Re: Some observations about AOO 4.1.10 and Windows 10 Pro 21H1

2021-07-19 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Jörg > On 07/17/2021 9:42 AM Jörg Schmidt wrote: > JRE 1.8.0_291 is not recognized by OO and cannot be activated - even if I > first install JRE and then AOO it is like this. > (In the forum http://de.openoffice.info it is however reported by a user that > he uses 1.8.0_291 in AOO 4.1.10,

Re: catalina branch waiting for reviews

2021-07-18 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Arrigo > On 07/18/2021 3:54 PM Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > I did not change any code, therefore I do not think I changed anything > for Linux and Windows. > > However, I just uploaded the en-US builds in RPM and DEB format to the > same directory, in case you or anyone else wants to test them

Re: catalina branch waiting for reviews [Was: [Mini] Setup of development environment]

2021-07-18 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Arrigo I do not have any Apple devices :) Did you build any Linux binaries (DEBs)? Can you share a link? Thanks! Pedro > On 07/18/2021 2:00 PM Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > > > Dear All, > > On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 03:27:54PM +0200, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > > > Dear All, > > > > I just

Re: [GitHub] [openoffice] ardovm edited a comment on pull request #133: graphite: remove the -Werror option from debug builds

2021-06-20 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Arrigo, all Development seems to be quite live at https://github.com/silnrsi/graphite Regards, Pedro > On 06/20/2021 9:08 PM GitBox wrote: > > > ardovm edited a comment on pull request #133: > URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/133#issuecomment-864605285 > > >The first

Re: Enhancement request from Facebook

2021-06-17 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias > On 06/17/2021 3:06 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > I was not able to change the download link, Maybe someone from Infra can make https://extensions.openoffice.org/en/download/4963 redirect to https://berma.pagesperso-orange.fr/HM/HistoryMaster-1.1.1.oxt or add an option so

Re: Enhancement request from Facebook

2021-06-17 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias > On 06/17/2021 10:42 AM Matthias Seidel wrote: > > I added some comments including a valid download link back in 2018 but they > > are not visible for some odd reason. > > That's because comments with links need to be published by an admin. (You > guess what sort of links we had

RE: Enhancement request from Facebook

2021-06-17 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi all > On 06/17/2021 6:46 AM Jörg Schmidt wrote: > https://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/history-master History Master version 1.1.1 works on AOO 4.1.10 I added some comments including a valid download link back in 2018 but they are not visible for some odd reason. An archived

Re: .uno:Reload button - a glitch

2021-06-14 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias, all > On 06/14/2021 7:00 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > > It occurs also in versions: 4.1.9 and 4.1.10. > > Yes, looks weird. Cannot reproduce on Ubuntu, it seems to be Windows only. I can reproduce with all 3 documents on Ubuntu 18.04.5 x64 (added this info on bugzilla) Regards,

Re: Hyperlink Warning Message

2021-06-12 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Carl > On 06/12/2021 6:45 PM Carl Marcum wrote: > There is now a PR #132 if you're able to test it. What do you mean test the PR? I already tested the resulting binary... The only action available for me at github is "Merge pull request" :) Cheers, Pedro

Re: Hyperlink Warning Message

2021-06-12 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Carl, all > On 06/12/2021 2:47 AM Carl Marcum wrote: > Can anyone on windows confirm with the file [1]? > [1] http://home.apache.org/~cmarcum/hyperlink-tests/hyperlink-test-doc.odt I confirm Francis' findings on AOO 4.1.11 running on Windows 7 x64. There is no problem reopening the

Re: rework the automated tests to not require an office build first

2021-06-12 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Carl, all > On 06/12/2021 2:13 PM Carl Marcum wrote: > The one big thing about this would be it would require a tester to have > the SDK installed in the office under test. > I think this is a much lower bar than building the office to get them. > > Does anyone have an opinion one way or

Re: Ubuntu 21.04 / dark mode

2021-05-30 Thread Pedro Lino
a combination of both themes. Grazie mille! Pedro > On 05/30/2021 8:51 AM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > > Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > Pedro Lino wrote: > >>> On 05/29/2021 9:32 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > >>> https://remixicon.com/ > >> > >

Re: Ubuntu 21.04 / dark mode

2021-05-29 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Andrea > On 05/29/2021 9:32 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Several other, more modern, icon > projects are available, like > https://remixicon.com/ > (Apache License AL2, latest update July 2020). They are monochrome, so > they might work better in dark mode. This one is really interesting!

Re: Ubuntu 21.04 / dark mode

2021-05-29 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi all > On 05/28/2021 10:27 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Now, it could be that icons were relicensed after they became part of > OpenOffice. While Wikipedia is definitely not a trusted source, it talks > about a public domain relicensing in 2009 due to the original terms > being too

Re: Start working on AOO 4.1.11?

2021-05-27 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi again > On 05/27/2021 1:39 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > > I am on Linux. Is it possible to build a binary from that branch? > > Not for me. I am already spending too much time on it. ;-) I didn't mean for you to build on Linux :) I meant is there a way that I have access to the branch

Re: Start working on AOO 4.1.11?

2021-05-27 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias > On 05/27/2021 1:19 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > Next set of Windows builds: > > https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-4111-Test/ > > Maybe you can spot the differences... ;-) I am on Linux. Is it possible to build a binary from that branch? Regards, Pedro

Re: Ubuntu 21.04 / dark mode

2021-05-27 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias > On 05/27/2021 9:35 AM Matthias Seidel wrote: > I asked a friend who is in graphic design and he spontaneously said > "Tango" [1]. > > But i think we removed Tango from AOO? I wonder why, since it is Public > Domain... Excellent! And the tar.gz file includes all images as SVG so

Re: Sourceforge project activity feedback

2021-05-04 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi all The Sourceforge activity is now up-to-date with version 4.1.10 ;) Small victories on May the Fourth! All the best, Pedro > On 03/30/2021 5:19 PM Marcus wrote: > > > Am 30.03.21 um 15:33 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > > Am 30.03.21 um 11:29 schrieb Pedro Lino: >

RE: Feature: automatic enter of a decimal point at a fixed position

2021-04-28 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Joerg > On 04/28/2021 5:31 PM Jörg Schmidt wrote: > Somehow I don't understand the discussions at the moment, sometimes the talk > is that the whole thing is unnecessary, sometimes I'm accused of talking > about the wrong topic... I apologize for not noticing that you had provided a file

RE: Feature: automatic enter of a decimal point at a fixed position

2021-04-28 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi all > On 04/28/2021 4:16 PM Jörg Schmidt wrote: > Peter is looking for a function with which he can achieve that when typing: > <1><2><3><4> > > the cell contains the value 12.34. That is correct. I just learned that Excel has such an Advanced feature which is disabled by default. My

Re: Feature: automatic enter of a decimal point at a fixed position

2021-04-28 Thread Pedro Lino
> On 04/28/2021 10:24 AM DaveB wrote: > Or a more simple solution = Format Cells Format cells changes the appearance, not the value. How would you use Format cells to modify the last two digits? - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Feature: automatic enter of a decimal point at a fixed position

2021-04-28 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Peter > On 04/28/2021 3:27 AM Peter Kovacs wrote: > I have been asked on Facebook, and I found a forum thread if there is a > feature that interprets the entry of numbers the last 2 numbers as digits. > Any Ideas, or inputs? Does LO maybe have done this? (I could not find > any hints.)

Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.10-RC2 as GA

2021-04-27 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Jim, all The Release Candidate is good for production/GA: [x] yes / +1 [ ] no / -1 My vote is based on [X] binding (member of PMC) [x] I have built and tested the RC from source on platform Linux x64 (Ubuntu 18.04) [x] I have tested the binary RC: Linux x86 (on

Re: Ubuntu 21.04 / dark mode

2021-04-25 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias > On 04/24/2021 8:37 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > Sure, SVG would be nice, but that needs someone to write the code. We > you can always create PNG out of SVG, so that should not stop us. > > However we could start by adding a dark mode icon set and begin with > some UI elements.

Re: Ubuntu 21.04 / dark mode

2021-04-24 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias > On 04/24/2021 6:44 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > Yes, now the elements in the status bar look better. Personally I don't > use dark mode, but it is sort of fashion now. I actually like it. But in this case I'm happy it is not the Default theme for Ubuntu 21.04 :) > But it is

Re: Ubuntu 21.04 / dark mode

2021-04-24 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias, all I just installed Ubuntu 21.04 from scratch (formatted the Pop!_OS SSD) and the default theme (Standard) does not cause AOO to switch to the High Contrast icon style. However the problem does occur if the user manually switches to the Dark Appearance. Turning off the

Re: Ubuntu 21.04 / dark mode

2021-04-23 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias, Marcus > On 04/23/2021 11:41 AM Marcus wrote: > > Can you please try "Tools - Options - OpenOffice - Accessibility" and > > turn off "Automatically detect high contrast mode of operating system"? That worked. The icons are now using the selected theme. But some items are

Re: Ubuntu 21.04 / dark mode

2021-04-23 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias I can say that on PopOS 20.10 based on Ubuntu 20.10 the default theme is also dark (Pop-dark) and AOO 4.1.9 shows the High Contrast icons (which is quite unpleasant) even if you switch to another Icon Style. Regards, Pedro > On 04/22/2021 7:31 PM Matthias Seidel

Sourceforge project activity feedback

2021-03-30 Thread Pedro Lino
wrote: > > > Hi Pedro, > > Am 03.03.21 um 00:24 schrieb Pedro Lino: > > Hi Matthias > > > >> On 03/02/2021 11:05 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > >> Am 14.02.21 um 17:35 schrieb Pedro Lino: > >>> Hi Marcus > >>> > >&g

Re: Request for Windows build of my branch "bettersave"

2021-03-19 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Arrigo > On 03/19/2021 7:39 PM Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > For the record: > https://home.apache.org/~ardovm/openoffice/bettersave-2021-03-16/ I have been using Rev. 5eeab56186 for daily work since Matthias released it on the 16th. I don't see any issues. What exactly do you want users to

Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

2021-03-15 Thread Pedro Lino
date? > > Regards, > >    Matthias > > Am 22.01.21 um 00:39 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > > On 21/01/2021 Pedro Lino wrote: > >>> Please let me know if it works; if it does, I will then revert it and > >>> republish only after 4.1.9 is out ... > >>

Re: Reporting broken download link

2021-03-07 Thread Pedro Lino
The download link redirects to Sourceforge a reliable download source. You can also use the direct download from the Apache server http://archive.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.1.9/binaries/ but you need to manually select the correct file e.g. for en_US using the Windows OS it would be

Re: Testing Open Office for Big Sur 11.2.2

2021-03-04 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Carolyn Hopefully the new version 4.1.9 released on February 7th solved the identified issues with Big Sur Please make sure to install this version and report back if you ever find any issues. https://www.openoffice.org/download/index.html Thank you for your encouraging message! All the

Re: Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] Apache OpenOffice 4.1.9 released

2021-03-02 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias > On 03/02/2021 11:05 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > Am 14.02.21 um 17:35 schrieb Pedro Lino: > > Hi Marcus > > > >> On 02/14/2021 3:36 PM Marcus wrote: > >>> One question: does someone have the permissions to update the Sourceforge > >&

Re: What happens if you save a Calc file as Microsoft Excel 2003 XML (.xml) in Windows

2021-03-01 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi all My findings are exactly the same as those from Francis. Copying the contents to a new spreadsheet saves in XML 2003 without any issues. It is this specific ODS file that has a problem. Curiously, the file saved as XML 2003 will not open correctly in OpenOffice... Regards, Pedro > On

Re: Unlocking Documents

2021-02-26 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Dirk That is how a Compact Disk works. You can not edit a document in a CD. You need to copy the files to your Documents (or other) folder and then you can edit it. NEVER share any password on a public email. I advise you to change it right now. Regards, Pedro > On 02/26/2021 5:30 AM Dirk

Re: Windows Buildbots

2021-02-25 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias > On 02/25/2021 12:56 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > The Windows Buildbots are offline for more than two weeks. > Apparently nobody noticed it... Personally I only use Windows builds from Sourceforge or from https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/ Unfortunately there doesn't

Re: java run timer

2021-02-15 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Pete If you are using OpenOffice under the Windows OS, please notice that the only version available for that OS is 32bit (or x86) which means that you need to install Java 32bit even if you already have Java 64bit. There is no conflict between the two so there is no problem in having both

Re: Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] Apache OpenOffice 4.1.9 released

2021-02-14 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Marcus > On 02/14/2021 3:36 PM Marcus wrote: > > One question: does someone have the permissions to update the Sourceforge > > page? > I don't know how to edit this. I don't find any hint for it - even as > admin. Must be a thing of SF.net. Can we ask them? I volunteer to do that on

Re: Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] Apache OpenOffice 4.1.9 released

2021-02-13 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi all I am happy to announce that I was notified today about the availability of a new AOO version! Congratulations to all for the previous effort to fix notifications in 4.1.8! One question: does someone have the permissions to update the Sourceforge page? It is a little absurd that on the

Re: [openoffice] branch trunk updated: Update url_transfer.htm

2021-02-07 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Mathias > On 02/07/2021 10:48 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > This is the easiest way... ;-) Ok. I expected a point and click option would be available at the Github website... > Did you checkout from GitHub or from Gitbox? Thanks to this question I noticed that the Terminal prompt was

Re: [openoffice] branch trunk updated: Update url_transfer.htm

2021-02-07 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Mathias > I think this was your first commit with Git? Congratulations! I had done a previous one but it was for the website. > This seems to be safe to be "cherry-picked" from trunk for AOO42X: > > git checkout AOO42X > git pull > git cherry-pick -x 5215491 > git push origin AOO42X

Re: Testing Beta versions

2021-02-06 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi David Thank you for volunteering your time! > I have a Macbook Pro and a Windows 10 box I can use for beta testing of new > Open office versions and as I am retired, I do have time to test English > versions of this great product. There is a Release Candidate of the upcoming 4.1.9 version

Re: imposible to open files

2021-02-05 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Iouri This problem has been solved in version 4.1.9 which will be released soon. I think that what is unacceptable is that Apple released such a buggy update to the OS. Example https://discussions.apple.com/thread/252174979?page=19 Remember that you are paying to Apple while Apache

Re: Website not available

2021-02-04 Thread Pedro Lino
It was down for some time, then recovered and now it reports Forbidden You don't have permission to access this resource. > On 02/04/2021 3:05 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > > > Hi - > > It’s available here in the US. Would someone check in Europe. > > Thanks, > Dave > > Sent from my iPhone >

Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

2021-01-21 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Andrea > On 01/21/2021 11:39 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > OK, thank you for checking. I've now reverted the fix and we'll go live > with a more complete version when people will have upgraded to 4.1.9. Agreed. Thank you! > But when we are not in proximity of a release, we can trigger the

Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.9-RC1 as GA

2021-01-21 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Jim, all The Release Candidate is good for production/GA: [x] yes / +1 [ ] no / -1 My vote is based on [ ] binding (member of PMC) [x] I have built and tested the RC from source on platform [Ubuntu 18.04 x64] [x] I have tested the binary RC on platform [Ubuntu 14.04

Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

2021-01-21 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Andrea > On 01/21/2021 8:04 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > I believe it's fixed now (limited to the specific case of the English > dictionary; I had to find some workarounds so I enabled only that > extension for testing). > Please let me know if it works; if it does, I will then revert it

Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

2021-01-20 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Andrea > On 01/20/2021 10:23 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > I think we can fix it. Let me give it a try tomorrow. Excellent! Thanks! > What I can do tomorrow is: I can check whether our (site moderator) > access is enough to push the updated feed live; and I'll document it > internally in

Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

2021-01-19 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias, Marco, all > On 01/19/2021 5:38 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > > AOO is looking for an "update feed", quite similar to the release updates. > (Release update feeds are generated by hand after every release) > > In this case it looks for the feed on the SourceForge

Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

2021-01-19 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Czeslaw > On 01/19/2021 1:14 PM Czesław Wolański wrote: > 4.1.9 RC1, Windows 7 > English spelling extension: > I can confirm your observation - checking for update of any version > (2020.07.01 - 2020.12.01) > results in a message "No new updates are available.". Thank you for confirming!

Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

2021-01-19 Thread Pedro Lino
mber of the extension > and the release notes. > > Not sure why it happens. > > On 19/01/2021 12:04, Pedro Lino wrote: > > > > > > Hi all > > > > I am testing version 4.1.9 RC1 under Windows 7 and I just noticed > >

Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

2021-01-19 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi all I am testing version 4.1.9 RC1 under Windows 7 and I just noticed that the English spelling extension I have installed is from 2020.07.01 but Checking for updates does not report any new version. This is particularly odd because this extension is updated monthly (including in January

Re: Problem Building OpenOffice

2021-01-14 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Arrigo > On 01/14/2021 12:43 PM Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > Thank you for the suggestion. > I put it in this way: > https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step_Linux#Ubuntu_18.04 I noticed after sending the email :) I have added some edits to that page but

Re: Problem Building OpenOffice

2021-01-14 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Arrigo > On 01/14/2021 8:11 AM Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > The package is in the "universe" repository. Make sure you enabled it: > > $ sudo add-apt-repository universe > $ sudo apt update > > (Credit: https://itsfoss.com/ubuntu-repositories/ ) Thank you for the fast (and accurate)

Re: Problem Building OpenOffice

2021-01-13 Thread Pedro Lino
On Ubuntu 18.04 you need sudo apt-get install g++ gcc bison flex libarchive-zip-perl libcups2-dev libpam0g-dev \ gperf libfreetype6-dev libxaw7-dev libfontconfig1-dev libxrandr-dev patch \ libgconf2-dev libgnomevfs2-dev ant libgtk2.0-dev junit junit4 libidl-dev liborbit2-dev \

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release of Apache OpenOffice 4.1.9 RC1

2021-01-11 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Jim I downloaded and installed the Linux x64 builds on Ubuntu 18.04.5 x64 yesterday and didn't find any problems... What problems should have been detected? Regards, Pedro > On 01/11/2021 1:50 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > I have discovered an issue w/ the Linux and macOS builds. It is

Re: new person

2020-12-17 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Bartosz Welcome! > On 12/17/2020 9:16 PM Bartosz Bartczak wrote: > I'm using OO and AOO very long time in IT Businesses. > I think I can "pay my debt" for what you have been doing for me through > the AOO program. There is no debt ;) but any help is very welcome! > I don't know what a

Re: Outdated banner on homepage

2020-12-16 Thread Pedro Lino
> On 12/16/2020 7:49 PM Marcus wrote: > IMHO a bit too much effort for just a little value add. I can insert the > comment without the mail address. It can be easily found out anyway. Why is it necessary to remove the mail address? It is a public email, it is mentioned many times on this

Re: Outdated banner on homepage

2020-12-13 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Marcus, all > On 12/13/2020 6:43 PM Marcus wrote: > I think Pedro suggested to put a comment before the code part that is > controlled / filled from outside of our project. Then everybody can see > what is coming from us and from other parts of the ASF. > Just put the comment at the top

Re: Outdated banner on homepage

2020-12-13 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Dave, all > On 12/13/2020 12:32 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > The event banner is something the ASF wants on all websites. Agreed. But if there is no event to be announced there is no need to keep the banner until there is a new one, right? > I agree it is outdated. This graphic is controlled

Re: Outdated banner on homepage

2020-12-13 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias, all > On 12/13/2020 12:14 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > As I already wrote you, these banners are controlled by the ASF. You can > see them on every ASF project page. > > Please do not touch the code! I already read your opinion in the previous email. Is this a written rule? If so

Outdated banner on homepage

2020-12-13 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi all Is it possible to remove the outdated banner to ApacheCon on the openoffice.org footer? I can simply comment the HTML code if this is not a problem. Otherwise if there is a more bureaucratic path please let me know which steps to take. Regards, Pedro

Re: typo

2020-12-10 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias > On 12/10/2020 10:52 AM Matthias Seidel wrote: > Since you are committer, you can do it yourself, see: > > https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/blob/main/README.md Thanks! In this case it is not needed because the link in OpenOffice.org is pointing directly to

Re: typo

2020-12-10 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias > On 12/10/2020 9:40 AM Matthias Seidel wrote: > Thanks! Since you have write access you can skip the Pull Request... ;-) Excellent :) > > BTW: The project page is self publishing, openoffice.org needs a manual > step for publishing. Can I do that myself as well or is it

Re: typo

2020-12-10 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias and Czeslaw > On 12/10/2020 9:05 AM Matthias Seidel wrote: > > I could have sworn I reported that ages ago. ;‑) > > Meanwhile the page is on GitHub and you can easily create a Pull > Request! ;-) > > https://github.com/apache/openoffice-project Fixed. Thank you for teaching others

Re: English flyer

2020-12-01 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Emilie I don't know Slack but it is certainly better than this mailing list for sharing documents... This list strips attachments so when you say "here it is" we see nothing :) Please upload it somewhere (Slack?) and share the link Regards, Pedro > On 12/01/2020 9:58 AM Emilie Drd

Failure to load document from connected Android device

2020-11-29 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi all I reported some time ago a bug which I assumed was related to Samba shared folders https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128049 Today while trying to edit an ods document in my Android phone (connected through USB on Ubuntu 18.04 x64) I got a similar error message General

Re: Downloading an Open Office version that Works for Kindle Fire HD8

2020-11-23 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Melinda Actually Marcus did reply to you on the same day. Maybe your email blocked the answer? See the Dev Mail Archive http://openoffice.2283327.n4.nabble.com/Downloading-an-Open-Office-version-that-Works-for-Kindle-Fire-HD8-td4701901.html Best regards, Pedro > On 11/23/2020 2:03 PM

Re: New EPM Maintainer... me!

2020-11-21 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Peter > On 11/21/2020 5:18 PM Peter Kovacs wrote: > I think epm that the distros ship is maintained by some asian volunteers > on epmhome.org. (i do not understand a thing. No, the page is not related to the package. The page is about Collagen

Re: trunk extension issue?

2020-11-13 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Jim > On 11/13/2020 3:00 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > any ideas? I'm guessing a bad URL? It is the same issue as the OpenOffice download... Because the only download option is from the Sourceforge master, it fails to get the file most of times (overload?) If you paste the full link on the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache OpenOffice 4.1.8 released

2020-11-11 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias, all > On 11/11/2020 4:41 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > May be a matter of time? Yes, let's hope so. But I expect that 6 days should be enough to synchronize more than one mirror. Regarding Microsoft's bad will, I think this is a little too much https://i.imgur.com/dTZVLcK.png

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache OpenOffice 4.1.8 released

2020-11-11 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias, all > On 11/11/2020 3:54 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > That's not new with files downloaded from the Internet. > But somehow I did hope that the ASF certificate would silence > SmartScreen... ;-) It does. At least on the PC I managed to test this. I can't believe that after all the

Re: [POLLS CLOSED] Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.8-RC2 as GA

2020-11-05 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Jim, all > On 11/05/2020 12:22 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > The vote is closed and AOO 4.1.8-RC3 was overwhelmingly approved for release. Excellent! > Both Matthias and I will start signing our respective binaries (Windows and > macOS) Looking forward to test signed binaries on

Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.8-RC2 as GA

2020-11-05 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias > On 11/05/2020 11:15 AM Matthias Seidel wrote: > I just fixed that! Thank you! > BTW: You can log into cWiki using your ASF credentials. Editing is easy! ;-) You are right. I simply forgot that I had permission to do that myself. Sorry and thanks! Regards, Pedro

Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.8-RC2 as GA

2020-11-04 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Marcus > On 11/04/2020 8:26 PM Marcus wrote: > to help you a bit I've already summarized and counted the votes - which > were cast until now - here: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.8 One small correction: I only built from source under Linux, not under

Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.8-RC2 as GA

2020-11-02 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Jim, all > The Release Candidate is good for production/GA: > > [X] yes / +1 > > [ ] no / -1 > > My vote is based on > > [ ] binding (member of PMC) > > [X] I have built and tested the RC from source on platform [Linux Ubuntu > 18.04.5 X64] > > [X] I have tested the binary RC

Re: 4.1.8-RC3

2020-11-01 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Don > On 11/01/2020 5:55 PM Don Lewis wrote: > What about AOO418? Apparently this issue only happened with my own build. It does not occur with the official 418 RC3 build compiled by Jim (I mentioned this in a previous email) So there is no need to worry about branch 418, only 42x and

Re: 4.1.8-RC3

2020-11-01 Thread Pedro Lino
Ji Matthias > On 11/01/2020 3:22 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > @Pedro: Does that solve the problem? If yes, could you set the issue to > "RESOLVED"? I will have to build from branch 4.2.x and test. Regards, Pedro - To

Re: 4.1.8-RC3

2020-11-01 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Andrea, all > if you do it all in one step, dpkg > is able to know that you are going to update all packages. Thank you for the explanation. Then it makes sense to at least change the tutorial at oo.org or even switch to the apt command below? > > Is there an apt command to do this? I

Re: 4.1.8-RC3

2020-10-31 Thread Pedro Lino
Top posting. +1 Can we start a vote on RC3? > On 10/31/2020 3:19 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > > > Additionally, I have uploaded and Test signed all Windows binaries. > Should RC3 be voted to be released I can instantly sign them with the > ASF certificate and download that set. > > Of

Re: 4.1.8-RC3

2020-10-31 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Don > On 10/31/2020 12:58 PM Don Lewis wrote: > > Installing 4.1.8 over 4.1.7 end with error reported 2 years ago > > > > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127774 > > I just updated that ticket with some new information. It is possible to > debug this by rebuilding just the scp2

Re: 4.1.8-RC3

2020-10-30 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Andrea > On 10/30/2020 10:29 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > It might be hard to try again in the same conditions, but isn't this > fixed by running the update in one shot? > > $ sudo dpkg -i *.deb desktop-integration/*deb I don't see why that would have different results. The point is that

Re: 4.1.8-RC3

2020-10-30 Thread Pedro Lino
Just recompiled AOO 4.1.8 on another Ubuntu 18.04.5 x64 without issues. Installing 4.1.8 over 4.1.7 end with error reported 2 years ago https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127774 > On 10/29/2020 3:07 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > I think we are ready for 4.1.8-RC3. I'll start Linux

Re: 4.1.8-RC3

2020-10-29 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Jim, all Compiling under Ubuntu 18.04.5 x64 stops at ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making /source/openoffice/main/sc/source/filter/xml ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making /source/openoffice/main/sc/source/ui/unoobj When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the

Re: QA Automated Test coverage

2020-10-29 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Peter > On 10/29/2020 10:47 AM Peter Kovacs wrote: > > > How about creating an automated manual test RPA robot as a GSoC? > > Just a wild idea. I think that if one of the people reading this email today knows how to fix this (and has the time/urge to scratch this itch) then it is

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

2020-10-28 Thread Pedro Lino
please test the '-jj1' builds available. > > > >> On Oct 28, 2020, at 1:28 PM, Pedro Lino wrote: > >> > >> Hi Jim > >> > >> Find attached an odt and an ods that I just confirmed that cause the error > >> messages with test1

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

2020-10-28 Thread Pedro Lino
own to cause the error? TIA > > > On Oct 28, 2020, at 9:34 AM, Pedro Lino > > wrote: > > > > Hi Jim > > > > Top posting. > > The most commonly used Ubuntu version should be 18.04 (but Canonical still > > supports as far back as 14.04) but many o

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

2020-10-28 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Jim Top posting. The most commonly used Ubuntu version should be 18.04 (but Canonical still supports as far back as 14.04) but many of us are already testing that version. If this is just a test VM, I would say it could be useful if you installed 20.04.1 LTS which none of us is using but

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

2020-10-26 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Jim Still the same errors on Ubuntu 18.04.5 x64 Pedro > On 10/26/2020 1:56 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > test12 is now available... you know where :) > > > On Oct 26, 2020, at 7:12 AM, André Pereira wrote: > > > > teste11 > > Here with Debian 10 64bits I have "General Error" message

Re: test2 is ready to run

2020-10-24 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias, all > On 10/24/2020 5:39 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > > I have an old laptop (Intel Classmate aka Magalhães) running Ubuntu 12.04 > > x86 which I can give a spin if/when a 32bit build is available. > > We would definitely need someone to test the RC on 32bit Linux. Ok. I can do

Re: test2 is ready to run

2020-10-24 Thread Pedro Lino
No problems on Ubuntu 18.04.5 x64 Would it be useful to test on an older (or newer) distro like Ubuntu 14.04 or 20.10? I have an old laptop (Intel Classmate aka Magalhães) running Ubuntu 12.04 x86 which I can give a spin if/when a 32bit build is available. Regards, Pedro > On 10/24/2020 4:56

Re: test2 is ready to run

2020-10-23 Thread Pedro Lino
Test6 works perfectly under Ubuntu 18.04 x64! > On 10/23/2020 10:09 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > test6 is ready!! Thx everyone for their patience and for their testing. > > > On Oct 23, 2020, at 2:21 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > > Status update > > ... still working on this... the

Re: test2 is ready to run

2020-10-23 Thread Pedro Lino
This build has the same errors when opening ods and odt > On 10/23/2020 11:53 AM Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > test4 is uploaded and ready to be tested. Thx again! > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: test2 is ready to run

2020-10-22 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Jim Good news! Test 3 has no problems and check for Update also works (it didn't in test2) Apparentely we have a good one! :) (Downloading at 500Mbit means 3 seconds to download 150MB :) ) Regards, Pedro > On 10/22/2020 5:58 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > YEAH! I am now building from

Re: AOO418-RC2: General Error on opening files on Ubuntu

2020-10-22 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Don > On 10/22/2020 9:30 AM Don Lewis wrote: > If I build the same git revision of AOO418 on Ubuntu 16, then install > and run it there, I do *not* see the General Error problem. Can you please post a link to the tar.gz to test if installing on Ubuntu 18.04 has problems? Thanks! Pedro

Re: AOO418-RC2: General Error on opening files on Ubuntu

2020-10-21 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Jim > I have uploaded builds of AOO-4.1.7 from my CentOS5 build VM. If these break, > then we know it's something on my build platform. If not, then we know it's > code related. These builds do not throw errors but I am on my home laptop now (still Ubuntu 18.04.5 x64). Do you have the

Re: AOO418-RC2: General Error on opening files on Ubuntu

2020-10-21 Thread Pedro Lino
f your question is if the error messages that popup when using your builds only show up on Ubuntu, then I can not answer. I don't use other distros. Regards, Pedro > > On Oct 21, 2020, at 9:41 AM, Pedro Lino wrote: > > > > Hi Jim > > > > I'm afraid not... > &

Re: AOO418-RC2: General Error on opening files on Ubuntu

2020-10-21 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Jim I'm afraid not... FYI I just finished compiling under Ubuntu 18.04.5 x64 using ./configure --with-build-version="$(date +"%Y-%m-%d %H:%M") - `uname -sm`" --with-dmake-url=https://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2

Re: AOO418-RC2: General Error on opening files on Ubuntu

2020-10-20 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Jim I'm afraid that your build AOO418m3(Build:9803) - Rev. 314bad97e5 2020-10-19 18:37 - Linux x86_64 still shows the same error messages... Regards, Pedro > On 10/20/2020 12:50 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > Can someone try the versions available at: > >

  1   2   3   4   5   >