] I have built and tested the RC from source on Windows 10 64-bit en-US (full) [X] I have tested the binary RC on Windows 7 and 11 (both

Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.15-RC2 as GA

Hi all The Release Candidate is good for production/GA: [x] yes / +1 [ ] no / -1 My vote is based on: [x] binding (member of PMC) [x] I have built and tested the RC from source on platform [Linux Ubuntu 18.04 x64] [x] I have tested the binary RC

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.15-RC2 as GA

Hi Czesław, Am 07.12.23 um 17:13 schrieb Czesław Wolański: Hi All, The Release Candidate is good for production/GA: [X] yes / +1 [ ] no / -1 My vote is based on: [X] binding (member of PMC) [X] I have built and tested the RC from source on Windows 10 64-bit en-US

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.15-RC2 as GA

Hi All, The Release Candidate is good for production/GA: [X] yes / +1 [ ] no / -1 My vote is based on: [X] binding (member of PMC) [X] I have built and tested the RC from source on Windows 10 64-bit en-US (full) [X] I have tested the binary RC on Windows 7 and 11 (both

Re: Pootle Server Update

FYI: I disabled CouchDB now... Regards,    Matthias Am 26.11.23 um 18:25 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Hi Dave, All, Did you get any (offline) reaction from JMeter or CouchDB? I see that Subversion is interested in some translated strings, so we should keep it for the moment. Regards,   

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.15-RC2 as GA

Hi Marcus, Am 06.12.23 um 19:12 schrieb Marcus: To push this topic: I'll find time for testing on Friday or Saturday. What about others? And we still have open tasks (even for the easiest things) in our Release Schedule: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.15 Is

Re: Extension and publish

Hi, Am 07.12.23 um 10:39 schrieb Bidouille: FYI unable to upload an OXT hosting on SF I got an error The website encountered an unexpected error. Please try again later. Sorry, I cannot help you here, please contact the SourceForge Help Desk. BTW: Did you test AOO 4.1.15-RC2? Some people

Re: Extension and publish

FYI unable to upload an OXT hosting on SF I got an error The website encountered an unexpected error. Please try again later. - Mail original - > De: "Matthias Seidel" > À: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Envoyé: Mercredi 6 Décembre 2023 17:04:45 > Objet: Re: Extension and publish > >