On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>
>> From: Simos Xenitellis [mailto:simos.li...@googlemail.com]
>
>> > Maybe I would also like to be a participant in the
>> LibreOffice Certification
>> > Program, but I am a free spirit and prere
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> From: Thorsten Behrens [mailto:t...@libreoffice.org]
>
>> I think at the time of your posting, that topic was somewhat on
>> hold/stalled. Being 2 months late to a discussion sometimes gets you
>> no reaction, simply because noone h
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Dr. Michael Stehmann
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this discussion is really useless. We have to do more urgend tasks yet.
>
> If TDF people want to talk with us, they know where to find us. And vice
> versa.
>
> We have talked a lot in the past. But at the moment I can not
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 5:53 PM, Phillip Rhodes
wrote:
> Sure, I don't claim it's a perfect analogy between "their" world and the
> world of F/OSS.
> But I think the broad point generalizes well enough to apply to us:
>
> Have *some* differentiating factor that defines why a group of people would
>
ISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long)
>>
>> On 2016-09-06 17:06 (+0100), Simos Xenitellis
>> wrote:
>>
>> Just responding to these specific bits with my Apache Brand Management
>> Committee member hat on.
>>
>> > which claims that t
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Not sure how this will come across... I am certain I will not
> be fully understood about this, anyway, this question deserves an
> answer.
>
> What has been obvious, from following the numerous threads in various
> places, as well as contribu
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
> As different "technical press" outlets make their own derivations of other
> articles, there is incorrect quotation and reference to historical matters
> that have nothing to do with the present state and how we move forward.
>
> For me
