Thanks Peter.
I'm subscribed to the list, only I'm reading it
via 'nabble', so no need to trouble yourselves
with CC's.
Like I said on BZ, I was able to build 'trunk'
about mid-April, but that was on another linux
system.
I don't have the exact config, but looking in
the notes I think there
Hello all
What is the progress on scons-build project?
And you'd need to be a programmer to help speed
it up, I suppose?
-Yury
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Compiling from the trunk with
--disable-kde and --disable-kde4
can't be completed here (diagnostics follows).
I have no KDE4 installed, only KDE5 and TDE.
Questions:
1) Where to look to try to unhook that KDE
dependency?
2) The Trinity DE (KDE3 analogue) can't be
dropped-in (--enable-kde
On 11/06/21 20:52, Carl Marcum wrote:
If need be I create shell script with
alternate config directory specification:
-env:UserInstallation=file:///home/you/.openoffice/4
Is this for an alternate user profile?
Is this passed at startup?
Yes and yes.
Pity this trick has (had?) to be
On 2021/06/08 15:50:56, Marcus
wrote: > Am 08.06.21 um 16:08 schrieb Carl
Marcum:> > > Would sharing the "installed" type
builds work for Linux testing of > > > small
changes as long as the architecture was the same?
I'm using OpenOffice and/or LibreOffice in this
manner for years. This
I can't build the AOO from source on modern
linux system with gcc 10 for some time now,
maybe for two months, because of an issue with
boost.
In modules: xml2cmp and cosv (whichever's
reached first) I get the following:
On 2021/06/18 07:08:17, Yury Tarasievich wrote
...
I've managed to actually finish the build with
the changes:
https://gist.github.com/yurytch/9725e3281f9ef784cbf865fcebf51517
(plus some info in two comments)
This is of course a kludge cubed, but at the
moment it seems to serve. I didn't
Hi all,
Following the results described in this post:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra0045b3901742ecbda7e23791819eabb18920a3c5848ebf586103a33%40%3Cdev.openoffice.apache.org%3E
When configuring with external boost library (I
have 1.76.0 installed, all headers and libraries
ARE
Right, understandable.
Only I believe there's need to consider also
that the newer GCC (10.3.0 in my case) can't
(won't?) compile even the headers-only part of
older boost (1.55, the internal one).
Maybe there're issues with other libraries
frozen at their older versions, too.
-Yury
Hello Peter,
You are right on both issues, of course.
To be fair, on your (1), I didn't touch that
variable check, I just brute-forced the C++11
mode of compilation.
Which leads to your (2), but thing is, modern
boost sort of requires C++11. Might be other
external modules do, too.
Might
Hi all,
The thing's here:
https://gist.github.com/yurytch/8ea677f1fa937cf508526618768b9a61
Does what it says in the Subject.
(disregard the exclamation marks, they are there
just for my attention)
Why that patch? Because standard configure AS IT
IS either enables category-b -- and all the
Could you guys put these changes in, please,
instead of me messing with git?
I'm quite incompetent in git process,
and the patch content is straightforward.
Anybody could produce it.
-Yury
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
@Carl: Done, to the best of my understanding.
@Matthias: I meant the thing is trivial,
and I just have NO practice with more complex
git use scenarios
(trivial 'pull'ing and looking at 'diff'
contents do not count).
Yes, I SHOULD spare a day or two, to read and
internalise a book or a
Wish to inform you, that build of 4.5.0 trunk
completes successfully with gcc 11.2.0 on fairly
fresh linux (slackware with 5.13.12 and
GLIBC_2.3.4).
Binaries of Writer and Draw seem to function
normally so far.
Options used were the same as in my June's
report. (Only I'm not sure if
On 31/12/2022 12:32, Peter Kovacs wrote:
FWIW, I'm using for a year and a half the AOO
trunk built from source in C++11 mode, with
GCC 10 through 12 (Slackware current).
(If you're going to search for it, the patch I'm
still applying is dated June 19, 2021. I've
definitely reported it
On 30/12/2022 22:44, Peter Kovacs wrote:
> I managed to Build AOO trunk on Ubuntu 22.04.
> The build has been rough and with a lot of
Issues.
FWIW, I'm using for a year and a half the AOO
trunk built from source in C++11 mode, with GCC
10 through 12 (Slackware current). I believe
I've
Hello all,
I've built an instance of AOO 4.5 from couple of
days old git checkout. (fresh-ish Linux, gcc
12.2.0) After launching the binary and letting
it sit there, it reliably fails after a minute
or so, always with the same kind of stack trace,
which follows after my text.
I have
On 26/11/2022 18:13, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Can you try to disable the automatic update check?
Am 26.11.22 um 16:08 schrieb Yury Tarasievich:
I've built an instance of AOO 4.5 from couple of days old git
checkout. (fresh-ish Linux, gcc 12.2.0) After launching the binary and
letting it sit
On 26/11/2022 18:29, Matthias Seidel wrote:
But there seems to be a problem with our update check. Do you build with
system-SSL?
Actually, I build with maximum use of internal
libs. These are active in config:
--without-stlport
--with-system-stdlibs
--with-system-libs=no
...obviously, checking for updates explicitly
produces a crash with the same sort of stack trace.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
On 26/11/2022 18:27, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
What are the versions of libcurl and libssl?
My distro's ones:
curl-7.85.0
openssl-1.1.1q
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands,
BTW, I've checked my notes, and these crashes
'out of nowhere' which now I know to be caused
by update component, may have been introduced
(or started to happen) not later than May 3, 2022.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
OK, I've reconfigured AOO to use the internal
curl, and build process as such completes okay,
however, I can't make the build system rebuild
everything depending on curl.
And I'm not rebuilding from scratch again right now.
Is there a complete dependencies rebuild command?
I've tried copying
I have some keyboard shortcuts for macros
defined in user's config.
With fresh 4.5 as built from source none of
these have any effect, either those set to
extensions installed, or to my own Basic
procedures.
Redefining doesn't help. In the dialog,
definitions change from likes of
Apologies if I'm being dense here, but is this
indeed compiling to c++14? Won't you need
explicit -std=c++14 option for that?
To compile 'just' to c++11 (on linux) a patch of
about 19 parts is needed, although admittedly it
consists mostly of these guys:
+#define
Actually, that looks like an idea for an OOO
extension (for someone to implement).
On 21/02/2023 21:23, Marcus wrote:
Forwarding the answer to Heena as she is not
subscribed to this mailing list.
Hello, I have open office bt im unable to
convert my pdf to excel .
On 22/02/2023 19:42, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Actually, that looks like an idea for an OOO extension (for someone to
implement).
We do have this one:
https://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/pdf-import-apache-openoffice
I know about that one, and it's actually
included in AOO sources,
On 24/04/2023 00:42, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
Corentin Verbrèghe wrote:
on the version with Commons in the Gallery, to
In my opinion your idea is better off as an
extension that people can use if they have the
need.
+1 to that, because:
It's not only Wikimedia Commons that has images
On 16/04/2023 16:21, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
I just pushed some commits to the scons-build branch, in which I am
attempting to write _from scratch_ the SConscripts to build some
modules.
...
The only module that _seems_ to build is xml2cmp, but only under Linux
so far.
Is it because of
On 15/02/2023 19:39, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
I documented 8 projects that tried to achieve
that and compared them in the attached
spreadsheet, and there are more.
The document is a beaut, but you've excluded
Flatpak and Snap, one of which you sort of
condemn and one of which you recommend,
Hi guys,
I still have my issue with 'Macro Security'
button or, rather, with the macro security
subsystem not allowing my macros to be run off
keyboard shortcuts.
My supposition (maybe wrong) is that the
certificates got stale, so I've tried to plug in
the newest version of the (possibly)
Responding to my own post. Some success & some
unsuccess, too.
Finally, got macros security working by a total
wipeout of unxlngx6.pro subdirs & a rebuild.
Wasn't able to put the newer xmlsec1 in, at
least quickly-like, as there are tons of patches
for its code in the AOO tree.
Also I
Hi all,
I seem to have no trouble in compiling the trunk
with 1.79 boost on a fairly fresh linux distro.
Notes:
- I'm building with my patch applied, enabling
to build with c++11
- I had tentatively removed patching with
boost_1_55_0.patch and boost-clang.patch in
boost/makefile.mk, seems
IMO, not much hope in such letters, and not much
potential good from people 'possibly to be
lured' from there.
The LO folks have already played the MS kind of
game, when jumping to the 1.3 file format ahead
of everybody. And our icon sets and menus
structure do need daily reorganising,
...in followup to my previous post:
So sources for xmlsec1 library which is used in
the 'xmlsecurity' module are NOT downloaded when
this condition (in external_deps.lst) is false?
if (ENABLE_NSS_MODULE!=NO && SYSTEM_NSS!=YES)
And I have both ENABLE_NSS_MODULE and SYSTEM_NSS
set to YES
Apologies for not responding earlier, was
optimistically expecting to report a complete
success 'any moment now'. No such luck, though, yet.
My findings at the moment are:
1. The scp2 module needs to be rebuilt from
scratch every time the build configuration changes.
As it is, the scp2
Hi,
Thank you, Damjan, for the prompt looking into
the problem.
Regarding the matters you address:
If I understand correctly, the configure code
allows for a separate inclusion of nss (more on
that at the very end of this message):
--with-system-nss
...which brings us to the original
Hi,
Yeah, the linux build. AFAIU the build process
is a bit wilful, maybe it's fluking again.
Anyway, I sort of went around the issue, but
what about macros security button (see my
neighbouring post)??
What does it want, a new set of certificates, or
what?
I literally lose half of my
Hi,
Thanks for answering. What fails in
IMPL_LINK( SvxSecurityTabPage, MacroSecPBHdl,
void*, EMPTYARG )
is that check:
if ( xD.is() )
And the xD object is non-null at that.
Somehow I can't set a breakpoint to that
IMPL_LINK call. Neither variants with
SvxSecurityTabPage:: nor
> And it's --with-system-openssl or
--without-system-openssl, there is no
--with-system-openssl=yes like you had.
Sorry for stating the obvious but anything
non-empty goes, provided it's not a 'no'.
Anyway it compiles successfully, like I've said,
only it then fails when copying
Hi all,
Regarding the matter in the Subject, I've found
I can just build with internal OpenSSL (which's
rather old, btw), then rename libcrypto.so and
libssl.so, and so actually use the system libraries.
But as to why I needed that - it *looks* like at
some point in the 4.5 branch
Hi all,
I'm trying to build the trunk codebase with
maximum use of system libs and specifically with
--with-system-openssl=yes, to get rid of the
update routine crashing.
The build seems to complete okay, but in the
instsetoo_native stage it breaks, telling me:
ERROR: File not found:
Hi folks,
Is there any utility in publishing building
experience, like with non-standard
configurations, and such? It's sort of
'experimental data' after all, right?
If so, what's the preferred form and the
'repository' for that?
Anyway, I've just completed building yesterday's
trunk with
Hi all,
It is the second time my email didn't make it
into the list, or, at least, into the list
archives at
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@openoffice.apache.org/maillist.html.
The emails were sent (and not returned) on Jan
20 and on Jan 26 (today, at about 8:00 UTC).
Wonder if this
44 matches
Mail list logo
