Cual seria mejor opción para seguir El mar., 29 de diciembre de 2020 17:18, Marcus <marcus.m...@wtnet.de> escribió:
> Am 29.12.20 um 20:05 schrieb Dave Fisher: > >> On Dec 29, 2020, at 10:47 AM, Czesław Wolański < > czeslaw.wolan...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> I suggest we offer something clearer and more direct. I’m not sure what > >> that is. > >>> Perhaps we need a compatible java page to point Windows, macOS, and > Linux > >> users > >>> to acceptable versions. > >>> Maybe we have such a page we can better highlight from the Download > page? > >> > >> Link on the download page "Java and Apache OpenOffice" > >> > >> https://www.openoffice.org/download/common/java.html > >> > >> Page with sections: > >> - "Why Do I Need Java to Use Apache OpenOffice?", > >> - "Which Java Version Do I Need to Use Apache OpenOffice?" > >> - "Where Can I Get Java?". > >> > >> Is that a good starting point? > > > > I think so. That page could use a major edit. We don’t need to discuss > legacy releases and the links need to be more direct. > > +1 > > > For Oracle looks best: https://java.com/en/download/manual.jsp < > https://java.com/en/download/manual.jsp> > > > > And instead of OpenJDK we should point to AdoptOpenJDK: > https://adoptopenjdk.net/releases.html < > https://adoptopenjdk.net/releases.html> > > > > It looks like we could even add a button to the download page that might > pick out the proper adoptopenjdk. > > Even this is possible. But it takes time as the download style and > JavaScript magic needs to be extended. > > Until then the simple "Windows 32-bit (x86) (EXE)" drop-down-item is a > good and clear statement to separate from 64-bit. > > I can also add a 64-bit item with a hint text that AOO 32-bit will run > also on Windows 64-bit and I can also add a Java hint. > > Marcus > > > > >> Am Di., 29. Dez. 2020 um 19:02 Uhr schrieb Dave Fisher <w...@apache.org > >: > >>>> On Dec 29, 2020, at 9:47 AM, Rory O'Farrell <ofarr...@iol.ie> wrote: > >>>> On Tue, 29 Dec 2020 18:31:23 +0100 > >>>> Peter Kovacs <pe...@apache.org> wrote: > >>>>>> On 29.12.20 18:25, Dave Fisher wrote: > >>>>>>> On Dec 29, 2020, at 8:39 AM, Jörg Schmidt <joe...@j-m-schmidt.de> > >>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>>>>> From: Bidouille [mailto:ooofo...@free.fr] > >>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 3:02 PM > >>>>>>>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Proposed change for download page > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Personally, I don't see the need until we have a real x64 > version. > >>>>>>>> +1 > >>>>>>> Don't you care if users can't find their way around and therefore > >>> stop using AOO? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> That was exactly the result of the thread that prompted me to > suggest > >>> a small correction on the download page. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> The thread is unfortunately in German, but here is the link: > >>>>>>> http://de.openoffice.info/viewtopic.php?p=293070#p293070 > >>>>>> You should have started your discussion with this context. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> It is better to discuss the actual problem which is that Windows > users > >>> of AOO don’t know that they require a 32 bit Java than it is to > suggest a > >>> minor fix to the download page. > >>>>> Java 32 bit is part of the release notes. > >>>> > >>>> Which, experience on en-Forum indicates, no average user ever reads! > >>> > >>> Does your average Windows user know the difference between X86 and > X64?! > >>> > >>> I suggest we offer something clearer and more direct. I’m not sure what > >>> that is. Perhaps we need a compatible java page to point Windows, > macOS, > >>> and Linux users to acceptable versions. Maybe we have such a page we > can > >>> better highlight from the Download page? > >>> > >>> What advice does the en-Forum offer? > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >
