Ugh.. I am really tired of this.
I even declare myself agnostic.
I have a new way to address this issue and hopefully put an end to it
and I will post it RSN, OK?
Pedro.
Hi Pavel;
It is a bit strange that you seem to be the only one that reports this
error after all this time: I wonder if you are using something different
than the internal boost (which is already outdated), or if this is just
a WaE.
In any case, try this:
I guess I shouldn't be surprised that this thread keeps reappearing
in my inbox ;).
- Messaggio originale -
Da: Andrea Pescetti
...
what the result of the power function in edge cases should be.
So let me suggest a solution ... this really needs to be a per-document
setting. ...
Hello;
Sorry that I was misunderstood.
I didn't really mean the patch was redundant:
- I am aware that upstream (hsqldb) will be releasing a new version (2.3)
which will fix the jdk7 problems and will work with AOO.
- I am not aware of anyone working on updating this so if you guys have a
Hello David;
I assume you are using the base compiler (gcc 4.2.1).
It should build, however, you are not providing enough information: we need a
complete log, in particular the initial error messages for each module. Try
make build-log
Best regards,
Pedro.
Hello;
I have created a new bugzilla issue with instructions on how to
update python:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122010
It's a good task for a new volunteer as it teaches how to do simple updates
and it's rather important for the next AOO release; Python 2.7.4 includes
In reply to:
Can someone get Pedro to stop vandalizing this Bugzilla issue?
Vandalizing?? So I guess I shouldn't be closing/opening my own
bugzilla reports from now on since that is all someone else's
property now.
I guess will only comment on the withdrawn patch:
The withdrawal doesn't have
- Messaggio originale -
Da: Rob Weir
...
The fact that you wrote the issue initially is not relevant to whether
the issue is marked won't fix or not. That field is not for
entering your personal opinion. It is for expressing the project's
consensus for how the issue is handled.
: Rob Weir
On May 6, 2013, at 8:03 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
- Messaggio originale -
Da: Rob Weir
...
The fact that you wrote the issue initially is not relevant to whether
the issue is marked won't fix or not. That field is
not for
entering your
Hello;
Just FYI, beyond the STL/TR1 issues ...
It seems some of the recent changes broke configure for platforms
that report themselves as amd64 instead of x86_64:
...
checking for custom pack.lst... no
checking build system type... Invalid configuration `amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1':
machine
Hi again;
On 04.06.2013 11:46, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hello;
Just FYI, beyond the STL/TR1 issues ...
It seems some of the recent changes broke configure for platforms
that report themselves as amd64 instead of x86_64:
...
checking for custom pack.lst... no
checking build system type... Invalid
Hello;
Really nice to see nss being split soon. I hope we can use an external
nss too as the one we include internally is somewhat outdated and
potentially insecure.
While on the subject of replacing mozilla addressbook, just thought I'd
remind about the analysis done by Andre while we were
Hello;
I just noticed on FreeBSD port we have a dependency on poppler-glib.
Opengrok reports it is detected in configure but it doesn't seem
to be used elsewhere.
The poppler license is cat-x so it was probably removed before
graduation. Is it still useful at all?
Regards,
Pedro.
Hello;
I tried the new --with-system-nss configure option but it failed
in the libxmlsec module:
checking for libxslt libraries = 1.0.20... no
checking for openssl libraries = 0.9.6... no
checking for nspr libraries = 4.0... no
checking for nss libraries = 3.2... no
checking for
Hi Juergen;
I am just catching up with some old mail but thank you for the
interesting report.
Just as an external observer and reminding that IANAL, the LO/TDF
doesn't seem to be complying with the Apache License section 4
subsection (d) and is misinterpreting on purpose subsection (b).
Excuse the intermission as I have been very busy lately on my other pet
project ...
+1 Ninja
We have seen it speed up things in some of FreeBSD's ports plus it is
under an Apache License (which is probably not as relevant ... but is
good).
Cheers,
Pedro.
Hi Andre;
On 22.01.2014 23:13, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
...
+1 Ninja
We have seen it speed up things in some of FreeBSD's ports plus it is
under an Apache License (which is probably not as relevant ... but is
good).
Do you know if anyone has written down their experience with porting
El 07/02/2014 12:00, Rob Weir escribió:
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Tenzin Chhosphel chhos...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Andre,
I had no problems building OpenOffice, it was flawless. It just took
several hours (like over 10) just like it says in the building guide page. I am
also a
El 07/02/2014 14:22, Pedro Giffuni escribió:
El 07/02/2014 12:00, Rob Weir escribió:
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Tenzin Chhosphel chhos...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Andre,
I had no problems building OpenOffice, it was flawless. It
just took several hours (like over 10) just like
Hello;
Concerning beanshell itself, we did everything we were supposed to do to
get Beanshell into the ASF. The code was relicensed and the major
IP-clearance process was done. The author also submitted a SGA to the
ASF secretary. You can check out the code in apache-extras:
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0
I have not been very involved in this release but I am very glad with
the progress made. The accessibility support, in particular, is key for
many users that would otherwise have very limited access to information.
Huge congratulations
Hello;
FWIW, I have been playing with some tools on other projects and I ended
tackling a lame set of issues that infests the OpenOffice code since a
long time ... spelling fixes (non-german only, sorry :-P) !!
The patch should be innocuous but this is not something I would feel
comfortable
Not sure if the poll is still open but ...
it's still monday here. ;).
+1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Fixed as of r1591100, thanks!.
Sorry, I knew some of this could happen.
Unfortunately AOO is broken with FreeBSD 10+ (clang/libc++ has bridge
issues) so
my testing was limited. It also means I won't be doing much AOO in a while.
Pedro.
On 04/29/14 15:46, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On
FWIW ...
The change was announced ages ago:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/openoffice-dev/201404.mbox/raw/%3C5345E952.8060909%40apache.org%3E
But of course there were good reasons to wait after the release before
committing it.
About the argument of the value behind the changes,
Hi guys;
I have been, rather reluctantly, maintaining the Dmake thing we
inherited from SUN in Apache Extras.
I am glad to announce that a new maintainer stepped in (see below) and
has already made a great job transferring the *complete* history in a
github repository here:
Hello;
While preparing my talk for ApacheConEU, I noticed there is no SDK for
FreeBSD so I rolled my own:
http://people.apache.org/~pfg/files/Apache_OpenOffice-SDK_4.1.1_FreeBSD_x86-64_install_en-US.tbz
This for FreeBSD 10.1-PRERELEASE amd64.
Regards,
Pedro.
Hello;
Il giorno 14/dic/2014, alle ore 17:20, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org
ha scritto:
On 14/12/2014 Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Looking at
aoo-4.1.1/writerperfect/source/filter/DocumentCollector.cxx, the first
one I chose to examine, I see three Copyright notices and an LGPL
Hello Kay;
FWIW,
Last time I worked on this (long, long ago) the idea was to remove
completely the ext_sources dir and have people download the files
from ooo-extras. As is usual with developer inertia, no one ever got
to actually remove that directory, but in essence it is deprecated.
Please
On 01/23/15 17:02, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org
mailto:p...@apache.org wrote:
Hello Kay;
FWIW,
Last time I worked on this (long, long ago) the idea was to remove
completely the ext_sources dir and have people download
Just my $0.02,
Actually the page makes sense. What is happening is that a group
of free software advocates see the advantages of permissive
licenses, and particularly the success of the ASF, as a threat to
their business.
Bradly Kuhn in particular has always been aggressive towards
OpenOfficeas
Sorry for the late reply ...
I guess this could be considered the coding style manual in OpenOffice:
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Cpp_Coding_Standards
I personally don't like it but it is the style used in the source code and
I don't think we should start introducing a new one.
Pedro.
Hi;
Replacing VCL with Qt (or GTK or enlightenment or anything) is a very
complex project.
There is a KDE CWS which may be somewhat of a starting point but it
dowsn't really
touch the surface of what you want to do.
This said, it is the type of revolutionary projects I would certainly
(re sending through the Apache relay this time ..)
Hi Dennis;
There is never actually such thing as the voice of the project. We have
our reasons for choosing a license and it's healthful to explain it's
advantages but, at least in the US, in order to give legal advice you
have to be a lawyer
Hello;
One of the great achievements behind this project is the ability to open
new code under a less restrictive license for use in other Apache Projects.
The author of beanshell, Patrick Niemeyer, generously agreed to make the
sources for his project available under an Apache License and
Actually ...
I had to revert this as I had forgotten about some small adjustments.
Will be back to this later.
Pedro.
On 01/11/15 15:50, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hello;
One of the great achievements behind this project is the ability to
open new code under a less restrictive license for use
Hello;
I don't currently use git but what I use is not really important:
if a move to git were to be considered, it would only make sense
if we can rescue the pre-apache history and in particular the
Hg CWSs.
Just my $0.02,
Pedro.
Helo Sharoon;
It sound like Apache POI would satisfy your requirement:
http://poi.apache.org/
Regards,
Pedro.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Hi;
In FreeBSD we now got a patch to avoid build conflicts when LibreOffice
is installed:
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revisionrevision=379874
The commit message is pretty detailed and there is also a link
to FreeBSD's code review system. Unfortunately I can't test it on
non-FreeBSD
Hello;
Not that I care too much, but while CentOS 5 hasn't reached it EOL,
it doesn't make much sense to force ourselves to ship AOO there.
I think we should move to CentOS 6 which is likely to remain very popular
since it's the last version without systemd.
This would put up less pressure on
Hello;
As mentioned in this posting
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.LSU.2.11.1501190021270.2527
(with links to full build logs) Apache OpenOffice broke when building with
gcc 4.9. Apparently it's some visibility issue.
Regards,
Pedro.
Hello;
I just wanted to mention that while it indeed appears that Apache
OpenOffice is over-going a crisis, you can rest assured that in
opensource there is no such thing as death.
We always knew that other projects would take our code and
won't give back, we always knew that there would be a
Hello Gavin;
Thank you for looking at it, I wasn't really aware the buildbot was
still available.
In upstream FreeBSD we of course do our own builds with minimal patches
but we use pre-packaged dependencies when possible.
I strongly recommend upgrading the buildbot to FreeBSD 10 and using
Hello;
It's not spam (I received it twice) ... the project has been using
Coverity for a while:
https://scan.coverity.com/projects/174
Most committers were subscribed to the service through a list
we provided when it was set up from the Apache OpenOffice side.
Pedro.
IMHO, this is a *must* for the next release ...
It has been a very requested feature for the Italian PA. (I am
not involved but I saw this mentioned in a couple talks).
I recall there was an interesting CMIS GSoC too and this might
be a good chance to get that hooked in. Perhaps Jürgen can
not
subscribed.)
On 06/03/15 11:51, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hi again Gavin;
There are packages for llvm35, llvm36 and llvm-devel. Try:
pkg install llvm35
# ls /usr/local/bin/clang*
/usr/local/bin/clang++-devel/usr/local/bin/clang-devel
/usr/local/bin/clang++35 /usr/local/bin/clang-format
Hi again Gavin;
There are packages for llvm35, llvm36 and llvm-devel. Try:
pkg install llvm35
# ls /usr/local/bin/clang*
/usr/local/bin/clang++-devel/usr/local/bin/clang-devel
/usr/local/bin/clang++35 /usr/local/bin/clang-format-devel
/usr/local/bin/clang-check-devel
Hello;
On 17/06/2015 06:03 p.m., Pedro Giffuni wrote:
...
BTW, we will have to do something about OOo-extras.
I will probably just have the apache-extras project deleted
before the deadline since there is no repository history
to preserve.
FWIW, delete means the website and the svn
Hi Kay;
You want to check this email in the archives:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/openoffice-dev/201408.mbox/%3C540130E6.3060709%40apache.org%3E
Also note that Apache extras (and google code) is
basically dying this year.
BTW, we will have to do something about OOo-extras.
I will
, but then I could just drop
linux altogether
as I don't test it and we don't have buildbots for branches :-P.
Pedro.
On 05/30/15 15:57, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hello;
I started the discussion on dropping CentOS 5 and moving on
to CentOS 6. There was no comment against moving to the
newer version
Hello;
I started the discussion on dropping CentOS 5 and moving on
to CentOS 6. There was no comment against moving to the
newer version, which AFAICT is the last version to support
32 bits.
Assuming AOO builds on CentOS 6, is there any reason to insist
on CentOS 5?
Pedro.
Hi Kay;
It's somewhat interesting for FreeBSD since we carry compatibility libraries
(currently 32 bit but 64 bit will be available) from CentOS 6 .
If you want to play a bit more try building it with _FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
[1].
It's not too interesting because the native port works fine, though,
On 07/13/15 23:33, Don Lewis wrote:
On 13 Jul, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
I did notice the buildbot was failing on nss(?).
That's what I get for taking hunks from elsewhere :-P.
Patch below ...
Committed as revision 1690992.
Thanks!
As you might have noticed I don't spend much quality time
On 07/14/15 02:32, Don Lewis wrote:
Next problem:
/bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link c++ -g -O2 -o chmorph
chmorph.o ../parsers/libparsers.a ../hunspell/libhunspell-1.3.la
libtool: link: c++ -g -O2 -o chmorph chmorph.o ../parsers/libparsers.a
On 07/13/15 20:06, Don Lewis wrote:
On 13 Jul, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
On 07/13/15 11:29, Don Lewis wrote:
...
OpenOffice has a clang patch that was not catching this.
I hacked it for FreeBSD now:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1690740
But there is certainly something
Hi Don;
On 07/15/15 15:49, Don Lewis wrote:
On 15 Jul, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
And here comes one of the huge can of worms in OpenOffice:
we are using a very old version of ICU.
The truth is, we have code to update ICU to a more recent
version resting peacefully somewhere in the Symphony branch
On 07/13/15 11:29, Don Lewis wrote:
...
OpenOffice has a clang patch that was not catching this.
I hacked it for FreeBSD now:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1690740
But there is certainly something wrong as clang is not being detected.
I think clang defines __GNUC__, so
On 07/13/15 02:06, Don Lewis wrote:
On 12 Jul, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hi Gavin;
Let me copy Don Lewis, who maintains the FreeBSD port @FreeBSD ...
On 07/12/15 12:59, Gavin McDonald wrote:
On 12 Jul 2015, at 4:50 pm, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org
mailto:p...@apache.org wrote:
Hello;
On 07
On 07/13/15 02:06, Don Lewis wrote:
...
According to the bootstrap log, it's not a download problem.
I'm able to reproduce the problem here. It looks like clang doesn't
like some of the code in CoinMP:
In file included from ClpSolve.cpp:347:
On 07/14/15 23:33, Don Lewis wrote:
...
It appears that hunspell has a way of generating that header in the that
location on systems that don't have gettext, but for whatever reason it
decided not to do so. The real problem is this fragment of
ext_libraries/hunspell/makefile.mk:
.ELIF
Hi Damjan;
I am rather surprised that cppunit tests may work still. As I was explained,
long ago, in order to work cppunit would have to be in the tree.
The plan is/was to replace cppunit with gtest, which is more powerful
and has a fine license. Google test (gtest) was brought into the tree
curious that while I am sure other developers spent a lot
of time optimizing the startup, they had never thought of this change
before.
Enjoy!
Pedro.
> Il giorno 28/ott/2015, alle ore 20:24, Pedro Giffuni <p...@apache.org> ha
> scritto:
>
> Just wondering …
>
> Are people n
Hello;
First of all, a warm welcome to Patricia. Java developers are
particularly welcome at this stage!
Just IMHO, the C++ side of AOO is either under-control or
too-ugly-to care-about, so we would do good focus more on the
Java parts, which are also somewhat ugly but still promising.
Once you
Just wondering …
Are people noticing a faster startup in AOO 4.1.2? In the BSDs we generally
prefer to use calloc over malloc + memset when it makes sense. A relatively
small change that I did, and was safe enough to be merged to the release,
might have had an effect there.
It’s too easy to be
Hello;
You may want to look at configure.ac below line 3908, and particularly 3921.
Remember to run autoconf as well.
Hope that helps,
Pedro.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional
.
This type of attitude also backfires, and is the main reason why you didn’t see
many contributions from me until just before the AOO release.
Pedro.
> Il giorno 11/nov/2015, alle ore 23:00, Pedro Giffuni <p...@apache.org> ha
> scritto:
>
> Wow .. this is pathetic … the change was
Wow .. this is pathetic … the change was not too important but it is actually
not
the first time it happens. Funny thing is that at ApacheConEU I met some nice
people from this company that wanted to hire OpenOffice developers.
Some people see AOO as a test to see if permissive licenses are
Committed thanks!
..
Sendingmain/configure.ac
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 1714089.
> Il giorno 12/nov/2015, alle ore 10:43, Pedro Giffuni <p...@apache.org> ha
> scritto:
>
> Hello;
>
> You may want to look at configure.ac below line 390
Just to note some things related to a Win64 port:
- In order to support win64 builds we would have to add a win64 bridge which we
currently don’t have. The process is similar to porting to a new architecture:
mail archives should have a message from Tor Lillquist who did the LibreOffice
port
FWIW,
I have taken libreoffice patches after the author has agreed by copying the
email providing permission to our secretary. An iCLA is not mandatory
even for large patches unless the author wants to formally continue
contributing his code.
Note that there are several LibreOffice developers
+1 to using more Java.
The Apache Software Foundation is indeed about Java (not exclusively but
it's likely to be the most popular language).
FWIW, there was something we discussed briefly in ApacheCon 2014,
just an idea floating in the air that I'll share ...
Since OpenOffice first came into
FWIW ...
FreeBSD's ports builds, which include the latest release candidate,
were now marked broken with OpenJDK8.
I don't have more details.
Pedro.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For
Hi Damjan;
First of all, thank you for the hard work.
It has proven very useful so far: I was looking at bringing parts of
the illumos port and the tests caught up some issues that would
have caused insane trouble.
About
8. main/xmlsecurity/qa/certext
neon was, of course, replaced with serf. I
About commercial extensions ...
It's fine. We want to encourage people to use OpenOffice, and even if
they don't
give anything back to us, building a sustainable business market around
it will
help us be a real alternative to the commercial options. If people can
only make
a business around
Hello;
On 07/11/15 05:39, Marcus wrote:
Am 07/11/2015 11:31 AM, schrieb Gavin McDonald:
The ‘open office-fbsd-nightly’ fails the ‘build —all’ step and needs
investigating.
1 module(s):
coinmp
need(s) to be rebuilt
Reason(s):
ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making
Hi Gavin;
Let me copy Don Lewis, who maintains the FreeBSD port @FreeBSD ...
On 07/12/15 12:59, Gavin McDonald wrote:
On 12 Jul 2015, at 4:50 pm, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org
mailto:p...@apache.org wrote:
Hello;
On 07/11/15 10:39, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hello;
On 07/11/15 05:39, Marcus
Hello;
On 07/11/15 10:39, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hello;
On 07/11/15 05:39, Marcus wrote:
Am 07/11/2015 11:31 AM, schrieb Gavin McDonald:
The ‘open office-fbsd-nightly’ fails the ‘build —all’ step and needs
investigating.
1 module(s):
coinmp
need(s) to be rebuilt
Reason(s):
ERROR: error
+1
Thank you for working on this. Having working unit tests is key for
future development!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Hi Dennis;
I find your posting somewhat confusing as the topic would indicate something
different from the body of the message.
I agree in observation 5 that the ASF (actually I can only speak
partially for AOO)
does *not* police the use of ALv2 content by third parties. This, of
course,
Hi again Dennis;
I stopped using AOO's bugzilla after an unconfortable incident.
Since the PMC was notified twice about it, I will just make it public.
You should take a look at:
main/ooo_custom_images/industrial/README
Pedro.
On 30/08/2015 10:57 p.m., Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hi Dennis;
I
Hello;
As Kay has noticed, and basically thanks to the last mile patches from
Don Lewis, we now have green lights on the FreeBSD buildbot.
I consider the FreeBSD port finished and stable.
I couldn't go on without thanking also Gavin McDonald and Andrew Rist
for having set up the buildbot in the
Hello;
First of all +1.
This is a great idea because there are several Apache Projects like
Apache Ofbiz need such files to support within their own projects
deprecated such support do to the lack of availability and the
(previous) copyleft licensing.
I think the files are known as the Uno
Hi Carl;
Just for reference, from:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/trunk/OPTIONAL_LIBRARIES
It appears some applications may need more:
-OpenOffice UNO (LGPL)
http://udk.openoffice.org/
applications/content/lib/uno:
XFlatXml.jar
XMergeBridge.jar
XSLTFilter.jar
Hi Damjan;
First of all ... an applause for working on this!
Thank you for making the call for testers as well.
As I see it, unless you get negative feedback and since the patch works
in a platform
you can go ahead and commit-test it after some time you judge sufficient.
The buildbots are
Hi Bruce;
I just looked a bit ...
Calligra does look nice and I see it has advanced quite nicely.
There's probably still the issue of multi-platform support but it
is certainly refreshing to see something different.
Thanks,
Pedro.
On 09/14/15 17:18, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hello;
This may
Hello;
This may sound controversial, and is indeed just IMHO, but I am afraid
that the general Office-suite marketplace is stuck and people shouldn't
expect much more from it.
Basically I find myself repeating the idea of the 90's where the version
of the
Hi;
I don't really have much time for this but it looked pretty easy so
I got started in the OpenSSL update.
http://people.apache.org/~pfg/patches/aoo-openssl-0.9.8zg.diff
I won't make any claims ... and I specifically didn't look at the ming
stuff.
Just something I thought people may want
/harassment and
I was told (hi Rob!) the only way to get rid of it was to deactivate my email
so I stopped using it altogether. Perhaps the project should move to JIRA but
even so I just don’t want to be involved there anymore.
Pedro.
> Il giorno 20/set/2015, alle ore 11:41, Pedro Giffuni <p...@apac
Hi Damjan and list;
Working on gbuild would certainly be welcome, however please do so on the
gbuild branch.
The branch is really old, I recall it was broken for FreeBSD, so it needs
updating. I realize the request may seem inconvenient but the gbuild branch
contains the last OpenOffice.org
an
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Pedro Giffuni <p...@apache.org> wrote:
Hi again Damjan;
I was assuming that we are sort of preparing for a release and we don’t want
ugly surprises with the build system. On second thoughts we do have a bunch
of buildbots so we will detect any wrong-going
Hi Andrea;
It did catch me somewhat off-guard that the release is not branched from
trunk. It basically means that some changes that have been in the tree
for over a year won't be included into the next release.
I don't really want to spend time merging changes to the 410 branch, but
I will be
don't really address the
buildbot issues as that is more work.
Pedro.
On 09/24/15 11:56, Don Lewis wrote:
On 24 Sep, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hi Andrea;
It did catch me somewhat off-guard that the release is not branched from
trunk. It basically means that some changes that have been in the tree
On 09/24/15 11:56, Don Lewis wrote:
On 24 Sep, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hi Andrea;
It did catch me somewhat off-guard that the release is not branched from
trunk. It basically means that some changes that have been in the tree
for over a year won't be included into the next release.
I don't
Hello;
On 09/25/15 12:35, Don Lewis wrote:
Using the FreeBSD ports framework, I am able to successfully build
AOO410 branch revision r1705179 on FreeBSD 9.3, 10.1, and 11.0-CURRENT,
on both i386 and amd64. The only required patch is a tweak to the
optimization flags to avoid a bug in clang 3.6
Pedro.
> Il giorno 23/set/2015, alle ore 10:48, Pedro Giffuni <p...@apache.org> ha
> scritto:
>
> Hi Damjan and list;
>
> Working on gbuild would certainly be welcome, however please do so on the
> gbuild branch.
>
> The branch is really old, I recall it wa
Hello Carl;
Great job so far!
I agree they should be voted as a bundle. In the future we should just build
this
stuff along with the release and it would be automatic part of the release
engineering process.
In that order of ideas, the .pom files should be uploaded to SVN even if they
are
Hello;
Just thought I¡d share this link I came up with:
https://reproducible-builds.org
The subject is somewhat controversial; making a reproducible build involves
effort and is unlikely to add value to the end product. Still there are
interesting
issues though.
The main question is: do the
On 01/03/16 14:32, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
On 01/03/16 14:24, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Fixed (I hope) ... Thanks Damjan!
Ouch ... I read the original posting from a mobile device, and
somehow I mistakedly thought it was damjan@ who had found the issue!
Full credit goes to j.nitschke
Hello guys:
Some of you may have noticed this:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1722635
Unfortunately I had to revert it because it broke the buildbots.
I can't reproduce the error and the buildbots don't give
sufficient details [1], so I don't think I will spend more time
on
support so we could start using newer
versions of MSVC compilers.
IMHO, both updates would be better done by someone with a Windows
build box.
Regards,
Pedro.
On 01/03/16 10:23, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hello guys:
Some of you may have noticed this:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view
101 - 200 of 333 matches
Mail list logo
