I think I merged all your changes.
This is the first time I did this w/ github so please let me know if I need
to do something more.
Fred
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.orgwrote:
Fred Ollinger wrote:
I'm building this now.
I think that perhaps
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 1:10 PM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
On Apr 9, 2013 7:05 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 1:00 PM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
On Apr 9, 2013 6:47 PM, Rob Weir
I'm building this now.
I think that perhaps this was dropped.
My goal is to first build aooo 3.3 rpm (last srpm) then to build 4.0 latest.
Anyone want this if it works?
Fred
I built an epm package and can send it to you if you like or whatever.
I have a spec as well. Just email me in private.
Fred
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
arie...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 03:36:19PM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 3/28/13 2:09 PM,
What was the original problem that we are trying to solve?
From what I can gather we have no idea how many people use Base.
There's speculation that it's small, but unless it's measured, what
does this mean? Also, there are some people who think that Base works
for them and that it's critical for
Perhaps a survey question could be regarding this. How many people use
it? What features do they use? What features do they want. To MS
Access users, it could be, feature(s) would get you to switch to AOOO
for all DB needs?
Fred
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
May I please an account?
I'm building on fedora now. I'd like to point the first page to the second.
Also, I do now have some minor updates.
Sincerely,
Fred
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:09 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
On 20/03/2013 Kay Schenk wrote:
:
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Fred Ollinger folli...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know where this is at, but I heard that people wanted this.
So far, I have a spec file for dmake. I need to fix a few errors and
warnings, but it does make an rpm which works.
I'm keeping my work here:
https
I don't know where this is at, but I heard that people wanted this.
So far, I have a spec file for dmake. I need to fix a few errors and
warnings, but it does make an rpm which works.
I'm keeping my work here:
https://github.com/fredollinger/aooo-fedora-rawhide
Next move is an rpm for esp.
I know that there were reasons for the fork and I respect that. I was
wondering if libreoffice and aooo can't agree to some basic level api
for 3rd party developers?
Probably not, but I think it's worth asking.
Fred
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Keith Curtis keit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon,
originale -
Da: Fred Ollinger folli...@gmail.com
A: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Cc:
Inviato: Venerdì 15 Febbraio 2013 13:49
Oggetto: oracle java7 build bug
T his is using the patch that I had created last week which gets us
past the hsqldb java7 compile errors:
Entering /mnt/lfs/sources
care which) soon if we are really going to drop
java6 like others had told me.
Sincerely,
Fred
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 5:20 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Fred Ollinger folli...@gmail.com
This is using the patch that I had created last week which gets us
past the hsqldb java7 compile errors:
Entering /mnt/lfs/sources/ubuntu/local_dev300/vcl/prj
cd .. make -s -r -j1
make: *** No rule to make target
`/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gcache.h', needed by
Relying on jars, IMHO, is not bad, but it depends on your goals.
The point of compiling from source is that it's a first step to
actually being a developer which is why I do it. Compiling problems
aren't problems for us new developers they are puzzles to solve to
help people out.
If there are
I'll help with testing java 6 and java 7 from Oracle.
I vote for keeping up with latest and greatest, but we should also
respect that many distros are probably going to ship java 6 for a
while.
Thus, we should probably work with both then officially deprecated
java6 when it's time.
Fred
On
Haha, I don't know. I could be wrong.
I'm not trying to start a debate, but I'm just trying help to get
things working on as many current distros as possible.
Best Wishes,
Fred
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Fred
OK, I won't build with java6 anymore then.
Fred
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Fred Ollinger folli...@gmail.com wrote:
Haha, I don't know. I could be wrong.
OpenJDK 7 is the current version, OpenJDK 8 is coming
I love it. I'd prefer a warning rather than silently giving me 1 even
if I had that in the past.
Another idea is to return 1, but have a popup which says: We are
returning 1 to 0^0 due to backwards compatability, but we this might
change in the fure. Click here to never show this warning again
I don't have time now, but David has given me some great ideas on how
he uses macros. Anyone interested should ask for details.
It's nice to see an intelligent end user making detailed suggestions.
Again, I won't work on this now due to it's size, but I would like
oocalc to have a simpler macro
To whom it may concern,
Below is a patch to fix some java7 compilation bugs. Also, this is attached.
Index: hsqldb/jdbcDriver.java
===
--- hsqldb.orig/jdbcDriver.java 2013-02-07 09:17:01.0 -0800
+++ hsqldb/jdbcDriver.java
=
Building module vcl
=
Entering /mnt/lfs/sources/ubuntu/local_dev300/vcl/prj
cd .. make -s -r -j1
[ build DEP ] LNK:Library/libvclplug_gtkli.so
make: *** No rule to make target
`/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gcache.h', needed by
21 matches
Mail list logo
