Still waiting on 4.1.10 to show up on
https://archive.apache.org/dist/openoffice/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
on-route...
> On Apr 29, 2021, at 2:44 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Am 29.04.21 um 20:38 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Still waiting on 4.1.10 to show up on
>> https://archive.ap
All AOO 4.1.10 artifacts have been uploaded to both the ASF's release repo as
well as SF.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
The VOTE is scheduled to close today... anyone opposed if I keep it open for
another 24-48 hours?
> On Apr 25, 2021, at 4:15 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community
> builds of
> Apache OpenOffice 4
I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community builds
of
Apache OpenOffice 4.1.10-RC2 as GA.
These artifacts can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.10-RC2/
Please cast your vote:
The Release Candidate is good for production/GA:
[ ]
Well... it takes *time* to do the release, since there are uploads, and sync,
etc...
> On Apr 28, 2021, at 1:12 PM, Marcus wrote:
>
> Am 28.04.21 um 13:47 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> The VOTE is scheduled to close today... anyone opposed if I keep it open for
>>
As noted elsewhere, I use CentOS7 for our 4.2.X/trunk Linux 64 bit builds.
> On May 1, 2021, at 5:35 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127513
>
> Should this Issue not be adjusted?
>
>
> All the best
>
> Peter
>
> --
> This is the Way!
Anyone tried building HEAD of AOO42X w/ Java8 (or later) and
Apache Ant 1.10?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
For me, the issue seemed to be this code chunk in scripting/java/build.xml
Previously, the java.version was 1.7 which made trying to build break when
using Java8 on the mac. Since the above edit, all proceeds fine. No doubt,
there is a more
Carl, on what platform? TIA.
> On Feb 11, 2021, at 6:26 AM, Carl Marcum wrote:
>
> On 2/9/21 6:39 PM, Carl Marcum wrote:
>> On 2/8/21 8:54 PM, Carl Marcum wrote:
>>> On 2/8/21 7:15 PM, Carl Marcum wrote:
>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>
>>>>
Which version of Xcode?
> On Jan 27, 2021, at 5:48 PM, Dylan Pham wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm building trunk/450 on macos big sur and got an error below:
>
> Makefile:50: /Users/devops1/aoodev/openoffice/ext_libraries/apr-util/
> unxmaccx.pro/misc/build/apr-util-1.6.1/build/rules.mk: No such
In an effort to save some time and resources, can we confirm on whether or not
we are building the full language set?
> On Mar 20, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have created the directory structure for Dev3:
>
>
> On Mar 29, 2021, at 3:53 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Is this the new 4.1.x development branch?
>
> Should I commit to it and we branch off 4.1.10 later?
+1
>
> Matthias
>
> Am 29.03.21 um 17:40 schrieb j...@apache.org:
>> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git
ve Fisher <mailto:w...@apache.org>
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, 9 March 2021 9:51 AM
>>>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org <mailto:dev@openoffice.apache.org>
>>>> <mailto:dev@openoffice.apache.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Platform hint
I don't understand the question. We just have 1 offering for Mac users... so
what kind of hint text would we need?
> On Mar 8, 2021, at 9:28 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Really no mac user interested?!
>
> Regards,
>
>Matthias
>
> Am 05.03.21 um 20:58 schrieb Marcus:
>> Am 10.01.21
git hash: b1cdbd2c1b0c99b9e8c2ff5f17cc0127551a8f62
> On Apr 19, 2021, at 1:16 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> Since we did kinda do a RC1, at least it was up on the dev dist site, I think
> we should call this RC2. I'll make the updates and then start the macOS and
> Linux build
ow? Time to branch off AOO4110 and make
> a Release Candidate!
>
> Then we can bump up AOO41X, so we can merge Carl's Test fixes.
>
> Regards,
>
>Matthias
>
> Am 14.04.21 um 01:42 schrieb Carl Marcum:
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> This time to the lis
I deem it is time for us to push through with a 4.1.10 release of AOO. I am
proposing a AOO 4.1.10-RC1 release sometime over the next week. I am currently
building macOS and Linux 64/32 tests (RC1s) for HEAD of AOO41X
-
To
...
>
> Matthias
>
> Am 20.04.21 um 17:01 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> Windows binaries are also uploaded now, I think we are complete!
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>> Am 19.04.21 um 19:26 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> git hash:
Jim,
>
> Am 20.04.21 um 18:28 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Yeah... I'm fixing as we speak.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Linux (x64) builds are OK.
>
>>
>>> On Apr 20, 2021, at 11:27 AM, Matthias Seidel
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Jim,
>>>
&g
Before we call a vote, I'd like to ask as many people as possible to give the
2nd release candidate of AOO 4.1.10 a good, solid test.
The source files and complimentary community builds for this RC can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.10-RC2/
Cheers!
In prep for 4.1.10 (and our 1st release candidate), we're using
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.10
for tracking.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional
Approved and merged... sorry for the delay
> On Apr 16, 2021, at 1:38 PM, Carl Marcum wrote:
>
> Hi Arrigo,
>
> On 4/16/21 12:36 PM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>> Dear All,
>>
>> PR 126 [1] is about the "About" dialog (sorry for the word play :-).
>>
>> It fixes an invalid display of the build
The above issue (https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128426)
is closed for 4.1.x but it seems to crop back up with the various
4.2.x builds on macOS. Of particular interest is that what "fixed"
the bug back when we were handling 4.1.9 RCs was that the bug occurred
when built using a later
And the macOS, Linux64 and Linux32 bit builds can be found at:
https://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/AOO-4.1.11-test/
Cheers!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands,
I believe the fix, which is universal, is already folded into the repos
> On Aug 25, 2021, at 5:43 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Am 06.08.21 um 12:26 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>> Hello Jim, All,
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 05, 202
Should I do macOS and Linux ones as well?
> On Aug 19, 2021, at 7:06 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I just uploaded new AOO4111 Test Builds for Windows:
>
> https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-4111-Test/
>
> Feedback is welcome!
>
> Regards,
>
>Matthias
>
>
HEAD on origin/AOO41X?
> On Aug 19, 2021, at 10:08 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Am 19.08.21 um 15:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Should I do macOS and Linux ones as well?
>
> I think that would be great!
>
> Regards,
>
>Matth
The issue is that for AOO 4.1.x we must use an out-of-date version of Xcode.
With 4.2.0 and beyond, we use later versions of Xcode (and the SDK) that fully
support the Apple requirements.
> On Sep 10, 2021, at 4:07 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> Hi -
>
> I think our setup for macOS digital
If HEAD of the branch is ready, then I'm all for an RC1. Once I hear
definitively, I'll start the Linux and macOS builds
> On Sep 17, 2021, at 5:27 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> Yes
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Sep 17, 2021, at 2:09 AM, Pedro Lino
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Matthias
>>
On
It does...
> On Aug 3, 2021, at 1:25 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Am 03.08.21 um 19:21 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Thanks... but that seems based on some older version of AOO41X... or am I
>> missing something?
>
> Yes, we had this problem
Wow. This is weird, but also kind of makes sense since it seems so very, very
platform and SDK sensitive.
Someone remind me what the catalina branch is and how it relates to trunk and
AOO42X, please :-)
> On Jul 27, 2021, at 4:21 PM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
> resurrecting
Thanks... but that seems based on some older version of AOO41X... or am I
missing something?
> On Aug 3, 2021, at 1:06 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Am 03.08.21 um 18:42 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Wow. This is weird, but also kind of makes sense since it
Next weekend? Any idea?
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>> Am 29.07.21 um 15:21 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Am 27.07.21 um 19:11 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>>>>> Hello All,
>>>&
Hmmm... this seems to indicate that it is something in the UNO code itself
which may be the issue, and specifically about exception handling... possibly
some weirdness in the assembly part.
That narrows things down... great work Arrigo!
be found at:
o https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/binaries/
Thank you!
--
Jim Jagielski, on behalf of the AOO PMC
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands
Never mind that one: This one is the one: THX!
diff --git a/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
b/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
index dc67c5dc58..fc75fa9cb9 100644
--- a/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
+++ b/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
@@ -131,9
Can you try this:
diff --git a/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
b/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
index dc67c5dc58..fc75fa9cb9 100644
--- a/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
+++ b/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
@@ -131,9 +131,10 @@ inline sal_Bool
I think I will tag tomorrow morning and start some builds :-)
> On Aug 3, 2021, at 12:48 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Ready, when you are! ;-)
>
> Am 03.08.21 um 18:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> I'd like to spend some time on the ODS bug on macOS:
>>
the Apache server?
>
> Matthias
>
> Am 06.08.21 um 16:49 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>
>>> On Aug 6, 2021, at 10:12 AM, Matthias Seidel
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> That's c9282f5c5c ?
>> Yep. That's right!
>>> Building for Windows now
Any other opinions or comments?
> On Aug 6, 2021, at 12:52 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> To me, it being within OpenOffice.git makes the most sense... but I'm fine
> either way ;)
>
>> On Aug 6, 2021, at 12:49 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>
>> Within /Apache/Op
> On Aug 4, 2021, at 9:23 AM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>
> Hello Jim,
>
> On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 08:09:11AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>>> On Aug 4, 2021, at 7:54 AM, Arrigo Marchiori
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Jim,
>>>
&g
Can you apply the below to your catalina branch build and see how it works?
diff --git a/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
b/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
index dc67c5dc58..97c4d080f4 100644
--- a/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
+++
diff --git a/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
b/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
index dc67c5dc58..8ea41ec95f 100644
--- a/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
+++ b/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
@@ -131,16 +131,22 @@ inline sal_Bool SAL_CALL
> On Aug 4, 2021, at 7:54 AM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>
> Hello Jim,
>
> On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 07:39:14AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> Can you apply the below to your catalina branch build and see how it works?
>>
>> diff --git a/main/comphelper/i
> On Aug 6, 2021, at 10:12 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> That's c9282f5c5c ?
Yep. That's right!
>
> Building for Windows now. Might take some time, since I can do only
> single threaded build with Cygwin 3.2.0.
>
Yikes!
I have tagged AOO420-Dev3-m3 and am working on the builds.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
The Crash Report indicates that it is the Check For Updates function that
causes the problem. Some weirdness with serf and SSL certs.
libnss3 -> libsmime -> libnssutil3 -> libplds4
> On Aug 6, 2021, at 6:04 PM, Bouschen, Michael
> wrote:
>
>
I'm not getting that crash, even after scrolling thru the doc, resizing the
window, etc...
> On Aug 6, 2021, at 12:38 PM, Michael Bouschen wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> thanks for trying.
>
> I also see this window, but after a few more seconds OpenOffice crashes.
> I figured out OpenOffice up to
ed.
>
> Of course there would be wiki and webpages to update.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Aug 6, 2021, at 9:31 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>> Our devtools repo is till under svn; should we switch it to git. It would
>> be nice, I think, to use on version
Our devtools repo is till under svn; should we switch it to git. It would be
nice, I think, to use on version control implementation for all our code
related repos.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
I am uploading both the regular and the ./Dev/ builds... just in case there is
something in the Dev builds themselves which causes issues
> On Aug 6, 2021, at 3:44 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Sorry, these are NOT Dev builds, compare to Dev2:
>
>
Can you try this version:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/binaries/de/Apache_OpenOffice_Dev_4.2.0_MacOS_x86-64_install_de.dmg
> On Aug 6, 2021, at 4:37 PM, Michael Bouschen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I just updated my system to macOS 11.5.1 and reinstalled OpenOffice
The macOS, Linux64 and Linux32 builds are also there!
> On Sep 23, 2021, at 9:48 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have uploaded all Windows binaries to:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.11-RC1/binaries/
>
> Although we have not yet announced AOO
exxAndJava.(RexxAndJava.java:880)
> at
> org.rexxla.bsf.engines.rexx.RexxEngine.initialize(RexxEngine.java:291)
> at org.apache.bsf.BSFManager$8.run(BSFManager.java:854)
> at java.base/java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
> at org.apache.
I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community builds
of
Apache OpenOffice 4.1.11-RC1 as GA.
These artifacts can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.11-RC1/
Please cast your vote:
The Release Candidate is good for production/GA:
[ ]
> On Sep 29, 2021, at 4:25 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Sep 29, 2021, at 1:05 PM, Arrigo Marchiori
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Dave, All,
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 03:35:30PM -0700, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Pedro,
>>>
>>> I think that AOO42X and Trunk need to improve in three
> On Sep 30, 2021, at 6:37 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community
> builds of
> Apache OpenOffice 4.1.11-RC1 as GA.
>
> These artifacts can be found at:
>
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dis
For Linux it's hard, because it depends on so many factors, such as kernel
version, libc versions, etc... Also, you can build a stripped down version
on older platforms that lack new libraries, or build against a new OS and
include all the bells and whistles.
The best we've been able to come up
gt;
>
>
> Am 30.09.21 um 12:37 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community
>> builds of
>> Apache OpenOffice 4.1.11-RC1 as GA.
>> [...]
>> This vote will be open for the normal 72hrs.
>
>
>
++1!
> On Dec 30, 2021, at 5:23 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>
> On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 06:13:50 +0100, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> unfortunately I have to say goodbye to the AOO project, the reasons are
>> family related.
>>
>> I would like to thank everyone involved in AOO
> On Nov 17, 2021, at 7:36 PM, Carl Marcum wrote:
>
> Hi Arrigo,
>
> On 11/17/21 2:16 AM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I pushed a new branch "serf", that contains the OpenSSL upgrade
>> commits (I reverted the reverts ;-) plus a tentative upgrade of the
>> serf library to
I wonder if maybe we should also consider dropping OpenSSL for LibreSSL
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> On Nov 11, 2021, at 10:51 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
>
>
> I still think we should work on 2. somehow.
For AOO42X and above, I agree. It's a lot of work for AOO41X simply because of
the additional requirements for the old build systems.
> On Nov 11, 2021, at 7:35 AM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>
> Hello Jim, All,
>
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 01:19:16PM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> To be honest, I think we are *stuck* with OpenSSL 1.0.2 until Serf
>> is upgraded to support 1.1
>
> Sorry... do yo
Nov 11, 2021, at 8:46 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Am 11.11.21 um 14:16 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> According to the serf mailing list, there are issues, at least with the test
>> suite.
>>
>> Can someone confirm that AOO42X/trunk do NOT ha
Jim,
>
> Am 09.11.21 um 21:50 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> I've recently folded in openssl-1.1 to trunk and all branches, but this gets
>> us in a corner.
>>
>> To support this version of openssl, we need to upgrade Serf. This means that
>> we need to
Ugg ugg and double ugg
We seem to be stuck in a chicken-and-egg situation.
Do we *really* need OpenSSL 1.1? Because even the latest release of serf
doesn't really support that.
What is the issue w/ using OpenSSL 1.0.2 that is driving us to OpenSSL 1.1?
PS: OpenSSL is universally, IMO,
To be honest, I think we are *stuck* with OpenSSL 1.0.2 until Serf is upgraded
to support 1.1
> On Nov 10, 2021, at 12:22 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Am 10.11.21 um 18:05 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Ugg ugg and double ugg
>>
>> We seem to be stuck
We could, but they are worse at releases than we are :-P
> On Nov 10, 2021, at 1:24 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Am 10.11.21 um 19:19 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> To be honest, I think we are *stuck* with OpenSSL 1.0.2 until Serf is
>> upgraded to support 1.1
>
I'm gonna look into the serf->(lib)curl option... Since we don't use any of the
fancy features of serf, I'm thinking that the easy option might be best
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For
> On Nov 10, 2021, at 1:33 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Am 10.11.21 um 19:30 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> We could, but they are worse at releases than we are :-P
>
> A problem that needs to be fixed... ;-)
>
> BTW: I think you reverted one of my commi
I've recently folded in openssl-1.1 to trunk and all branches, but this gets us
in a corner.
To support this version of openssl, we need to upgrade Serf. This means that we
need to also update apr and apr-util as well as include a requirement that the
build server also as SCons installed. This
Agreed
> On Oct 26, 2021, at 9:38 AM, Pedro Lino
> wrote:
>
> Hi Matthias
>
> People who bought the M1 are those who want to have "the latest" so if they
> are about to upgrade, AOO should be ahead.
> My opinion is yes.
> In any case people with an M1 Apple are probably 0,0001% of AOO
> On Jul 19, 2021, at 10:26 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> People need macOS builds more frequently to test.
>
Agreed. But every time I seem to encourage a test macOS build, it seems that
people want to hold off...
I thought that more recent systems were what the 4.2.x... branch was for.
> On Jul 19, 2021, at 10:46 AM, Arrigo Marchiori
> wrote:
>
> Hello Jim,
>
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 10:14:03AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> What is wrong w/ using the build stuff
What is wrong w/ using the build stuff that we have used for years?
> On Jul 18, 2021, at 9:00 AM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 03:27:54PM +0200, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I just committed the "catalina" branch:
>>
sis for refreshed code and translations.
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>>
>>>> Keith
>>>>
>>>>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
Snapshot works for me
> On Jul 23, 2021, at 10:43 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Am 16.07.21 um 13:39 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> I'm ready for a dev3...
>
> That's great!
>
> Are there any patches in the pipeline or do we want to do a
Thanks! I volunteer to RM. Is that OK?
> On Mar 15, 2022, at 6:43 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Just FYI, I created a Release Schedule for AOO 4.1.12:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.12
>
> Feel free to update!
>
> Regards,
>
>Matthias
>
If everyone is in agreement, I'll create a macOS and Linux test/dev build of
AOO41X HEAD
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> On Feb 10, 2022, at 1:13 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Pedro,
>
> Am 10.02.22 um 18:16 schrieb Pedro Lino:
>> Hi Matthias, all
>>
>>> On 02/10/2022 4:29 PM Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>
>>> I think Jim has Java 7 available, since we always built AOO41X with it.
>> Is there any reason
The en-US version of a dev/test of AOO 4.1.12 can be found here:
http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
... Are available at
http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/
Assuming these look good, we can progress to an RC1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
OK, i'll do a quick test build of HEAD on CentOS5 64-and-32 and we'll see if we
are
ready to rock and roll.
> On Mar 22, 2022, at 8:09 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Am 22.03.22 um 11:33 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Other than
>>
>>
>
Are we ready for a RC1?
> On Mar 27, 2022, at 9:44 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Am 25.03.22 um 13:24 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> ... Are available at
>>
>> http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/
>
> Thanks!
>
> I tested
Other than
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?list_id=244111_format=advanced=FIXED=FIXED_WITHOUT_CODE_milestone=4.1.12
What other patches are we looking at?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
That's right... I'll wait to even try compiling until things settle down and we
have some slowly moving target I can compile and build against.
> On Feb 8, 2022, at 6:06 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Arrigo,
>
> No need to apologize. ;-)
>
> But I think, before we begin to think
I'll start work on an RC1 this week. RC1 will be based on
60e0a1c111c55ed3416146f0d2a848c993474018
> On Apr 7, 2022, at 5:21 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Am 05.04.22 um 14:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Are we ready for a RC1?
>
> So, basically on
I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community builds
of
Apache OpenOffice 4.1.12-RC1 as GA.
These artifacts can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.12-RC1/
Please cast your vote:
The Release Candidate is good for production/GA:
[ ] yes
I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community builds
of Apache OpenOffice 4.1.15-RC1 as GA.
These artifacts can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.15-RC1/
Please cast your vote:
The Release Candidate is good for production/GA:
> On Oct 2, 2023, at 12:11 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>
> Is there a step by step how to build AOO on these? Knowing the steps would
> allow someone who is interested to try on their own Mac.
>
> Remind what version of macOS should be the minimum? My 11 year old iMac can
> only be on
> On Oct 1, 2023, at 7:44 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>
> 127154 and 127966 need to be looked at by a Mac developer.
>
Those look pretty old. I should create a quick macOS 4.2.0 dev build for testing
-
To unsubscribe,
> On Oct 4, 2023, at 2:12 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 4:52 PM Jim Jagielski <mailto:j...@jagunet.com>> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> On Oct 1, 2023, at 7:44 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>>>
>>> 127154 and 12796
I'm back from the All Things Open event, so I signed up for some tasks as well.
> On Oct 18, 2023, at 5:52 PM, Marcus wrote:
>
> Am 17.10.23 um 16:52 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Am 05.10.23 um 16:50 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>>> Matthias Seidel wrote:
I would like to collect ideas
I'll start some dev builds for 0a12a2c1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> On Oct 5, 2023, at 3:20 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Oct 4, 2023, at 2:12 PM, Damjan Jovanovic > <mailto:dam...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 4:52 PM Jim Jagielski > <mailto:j...@jagunet.com> <mailto:j...@
Yep. macOS and Linux 32 and 64 bit builds (as source) are uploaded to dist/dev
> On Oct 24, 2023, at 5:52 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Am 23.10.23 um 14:34 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> I'll start some dev builds for 0a12a2c1
>
> So thi
I'll keep this open for a few more days to allow for more testing and voting...
> On Apr 21, 2022, at 1:36 AM, Don Lewis wrote:
>
> On 13 Apr, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community
>> builds of
>> Apache
I was hoping for more testing and feedback, but we have rec'd the necessary
number of
binding votes, and so this VOTE PASSES.
> On Apr 13, 2022, at 9:54 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community
> builds of
> Apache Op
1001 - 1100 of 1153 matches
Mail list logo
