Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.10-RC2 as GA

2021-04-26 Thread Don Lewis
The Release Candidate is good for production/GA: [X] yes / +1 [ ] no / -1 My vote is based on [ ] binding (member of PMC) [X] I have built and tested the RC from source on platform [FreeBSD] [ ] I have tested the binary RC on platform [ ]

Re: Apache OpenOffice 4.1.10-RC2

2021-04-21 Thread Don Lewis
On 20 Apr, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Before we call a vote, I'd like to ask as many people as possible to give the > 2nd release candidate of AOO 4.1.10 a good, solid test. > > The source files and complimentary community builds for this RC can be found > at: > >

Re: Fwd: [libexpat/libexpat] Release R_2_3_0 - 2.3.0

2021-03-26 Thread Don Lewis
On 25 Mar, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi all, > >> #422 #426 #447 Windows: Drop support for Visual Studio <=14.0/2015 > > Seems, we are out of look here due to the ancient compiler we still use > on Windows... Same with nss. I suspect lack of C99 support is the issue.

Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.9-RC1 as GA

2021-01-18 Thread Don Lewis
[X] yes / +1 [ ] no / -1 My vote is based on [ ] binding (member of PMC) [X] I have built and tested the RC from source on platform [FreeBSD] [ ] I have tested the binary RC on platform [ ] On 18 Jan, Jim Jagielski wrote: > I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary

Re: AOO 4.1.9 Info - bug 127952

2021-01-06 Thread Don Lewis
On 6 Jan, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > >> On Jan 6, 2021, at 9:19 AM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: >> >> Hello All, >> >> >> - My own build of trunk on Linux can open the file. >> >> Do you think that this is worth more investigation before releasing >> 4.1.9? >> > > AFAICT, it is not a

Re: issue with dmake clean

2020-12-16 Thread Don Lewis
On 16 Dec, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > Hello all, > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 05:56:48PM -0500, Carl Marcum wrote: > >> On 12/15/20 3:37 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: >> > >> > On 15.12.20 20:14, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> > > >> > > > On Dec 15, 2020, at 12:57 PM, Matthias Seidel >> > > > wrote: >> > >

Re: Updates to ./configure(.ac)

2020-12-09 Thread Don Lewis
On 9 Dec, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > >> On Dec 9, 2020, at 9:56 AM, Mechtilde wrote: >> >> Hello Jim, >> >>> >>> So I was thinking we just have these 3: >>> >>> --with-epm >>> --with-dmake >>> --with-beanshell >> >> I want to differ whether we build with system version or with separate >>

Re: Configure missing gtk-plugin

2020-12-06 Thread Don Lewis
On 7 Dec, Peter Kovacs wrote: > Hello all, > > I haave an issue with configuring I am unfammiliar with. > > configure: error: requirements to build the gtk-plugin not met. Use > --disable-gtk or install the missing packages > > What does this mean? I did not find this in any package. >

Re: Help w/ bt

2020-12-02 Thread Don Lewis
On 2 Dec, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Building --enable-debug is causing a weird issue... > > ../unxmaccx.pro/bin/makedepend: error: got signal 4 > dmake: Error code 1, while making '../unxmaccx.pro/obj/checkdll.obj' > dmake: '../unxmaccx.pro/obj/checkdll.obj' removed. > > I'm not sure if this is

Re: [openoffice] branch trunk updated: Huge updates to macOS UNO bridges, based on FreeBSD and Linux.

2020-12-01 Thread Don Lewis
On 1 Dec, j...@apache.org wrote: > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > jim pushed a commit to branch trunk > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice.git > > > The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/trunk by this push: >

Re: [OPINION VOTE] CentOS7 or Ubuntu 14.04

2020-11-10 Thread Don Lewis
On 10 Nov, Jim Jagielski wrote: > CentOS7: glibc 2.17 > Ubuntu 14.04: glibc 2.19 > > Since CentOS7 emulates the "super stable" worldview of RHEL, the > CentOS7 version will likely always be the older one. In that case I think a Ubuntu build is unlikely to run on CentOS 7.

Re: [OPINION VOTE] CentOS7 or Ubuntu 14.04

2020-11-10 Thread Don Lewis
On 10 Nov, Jim Jagielski wrote: > History: For previous AOO releases (up to 4.1.8), we have used > CentOS5 as our build environ for our community builds. > As of 4.2.x, this is no longer an option. Instead, we > baselined CentOS7 (mainly due to gstreamer 1.0). > >

upgrade notifications once we release 4.2.0

2020-11-09 Thread Don Lewis
For 4.2.0, we are talking about building on CentOS 7. Therefore some of platforms that we currently support won't support 4.2.0, in particular CentOS 5, which is currently EOL and CentOS 6, which is still supported upstream, at least for now the last time I looked. If a user is running on an

Re: update NSS libraries

2020-11-07 Thread Don Lewis
On 7 Nov, John D'Orazio wrote: > Hello all, ss I continue building and debugging the next release of my > Writer add-on, in which I'm attempting to include the *Chrome Embedded > Framework* in it's Java flavoured build (I'm using the builds from this > release >

Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.8-RC2 as GA

2020-11-03 Thread Don Lewis
On 2 Nov, Jim Jagielski wrote: > I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community > builds of > Apache OpenOffice 4.1.8-RC3 as GA. > > These artifacts can be found at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.8-RC3/ > > Please cast your vote: The

Re: 4.1.8-RC3

2020-11-02 Thread Don Lewis
On 1 Nov, Pedro Lino wrote: > Hi Don > >> On 11/01/2020 5:55 PM Don Lewis wrote: > >> What about AOO418? > > Apparently this issue only happened with my own build. It does not occur with > the official 418 RC3 build compiled by Jim > (I mentioned

Re: 4.1.8-RC3

2020-11-01 Thread Don Lewis
On 1 Nov, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Don, > > Thanks for the update! > > @Pedro: Does that solve the problem? If yes, could you set the issue to > "RESOLVED"? What about AOO418? - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: 4.1.8-RC3

2020-10-31 Thread Don Lewis
On 31 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Don, > > Am 31.10.20 um 13:58 schrieb Don Lewis: >> On 30 Oct, Pedro Lino wrote: >>> Just recompiled AOO 4.1.8 on another Ubuntu 18.04.5 x64 without issues. >>> >>> Installing 4.1.8 over 4.1.7 end with error reported

Re: 4.1.8-RC3

2020-10-31 Thread Don Lewis
On 30 Oct, Pedro Lino wrote: > Just recompiled AOO 4.1.8 on another Ubuntu 18.04.5 x64 without issues. > > Installing 4.1.8 over 4.1.7 end with error reported 2 years ago > > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127774 I just updated that ticket with some new information. It is possible

Re: 4.1.8-RC3

2020-10-29 Thread Don Lewis
On 29 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote: > I think we are ready for 4.1.8-RC3. I'll start Linux and macOS builds. Building on CentOS 5 and running both on CentOS 5 and Ubuntu 16 seem to work. - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [openoffice] branch AOO418 updated: Fix redland build issues when using CentOS5 as build and later platforms as user. Squash General Error.

2020-10-29 Thread Don Lewis
trunk and AOO42X should also get this fix. On 29 Oct, j...@apache.org wrote: > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > jim pushed a commit to branch AOO418 > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice.git > > > The following commit(s) were

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

2020-10-29 Thread Don Lewis
On 28 Oct, Don Lewis wrote: > On 28 Oct, Don Lewis wrote: >> On 27 Oct, Don Lewis wrote: >>> On 27 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>>> Maybe... but it DID WORK before. That is, before the mega patch, >>>> configure did the "right thing". So if som

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

2020-10-28 Thread Don Lewis
On 28 Oct, Don Lewis wrote: > On 27 Oct, Don Lewis wrote: >> On 27 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> Maybe... but it DID WORK before. That is, before the mega patch, >>> configure did the "right thing". So if something is causing configure >>> to make a di

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

2020-10-28 Thread Don Lewis
On 27 Oct, Don Lewis wrote: > On 27 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Maybe... but it DID WORK before. That is, before the mega patch, >> configure did the "right thing". So if something is causing configure >> to make a different decision, it is due to the interaction w

Re: building from a source tarball

2020-10-28 Thread Don Lewis
On 28 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote: > In particular, this is when building from the "official" SRC_RELEASE > tarball we provide. Is the inc/reporevision.lst file not included? It is in one of the RCs that I looked at. - To

Re: building from a source tarball

2020-10-28 Thread Don Lewis
6f662dc2a8f9%40%3Cdev.openoffice.apache.org%3E > Regards, > >    Matthias > > Am 28.10.20 um 18:33 schrieb Don Lewis: >> Something that we are still missing for AOO418 is a fix for getting the >> revision info when building from a source tarball instead of a git >>

building from a source tarball

2020-10-28 Thread Don Lewis
Something that we are still missing for AOO418 is a fix for getting the revision info when building from a source tarball instead of a git checkout. Someone mentioned this a couple weeks ago. - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

2020-10-27 Thread Don Lewis
tinent difference between the 2... > >> On Oct 27, 2020, at 5:24 PM, Don Lewis wrote: >> >> On 27 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> For completeness, and especially for those not following the thread, >>> what we have conclusively shown is that it is NOT an issue w/ the

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

2020-10-27 Thread Don Lewis
ewer distros. >> On Oct 27, 2020, at 5:09 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Oct 27, 2020, at 2:34 PM, Don Lewis wrote: >>> >>> On 27 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>>> Thanks all... I am now building the final

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

2020-10-27 Thread Don Lewis
On 27 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Thanks all... I am now building the final 'git bisect' test, based on > > > https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/f7070ae3689d0d34bf9dab3d31f56744d0df4784 > > assuming that this is good, it seems like 99% likely that the problem arose > with > >

Re: openssl upgrade for 4.1.8

2020-10-22 Thread Don Lewis
On 22 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Regarding this commit: > > > https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/8d4c92f789718b2f73ea62d487811a0c9d476739 > > why the change > > - CONFIGURE_ACTION=Configure linux-generic64 > + CONFIGURE_ACTION=Configure linux-x86_64 no-dso no-shared $(NO_ASM)

Re: AOO418-RC2: General Error on opening files on Ubuntu

2020-10-22 Thread Don Lewis
On 21 Oct, Don Lewis wrote: > On 21 Oct, Don Lewis wrote: >> On 21 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On Oct 21, 2020, at 4:21 PM, Andrea Pescetti >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> It looks like we are getting closer

Re: AOO418-RC2: General Error on opening files on Ubuntu

2020-10-22 Thread Don Lewis
On 21 Oct, Don Lewis wrote: > On 21 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> >>> On Oct 21, 2020, at 4:21 PM, Andrea Pescetti >>> wrote: >>> >>> It looks like we are getting closer I mean, we have a commit that >>> is only relevant to Cen

Re: AOO418-RC2: General Error on opening files on Ubuntu

2020-10-21 Thread Don Lewis
Sounds like test="string-length($shift)!=0" doesn't work, which is odd ... >> >>> On Oct 21, 2020, at 2:41 PM, Don Lewis wrote: >>> >>> On 21 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>>> OK... so $shift is a number then, or should be? But sometimes $shift &

Re: AOO418-RC2: General Error on opening files on Ubuntu

2020-10-21 Thread Don Lewis
On 21 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > >> On Oct 21, 2020, at 4:21 PM, Andrea Pescetti >> wrote: >> >> It looks like we are getting closer I mean, we have a commit that >> is only relevant to CentOS 5 and we know that Jim's builds are done >> on CentOS 5 and have the bug, while the others

Re: AOO418-RC2: General Error on opening files on Ubuntu

2020-10-21 Thread Don Lewis
On 21 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote: > never mind this... it's not a matter of building. I can build fine. It > just crashes on Ubuntu. no idea why. Are you building on the same version of Ubuntu? - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: AOO418-RC2: General Error on opening files on Ubuntu

2020-10-21 Thread Don Lewis
n my reading. I don't know what number() would do in this situation. > I'm thinking this isn't the problem though with the failures :/ Yeah, I think it's probably something else that went in at the same time, and I think also that build OS vs. deployment OS is part of the mix. >> O

Re: AOO418-RC2: General Error on opening files on Ubuntu

2020-10-21 Thread Don Lewis
On 21 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote: > so are YOU able to build HEAD of AOO418 on CentOS5 ?? I haven't tried to build today's HEAD, but I've built and tested all of my AOO418 commits on CentOS 5 before I made the commits. - To

Re: AOO418-RC2: General Error on opening files on Ubuntu

2020-10-21 Thread Don Lewis
On 21 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Am 21.10.20 um 17:43 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Should that fix be just: >> >> > > https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/9510f3847723b65ae47efff8796e6f14f586ce09 > > Really looks like a candidate... I doubt it. Unless you are building on CentOS 5,

Re: AOO418-RC2: General Error on opening files on Ubuntu

2020-10-21 Thread Don Lewis
On 21 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Should that fix be just: > > That would work, but it would produce a different output. It would always put ">> $shift" in the output whenever $shift is nonblank. The change that I committed only puts ">> $shift" in the output if $shift is nonblank and

Re: AOO418-RC2: General Error on opening files on Ubuntu

2020-10-21 Thread Don Lewis
On 21 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote: > I don't have it, but that was around the end of Aug right? So right around > the time when a bunch of stuff was included like updates to nss, libxslt, > libxml2... > > I'm trying to get my head around the logic of > > >

Re: 4.1.8 RC2 build broken when configured with --without-fonts

2020-10-11 Thread Don Lewis
On 12 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Don, > > Am 12.10.20 um 00:49 schrieb Don Lewis: >> On 10 Oct, Don Lewis wrote: >>> On 10 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>>> Hi Don, >>>> >>>> Am 10.10.20 um 13:30 schrieb Don Lewis: >>>

Re: 4.1.8 RC2 build broken when configured with --without-fonts

2020-10-11 Thread Don Lewis
On 10 Oct, Don Lewis wrote: > On 10 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> Hi Don, >> >> Am 10.10.20 um 13:30 schrieb Don Lewis: >>> On 10 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>>> Hi Don, >>>> >>>> Am 10.10.20 um 13:04 schrieb Don Lewis: >&

Re: error in instsetoo_native module

2020-10-11 Thread Don Lewis
On 11 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Peter, > > ** > ERROR: ERROR: Missing files > in function: remove_Files_Without_Sourcedirectory > ** > > That looks like the problem Don is having on FreeBSD. >

Re: Building 4.1.8-RC2 - packaging issues

2020-10-11 Thread Don Lewis
On 11 Oct, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > I've built the 4.1.8-RC2 sources from > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.8-RC2/source/ > on a new CentOS 7 VM and generated "installed" (not packaged), RPM and > DEB builds that I tested on a variety of Fedora and Ubuntu systems. > > All

Re: 4.1.8 RC2 build broken when configured with --without-fonts

2020-10-10 Thread Don Lewis
On 10 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Don, > > Am 10.10.20 um 13:30 schrieb Don Lewis: >> On 10 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> Hi Don, >>> >>> Am 10.10.20 um 13:04 schrieb Don Lewis: >>>> On 9 Oct, Dave Fisher wrote: >>>>&g

Re: 4.1.8 RC2 build broken when configured with --without-fonts

2020-10-10 Thread Don Lewis
On 10 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Don, > > Am 10.10.20 um 13:04 schrieb Don Lewis: >> On 9 Oct, Dave Fisher wrote: >>> It’s a guess, but which Java are you using? >> OpenJDK 1.8.0_252 > What happens if you build with Java 7? >> >>> Some of tho

Re: 4.1.8 RC2 build broken when configured with --without-fonts

2020-10-10 Thread Don Lewis
avadoc is being run on some files that have never been run through javadoc before in recent history. I have no idea what might be triggering that and why it suddenly started happening. > Regards, > Dave > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Oct 9, 2020, at 6:08 PM, Don Lewis wrote

4.1.8 RC2 build broken when configured with --without-fonts

2020-10-09 Thread Don Lewis
I started working on the FreeBSD port for 4.1.8. Unlike the the other ports, the FreeBSD port doesn't bundle fonts with the package. Instead it uses fonts from the system, installing them separately if necessary. To do this, it configures with the --without-fonts option. This 4.1.8 RC2 fails

how to download RC2?

2020-10-08 Thread Don Lewis
I want to download the source tarball for RC2, but this page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-fullsets isn't helpful. - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [openoffice] branch AOO418 updated: Fix broken compile for older Linux... disable HW accel just as we used to do before

2020-10-06 Thread Don Lewis
On 6 Oct, j...@apache.org wrote: > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > jim pushed a commit to branch AOO418 > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice.git > > > The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/AOO418 by this push: >

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

2020-10-06 Thread Don Lewis
On 6 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Thanks! Since these are relatively new, I think that this can hold for 4.1.9 I'd at least like to get the nss update into trunk/AOO42X where it can soak for a while. >> On Oct 6, 2020, at 12:19 PM, Don Lewis wrote: >> >> On 6 Oct, Jim Ja

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

2020-10-06 Thread Don Lewis
On 6 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote: > OK... as expected, it fails on macOS. > > 2 things I see: in the nss.patch file there is a line: > > Only in misc/build/nss-3.39/nss/coreconf: Darwin.mk.rej > > So I'm wondering if the patch file itself or maybe even the whole pull > request is borked. >

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

2020-10-05 Thread Don Lewis
Any progress on nss? On 30 Sep, Jim Jagielski wrote: > I'll see how the build on macOS goes, but likely won't be able to get to it > until Monday. > >> On Sep 29, 2020, at 2:52 PM, Don Lewis wrote: >> >> On 29 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> Hi Don, >&

Re: [openoffice] branch trunk updated: It seems we need YYDEBUG to compile main/connectivity now.

2020-10-05 Thread Don Lewis
On 5 Oct, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 8:08 AM Don Lewis wrote: > >> On 5 Oct, dam...@apache.org wrote: >> > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. >> > >> > damjan pushed a commit to branch trunk >&

Re: Fwd: [libexpat/libexpat] Release R_2_2_10 - 2.2.10

2020-10-05 Thread Don Lewis
On 3 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi all, > > Libexpat has been updated! > > Regards, > >    Matthias > > > > Weitergeleitete Nachricht > Betreff: [libexpat/libexpat] Release R_2_2_10 - 2.2.10 > Datum:Sat, 03 Oct 2020 11:35:44 -0700 > Von: Sebastian Pipping

Re: [openoffice] branch trunk updated: It seems we need YYDEBUG to compile main/connectivity now.

2020-10-05 Thread Don Lewis
On 5 Oct, dam...@apache.org wrote: > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > damjan pushed a commit to branch trunk > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice.git > > > The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/trunk by this push: >

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

2020-09-30 Thread Don Lewis
I've got everything on my list for AOO418 in the queue: * Fix for old java detection when building with new java Set java compilation target to version 1.5 #101 https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/101 * Bug fixes from upstream for bundled libxml2 and serf modules

Re: Building AOO under Debian9

2020-09-30 Thread Don Lewis
ugh. This is one more level of escaping than I think should be necessary, but \\n didn't seem to help. > Thanks for your help > > Kind regards > > Mechtilde > > Am 30.09.20 um 08:38 schrieb Don Lewis: >> On 30 Sep, Mechtilde wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >

Re: Building AOO under Debian9

2020-09-30 Thread Don Lewis
On 30 Sep, Mechtilde wrote: > Hello, > > I set up a recent build environment with Debian 9. > > I have got the same error message again: > > ~/openoffice/main/instsetoo_native$ build --from cui > build -- version: - > > > = > Building module cui > = > > Entering

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

2020-09-29 Thread Don Lewis
On 29 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Don, > > Am 26.09.20 um 23:47 schrieb Don Lewis: >> On 26 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Am 25.09.20 um 18:05 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>>> Am 25.09.20 um 14:01 schrieb Jim Jagiel

Re: java detection

2020-09-26 Thread Don Lewis
On 27 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Am 26.09.20 um 23:43 schrieb Don Lewis: >> On 26 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> Hi Don, >>> >>> Is this an easy fix? >> Yes. What minimum version should we target? > > The same as in trunk? Trunk currently

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

2020-09-26 Thread Don Lewis
On 26 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi all, > > Am 25.09.20 um 18:05 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Am 25.09.20 um 14:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> That looks quite a bit more straightforward :-) >> Let's wait for Don's PR, this is only a minor update from Python 2.7.17 >> to 2.7.18. > > Merged

Re: java detection

2020-09-26 Thread Don Lewis
On 26 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Don, > > Is this an easy fix? Yes. What minimum version should we target? > Regards, > >    Matthias > > Am 25.09.20 um 22:54 schrieb Don Lewis: >> On 25 Sep, Don Lewis wrote: >>> On 24 Sep, Don Lewis wrote: >&g

Re: java detection

2020-09-25 Thread Don Lewis
On 25 Sep, Don Lewis wrote: > On 24 Sep, Don Lewis wrote: >> I've been looking into the problem where AOO418 can't detect older >> versions of java when it is built with a new version of java. This is a >> definite puzzle because the detection is done by the jvmfwk mo

Re: java detection

2020-09-25 Thread Don Lewis
On 24 Sep, Don Lewis wrote: > I've been looking into the problem where AOO418 can't detect older > versions of java when it is built with a new version of java. This is a > definite puzzle because the detection is done by the jvmfwk module, and > the code in that module is ident

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

2020-09-24 Thread Don Lewis
On 24 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Great! > > We should also cherry-pick Don's Python update: > > https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/26aca12f509e5c739c98db9ce5641a2c5feecea7 > > And update LICENSE: > >

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

2020-09-24 Thread Don Lewis
On 24 Sep, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Well, gotten further but now there are packaging issues. Something with the > new apr/apr-util/serf stuff is getting hosed... looking into it: > > ERROR: The following files could not be found: > ERROR: File not found: libapr-1.0.5.2.dylib > ERROR: File not

java detection

2020-09-24 Thread Don Lewis
I've been looking into the problem where AOO418 can't detect older versions of java when it is built with a new version of java. This is a definite puzzle because the detection is done by the jvmfwk module, and the code in that module is identical between AOO418 and trunk. The only difference is

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

2020-09-22 Thread Don Lewis
On 22 Sep, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Just a FYI that HEAD of AOO418 builds on macOS with no issues so far... https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/94 has some macOS-specific changes from AOO42X. - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Minimum MacOS Version for trunk and 4.2.0 builds

2020-09-22 Thread Don Lewis
On 20 Sep, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > Am 20.09.20 um 20:16 schrieb Dave Fisher: >>> On Sep 20, 2020, at 9:40 AM, Marcus wrote: >>> >>> Am 19.09.20 um 12:36 schrieb Peter Kovacs: Keep in mind that C++ Standard has changed a lot in reasoned years, and at least I would like to go with the

Re: Minimum MacOS Version for trunk and 4.2.0 builds

2020-09-22 Thread Don Lewis
On 20 Sep, Dave Fisher wrote: > > >> On Sep 20, 2020, at 9:40 AM, Marcus wrote: >> >> Am 19.09.20 um 12:36 schrieb Peter Kovacs: >>> Keep in mind that C++ Standard has changed a lot in reasoned years, >>> and at least I would like to go with the new standard. If we stick >>> to the old code

Re: [GitHub] [openoffice] DonLewisFreeBSD opened a new pull request #94: Bundle418

2020-09-15 Thread Don Lewis
After dodging a local wildfire and potential evacuation, excessive heat warnings and requests by the power company to conserve power, possible rolling blackouts due to power shortages, high wind warnings with a two day Public Safety Power Shutoff to avoid power-line caused fires, smoke plumes from

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

2020-09-04 Thread Don Lewis
On 4 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Jim, Don, > > Am 28.08.20 um 15:17 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Let's commit and work after pushed. > > We should try > > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887 > > again for 4.1.8. I've included it in a large bundle of cherry-picks that I've been

libxslt upgrade breaks CentOS 5 build

2020-08-30 Thread Don Lewis
I've been looking at upgrading a bunch of our bundled dependencies, and it looks like upgrading libxslt (or maybe libxml2) breaks the build on CentOS 5. The writerfilter module uses xsltproc to generate the header resources.hxx, and in some cases it contains invalid C cod such as:

Re: installing git on centos 5.5

2020-08-30 Thread Don Lewis
On 30 Aug, Carl Marcum wrote: > Hi Don, > > On 8/29/20 8:02 PM, Don Lewis wrote: >> On 29 Aug, Don Lewis wrote: >>> On 29 Aug, Don Lewis wrote: >>>> On 23 Aug, Carl Marcum wrote: >>>>> I'm setting up a new CentOS 5.5 VM that I can build 4.1.x s

Re: installing git on centos 5.5

2020-08-29 Thread Don Lewis
On 29 Aug, Don Lewis wrote: > On 29 Aug, Don Lewis wrote: >> On 23 Aug, Carl Marcum wrote: >>> I'm setting up a new CentOS 5.5 VM that I can build 4.1.x series on. >>> >>> First hurdle was figuring out out how to point to the vault.centos.org >>

Re: installing git on centos 5.5

2020-08-29 Thread Don Lewis
On 29 Aug, Don Lewis wrote: > On 23 Aug, Carl Marcum wrote: >> I'm setting up a new CentOS 5.5 VM that I can build 4.1.x series on. >> >> First hurdle was figuring out out how to point to the vault.centos.org >> archived rpms. >> Unfortunately no git was

Re: installing git on centos 5.5

2020-08-29 Thread Don Lewis
On 29 Aug, Don Lewis wrote: > On 23 Aug, Carl Marcum wrote: >> I'm setting up a new CentOS 5.5 VM that I can build 4.1.x series on. >> >> First hurdle was figuring out out how to point to the vault.centos.org >> archived rpms. >> Unfortunately no git was

Re: installing git on centos 5.5

2020-08-29 Thread Don Lewis
On 23 Aug, Carl Marcum wrote: > I'm setting up a new CentOS 5.5 VM that I can build 4.1.x series on. > > First hurdle was figuring out out how to point to the vault.centos.org > archived rpms. > Unfortunately no git was available then. I've managed to resurrect my CentOS 5 VM. git builds from

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

2020-08-27 Thread Don Lewis
On 27 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Am 27.08.20 um 19:32 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> >> Hi Don, >> >> Am 24.08.20 um 04:04 schrieb Don Lewis: >>> I've got a bunch of cherry picks that I'm planning to merge into AOO418. >>> There are two categories:

Re: Spurious file libgcc_s.so.1 during Linux build [Was: OpenSSL versions]

2020-08-27 Thread Don Lewis
On 27 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Don, > > Am 26.08.20 um 03:55 schrieb Don Lewis: >> On 25 Aug, Don Lewis wrote: >>> On 25 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote: >>>>> On 08/25/2020 8:35 PM Don Lewis wrote: >>>>> Try deleting /opt/openoffice4/progr

Re: Spurious file libgcc_s.so.1 during Linux build [Was: OpenSSL versions]

2020-08-25 Thread Don Lewis
On 25 Aug, Don Lewis wrote: > On 25 Aug, Don Lewis wrote: >> On 25 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote: >>> >>>> On 08/25/2020 8:35 PM Don Lewis wrote: >>> >>>> Try deleting /opt/openoffice4/program/libgcc_s.so.1 >>>> For some reason that bogus f

Re: Spurious file libgcc_s.so.1 during Linux build [Was: OpenSSL versions]

2020-08-25 Thread Don Lewis
On 25 Aug, Don Lewis wrote: > On 25 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote: >> >>> On 08/25/2020 8:35 PM Don Lewis wrote: >> >>> Try deleting /opt/openoffice4/program/libgcc_s.so.1 >>> For some reason that bogus file is getting packaged by your build. >> >&g

Re: Spurious file libgcc_s.so.1 during Linux build [Was: OpenSSL versions]

2020-08-25 Thread Don Lewis
On 25 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote: > >> On 08/25/2020 8:35 PM Don Lewis wrote: > >> Try deleting /opt/openoffice4/program/libgcc_s.so.1 >> For some reason that bogus file is getting packaged by your build. > > Yep. That fixed it. It doesn't make any sense to me

Re: Spurious file libgcc_s.so.1 during Linux build [Was: OpenSSL versions]

2020-08-25 Thread Don Lewis
On 25 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote: > Hi Matthias > >> On 08/25/2020 8:07 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > >> If you start AOO in a shell with "soffice", does that give some information? > > Didn't think about that :) > > /opt/openoffice4/program/javaldx: error while loading shared libraries: >

Re: Spurious file libgcc_s.so.1 during Linux build [Was: OpenSSL versions]

2020-08-25 Thread Don Lewis
On 25 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote: > Hi Matthias > >> On 08/25/2020 8:07 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > >> If you start AOO in a shell with "soffice", does that give some information? > > Didn't think about that :) > > /opt/openoffice4/program/javaldx: error while loading shared libraries: >

Re: Spurious file libgcc_s.so.1 during Linux build [Was: OpenSSL versions]

2020-08-25 Thread Don Lewis
On 25 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Pedro, > > Am 25.08.20 um 20:11 schrieb Pedro Lino: >> Hi Don >> >>> On 08/25/2020 10:59 AM Don Lewis wrote: >>> With the latest batch of cherry-picks that I just pushed to AOO418 and >>> using OpenJDK 8, I

Re: Spurious file libgcc_s.so.1 during Linux build [Was: OpenSSL versions]

2020-08-25 Thread Don Lewis
On 25 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote: > Hi Don > >> On 08/25/2020 10:59 AM Don Lewis wrote: > >> With the latest batch of cherry-picks that I just pushed to AOO418 >> and using OpenJDK 8, I was able to build AOO418 on Ubuntu 18. > > After updating with your

Re: Spurious file libgcc_s.so.1 during Linux build [Was: OpenSSL versions]

2020-08-25 Thread Don Lewis
On 25 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote: > >> On 08/25/2020 3:47 AM Don Lewis wrote: > >> It's one of the bug fixes that I >> plan to cherry-pick for AOO418 tonight. > > Excellent! Thanks! > >> What version of OpenJDK are you using? I'm seeing a fair amount of

Re: Spurious file libgcc_s.so.1 during Linux build [Was: OpenSSL versions]

2020-08-24 Thread Don Lewis
On 24 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote: > >> On 08/24/2020 3:18 PM Don Lewis wrote: > >> Is this a parallel build? Has the offuh module been built and >> delivered? Seems oa little dd that offuh is not listed as a dependency >> in sax/prj/build.lst, but it is listed

Re: Spurious file libgcc_s.so.1 during Linux build [Was: OpenSSL versions]

2020-08-24 Thread Don Lewis
On 24 Aug, Don Lewis wrote: > On 24 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote: >> Hi Don, all >> >>> On 08/24/2020 3:18 PM Don Lewis wrote: >> >>> Is this a parallel build? >> >> Switched to single thread building >> >> build --all >> >&g

Re: Spurious file libgcc_s.so.1 during Linux build [Was: OpenSSL versions]

2020-08-24 Thread Don Lewis
On 24 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote: > Hi Don, all > >> On 08/24/2020 3:18 PM Don Lewis wrote: > >> Is this a parallel build? > > Switched to single thread building > > build --all > > when it stopped I followed the suggestion by Rigo and deleted > /source/o

Re: installing git on centos 5.5

2020-08-24 Thread Don Lewis
On 24 Aug, Carl Marcum wrote: > Hi Don, > > On 8/23/20 2:58 PM, Don Lewis wrote: >> On 23 Aug, Carl Marcum wrote: >>> I'm setting up a new CentOS 5.5 VM that I can build 4.1.x series on. >>> >>> First hurdle was figuring out out how to point

Re: Spurious file libgcc_s.so.1 during Linux build [Was: OpenSSL versions]

2020-08-24 Thread Don Lewis
On 24 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote: > Hi Don, all > >> On 08/24/2020 3:18 PM Don Lewis wrote: > >> Is this a parallel build? > > Switched to single thread building > > build --all > > when it stopped I followed the suggestion by Rigo and deleted > /source/o

Re: Spurious file libgcc_s.so.1 during Linux build [Was: OpenSSL versions]

2020-08-24 Thread Don Lewis
On 24 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote: > Hi Don, all > >> On 08/24/2020 3:18 PM Don Lewis wrote: > >> Is this a parallel build? > > Switched to single thread building > > build --all > > when it stopped I followed the suggestion by Rigo and deleted > /source/o

Re: Spurious file libgcc_s.so.1 during Linux build [Was: OpenSSL versions]

2020-08-24 Thread Don Lewis
On 24 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote: > Ciao Rigo > >> > /source/openoffice/main/solver/418/unxlngx6.pro/lib/libgcc_s.so.1: invalid >> > ELF header >> > > > Now it stopped at expat, but the issue was the same: libgcc_s.so.1: invalid > ELF header > >> > I'm wondering why there is a copy of

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

2020-08-24 Thread Don Lewis
On 24 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote: > Hi Don, all > > I'm still trying to compile 418 on Ubuntu 18.04 x64 > I updated the 418 code but I get stuck at module graphite with the following > error (log file at https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/config.log) > > Any ideas? The error is happening during the

Re: installing git on centos 5.5

2020-08-24 Thread Don Lewis
On 24 Aug, Carl Marcum wrote: > Hi Don, > > On 8/23/20 2:58 PM, Don Lewis wrote: >> On 23 Aug, Carl Marcum wrote: >>> I'm setting up a new CentOS 5.5 VM that I can build 4.1.x series on. >>> >>> First hurdle was figuring out out how to point

AOO418 cherry picks

2020-08-23 Thread Don Lewis
I've got a bunch of cherry picks that I'm planning to merge into AOO418. There are two categories: * Fixes from the FreeBSD port that have been upstreamed to the trunk and AOO42X branches, but I'm still carrying around in the FreeBSD port of 4.1.7. * Updates of a bunch of the bundled

  1   2   3   4   >