[Action required] Cygwin x86 end-of-life

2022-11-26 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias, all

> On 11/25/2022 7:16 PM WET Matthias Seidel  wrote:

> Damjan posted the needed patches to build AOO41X with Cygwin64, if
> anyone wants to commit them...

If this exists and works, it should be committed ASAP. 

It makes no sense at all to keep a separate 41X procedure that relies on a 
discontinued library if all branches can be compiled with a single an updated 
one.

Can any programmer review and commit this, please?

Regards,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Fwd: Cygwin x86 end-of-life

2022-11-11 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias
 
If I understand correctly this will still allow to build x86 binaries for the 
Windows OS, right?
It would only be a problem if our builds had to be compiled in a x86 OS?
 
Regards,
Pedro

> On 11/11/2022 4:26 PM WET Matthias Seidel  wrote:
>  
>  
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> FYI, long announced.
> 
> Regards,
> 
>Matthias
> 
> 
>  Weitergeleitete Nachricht 
> Betreff:  Cygwin x86 end-of-life
> Datum:Fri, 11 Nov 2022 15:50:33 +
> Von:  Jon Turney  
> mailto:jon.tur...@dronecode.org.uk
> An:   cygwin-annou...@cygwin.com mailto:cygwin-annou...@cygwin.com
> 
> 
> 
> As has previously been announced, Cygwin is dropping support for x86 Windows. 
> Cygwin 3.3.6 is the final version supporting x86 (32-bit) Windows, and the 
> forthcoming Cygwin 3.4 will be released for x86_64 only.
> 
> Concurrent with that, updates to x86 packages will be stopped, and the Cygwin 
> x86 package repository will be archived.
> 
> (Instructions on the special steps needed to install from that archive will 
> be forthcoming, once we've worked out what they are.)
> 
> If you're using x86 Cygwin under WOW64 on a 64-bit Windows OS, please 
> strongly consider moving to an x86_64 Cygwin installation.
> 
> (If you have ARM hardware, we believe that x86_64 Cygwin works correctly 
> using the x86_64 emulation in Windows 11)
> 
> If you're one of the tiny percentage of Cygwin users using x86 Cygwin on a 
> real x86 Windows OS, don't panic! The current installation will continue to 
> run on your system. You just won't get any more updates.
> 


Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

2022-11-11 Thread Pedro Lino
I can't get 4.2.X to build in Ubuntu 18.04.6 x64

I'm using
./configure --with-build-version="$(date +"%Y-%m-%d %H:%M") - `uname -sm`" 
--with-dmake-url=https://github.com/jimjag/dmake/archive/v4.13.1/dmake-4.13.1.tar.gz
 --with-epm-url=https://github.com/jimjag/epm/archive/v5.0.0/epm-5.0.0.tar.gz 
--enable-opengl --disable-odk --enable-category-b --enable-bundled-dictionaries

but get

dmake:  Error: -- 
`./unxlngx6.pro/misc/8ce02a315807bd406b5de85ccf63e7fb-epm-5.0.0.unpack' not 
found, and can't be made

1 module(s): 
epm
need(s) to be rebuilt

Reason(s):

ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making /source/openoffice/main/epm

When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the build by 
running:

build --from epm


Any ideas?

Thanks!

> On 11/08/2022 1:43 PM WET Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
>  
> Let me know when we are ready for a Dev4 then and I'll kick off the builds.
> 
> > On Nov 8, 2022, at 5:32 AM, Matthias Seidel  
> > wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Jim, all,
> > 
> > Am 07.11.22 um 13:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> >> That works for me. I can do the same w/ the macOS and Linux builds.
> > 
> > I will use these two graphics for "branding" located here:
> > 
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.2.0-Dev4/wntmsci/
> >  
> > 
> > 
> >> Is HEAD of AOO42X in a suitable state, or are there additional fixes to be 
> >> added before we build?
> > 
> > It is usable, but some main blockers are not fixed.
> > 
> > And of course the translations need to be updated.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> >Matthias
> > 
> >>> On Nov 6, 2022, at 4:37 AM, Matthias Seidel  
> >>> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> Hi all,
> >>> 
> >>> We released our last Developer version some time ago.
> >>> Maybe we can start a Dev4 now?
> >>> 
> >>> Regarding Windows, I would like to do a "normal" build, just branded as
> >>> a "Developer Version".
> >>> This way we are much closer to a production build.
> >>> 
> >>> Additionally, I would like to build AOO with Adoptiums OpenJDK now.
> >>> 
> >>> How about removing (at least) Dev2?
> >>> 
> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/
> >>> 
> >>> Regards,
> >>> 
> >>>   Matthias
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
> >> 
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
> >> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

2022-11-09 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias

So, at that time we build from the source contained in the archive (aka tag)?
That makes sense!

Thanks!
Pedro


> On 11/08/2022 9:32 PM WET Matthias Seidel  wrote:
> 
>  
> Hi Pedro,
> 
> Am 08.11.22 um 22:17 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> > Hi Matthias
> >
> >> On 11/08/2022 8:23 PM WET Matthias Seidel  
> >> wrote:
> >>> I would like to try to build the Linux version under Ubuntu 20.04.
> >> No need to wait, you can always build your own version.
> > Yes, I know I can do a 42x build at any point (using the right settings). 
> > But the idea was to do the same build you and Jim are doing.
> > How can I make sure that I'm doing the same Rev?
> 
> We will announce the Git hash at that time and we can make a tag of it
> like for Dev3:
> 
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/releases/tag/AOO420-Dev3-m3
> 
> Regards,
> 
>    Matthias
> 
> >
> > Regards,
> > Pedro
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

2022-11-08 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias

> On 11/08/2022 8:23 PM WET Matthias Seidel  wrote:

> > I would like to try to build the Linux version under Ubuntu 20.04.
> 
> No need to wait, you can always build your own version.

Yes, I know I can do a 42x build at any point (using the right settings). But 
the idea was to do the same build you and Jim are doing.
How can I make sure that I'm doing the same Rev?

Regards,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

2022-11-07 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias, all

+1
I would like to try to build the Linux version under Ubuntu 20.04.

Best,
Pedro

> On 11/06/2022 9:37 AM WET Matthias Seidel  wrote:
> 
>  
> Hi all,
> 
> We released our last Developer version some time ago.
> Maybe we can start a Dev4 now?
> 
> Regarding Windows, I would like to do a "normal" build, just branded as
> a "Developer Version".
> This way we are much closer to a production build.
> 
> Additionally, I would like to build AOO with Adoptiums OpenJDK now.
> 
> How about removing (at least) Dev2?
> 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/
> 
> Regards,
> 
>    Matthias

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Let's replace expat with libxml2?

2022-10-16 Thread Pedro Lino
+1
And thank you Damjan for your continued effort!
 
Best,
Pedro

> On 10/15/2022 5:21 PM WEST Matthias Seidel  wrote:
>  
>  
> 
> Hi Damjan,
> 
> I am not a developer, so I can't comment on the technical issues.
> 
> But generally I like the idea of reducing dependencies and simplifying the 
> code.
> 
> Maybe we can create a separate git branch for this task?
> 
> Regards,
> 
>Matthias
> 
> Am 15.10.22 um 10:32 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
> 
> > 
> > Hi
> > 
> > We currently use 2 XML libraries in our C/C++ code, expat and libxml2.
> > This is unnecessary, one of them can be removed, and I propose we
> > remove expat.
> > 
> > expat is a small library that only does SAX parsing, and lacks DOM,
> > lacks XSLT, lacks schema validation or any more advanced features we
> > use. By comparison, libxml2 is probably the most complete open-source
> > XML library in the world for C, with endless features, many users,
> > stable API, no mandatory dependencies, portable, highly standards
> > compliant and compatible with other XML libraries, performs well
> > (https://xmlbench.sourceforge.net/results/benchmark200910/index.html),
> > is a requirement for libxslt, is permissively licensed, takes security
> > seriously (the maintainer made money by fixing its security bugs in
> > Google's bug bounties), actively developed, documented, nice readable
> > source code, and it's generally of very high quality.
> > 
> > We generally don't like unnecessary dependencies, and expat has been
> > difficult to upgrade to newer versions due to compiler issues. Since
> > expat only implements a small subset of libxml2's features, could we
> > replace it with libxml2?
> > 
> > Where is expat used? The output of "grep expat */prj/build.lst" gives
> > us these modules:
> > lucene
> > openssl
> > sax
> > shell
> > tools
> > 
> > lucene and openssl don't really require expat. Removing expat from
> > their build.lst and stopping the expat/ module from building still
> > gets lucene and openssl to build successfully, so clearly their
> > dependency on expat was always unnecessary. As of commit
> > 461facd3d94599cc708db50510b7e42483407720 they no longer depend on
> > expat.
> > 
> > tools probably also has an unnecessary dependency on expat, but this
> > is harder to prove as tools -> i18pool -> sax -> expat, so let's
> > revisit this later.
> > 
> > Only the sax and shell modules really use expat.
> > 
> > In sax, it is used to implement the com.sun.star.xml.sax.Parser UNO
> > service (com.sun.star.comp.extensions.xml.sax.ParserExpat
> > implementation name), which is used fairly widely throughout AOO,
> > including for loading OpenDocument files (sax -> svx -> xmloff), but
> > all the expat usage is contained in a single file:
> > sax/source/expatwrap/sax_expat.cxx.
> > 
> > In shell, it is used to implement a SAX parser internal to that
> > module, which is then consumed by several libraries, including
> > source/unix/sysshell which deals with the recently used file list in
> > $HOME/.recently-used.
> > 
> > 
> > Porting sax to libxml2
> > 
> > 
> > Patching the sax module to use libxml2 instead of expat was successful
> > enough to get AOO to build, run and load documents, even though it's
> > still incomplete.
> > 
> > Most of the SAX callbacks are compatible between expat and libxml2,
> > and converting those was easy. String types had to be changed, and
> > sometimes the parameter list has to be reordered, or expat-only
> > parameters removed. CDATA is reported with a single event in libxml2,
> > which needed conversion to startCDATA + characters + endCDATA events
> > on our UNO callbacks.
> > 
> > Unfortunately expat's XML_SetExternalEntityRefHandler() works quite
> > differently on libxml2, and has been commented out for now while I try
> > to understand what external entities are and how you generally load
> > them. Also expat's XML_SetDefaultHandlerExpand() is not yet
> > implemented and I am not sure what to do there.
> > 
> > One gotcha was that when there are no attributes on an element,
> > libxml2 calls the startElement() callback with NULL attributes, while
> > expat called it with attributes to a 1 element char** array containing
> > NULL. This was crashing i18npool's saxparser during the build, in
> > SaxExpatParser_Impl::callbackStartElement() during the conversion of
> > attributes to its attribute list. Luckily it was easy to fix.
> > 
> > The code for sax_expat.cxx has become quite a bit shorter, because
> > libxml2 always uses UTF-8 unlike expat which can be built with UTF-16
> > or UTF-8, so the XmlNChar2OUString() and XmlChar2OUString() functions
> > have been removed. Also the getErrorMessage() function no longer has
> > to have a list of hardcoded error codes with our error message for
> > each, as libxml2's xmlCtxtGetLastError() returns the official error
> > message.
> > 
> > Also the sax module uses the SAX1 API. libxml2 supports both SAX1 and

Re: state of Blockers on 4.2.0

2022-09-27 Thread Pedro Lino
+1

> On 09/27/2022 3:03 PM WEST Matthias Seidel  wrote:
> 
>  
> +1
> 
> Am 27.09.22 um 08:21 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> > I have added some information to the Overview List, to ease the
> > desicion what to do next.
> >
> > I also did a quick Review on each issue, and tried to add the state to
> > the Resolution Column.
> >
> > Maybe it would be good to add somewhere a rough description what we
> > need to do next for each issue?
> >
> > For example:  "need testing on Linux, Windopws, MacOS"
> >
> > or "Development (3/5) see comment 4"
> >
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> >
> > Am 24.09.22 um 04:48 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> >> Hello all,
> >>
> >> I was looking at our blockers for 4.2.0. I am confused atm. If I read
> >> it right, then we have 3 Blockers for Windows and 2 for Mac 0 Linux,
> >> right?
> >>
> >> The other open Bugs are they resolved? - For example 126762
> >>  seems to be fixed
> >> for 4.2., but state is still open.
> >>
> >>
> >> I think a bit of clarity would help. I try to look at the MacOsX
> >> build next.
> >>
> >>
> >> All the best
> >>
> >> Peter
> >>
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: en-US template for translation (Pootle)

2022-09-17 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias

As I mentioned before to yourself and Mechtilde I would like to be involved in 
the 42X translation (in addition to the Portuguese translation)

Unfortunately I was never able to go much further on the lessons with Mechtilde 
because I don't have the permissions.

I'm also interested in creating a new Portuguese variant for 42X (called PreAO 
meaning "before Orthographic Agreement")

I will not have time during this weekend as I will be traveling abroad tomorrow 
for a full week meeting, but I am available the following week.

Please keep me in the loop!

All the best, 
Pedro
  

> On 09/17/2022 4:48 PM WEST Matthias Seidel  wrote:
> 
>  
> Hi all,
> 
> Just to let you know: Mechtilde, Peter and I are working on the
> translation process.
> 
> First step was that we modified the Linux64 buildbot for AOO42X to
> create the en-US,sdf from the source strings.
> 
> If anyone needs it you can find it here:
> 
> https://nightlies.apache.org/openoffice/install/linsnap-42x/?C=M;O=D
> 
> This file is used for the update of the Pootle strings.
> 
> Regards,
> 
>    Matthias

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Updating extensions

2022-08-21 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias

> On 08/21/2022 6:25 PM WEST Matthias Seidel  wrote:

> That's what I meant by reducing (the manual work). ;-)
> >

:) +1

> I am not sure if an update feed for Danish exists, since the dictionary
> was set up new at some point. [1]
> 
> Can you have a look, please?

It is working correctly.
I installed the 2020 version and was notified of the 2021 version. The 2022 
version is posterior to the last update feed (because 4.1.13 was released 
meanwhile)

Regards,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Updating extensions

2022-08-21 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias

> On 08/21/2022 5:11 PM WEST Matthias Seidel  wrote:
 
> Normally, the update feed should be adjusted as soon as an extension
> gets a newer version.

That would be the ideal situation if it was operating automatically :) 
 
> But the English dictionary is updated every month, so I think we should
> reduce the update messages here.

There is no need to reduce :)
Updating is manual so we can decide what period is reasonable.

> I would suggest to start the update feed for the English dictionary
> again for the September release and then to do it on a (roughly) 3 month
> base.
> 
> How do others feel about it?

+1
3 months sounds like a reasonable interval
 
> BTW: Do we have an update feed for other dictionaries (e.g. Danish,
> Ukrainian)?

AFAIK if the users install any dictionary with a proper update link, they will 
be notified of a new version when the update feed is updated.

Regards,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Current comparison of LO vs AOO

2022-07-28 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi all

Published today a quite accurate comparison (some minor details are not so 
correct)

https://itsfoss.com/libreoffice-vs-openoffice/

The Table of Contents could almost be used as a to-do list :)

Best,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: problem downloading binaries from sourceforge

2022-07-25 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Marcus, Carl

> On 07/25/2022 5:06 PM WEST Marcus  wrote:
>  
> Am 25.07.22 um 16:04 schrieb Carl Marcum:

> > It seems to be fixed now.
> 
> I can see the listed item for 4.1.13 and it has already over 81,000 
> downloads.

Yes, all is back to normal, even the mirror options.

Regards,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: problem downloading binaries from sourceforge

2022-07-25 Thread Pedro Lino
It worries me that 4.1.13 does not show up on

https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/

Should I report that?

Sourceforge must be changing the pages (again) because when you press the 
"Problems Downloading?" button, you no longer have the option to choose the 
mirror you want, it will simply switch to another mirror...

Regards,
Pedro

> On 07/25/2022 1:52 PM WEST Carl Marcum  wrote:
> 
>  
> Hi All,
> 
> I tried going through https://openoffice.apache.org/downloads.html to 
> download Linux x86-64 rpm binaries and follow the binary link to SF and 
> the download download doesn't start and it redirects me to the files 
> page and 4.1.13 isn't listed but there is another download button that 
> doesn't work and then I'm back to the files page.
> 
> When I try to login I get a 404 that it says the website is temporarily 
> in static offline mode.
> But it shows a tweet that says its back to full capacity.
> 
> Anybody else get this?
> 
> Thanks,
> Carl
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: [DISCUSS] 4.1.13 release user profile warning

2022-07-15 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Carl

> On 07/15/2022 2:26 AM WEST Carl Marcum  wrote:

> As it seems the AOO 4.1.13 RC1 vote may pass (hopefully soon ), I'm 
> working on the announce email and blog post.
> 
> Since the .openoffice user profile is not backward compatible with 
> previous 4.1 versions for stored passwords, should we place a warning 
> for users to back up up their user profile  in the announce email, blog 
> post, release notes, etc. or not necessary?

If we do mention it, we have to make perfectly clear that this will only affect 
users that enabled the "Openoffice dialog" AND have set a "Master password".
These are two options that are NOT enabled by default so only advanced users 
would use both.

That said, for those users, they have to realize that they MUST make a backup 
before updating IF they intend to downgrade AOO at any point (which is also 
something common users don't do...)

I hope such a warning is not confusing/worrying for common users...

Best,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.13-RC1 as GA

2022-07-10 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi all

The Release Candidate is good for production/GA:

[X] yes / +1
[ ] no / -1

My vote is based on

[X] binding (member of PMC)
[X] I have built and tested the RC from source on platform [Linux Ubuntu 
18.04 x64]
[X] I have tested the binary RC on platform [Linux Ubuntu 20.04 x64; 
Windows 7 x64; Windows 10 x64]

I checked the Source signature and SHA256 and SHA512 CRCs as well as both CRCs 
for the Linux x64 and Windows x86 main installer in en-US and PT and for the PT 
language pack binaries

I tested the en-US installer plus the PT language pack as well as the PT 
installer alone. 

On Linux Ubuntu 20.04 x64 I opened ODT, ODS, ODP and ODF as well as DOC, XLS, 
PPT and DOCX, XLSX and PPTX files without any issues.

Regards,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: AOO in Microsoft Store

2022-05-24 Thread Pedro Lino
Well done!

It is really easy to install from the Store.

Regards,
Pedro

> On 05/24/2022 4:55 PM Matthias Seidel  wrote:
> 
>  
> Just FYI:
> 
> https://blogs.windows.com/windowsdeveloper/2022/05/24/microsoft-store-grows-with-the-developer-community/
> 
> Direct link to OpenOffice now:
> 
> https://apps.microsoft.com/store/detail/apache-openoffice/XP89J5462CMGJD
> 
> Regards,
> 
>    Matthias

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Extensions website: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

2022-05-24 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias, Bidouille

> On 05/24/2022 11:35 AM Matthias Seidel  wrote:
> 
>  
> Hi Pedro,
> 
> Am 24.05.22 um 12:28 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> > Hi Matthias
> >
> > I can handle that. I'm already doing the extensions update notification.
> > It is a low volume mail. Can you redirect to pl...@apache.org?
> No, the mail process itself is broken...

Oh, ok. And what can be done to fix the mail process?

> We really need to fix these problems together with SourceForge...

Bidouille, could you describe to Sourceforge support the steps that you took 
and the problem with this extension?
Is it available for download somewhere else?

Regards,
Pedro


> >> On 05/24/2022 11:01 AM Matthias Seidel  wrote:
> >>
> >>  
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Am 24.05.22 um 11:56 schrieb Bidouille:
> >>> Hello,
> >>> To publish extension, you must send an e-mail to 
> >>> noreply[at]extensions.openoffice.org
> >>> Is this address correct?
> >>> Because I got an "undelivered" message.
> >> Normally an administrator must publish an extension if it contains links
> >> to external locations (like for pictures or videos).
> >>
> >> If you think of
> >> https://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/ancdef-anchor-default-pictures
> >> I have already published it yesterday.
> >>
> >> And yes, the mail procedure is still broken...
> >>
> >> If we only could find a volunteer?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >>    Matthias
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> - Mail original -
> >>>> De: "Mail Delivery System" 
> >>>> À: x
> >>>> Envoyé: Mardi 24 Mai 2022 11:47:47
> >>>> Objet: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
> >>>>
> >>>> This is the mail system at host xxx.
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
> >>>> be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
> >>>>
> >>>> For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.
> >>>>
> >>>> If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
> >>>> delete your own text from the attached returned message.
> >>>>
> >>>>The mail system
> >>>>
> >>>> : connect to
> >>>> extensions.openoffice.org[204.68.111.101]:25: Connection timed
> >>>> out
> >>>>
> >>> -
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>>
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Extensions website: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

2022-05-24 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias

I can handle that. I'm already doing the extensions update notification.
It is a low volume mail. Can you redirect to pl...@apache.org?

Unfortunately there is also some problem with Sourceforge for that extension?

The "/19242/0/ancdef1.0.0..42/0/ancdef1.0.0.oxt" file could not be found or is 
not available. Please select another file.

Regards,
Pedro

> On 05/24/2022 11:01 AM Matthias Seidel  wrote:
> 
>  
> Hi,
> 
> Am 24.05.22 um 11:56 schrieb Bidouille:
> > Hello,
> > To publish extension, you must send an e-mail to 
> > noreply[at]extensions.openoffice.org
> > Is this address correct?
> > Because I got an "undelivered" message.
> 
> Normally an administrator must publish an extension if it contains links
> to external locations (like for pictures or videos).
> 
> If you think of
> https://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/ancdef-anchor-default-pictures
> I have already published it yesterday.
> 
> And yes, the mail procedure is still broken...
> 
> If we only could find a volunteer?
> 
> Regards,
> 
>    Matthias
> 
> >
> >
> >
> > - Mail original -
> >> De: "Mail Delivery System" 
> >> À: x
> >> Envoyé: Mardi 24 Mai 2022 11:47:47
> >> Objet: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
> >>
> >> This is the mail system at host xxx.
> >>
> >> I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
> >> be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
> >>
> >> For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.
> >>
> >> If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
> >> delete your own text from the attached returned message.
> >>
> >>The mail system
> >>
> >> : connect to
> >> extensions.openoffice.org[204.68.111.101]:25: Connection timed
> >> out
> >>
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Warning macro with OXT

2022-05-23 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Bidouille, all

> On 05/22/2022 8:07 PM Bidouille  wrote:
> 
>  
> > There have been security fixes related to macros since 4.1.7. Please
> > take a look at the security reports. It’s likely this warning is a
> > result. There is a white list and possibly this type needs to be
> > added.
> As I said before: not occurs on 4.1.11
> This warning is a non sense for extensions.
> 
> For me regression

Confirmed with extension PicCom 
(https://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/set-picture-comment) using 4.1.12 
under Ubuntu 20.04 x64. There is a warning about macros when running this 
Extension under 4.1.12 but not under 4.1.11.

As you mentioned in a separate email, "this happens only when Basic macro is 
called in menu added by the OXT"

It is indeed a regression related to the macro execution fix.

Regards,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Connection not secure on openoffice.org

2022-05-21 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi all
 
Firefox reports "Connection not secure"
Reasons:
This website does not supply ownership information.
and
Connection not encrypted
 
Is this a new issue or was it me who had never noticed before?
 
Regards,
Pedro

Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice Wiki and Forums

2022-05-15 Thread Pedro Lino
After emptying the cache, the links reported by the OP do work, but on the page 
below the Database now works but not the Mailing Lists

Is this a separate issue?

Regards,
Pedro

> On 05/15/2022 2:30 PM Dick Groskamp  wrote:
> 
>  
> Just found another one on the wiki:
> 
> http://www.openoffice.org/qa/ooQAReloaded/DatabaseTeamsite/ooQA-TeamDatabaseLinks.html
> points to several links, of which most work correctly.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice Wiki and Forums

2022-05-15 Thread Pedro Lino


> Am 15.05.22 um 12:01 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> > Hi Peter,

> > What
> 
> What? What!
> 
> I need another coffee, it seems! ;-)

:) No more coffee! You are mixing up names and leaving unfinished sentences! :)
What you do need is a relaxing drink such as a chamomile or valerian infusion ;)

Have a relaxing Sunday!

Best,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice Wiki and Forums

2022-05-15 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias

> On 05/15/2022 10:43 AM Matthias Seidel  wrote:

> Such ".services." links were normally redirected. Maybe that stopped
> after the upgrade of the Wiki server?
> 
> If yes, we now have a lot of "broken" links everywhere...

Can we fix these two? Or should this be done through a global Find & Replace?
Who has permission to edit openoffice.org?

Regards,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: [GRAPHICS] Help with SVG versions of AOO website logo and Forum Header

2022-05-10 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias

> On 05/09/2022 6:39 PM Matthias Seidel  wrote:
> 
>  
> Hi Pedro,
> 
> That looks really good!

I think so too. But it is not my merit. I just converted the current design to 
SVGs :)
(and switched TM to (R) ) ;)

Best,
Pedro

> Am 08.05.22 um 00:30 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> > Hi again
> >
> > I have created an SVG for the Forums/Fora (don't know where I should upload 
> > it to)
> > The word Forum is editable (in Ubuntu Condensed 26pt)
> > I have created Forum (EN, FR, IT and PL), Foren (DE) and Foro (ES)
> >
> > https://imgur.com/a/FDqydFu
> >
> > If any of the other language users sends the word / characters I can update 
> > it or simply send the SVG
> >
> > Best,
> > Pedro
> >
> >> On 05/07/2022 7:38 PM Dave Fisher  wrote:
> >>
> >>  
> >> Hi -
> >>
> >> It would be great if we had a transparent background and svg versions of 
> >> our website logos:
> >>
> >> We have an svg version of the orb here: 
> >> https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/blob/main/assets/images/AOO_logos/svg/orb.svg
> >> I can’t find an svg of the full website logo. Does anyone know of one?
> >> An svg should convert any fonts to shapes
> >>
> >> (1) The Forum header - https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/logo_forum.png
> >>
> >> The same graphic on every forum right now. Size is 450px x 77px. Extra 
> >> credit if someone can create versions for: ES, FR, HU, IT, JA, NL, and PL. 
> >> VI is read-only and ZH is non-functional and not currently available.
> >>
> >> (2) The website logo - 
> >> https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/blob/main/assets/images/AOO_logos/AOO4_website_logo.png
> >>
> >> The size is 268px x 100px
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Dave
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: [GRAPHICS] Help with SVG versions of AOO website logo and Forum Header

2022-05-10 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Dave

I will upload or send to you by email the SVG(s) later today.

Can you use the SVG directly on the page? Wouldn't that be preferable instead 
of PNGs?

Separate issue:
I opened the Spanish forum on Firefox running on Linux and it looks good. 
However opening the same page on Android is missing some elements. I used 
Firefox and Vivaldi and in both the top bar is missing as well as the "Enlaces 
rápidos" text
I just switched to the EN page and the same problems occur on my Android 7.1.2 
mobile

Best,
Pedro

> On 05/10/2022 2:03 AM Dave Fisher  wrote:
> 
>  
> Hi Pedro,
> 
> You can see the new logo (you may have to clear cache) at 
> https://forum.openoffice.org/es/forum/ along with other forum sites.
> 
> Regards,
> Dave
> 
> > On May 7, 2022, at 3:30 PM, Pedro Lino  
> > wrote:
> > 
> > Hi again
> > 
> > I have created an SVG for the Forums/Fora (don't know where I should upload 
> > it to)
> > The word Forum is editable (in Ubuntu Condensed 26pt)
> > I have created Forum (EN, FR, IT and PL), Foren (DE) and Foro (ES)
> > 
> > https://imgur.com/a/FDqydFu
> > 
> > If any of the other language users sends the word / characters I can update 
> > it or simply send the SVG
> > 
> > Best,
> > Pedro
> > 
> >> On 05/07/2022 7:38 PM Dave Fisher  wrote:
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Hi -
> >> 
> >> It would be great if we had a transparent background and svg versions of 
> >> our website logos:
> >> 
> >> We have an svg version of the orb here: 
> >> https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/blob/main/assets/images/AOO_logos/svg/orb.svg
> >> I can’t find an svg of the full website logo. Does anyone know of one?
> >> An svg should convert any fonts to shapes
> >> 
> >> (1) The Forum header - https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/logo_forum.png
> >> 
> >> The same graphic on every forum right now. Size is 450px x 77px. Extra 
> >> credit if someone can create versions for: ES, FR, HU, IT, JA, NL, and PL. 
> >> VI is read-only and ZH is non-functional and not currently available.
> >> 
> >> (2) The website logo - 
> >> https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/blob/main/assets/images/AOO_logos/AOO4_website_logo.png
> >> 
> >> The size is 268px x 100px
> >> 
> >> Best,
> >> Dave
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> > 
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> > 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: [GRAPHICS] Help with SVG versions of AOO website logo and Forum Header

2022-05-07 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi again

I have created an SVG for the Forums/Fora (don't know where I should upload it 
to)
The word Forum is editable (in Ubuntu Condensed 26pt)
I have created Forum (EN, FR, IT and PL), Foren (DE) and Foro (ES)

https://imgur.com/a/FDqydFu

If any of the other language users sends the word / characters I can update it 
or simply send the SVG

Best,
Pedro

> On 05/07/2022 7:38 PM Dave Fisher  wrote:
> 
>  
> Hi -
> 
> It would be great if we had a transparent background and svg versions of our 
> website logos:
> 
> We have an svg version of the orb here: 
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/blob/main/assets/images/AOO_logos/svg/orb.svg
> I can’t find an svg of the full website logo. Does anyone know of one?
> An svg should convert any fonts to shapes
> 
> (1) The Forum header - https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/logo_forum.png
> 
> The same graphic on every forum right now. Size is 450px x 77px. Extra credit 
> if someone can create versions for: ES, FR, HU, IT, JA, NL, and PL. VI is 
> read-only and ZH is non-functional and not currently available.
> 
> (2) The website logo - 
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/blob/main/assets/images/AOO_logos/AOO4_website_logo.png
> 
> The size is 268px x 100px
> 
> Best,
> Dave
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: [GRAPHICS] Help with SVG versions of AOO website logo and Forum Header

2022-05-07 Thread Pedro Lino
Here is the English Forum logo converted to transparent

https://i.imgur.com/xWxzjbP.png

Mathias has some of these in SVG and the other ones can be easily converted.

Regards,
Pedro

> On 05/07/2022 7:38 PM Dave Fisher  wrote:
> 
>  
> Hi -
> 
> It would be great if we had a transparent background and svg versions of our 
> website logos:
> 
> We have an svg version of the orb here: 
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/blob/main/assets/images/AOO_logos/svg/orb.svg
> I can’t find an svg of the full website logo. Does anyone know of one?
> An svg should convert any fonts to shapes
> 
> (1) The Forum header - https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/logo_forum.png
> 
> The same graphic on every forum right now. Size is 450px x 77px. Extra credit 
> if someone can create versions for: ES, FR, HU, IT, JA, NL, and PL. VI is 
> read-only and ZH is non-functional and not currently available.
> 
> (2) The website logo - 
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/blob/main/assets/images/AOO_logos/AOO4_website_logo.png
> 
> The size is 268px x 100px
> 
> Best,
> Dave
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: WebDAV module ported from serf to curl; curl using openssl and zlib (was: Re: Openssl, serf and curl)

2022-04-28 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Damjan, Arrigo, all

> On 04/28/2022 5:11 PM Arrigo Marchiori  wrote:

> Binary for Linux available here for download:
> https://home.apache.org/~ardovm/openoffice/linux/openoffice4-serf2curl-2022-04-28-installed.tar.bz2

> I tried "Open" and entered a https address, that I know is password
> protected.
> 
> The current trunk would ask for the password. I got an error message
> instead:
> 
> > > Nonexistent object.
> > > Nonexistent file.

Same problem under Linux. Maybe it only works on 42X?

I could not test under Windows because there aren't any Windows Dev builds (42X 
or any other) available at
https://nightlies.apache.org/openoffice/install/
so I can't replace the DLLs

Best,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: WebDAV module ported from serf to curl; curl using openssl and zlib (was: Re: Openssl, serf and curl)

2022-04-26 Thread Pedro Lino

Hi Damian



I use Webdav almost on a daily basis.
Looking forward to testing a new build under Linux as soon as you push it to 42X

Can you share your working binaries for Windows?



Thanks!

Pedro
> On 04/26/2022 6:56 PM Damjan Jovanovic  wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 9:57 PM Jim Jagielski  > wrote:
> > I'm gonna look into the serf->(lib)curl option... Since we don't use any of 
> > the fancy features of serf, I'm thinking that the easy option might be best 
> > 
> > 
> > Hi
> > 
> > I've ported our WebDAV content provider module from Serf to Curl.
> > 
> > While it ended well, and several other bugs were found and fixed, it 
> > definitely wasn't the "easy option" Jim ;). Starting with conservative 
> > changes, it ended up needing total restructuring, and became more of a 
> > rewrite. The crashes were frequent and hung connections many, and I had to 
> > read up on the HTTP protocol, and read Curl and Serf's source code, but 
> > eventually I prevailed, and a clean elegant stable Curl WebDAV module 
> > emerged.
> > 
> > The huge patch is attached for anyone wishing to review and test. Unless 
> > there are major objections, I'll push it in a couple of days.
> > 
> > STATUS
> > 
> > It builds and works well on FreeBSD and Windows.
> > 
> > Most of the code was reused, and all the operations and semantics 
> > previously present with Serf, should have been preserved.
> > 
> > Browsing WebDAV files and directories, loading files, overwriting them 
> > ("Save"), creating them ("Save As"), renaming and deleting them, all works.
> > 
> > HTTP and HTTPS proxies work. Unlike Serf, Curl could also support SOCKS 
> > proxies (with minimal further changes), but AOO lacks that setting in the 
> > proxy UI and configuration.
> > 
> > Authentication works, both to the destination server and to the proxy 
> > server. I've successfully tested Basic and Digest authentication. Curl 
> > supports every authentication method Serf does and more.
> > 
> > HTTPS works, with a custom certificate verification function, using our own 
> > certificate store from NSS and its API (like the Serf code used). A bug was 
> > discovered (which is in the Serf implementation too) where self-signed 
> > certificates were being unconditionally rejected; apparently NSS wants to 
> > see that a copy of that certificate  in its certificate chain parameter 
> > too. Now they work, and the user gets prompted to allow access.
> > 
> > 
> > HTTPS and authentication can be used together on the same connection and 
> > work well, both bringing up their UI dialogs as needed.
> > 
> > A bug was fixed where when username and password were both present in the 
> > URL (dav://user:pass@host/path), the code was trying to split them at the 
> > "@" instead of ":".
> > 
> > Unnecessary base64 encoding and decoding was removed, when importing the 
> > TLS connection's certificates into our XSecurityEnvironment. They now come 
> > in directly as ASN.1 DER, and still work.
> > 
> > The code was greatly restructured and cleaned up, as Curl's API is 
> > synchronous and blocking, with parameters set in advance instead of through 
> > many callbacks, which has allowed using short clear methods, and clean 
> > separation between the session and request classes. The WebDAV content 
> > provider has shrunk from 35 to 21 C++ files, 43 to 29 header files, and 
> > 19129 to 15991 lines of code. With WebDAV methods centralized and 
> > refactored into only 10-20 lines of code each, instead of scattered across 
> > 4 files, it is much more understandable and maintainable now.
> > 
> > Curl is vastly more portable than Serf. We should build easily now even on 
> > OS/2. We can remain with existing build tools instead of needing scons or 
> > cmake just to build Serf.
> > 
> > 3 now unused dependencies were removed: apr, apr-util, and serf. Serf isn't 
> > so bad. APR's pool idea is an ingenious way of doing resource management in 
> > C. However Curl has excellent documentation, guides, examples, and detailed 
> > explanations and even example code for each setting, while Serf has no 
> > documentation. Serf might be worth it in a project that already uses APR a 
> > lot, but we don't.
> > 
> > Instead of the historical, crippled forms of logging like OSL_TRACE(), 
> > which don't appear in release builds, I've made it use the newer 
> > com.sun.star.logging UNO component (wrapped in comphelper::EventLogger), 
> > which was inspired by java.util.logging, with configurable verbosity 
> > levels, handlers (file and console) and output formats (plain, csv), and 
> > importantly, which produces output in release builds too. I've also made it 
> > so that on LogLevel::FINEST, Curl's verbose mode is enabled and Curl's 
> > debug output is also logged through us, with descriptions of what Curl is 
> > doing, and logs of all HTTP traffic including headers and bodies, before 
> > encryption and after decryption in the case of 

Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.12-RC1 as GA

2022-04-21 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Jim

FYI there are 6 binding votes
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.12#AOO4.1.12-VoteResolution

Regards,
Pedro

> On 04/21/2022 3:02 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
>  
> I'll keep this open for a few more days to allow for more testing and 
> voting...
> 
> > On Apr 21, 2022, at 1:36 AM, Don Lewis  wrote:
> > 
> > On 13 Apr, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >> I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community 
> >> builds of
> >> Apache OpenOffice 4.1.12-RC1 as GA.
> >> 
> >> These artifacts can be found at:
> >> 
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.12-RC1/
> >> 
> >> Please cast your vote:
> >> 
> > The Release Candidate is good for production/GA:
> > 
> > [X] yes / +1
> > 
> > [ ] no / -1
> > 
> > My vote is based on
> > 
> > [ ] binding (member of PMC)
> > 
> > [X] I have built and tested the RC from source on platform [FreeBSD]
> > 
> > [ ] I have tested the binary RC on platform [ ]
> > 
> > I tested the source tarball checksum.
> > 
> > Opening, editing, saving existing calc and writer docs works.
> > 
> > 
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> > 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.12-RC1 as GA

2022-04-19 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi all

> The Release Candidate is good for production/GA:
> 
> [X] yes / +1
> 
> [ ] no / -1
> 
> My vote is based on
> 
> [X] binding (member of PMC)
> 
> [X] I have built and tested the RC from source on platform [Linux Ubuntu 
> 18.04 x64]
> 
> [X] I have tested the binary RC on platform [Linux Ubuntu 18.04 x64, 20.04 
> x64; Windows 7 x64; Windows 10 x64]

I checked the Source signature and SHA256 and SHA512 CRCs as well as both CRCs 
for the Linux x64 and Windows x86 main installer in en-US and PT and for the PT 
language pack binaries

I installed the en-US plus PT language packs as well as the PT installer under 
Windows 7 x64, and Linux Ubuntu 20.04 x64. 

On Linux Ubuntu 20.04 x64 I opened ODT, ODS, ODP and ODF as well as DOC, XLS, 
PPT and DOCX, XLSX and PPTX files without any issues.

Regards,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: 4.1.12-dev developer test builds...

2022-04-05 Thread Pedro Lino
> On 04/05/2022 2:24 PM Matthias Seidel  wrote:
> 
>  
> Hi Jim,
> 
> Am 05.04.22 um 14:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> > Are we ready for a RC1?
> 
> *I* think we are... ;-)

+1

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: 4.1.12-dev developer test builds...

2022-03-26 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Jim

Works perfectly under Ubuntu 20.04.4 x64 (and includes the dedicatory to Joerg)
+1 to move on to RC1
I will be away until the 5th of April but am available to build, test and vote 
after that

Regards,
Pedro

> On 03/25/2022 12:24 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
>  
> ... Are available at
> 
>http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/
> 
> Assuming these look good, we can progress to an RC1
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Help building in Ubuntu 20.04.4?

2022-03-22 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias

> On 03/22/2022 1:25 PM Matthias Seidel  wrote:

> Can you post your configure?

./configure \
--with-build-version="$(date +"%Y-%m-%d %H:%M") - `uname -sm`" \

--with-dmake-url=https://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2
 \

--with-epm-url=https://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/epm-3.7.tar.gz
 \
--enable-opengl \
--disable-odk \
--enable-category-b \
--with-jdk-home=/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64 \
--enable-bundled-dictionaries

> > Does 41X still need gnome-vfs?
> 
> I don't think so, but I wanted to wait for the buildbot on Thursday.

Ok. Let's see how that goes.

Best,
Pedro


> >> Am 20.03.22 um 19:10 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> >>> Hi Pedro,
> >>>
> >>> Am 20.03.22 um 18:44 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> >>>> Hi Matthias
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 03/20/2022 5:22 PM Matthias Seidel  
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> Thank you for the quick answer and solution. Unfortunately I have no 
> >>>>>> idea on how to backport a commit from trunk. Can you/someone please do 
> >>>>>> that?
> >>>>> I will try. At least the ORbit patch looks easy...
> >>>> Excellent! Thanks!
> >>> The ORbit patch is in.
> >>>
> >>> @Jim/Damjan:
> >>>
> >>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/ca91c47212927702e72149e398fae850402fa54c
> >>>
> >>> This patch makes GIO default, is that available on CentOS 5?
> >>>
> >>> If yes, I am ready to commit it to AOO41X.
> >>>
> >>>>>> During compiling I realized that our build process now requires epm 
> >>>>>> 5.0.0 but the bootstrap still downloads epm 3.7
> >>>>>> Manually downloading epm 5 from
> >>>>>> https://github.com/jimjag/epm/archive/v5.0.0.tar.gz
> >>>>>> and renaming to 8ce02a315807bd406b5de85ccf63e7fb-epm-5.0.0 worked 
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Can you/someone please fix the bootstrap issue?
> >>>>> First of all, which version do you want to build?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> For AOO41X we use epm 3.7 for trunk/AOO42X we use epm 5.
> >>>> Ah, yes forgot that detail :) I built 42X to test the empty/not-empty 
> >>>> items
> >>>>
> >>>> Can bootstrap download both versions and the correct one is used during 
> >>>> compiling? (Please remember I'm not a programmer so if this suggestion 
> >>>> is stupid, just ignore it)
> >>> Bootstrap is part of the build process, so it always downloads the
> >>> appropriate version needed for the branch.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>>
> >>>    Matthias
> >>>
> >>>> Best,
> >>>> Pedro
> >>>>
> >>>> -
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>>>
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Help building in Ubuntu 20.04.4?

2022-03-21 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias

> I cherry-picked the second patch, so AOO41X should build now.
> 
> Can you test, please?

I get a lot of errors when trying to configure 41X

checking for GNOMEVFS... no
configure: error: Package requirements (gnome-vfs-2.0 >= 2.6.0 ) were not met:

No package 'gnome-vfs-2.0' found

Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
installed software in a non-standard prefix.

Alternatively, you may set the environment variables GNOMEVFS_CFLAGS
and GNOMEVFS_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config.
See the pkg-config man page for more details.

Does 41X still need gnome-vfs?

Best,
Pedro

> Am 20.03.22 um 19:10 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> > Hi Pedro,
> >
> > Am 20.03.22 um 18:44 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> >> Hi Matthias
> >>
> >>> On 03/20/2022 5:22 PM Matthias Seidel  wrote:
> >>>> Thank you for the quick answer and solution. Unfortunately I have no 
> >>>> idea on how to backport a commit from trunk. Can you/someone please do 
> >>>> that?
> >>> I will try. At least the ORbit patch looks easy...
> >> Excellent! Thanks!
> > The ORbit patch is in.
> >
> > @Jim/Damjan:
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/ca91c47212927702e72149e398fae850402fa54c
> >
> > This patch makes GIO default, is that available on CentOS 5?
> >
> > If yes, I am ready to commit it to AOO41X.
> >
> >>>> During compiling I realized that our build process now requires epm 
> >>>> 5.0.0 but the bootstrap still downloads epm 3.7
> >>>> Manually downloading epm 5 from
> >>>> https://github.com/jimjag/epm/archive/v5.0.0.tar.gz
> >>>> and renaming to 8ce02a315807bd406b5de85ccf63e7fb-epm-5.0.0 worked 
> >>>>
> >>>> Can you/someone please fix the bootstrap issue?
> >>> First of all, which version do you want to build?
> >>>
> >>> For AOO41X we use epm 3.7 for trunk/AOO42X we use epm 5.
> >> Ah, yes forgot that detail :) I built 42X to test the empty/not-empty items
> >>
> >> Can bootstrap download both versions and the correct one is used during 
> >> compiling? (Please remember I'm not a programmer so if this suggestion is 
> >> stupid, just ignore it)
> > Bootstrap is part of the build process, so it always downloads the
> > appropriate version needed for the branch.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >    Matthias
> >
> >> Best,
> >> Pedro
> >>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Help building in Ubuntu 20.04.4?

2022-03-20 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias

> On 03/20/2022 5:22 PM Matthias Seidel  wrote:

> > Thank you for the quick answer and solution. Unfortunately I have no idea 
> > on how to backport a commit from trunk. Can you/someone please do that?
> I will try. At least the ORbit patch looks easy...

Excellent! Thanks!

> > During compiling I realized that our build process now requires epm 5.0.0 
> > but the bootstrap still downloads epm 3.7
> > Manually downloading epm 5 from
> > https://github.com/jimjag/epm/archive/v5.0.0.tar.gz
> > and renaming to 8ce02a315807bd406b5de85ccf63e7fb-epm-5.0.0 worked 
> >
> > Can you/someone please fix the bootstrap issue?
> 
> First of all, which version do you want to build?
> 
> For AOO41X we use epm 3.7 for trunk/AOO42X we use epm 5.

Ah, yes forgot that detail :) I built 42X to test the empty/not-empty items

Can bootstrap download both versions and the correct one is used during 
compiling? (Please remember I'm not a programmer so if this suggestion is 
stupid, just ignore it)

Best,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Help building in Ubuntu 20.04.4?

2022-03-20 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Damian

Thank you for the quick answer and solution. Unfortunately I have no idea on 
how to backport a commit from trunk. Can you/someone please do that?

In any case the missing libraries were apparently not needed, as you mentioned, 
since compiling finished successfully after the hack mentioned below.

During compiling I realized that our build process now requires epm 5.0.0 but 
the bootstrap still downloads epm 3.7
Manually downloading epm 5 from
https://github.com/jimjag/epm/archive/v5.0.0.tar.gz
and renaming to 8ce02a315807bd406b5de85ccf63e7fb-epm-5.0.0 worked 

Can you/someone please fix the bootstrap issue?

Thanks!

Best,
Pedro

> On 03/20/2022 2:56 PM Damjan Jovanovic  wrote:
> 
>  
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2022 at 3:18 PM Pedro Lino 
> wrote:
> 
> > Hi all
> >
> > Installing needed libraries fails with
> >
> > E: Unable to locate package libgnomevfs2-dev
> > E: Unable to locate package liborbit2-dev
> >
> > Help?
> >
> > Pedro
> 
> 
> Backport these commits from trunk:
> 
> commit ca91c47212927702e72149e398fae850402fa54c
> Author: Damjan Jovanovic 
> Date:   Thu Oct 19 16:35:49 2017 +
> 
> GnomeVFS was deprecated 9 years ago. Make GIO, its replacement,
> the default searched by configure.ac instead.
> 
> 
> commit 6b1c0a07ced87c91d0adf8f59096a87e364647c0
> Author: Damjan Jovanovic 
> Date:   Sat Oct 21 06:15:07 2017 +
> 
> Don't require ORbit to compile. We never really needed it:
> GConf makes its own CORBA connection if it needs to, and
> the only reason we included orbit.h is to check whether
> the problematic version < 2.8 was present, as it deadlocks
> the GTK VCL plugin.
> 
> But ORbit 2.8 was released in 2003, and GConf doesn't
> even use CORBA connections any more. So drop the check
> and stop needing ORBit altogether.
> 
> 
> Regards
> Damjan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Help building in Ubuntu 20.04.4?

2022-03-20 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi all

Installing needed libraries fails with

E: Unable to locate package libgnomevfs2-dev
E: Unable to locate package liborbit2-dev

Help?

Pedro

Re: AOO 4.1.12?

2022-03-20 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias

Thank you for the test builds!

Regarding the release of 4.1.12, I will be away with limited internet access 
between 29th and 4th of April
I am available to test, vote and help with tasks after that.

Best,
Pedro

> On 03/18/2022 7:59 PM Matthias Seidel  wrote:
> 
>  
> Hi all,
> 
> The latest AOO41X Test build for Windows is available here:
> 
> https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.12_Win_x86_install_en-US_Test.exe
> 
> Regards,
> 
>    Matthias
> 
> Am 17.03.22 um 19:52 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
> > In article <48758D24-4BF7-4818-A138-E9C9FD7CA6E6__
> > 39009.0329734207$1647445273$gmane$o...@jagunet.com>, 
> > j...@jagunet.com says...
> >> Thanks! I volunteer to RM. Is that OK?
> > +1 from me as well
> >
> > Keith
> >
> >>> On Mar 15, 2022, at 6:43 PM, Matthias Seidel  
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> Just FYI, I created a Release Schedule for AOO 4.1.12:
> >>>
> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.12
> >>>
> >>> Feel free to update!
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>>
> >>>Matthias
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

2022-03-10 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias

Yes, it was updated on March 1st

Thanks to Andrea's clear instructions we now have one more trained "staff" to 
do this update ;)

I can confirm that it also works perfectly under Linux using the 4.1.12 Nightly 
builds

Maybe this is a good enough motive to release 4.1.12 to all?

Regards,
Pedro

> On 03/10/2022 4:10 PM Matthias Seidel  wrote:
> 
>  
> Hi Pedro, all,
> 
> Am 19.02.22 um 17:56 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> > Hi Andrea, all
> >
> >> On 02/13/2022 10:11 PM Andrea Pescetti  wrote:
> >> I'm assuming lazy consensus on giving you permissions on the Extensions 
> >> site (not the site itself, actually, but the shell access). You should 
> >> post here your SourceForge username for you to be added.
> >>
> >> Once we are ready with permissions we can then get into details of how 
> >> the feed works.
> > One week later, I assume no one opposes that I have permissions on the 
> > Extensions shell access?
> >
> > Who can handle this so you can teach me further steps?
> 
> At least on Windows I now get an update notification for the English
> dictionary.
> 
> So it seems to work again? Many thanks for that!
> 
> Looking at:
> 
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/aoo-extensions/files/17102/75/dict-en-20220301_aoo.oxt/stats/timeline
> 
> the download numbers increase now!
> 
> Note: With the next AOO release the update notifications should also
> work for macOS/Linux again.
> 
> Regards,
> 
>    Matthias
> 
> >
> > Regards,
> > Pedro
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

2022-02-19 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Andrea, all

> On 02/13/2022 10:11 PM Andrea Pescetti  wrote:

> I'm assuming lazy consensus on giving you permissions on the Extensions 
> site (not the site itself, actually, but the shell access). You should 
> post here your SourceForge username for you to be added.
> 
> Once we are ready with permissions we can then get into details of how 
> the feed works.

One week later, I assume no one opposes that I have permissions on the 
Extensions shell access?

Who can handle this so you can teach me further steps?

Regards,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Openssl, serf and curl... and NSS

2022-02-14 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Jim

> On 02/14/2022 12:24 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
>  
> If everyone is in agreement, I'll create a macOS and Linux test/dev build of 
> AOO41X HEAD

Please do!
Actually you should put it the other way around: "If no one opposes, I'll 
create a macOS and Linux test/dev build of AOO41X HEAD"

Regards,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

2022-02-13 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Andrea

> On 02/13/2022 10:11 PM Andrea Pescetti  wrote:

> I had to try a lot of times since apparently the process changed since 
> the last time I checked this, but I was able to login at last and it's 
> still weekend!

Thank you for taking some time to do this and for testing first!
 
> So, the first steps on your side, since the site is hosted on 
> SourceForge, would be:
> - Get a SourceForge account (and you probably already have one)
> - Follow this guide 
> https://sourceforge.net/p/forge/documentation/SSH%20Keys/ to create and 
> upload your SSH key
> - Test that the shell works by checking whether "ssh -t 
> your_user_n...@shell.sourceforge.net create" gives you a shell; then you 
> can simply type "exit" and logout as you won't have any projects 
> associated to you.

Done. It is working!

> I'm assuming lazy consensus on giving you permissions on the Extensions 
> site (not the site itself, actually, but the shell access). You should 
> post here your SourceForge username for you to be added.

My username is plino

> Once we are ready with permissions we can then get into details of how 
> the feed works.

Thanks!

Regards,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: OpenOffice wordmark exploration (yet without the "Apache" mention)

2022-02-13 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Manjiro

> On 02/13/2022 8:36 PM Corentin Verbrèghe  
> wrote:
 
> I think by making a request to Apache to change the icons of Writer and
> other software, they may agree.

Only the Blue Orb icon (or Logo) is part of the trademark. Icons for Writer or 
any other modules as well as icons for the toolbars are not included in the 
trademark and can be changed.

This is not a restriction to our freedom but a way to guarantee that even 
though anyone can use the freely available source code, they can not 
commercialize or offer a product named OpenOffice or use the same Logo
In any case it is not Apache that restricts our freedom ;)

Thank you for volunteering to contribute! I hope these small legal quirks do 
not demotivate you!

All the best,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

2022-02-11 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Andrea

Do you have time for this issue during this weekend?

Regards,
Pedro

> On 02/03/2022 11:01 PM Andrea Pescetti  wrote:
> 
>  
> Pedro Lino wrote:
> > I found some odd results. If the user has an older than 2017 version of the 
> > dictionary, the Extension Update dialog will report that version 2017.05.01 
> > is available. If the user has the 2017.05.01 version or newer it will 
> > always report that "No new updates are available."
> 
> This is not odd actually, it is quite easily explained.
> 
> The update feed, much like the one we use for OpenOffice itself, has 
> information on the latest available version. If you don't update it (I 
> mean, "updating the update feed") for a while it will still advertise 
> the old version as "latest", and the logic is that if you have a newer 
> version than what the feed believes is the "latest" then you are 
> considered to not need the update.
> 
> I'm surely available to show you all details, just please let FOSDEM 
> pass... but it is just round the corner, links coming in a separate mail.
> 
> Regards,
>Andrea.
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Openssl, serf and curl... and NSS

2022-02-10 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias, all

> On 02/10/2022 4:29 PM Matthias Seidel  wrote:
 
> I think Jim has Java 7 available, since we always built AOO41X with it.

Is there any reason for not updating to Java 8 which is still maintained?
Maybe we can let go of Java 7?

Regards,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Openssl, serf and curl... and NSS

2022-02-06 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Arrigo

> On 02/06/2022 9:24 PM Arrigo Marchiori  wrote:

> If anyone can reproduce the problem, i.e. has -- or can set up -- a
> WebDAV server with https access, I can provide a build for testing.

What problem? I use AOO to edit files on webdav.

I have just used build
AOO4112m1(Build:9809)  -  Rev. 1986472fd5
2022-02-03_12:29:43 - Rev. 1986472fd5882e9c172fd1e6628697ec0c37d322

to edit a file in
https://dav.mailbox.org/servlet/webdav.infostore/Userstore/Pedro%20Lino/Documents/

without any problems.

Regards,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Openssl, serf and curl... and NSS

2022-02-06 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias

> On 02/04/2022 6:41 AM Matthias Seidel  wrote:

> > I will install it on my "brand new" Ubuntu 20.04.3 tomorrow
> 
> That might look a bit odd since 20.04 introduced some kind of scaling
> factor in the UI. This is known, but it would need someone to fix it... ;-)

I don't see any scaling oddity. Can you show me what you mean?

One thing that I don't understand is what the "Automatic" Icon size does. The 
Icon size is always set to Small regardless of the screen density/resolution... 
Shouldn't it switch to Large on a FullHD display? At what ppi/resolution value 
is it set to switch?

Regards,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

2022-02-03 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Andrea

Thank you for the fast reply!

> On 02/03/2022 11:01 PM Andrea Pescetti  wrote:

> The update feed, much like the one we use for OpenOffice itself, has 
> information on the latest available version. If you don't update it (I 
> mean, "updating the update feed") for a while it will still advertise 
> the old version as "latest", and the logic is that if you have a newer 
> version than what the feed believes is the "latest" then you are 
> considered to not need the update.

Which means it has not been updated since 2017 and nobody noticed because it is 
automagically updated with each new install :)
 
> I'm surely available to show you all details, just please let FOSDEM 
> pass... but it is just round the corner, links coming in a separate mail.

Of course!
Unfortunately I will not be able to join you guys on Saturday since I will be 
traveling.
Maybe on Sunday...

All the best,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

2022-02-03 Thread Pedro Lino
Returning to this subject:

I found some odd results. If the user has an older than 2017 version of the 
dictionary, the Extension Update dialog will report that version 2017.05.01 is 
available. If the user has the 2017.05.01 version or newer it will always 
report that "No new updates are available."

I hope Andrea has some ideas on this.

Regards,
Pedro


> On 02/03/2022 11:04 AM Matthias Seidel  wrote:
> 
>  
> Hi Pedro, all,
> 
> Bumping this one up:
> 
> Is it possible to re-activate the update feed for SourceForge?
> 
> Regards,
> 
>    Matthias
> 
> Am 15.03.21 um 21:12 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> > Hi again Andrea
> >
> > Marco has released two versions since the one included in AOO 4.1.9
> >
> > Can you update this or teach us how to do it?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Regards,
> > Pedro
> >
> >
> >> On 03/10/2021 4:42 PM Matthias Seidel  wrote:
> >>
> >>  
> >> Hi Andrea,
> >>
> >> When would be the best time for an update?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >>    Matthias
> >>
> >> Am 22.01.21 um 00:39 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> >>> On 21/01/2021 Pedro Lino wrote:
> >>>>> Please let me know if it works; if it does, I will then revert it and
> >>>>> republish only after 4.1.9 is out ...
> >>>> It is fixed indeed (although I get 2 notifications for that
> >>>> extension, but one problem at a time!). Thanks!
> >>> OK, thank you for checking. I've now reverted the fix and we'll go
> >>> live with a more complete version when people will have upgraded to
> >>> 4.1.9.
> >>>
> >>>> if an extension author submits a new version does s/he have
> >>>> permission to do that manual update or s/he has to request someone to
> >>>> do it?
> >>> Extensions authors cannot trigger the update. Site moderators can (and
> >>> probably should) do it once in a while as a routine task. The worst
> >>> period is for sure when you are close to a release and the few weeks
> >>> after a release, since before the release you might be downloading a
> >>> newer version than the one coming with the release (like: if a bundled
> >>> extension was updated yesterday, 4.1.9 would contain an older
> >>> extension version than the one people would download today).
> >>>
> >>> But when we are not in proximity of a release, we can trigger the
> >>> update perhaps once a month; fact is, the process I could find is
> >>> still cumbersome and requires shell commands to be run, so until we
> >>> streamline it it won't be run very frequently. And I would be against
> >>> fully automating it as some anti-spam checks might be needed, even
> >>> though spam is a problem on the Templates site much more than the
> >>> Extensions site.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>>   Andrea.
> >>>
> >>> -
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>>
> >>>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Openssl, serf and curl... and NSS

2022-02-03 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias


> On 02/03/2022 7:48 PM Matthias Seidel  wrote:

> Build is finished but it doesn't start on my ancient Ubuntu 16.04:
> 
> The application cannot be started.
> exception occured raising singleton
> "/singletons/com.sun.star.deployment.ExtensionManager": loading
> component library failed:
> file:///opt/openoffice4/program/../program/deployment.uno.so

Installed without any issues on my ancient Ubuntu 18.04.6 x64 and checking for 
updates and extensions (except for Marco's English dictionaries) worked as 
expected.
I will install it on my "brand new" Ubuntu 20.04.3 tomorrow

Regards,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Openssl, serf and curl... and NSS

2022-02-03 Thread Pedro Lino
Thank you!

I will try it later today

Regards,
Pedro

> On 02/03/2022 5:06 PM Matthias Seidel  wrote:
> 
>  
> Am 03.02.22 um 18:00 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Can I just compile branch 41X to get a Linux build?
> 
> The buildbot is already building if someone wants to try later:
> 
> https://nightlies.apache.org/openoffice/install/linsnap-41x/?C=M;O=D
> 
> Regards,
> 
>    Matthias
> 
> >
> > Regards,
> > Pedro
> >
> >> On 02/03/2022 3:00 PM Matthias Seidel  wrote:
> >>
> >>  
> >> Fresh new Windows builds:
> >>
> >> https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-4112-Test/
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >>    Matthias
> >>
> >> Am 31.01.22 um 21:36 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
> >>> On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 10:29:57PM +0100, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hello Matthias,
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 05:55:26PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi Arrigo,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Can the changes to trunk be cherry-picked for AOO42X?
> >>>> Done.
> >>> Linux build available here:
> >>> http://home.apache.org/~ardovm/openoffice/linux/openoffice4-2022-01-31-x86_64-installed.tar.bz2
> >>>
> >>> Best regards,
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Openssl, serf and curl... and NSS

2022-02-03 Thread Pedro Lino
Thanks!

Can I just compile branch 41X to get a Linux build?

Regards,
Pedro

> On 02/03/2022 3:00 PM Matthias Seidel  wrote:
> 
>  
> Fresh new Windows builds:
> 
> https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-4112-Test/
> 
> Regards,
> 
>    Matthias
> 
> Am 31.01.22 um 21:36 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
> > On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 10:29:57PM +0100, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
> >
> >> Hello Matthias,
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 05:55:26PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Arrigo,
> >>>
> >>> Can the changes to trunk be cherry-picked for AOO42X?
> >> Done.
> > Linux build available here:
> > http://home.apache.org/~ardovm/openoffice/linux/openoffice4-2022-01-31-x86_64-installed.tar.bz2
> >
> > Best regards,

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

2022-02-03 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias

> On 02/03/2022 11:04 AM Matthias Seidel  wrote:

> Is it possible to re-activate the update feed for SourceForge?

I'm available to do this if someone helps me. Andrea?

Regards,
Pedro

> Am 15.03.21 um 21:12 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> > Hi again Andrea
> >
> > Marco has released two versions since the one included in AOO 4.1.9
> >
> > Can you update this or teach us how to do it?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Regards,
> > Pedro
> >
> >
> >> On 03/10/2021 4:42 PM Matthias Seidel  wrote:
> >>
> >>  
> >> Hi Andrea,
> >>
> >> When would be the best time for an update?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >>    Matthias
> >>
> >> Am 22.01.21 um 00:39 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> >>> On 21/01/2021 Pedro Lino wrote:
> >>>>> Please let me know if it works; if it does, I will then revert it and
> >>>>> republish only after 4.1.9 is out ...
> >>>> It is fixed indeed (although I get 2 notifications for that
> >>>> extension, but one problem at a time!). Thanks!
> >>> OK, thank you for checking. I've now reverted the fix and we'll go
> >>> live with a more complete version when people will have upgraded to
> >>> 4.1.9.
> >>>
> >>>> if an extension author submits a new version does s/he have
> >>>> permission to do that manual update or s/he has to request someone to
> >>>> do it?
> >>> Extensions authors cannot trigger the update. Site moderators can (and
> >>> probably should) do it once in a while as a routine task. The worst
> >>> period is for sure when you are close to a release and the few weeks
> >>> after a release, since before the release you might be downloading a
> >>> newer version than the one coming with the release (like: if a bundled
> >>> extension was updated yesterday, 4.1.9 would contain an older
> >>> extension version than the one people would download today).
> >>>
> >>> But when we are not in proximity of a release, we can trigger the
> >>> update perhaps once a month; fact is, the process I could find is
> >>> still cumbersome and requires shell commands to be run, so until we
> >>> streamline it it won't be run very frequently. And I would be against
> >>> fully automating it as some anti-spam checks might be needed, even
> >>> though spam is a problem on the Templates site much more than the
> >>> Extensions site.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>>   Andrea.
> >>>
> >>> -
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>>
> >>>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Openssl, serf and curl... and NSS

2022-01-30 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Arrigo

> On 01/30/2022 9:32 AM Arrigo Marchiori  wrote:

> > > If I build from his branch, I get the much awaited "already up to
> > > date" message!

I downloaded your tar.bz2 and both Updates (program and extensions) are working 
as expected under Linux x64 (in this case under Ubuntu 20.04.3). 
Well done!

> Do we want to work on merging the 'serf' branch now, or shall we wait?

Wouldn't it be better to fix for Mac before merging?

Thank you for your persistence!

All the best,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: RV: locale oc-ES

2022-01-11 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias, Javier

Actually it is quite simple to convert a LO to AOO (and vice-versa) dictionary 
extension. Basically they are both are just ZIP files renamed to OXT.
The main difference is that in AOO the dictionary files (.aff, .dic) are in a 
folder/directory named "dictionaries" (while in LO they are in the top level) 
and the description.xml requires different values, although the fields are 
exactly the same.
For simplicity I renamed the file COPYING.txt to LICENSES.txt

Here is a link to a working version
https://app.box.com/s/rf0qrdsoslvx4z25qd7htdvzgq1gs4m3

All the best,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Openssl, serf and curl

2021-12-09 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias

> On 12/09/2021 3:20 PM Matthias Seidel  wrote:

> Is this a real machine or a VM?

It is a real machine
 
> I ask, because I have seen the Update Feed fail on Ubuntu in a VM when
> it definitely worked on my Laptop.

There were a lot of errors during unpack, as I said. 

If Arigo can send me the deb installer, I can try it again.

Regards,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Openssl, serf and curl

2021-12-08 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Arrigo

I got some errors while unpacking the tar.bz2 file so I'm not sure it is 
working as expected. It did run and it still reported "Checking for an update 
failed."
I'm running Ubuntu 18.04 x64

Regards,
Pedro

> On 12/08/2021 7:08 PM Matthias Seidel  wrote:
> 
>  
> Hi Arrigo,
> 
> Am 07.12.21 um 22:05 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
> > Dear All,
> >
> > we are getting somewhere! I am replying myself again below.
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 08:26:55PM +0100, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
> >
> >> Dear All,
> >>
> >> On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 09:29:18PM +0100, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello All,
> >>>
> >>> just a little update.
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 01:44:43PM +0100, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
> >>>
>  Hello Matthias, All,
> 
>  On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 12:26:37AM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> 
> > Hi Arrigo,
> >
> > Am 17.11.21 um 08:16 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
> >> Dear All,
> >>
> >> I pushed a new branch "serf", that contains the OpenSSL upgrade
> >> commits (I reverted the reverts ;-) plus a tentative upgrade of the
> >> serf library to 1.3.9.
> >>
> >> A small patch is included to allow building with Python3-based SCons.
> >>
> >> The oox module also needed minor patching because it uses some OpenSSL
> >> functions that were refactored since OpenSSL 1.1.0.
> >>
> >> I tested it under Linux with Peter's Docker image (adding SCons). It
> >> builds and runs, but I am not sure how to verify if the SSL related
> >> problems are solved.
> >>
> >> I could not yet test if it builds under Windows and Mac. Any help
> >> would be appreciated. Please note that the "serf" branch derives from
> >> trunk.
> > I cannot get it to build on Windows.
> >
> > The build just stops at a certain point. No error messages.
>  I had not tested it under Windows, when I commited it. Sorry.
> 
>  The build stops because the existing patch to OpenSSL does not apply.
> 
>  If we disable it, we face another challenge: OpenSSL does not build
>  with Cygwin's Perl!
>  https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/9048
> 
>  I will investigate if we need Strawberry Perl as suggested in the
>  above link. It's sure this is getting more complex than expected.
> >>> I could patch the configure scripts to use Windows and Cygwin paths as
> >>> necessary. Now the compilation is failing because of missing symbols,
> >>> at link time.
> >>>
> >>> As soon as I have something almost usable, I will commit it.
> >> I think I fixed the OpenSSL module and the depending Python.
> > Not yet... there were more places in which the libraries were named,
> > and more fixes were necessary.
> >
> >> Serf is now posing another challenge.
> >>
> >> Apparently, SCons needs to access the Windows registry in order to
> >> detect the presence of Visual Studio. This is reasonable: also our
> >> "oowintool" script does so.
> >>
> >> Python scripts can access the Windows registry using the "winreg"
> >> module. The problem is that such module _is not included_ in Cygwin's
> >> Python distribution!
> >>
> >> There is a "cygwinreg" module available, but it does not seem to work.
> >>
> >> So instead of using an ``external'' Perl, we will need to use an
> >> ``external'' Python.
> > We will need an ``external'' SCons. I added the configure script
> > option "--with-scons" that must be used under Windows to point to a
> > ``native'' SCons.exe
> >
> > I added a minimal SConscript that checks the validity of the indicated
> > SCons.
> >
> > Unix users should just need to install SCons in some ways (either
> > using pip or the distribution's package) and it will be auto-detected
> > by the configure script.
> >
> >  - Linux build:
> >
> > http://home.apache.org/~ardovm/openoffice/linux/openoffice4-2021-12-07-x86_64-installed.tar.bz2
> >
> >  - Windows build:
> >
> > https://home.apache.org/~ardovm/openoffice/windows/Apache_OpenOffice-2021-12-06_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
> >
> > Do they work as expected?
> 
> I tested on Windows, it works as expected.
> 
> The main problem on Linux was the update feed...
> 
> Regards,
> 
>    Matthias
> 
> >
> > Best regards,

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Openssl, serf and curl

2021-11-26 Thread Pedro Lino
Dear Arrigo

Thank you for your effort!
Please don't take lack of feedback for lack of interest!
I volunteer to test any binaries on Windows 7, 10 or Linux if needed
I can compile on Linux but not on Windows

Regards,
Pedro

> On 11/26/2021 7:26 PM Arrigo Marchiori  wrote:
> 
>  
> Dear All,
> 
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 09:29:18PM +0100, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
> 
> > Hello All,
> > 
> > just a little update.
> > 
> > On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 01:44:43PM +0100, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
> > 
> > > Hello Matthias, All,
> > > 
> > > On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 12:26:37AM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Hi Arrigo,
> > > > 
> > > > Am 17.11.21 um 08:16 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
> > > > > Dear All,
> > > > >
> > > > > I pushed a new branch "serf", that contains the OpenSSL upgrade
> > > > > commits (I reverted the reverts ;-) plus a tentative upgrade of the
> > > > > serf library to 1.3.9.
> > > > >
> > > > > A small patch is included to allow building with Python3-based SCons.
> > > > >
> > > > > The oox module also needed minor patching because it uses some OpenSSL
> > > > > functions that were refactored since OpenSSL 1.1.0.
> > > > >
> > > > > I tested it under Linux with Peter's Docker image (adding SCons). It
> > > > > builds and runs, but I am not sure how to verify if the SSL related
> > > > > problems are solved.
> > > > >
> > > > > I could not yet test if it builds under Windows and Mac. Any help
> > > > > would be appreciated. Please note that the "serf" branch derives from
> > > > > trunk.
> > > > 
> > > > I cannot get it to build on Windows.
> > > > 
> > > > The build just stops at a certain point. No error messages.
> > > 
> > > I had not tested it under Windows, when I commited it. Sorry.
> > > 
> > > The build stops because the existing patch to OpenSSL does not apply.
> > > 
> > > If we disable it, we face another challenge: OpenSSL does not build
> > > with Cygwin's Perl!
> > > https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/9048
> > > 
> > > I will investigate if we need Strawberry Perl as suggested in the
> > > above link. It's sure this is getting more complex than expected.
> > 
> > I could patch the configure scripts to use Windows and Cygwin paths as
> > necessary. Now the compilation is failing because of missing symbols,
> > at link time.
> > 
> > As soon as I have something almost usable, I will commit it.
> 
> I think I fixed the OpenSSL module and the depending Python.
> 
> Serf is now posing another challenge.
> 
> Apparently, SCons needs to access the Windows registry in order to
> detect the presence of Visual Studio. This is reasonable: also our
> "oowintool" script does so.
> 
> Python scripts can access the Windows registry using the "winreg"
> module. The problem is that such module _is not included_ in Cygwin's
> Python distribution!
> 
> There is a "cygwinreg" module available, but it does not seem to work.
> 
> So instead of using an ``external'' Perl, we will need to use an
> ``external'' Python.
> 
> I will try to follow this path.
> 
> Questions and comments are welcome as usual.
> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> Arrigo
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Apache OpenOffice available in the Microsoft Store on Windows 10

2021-11-26 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias

> On 11/26/2021 6:39 PM Matthias Seidel  wrote:

> Another note:
> 
> With the new store you need a Microsoft account even if you want to
> install a free app...
> 
> BUT: This is not the case for classical programs like Apache OpenOffice! ;-)

That is actually good news for OpenOffice users! Will they be notified of new 
versions through the MS Store? (it is not really relevant if the AOO update 
check works)

I really think that it should not be necessary to be a registered user to 
install programs. But Microsoft is clearly following the Google's Android model 
where everything is connected to the user account (which is positive in some 
points, but it is not so good for privacy...)

It seems that if you don't want to be profiled, you really need to stick to 
Linux/BSD

Regards,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Apache OpenOffice available in the Microsoft Store on Windows 10

2021-11-25 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias

> On 11/24/2021 11:50 PM Matthias Seidel  wrote:

>Are they illegal? I am not a lawyer... They need to adjust some (a lot of) 
>things, but that has to be worked on.

They are illegally using the OpenOffice name so they have to be removed. Of 
course they can rebrand it and that would be legal but it would no longer show 
on a search for OpenOffice!

> > On a positive note, "our" Apache OpenOffice does show up on the Portuguese 
> > Microsoft Store app (using Windows 10 Pro 21H2) as the first option!
> > https://i.imgur.com/rdqewTK.png
> 
> That looks great! Did you try to install?

I did install it and it worked perfectly! In addition on another Windows 10 Pro 
machine that already had AOO 4.1.10 installed in the traditional way when I 
installed AOO 4.1.11 through the Store, it correctly updated AOO.

This is excellent!

Regards,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Apache OpenOffice available in the Microsoft Store on Windows 10

2021-11-24 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias

> On 11/24/2021 4:43 PM Matthias Seidel  wrote:

> And as I understand it, the "classical" Windows apps in the Microsoft
> Store will not show up on the Internet...

Then why do the illegal copies of those same "classical" apps that some 
smart-ass companies are trying to sell do show up on the Internet store? 

This is obviously not a criticism to you!

On a positive note, "our" Apache OpenOffice does show up on the Portuguese 
Microsoft Store app (using Windows 10 Pro 21H2) as the first option!
https://i.imgur.com/rdqewTK.png

Regards,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Apache OpenOffice available in the Microsoft Store on Windows 10

2021-11-23 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi all

> On 11/23/2021 7:26 AM Bidouille  wrote:
> 
>  
> Actually, I can not found this official version.
> If I try a search with OpenOffice, I get two others costing €9.99:
> * OpenOffice Windows Store Version 
> * OpenOffice Suite ‪RepackagerExpress.com

I get the same. In fact searching for Apache OpenOffice shows the same results
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/search/explore?q=apache+openoffice

Can anyone provide a link to the Free version?

Maybe it only shows up within the Windows 10 or 11 app?

Regards,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Buildbot config - svn or git?

2021-11-22 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias

I would say silence is agreement.

I assumed AOO moved from SVN to GIT, so in my mind it is the only logical 
option?

If no one has opposed in 4 days (72 hours), I believe this should be a green 
light for Gavin to move on?

Regards,
Pedro

> On 11/22/2021 8:53 PM Matthias Seidel  wrote:
> 
>  
> Hi all,
> 
> any other opinions?
> 
> Regards,
> 
>    Matthias
> 
> Am 18.11.21 um 13:38 schrieb Gavin McDonald:
> > Hi ,
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 9:42 PM Matthias Seidel 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Gavin
> >>
> >> Am 17.11.21 um 11:30 schrieb Gavin McDonald:
> >>> Hi All,
> >>>
> >>> With the new Buildbot 3.x we are using, we also added the ability to host
> >>> project config files from either an SVN [1] location or GIT [2] . So now
> >>> you have a choice. Currently your modified openoffice.py config lives in
> >>> SVN, but I can easily move it to GIT - the choice is yours!
> >> Personally, I would prefer git. Do we have write access?
> >>
> > Yep, all committers have access
> >
> >
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >>Matthias
> >>
> >>> HTH
> >>>
> >>> [1] -
> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/infrastructure/buildbot2/projects
> >>> [2] - https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-bb2
> >>>
> >>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Apache OpenOffice available in the Microsoft Store on Windows 10

2021-11-19 Thread Pedro Lino
> On 11/19/2021 4:47 PM Bidouille  wrote:

> A french version will be great.

Indeed!
And a Spanish version also... It is the 4th spoken language worlwide and the 
2nd by native speakers. Any Spanish volunteers?

Regards,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Who moderates users...@openoffice.apache.org?

2021-11-09 Thread Pedro Lino


> On 11/09/2021 12:13 PM Matthias Seidel  wrote:

> Let's stop this and go back to  work and move on with the project
> instead of harming it.

+1

Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Fwd: [HEADSUP] Phasing out old Windows versions and 32 bit support

2021-10-28 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias

Not wanting to disregard Damjan's effort, wouldn't it be better if people who 
can fix issues would focus on 4.2.x?

I assume Cygwin 3.3.0 will be supported for some time, so we should use that 
time to focus on 4.2.x?

Regards,
Pedro

> On 10/28/2021 1:57 PM Matthias Seidel  wrote:
> 
>  
> Hi all,
> 
> Cygwin 3.3.0 will be available soon and it will be the last 32-bit
> version we can build AOO41X with.
> 
> I remember, that Damjan longer ago posted a list of commits to make
> AOO41X buildable with Cygwin64.
> 
> Can we have a look at it?
> 
> Regards,
> 
>    Matthias
> 
> Am 27.10.21 um 18:25 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> > Hi Pedro,
> >
> > This is not about a 64-bit version of AOO but about building AOO with
> > Cygwin 64-bit.
> >
> > AOO41x needs Cygwin32 at the moment, trunk/AOO42X are already built with
> > Cygwin64.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >    Matthias
> >
> > Am 27.10.21 um 18:16 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> >> Hi Matthias
> >>
> >> I agree. Providing 64-bit Windows binaries must be the #1 priority for 
> >> this Project (not because they are needed or better than the 32-bit builds 
> >> but because they will not be supported by the compilers or the OS)
> >> This will also solve the problem of having to suggest the installation of 
> >> a 32-bit Java (which is also becoming unsupported)
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Pedro
> >>
> >>
> >>> On 10/27/2021 4:25 PM Matthias Seidel  
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> Looks like we need to get building AOO41X for Windows on Cygwin64 or 
> >>> get out AOO42X.
> >>>
> >>> Whatever comes first... ;-)
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>>
> >>>Matthias
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>  Weitergeleitete Nachricht 
> >>> Betreff:  [HEADSUP] Phasing out old Windows versions and 32 bit 
> >>> support
> >>> Datum:Wed, 27 Oct 2021 10:57:45 +0200
> >>> Von:  Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin-announce 
> >>>  mailto:cygwin-annou...@cygwin.com
> >>> Antwort an:   cyg...@cygwin.com mailto:cyg...@cygwin.com
> >>> An:   cygwin-annou...@cygwin.com mailto:cygwin-annou...@cygwin.com
> >>> Kopie (CC):   Corinna Vinschen  
> >>> mailto:corinna-cyg...@cygwin.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> [I sent this announcement to the Cygwin mailing list accidentally.
> >>> Now sending it to cygwin-announce, too, to reach more people. Please
> >>> reply on the cygwin mailing list if you have any concerns or comments]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Hi folks,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The upcoming version 3.3.0 is the last version officially supporting
> >>> Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008.
> >>>
> >>> The next major release 3.4.0 will be released in 2022 and will be the
> >>> last one officially supporting Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows Server 
> >>> 2008
> >>> R2, and Windows Server 2012.
> >>>
> >>> We're also planning to drop Support for the 32 bit release of Cygwin 
> >>> in
> >>> 2022, thus Cygwin 3.4.0 won't come in 32 bit anymore, and the package
> >>> maintainers won't have to update 32 bit packages anymore. If you're
> >>> still running Cygwin under WOW64, consider to move to 64 bit in the 
> >>> next
> >>> couple of months.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Corinna
> >>>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Fwd: [HEADSUP] Phasing out old Windows versions and 32 bit support

2021-10-27 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias

I agree. Providing 64-bit Windows binaries must be the #1 priority for this 
Project (not because they are needed or better than the 32-bit builds but 
because they will not be supported by the compilers or the OS)
This will also solve the problem of having to suggest the installation of a 
32-bit Java (which is also becoming unsupported)

Regards,
Pedro


> On 10/27/2021 4:25 PM Matthias Seidel  wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Looks like we need to get building AOO41X for Windows on Cygwin64 or get 
> out AOO42X.
> 
> Whatever comes first... ;-)
> 
> Regards,
> 
>Matthias
> 
> 
> 
>  Weitergeleitete Nachricht 
> Betreff:  [HEADSUP] Phasing out old Windows versions and 32 bit support
> Datum:Wed, 27 Oct 2021 10:57:45 +0200
> Von:  Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin-announce 
>  mailto:cygwin-annou...@cygwin.com
> Antwort an:   cyg...@cygwin.com mailto:cyg...@cygwin.com
> An:   cygwin-annou...@cygwin.com mailto:cygwin-annou...@cygwin.com
> Kopie (CC):   Corinna Vinschen  
> mailto:corinna-cyg...@cygwin.com
> 
> 
> [I sent this announcement to the Cygwin mailing list accidentally.
> Now sending it to cygwin-announce, too, to reach more people. Please
> reply on the cygwin mailing list if you have any concerns or comments]
> 
> 
> Hi folks,
> 
> 
> The upcoming version 3.3.0 is the last version officially supporting
> Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008.
> 
> The next major release 3.4.0 will be released in 2022 and will be the
> last one officially supporting Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows Server 2008
> R2, and Windows Server 2012.
> 
> We're also planning to drop Support for the 32 bit release of Cygwin in
> 2022, thus Cygwin 3.4.0 won't come in 32 bit anymore, and the package
> maintainers won't have to update 32 bit packages anymore. If you're
> still running Cygwin under WOW64, consider to move to 64 bit in the next
> couple of months.
> 
> 
> Corinna
> 


Re: macOS Monterey

2021-10-26 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias

People who bought the M1 are those who want to have "the latest" so if they are 
about to upgrade, AOO should be ahead.
My opinion is yes.
In any case people with an M1 Apple are probably 0,0001% of AOO users, if any 
of them would use an old school Office suite...

Regards,
Pedro
  
> On 10/26/2021 2:12 PM Matthias Seidel  wrote:
> 
>  
> Hi all,
> 
> Our Apple M1 (MacStadium) offers an upgrade to macOS 12 (Monterey).
> 
> Do we want to test it?
> 
> Regards,
> 
>    Matthias

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: 500 error while building during bootstrap

2021-10-03 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Andrea

> On 10/03/2021 10:42 PM Andrea Pescetti  wrote:

> Again, this is a local workaround for those who know what they are doing.

Clearly not my case (I'm not a programmer) so I won't risk it :)

Thank you anyway for the workarounds but I was "lucky" to have successfully 
compiled the RC1 build from git and from source before the 30th of September.

Regards,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: 500 error while building during bootstrap

2021-10-02 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias, Carl

I can confirm that bootstrapping works as expected on my Ubuntu 18.04.6 OS 
which is running OpenSSL 1.1.1 11 Sep 2018 (2018!)

There are two glitches (caused by missing MD5 files?)

downloading dmake-4.12.tar.bz2
downloading to /source/openoffice/ext_sources/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2.part
checksum not given, md5 of file is 266d817492d8259a640fad075461080e
downloading epm-3.7.tar.gz
downloading to /source/openoffice/ext_sources/epm-3.7.tar.gz.part
checksum not given, md5 of file is 3ade8cfe7e59ca8e65052644fed9fca4

Can someone fix this (or teach me how to do it?)

Regards,
Pedro

> On 10/02/2021 10:54 AM Matthias Seidel  wrote:
> 
>  
> Hi Carl,
> 
> Am 01.10.21 um 21:08 schrieb Carl Marcum:
> > Hi Matthias,
> >
> > On 10/1/21 1:25 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> >> Hi Carl,
> >>
> >> Am 01.10.21 um 19:21 schrieb Carl Marcum:
> >>> Hi All,
> >>>
> >>> I'm building 4.1.11 RC1 on a CentOS 7 VM I've been building both 41X
> >>> and trunk on for quite awhile.
> >>>
> >>> When building this RC1 in a new directory I'm getting "500 Can't
> >>> connect to sourceforge.net" for many dependencies during bootstrap.
> >>> Probably related to my SSL or something?
> >> That might be the problem:
> >>
> >> https://letsencrypt.org/docs/dst-root-ca-x3-expiration-september-2021/
> >
> > Nice find !
> 
> This might also be interesting:
> 
> https://letsencrypt.org/certificates/
> 
> >
> > Thank you.
> > After my build completes I'll see if we may need an update to our
> > build instructions for this.
> > My VM has 1:1.0.2k-21.el7_9 (1.0.2)
> > and the link says we now need 1.1.0 or later.
> >
> > Maybe https://www.openssl.org/source/openssl-1.1.1l.tar.gz
> 
> Yes, we should update to OpenSSL 1.1x asap.
> 
> Regards,
> 
>    Matthias
> 
> >
> > Thanks again,
> > Carl
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >>     Matthias
> >>
> >>> Anyway, I've copied my other ext_sources over and I'm building now but
> >>> I want to make sure my environment is good for next time I don't have
> >>> a new dependency.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Carl
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>>
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.11-RC1 as GA

2021-10-02 Thread Pedro Lino
   The Release Candidate is good for production/GA:
   
 [x] yes / +1
 [ ] no / -1
   
   My vote is based on
   
 [X] binding (member of PMC)
 [x] I have built and tested the RC from source on platform Linux x64 
(Ubuntu 18.04)
 [x] I have tested the binary RC: Linux x86 (on  Ubuntu 16.04 x86), Linux 
x64 (on Ubuntu 18.04 x64), Windows x86 (on Win 7 Pro x64 and Win 10 Pro x64)

Verified SHA512 and GPG signature of Source archive tar.gz   
Verified SHA256 and SHA512 for the Windows exe and the Linux DEB binaries, 
opened documents (ODT, ODS, ODP, ODF, DOC, XLS, PPT and DOCX, XLSX, PPTX) and 
signed ODT documents with PGP and EU ID Card

Regards,
Pedro Lino

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: AOO41X: Time for RC1?

2021-09-30 Thread Pedro Lino
+1 to starting the vote

Regards,
Pedro

> On 09/30/2021 10:51 AM Matthias Seidel  wrote:
> 
>  
> Hi all,
> 
> I tested 4.1.11-RC1 now on Windows, Linux and macOS (Intel/M1) and
> everything seems to be OK.
> 
> Time to start a vote?
> 
> Regards,
> 
>    Matthias
> 
> Am 27.09.21 um 21:56 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > it seems that all binaries are now uploaded...
> >
> > Time to call for testing?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >    Matthias
> >
> > Am 23.09.21 um 15:48 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I have uploaded all Windows binaries to:
> >>
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.11-RC1/binaries/
> >>
> >> Although we have not yet announced AOO 4.1.11-RC1 officially please feel
> >> free to download and test them!
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >>    Matthias
> >>
> >> P.S.: Linux/macOS builds will be uploaded next week
> >>
> >> Am 22.09.21 um 17:33 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I would be ready to upload the Windows binaries if we want to announce 
> >>> RC1?
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>>
> >>>    Matthias
> >>>
> >>> Am 21.09.21 um 23:15 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> >>>> Hi all,
> >>>>
> >>>> Am 21.09.21 um 22:42 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> >>>>> Hi Dave, all
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On 09/21/2021 9:07 PM Dave Fisher  wrote:
> >>>>>> windows - thanks Matthias
> >>>>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/912galt8kr7wiem/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.11_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe?dl=0
> >>>>> Installed and tested signing a document. Works as expected
> >>>>>  
> >>>>>> linux
> >>>>>> We are waiting for someone to do a build.
> >>>>> Can sign on Ubuntu 18.04 x64 using my PGP certificate
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Unless there is a problem on Mac, seems like ready to go?
> >>>> It looks good for me!
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>>
> >>>>    Matthias
> >>>>
> >>>>> Regards,
> >>>>> Pedro
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -
> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>>>>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Future - Digital Signatures

2021-09-29 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Dave

> On 09/28/2021 11:35 PM Dave Fisher  wrote:

> I think that AOO42X and Trunk need to improve in three ways.
> 
> (1) We need to make sure that we hook to the systems native key store and/or 
> a Mozilla keystone.
>   Setup may need to be improved.
> (2) We need to allow a PGP and EU card key to be selected and converted to 
> X509 internally while signing.
>   It looks like ODF 1.3 spec makes no changes to ODF 1.2 in terms of 
> digital signatures.
> (3) We need to properly display whatever signatures are on the document.

I agree. It is good news that ODF 1.2 supports signatures (although it would be 
ideal for AOO to move on to ODF 1.3)
 
> What happens when you inspect the digital signatures of a file signed in LO 
> with PGP and EU card in AOO 4.1.11 RC?

Document signed with OpenPGP using LO 6.4.7 in Ubuntu 18.04 x64
- opening with AOO 4.1.11 on the same Ubuntu 18.04 x64 the message is "Digital 
Signature: The document signature does not match the document content. We 
strongly recommend you to not trust this document."
- opening with 4.1.11 on Windows 7 Pro x64 the message is the same but there is 
a popup window when the document is opened with a serious warning
https://i.imgur.com/8CloLVl.png

Document signed with OpenPGP using AOO 4.1.11 in Win7 Pro x64
- opening with AOO 4.1.11 on Ubuntu 18.04 x64 the message is "Digital 
Signature: The document signature is OK, but the certificates could not be 
validated."

Document signed with EU card
- opening with AOO 4.1.11 on Ubuntu 18.04 x64 the message is "Digital 
Signature: The document signature is OK, but the certificates could not be 
validated."
- opening with AOO 4.1.11 on Windows 7 Pro x64 (where I have installed the Root 
certificate for my ID card), the message is "The document signature is OK". If 
another ID card is used to sign (and the Root certificate for that card is not 
imported) then the message is the same as under Ubuntu.

I can share the documents with you by personal email if that helps.

Regards,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: AOO41X: Time for RC1?

2021-09-28 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Dave

> On 09/28/2021 4:51 PM Dave Fisher  wrote:
> 
>  
> > On Sep 28, 2021, at 2:44 AM, Pedro Lino  
> > wrote:

> You can get a file size from a command line like this:
> 
> % svn ls --xml 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.11-RC1/binaries/en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.11_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz

That might be useful sometime. Thanks!
But the idea is to have information for all the files, in the browser, 
regardless of the OS ;)

> > I really like to know the size of the file I'm downloading before starting 
> > (to decide if it is something to be done on Wifi, on Mobile data or on 
> > ethernet)
> > 
> > Should this be requested to Infra?
> 
> We could. I’ll ask informally.

Thanks!

Regards,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: AOO41X: Time for RC1?

2021-09-28 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Dave

I'm downloading the Source now.

Is there any technical reason why dist.apache.org listings only show the file 
name?
Would it be possible to have them show the file details like in
https://downloads.apache.org/openoffice/4.1.10/source/
?

I really like to know the size of the file I'm downloading before starting (to 
decide if it is something to be done on Wifi, on Mobile data or on ethernet)

Should this be requested to Infra?

Regards,
Pedro


> On 09/27/2021 9:08 PM Dave Fisher  wrote:
> 
>  
> I’ve smoked tested the macOS en-US version.
> 
> Start testing people!
> 
> SDK at 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.11-RC1/binaries/SDK/ 
> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.11-RC1/binaries/SDK/>
> Source at 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.11-RC1/source/ 
> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.11-RC1/source/>
> 
> > On Sep 27, 2021, at 12:56 PM, Matthias Seidel  
> > wrote:
> > 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > it seems that all binaries are now uploaded...
> > 
> > Time to call for testing?
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> >Matthias
> > 
> > Am 23.09.21 um 15:48 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> >> Hi all,
> >> 
> >> I have uploaded all Windows binaries to:
> >> 
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.11-RC1/binaries/
> >> 
> >> Although we have not yet announced AOO 4.1.11-RC1 officially please feel
> >> free to download and test them!
> >> 
> >> Regards,
> >> 
> >>Matthias
> >> 
> >> P.S.: Linux/macOS builds will be uploaded next week
> >> 
> >> Am 22.09.21 um 17:33 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>> 
> >>> I would be ready to upload the Windows binaries if we want to announce 
> >>> RC1?
> >>> 
> >>> Regards,
> >>> 
> >>>Matthias
> >>> 
> >>> Am 21.09.21 um 23:15 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> >>>> Hi all,
> >>>> 
> >>>> Am 21.09.21 um 22:42 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> >>>>> Hi Dave, all
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>>> On 09/21/2021 9:07 PM Dave Fisher  wrote:
> >>>>>> windows - thanks Matthias
> >>>>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/912galt8kr7wiem/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.11_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe?dl=0
> >>>>> Installed and tested signing a document. Works as expected
> >>>>> 
> >>>>>> linux
> >>>>>> We are waiting for someone to do a build.
> >>>>> Can sign on Ubuntu 18.04 x64 using my PGP certificate
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Unless there is a problem on Mac, seems like ready to go?
> >>>> It looks good for me!
> >>>> 
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> 
> >>>>Matthias
> >>>> 
> >>>>> Regards,
> >>>>> Pedro
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> -
> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>>>> 
> >

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Issue with Windows 10 365 Word

2021-09-27 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Glenn

> On 09/27/2021 12:43 PM Glenn Kogan  wrote:
> 
>  
> My subscription with MS 365 Word ran out and I loaded in Apache Open Office, 
> no problem. About a week in my Apache files on my desktop show word? When I 
> click on the file it comes up Word 365 even though my subscription has 
> expired?  Do I need to remove the MS Word 365 app?  Please advise.

Windows 10 updates reset many file associations, especially those related to MS 
Office (but also images, etc). I think it is a good option to remove the Office 
365 if don't plan to renew in the near future (or use it as a document viewer).
I assume this should solve the problem with file associations but it is not 
guaranteed that the issue will not arise in future OS updates.

Regards,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: AOO41X: Time for RC1?

2021-09-21 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Dave, all


> On 09/21/2021 9:07 PM Dave Fisher  wrote:

> windows - thanks Matthias
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/912galt8kr7wiem/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.11_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe?dl=0

Installed and tested signing a document. Works as expected
 
> linux
> We are waiting for someone to do a build.

Can sign on Ubuntu 18.04 x64 using my PGP certificate

Unless there is a problem on Mac, seems like ready to go?

Regards,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Kendall Hunt Publishing - Permission Request (Seguin 5.17 - 5.19)

2021-09-21 Thread Pedro Lino
Good morning

Images and attachments are stripped in this mailing list.
Can you please provide a link to the images?

Best regards,
Pedro

> On 09/20/2021 9:16 PM Caroline Kieler  wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Good Afternoon –
> 
> 
> We are preparing a college publication and our author is interested in 
> including the screenshots below in her text. Is permission required?
> 
> 
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> 
> Caroline Kieler
> 
> Rights & Permissions Specialist
> Kendall Hunt Publishing Company
> 563.589.1147 | ckie...@kendallhunt.com
> 
>  
> 
> [cid:image002.jpg@01CF9AA0.838B8F00] http://www.kendallhunt.com/
> 
>  [cid:image003.jpg@01CF9A88.482BE620] 
> https://www.facebook.com/KendallHuntHE  [cid:image004.jpg@01CF9A88.482BE620] 
> https://twitter.com/KendallHuntHE  [cid:image005.jpg@01CF9A88.482BE620] 
> https://www.linkedin.com/company/kendall-hunt-publishing-company?trk=company_name
> 
> 


Re: AOO41X: Time for RC1?

2021-09-18 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Dave

I can't sign any document.
I have my own Certificate (from my European ID Card)
It shows up on the Windows certmgr.msc under Personal but does not show up on 
AOO 4.1.11 (AOO4111m1(Build:9808)  -  Rev. 8167b394bd) built by Matthias
I also have a personal SSH key in Linux which AOO 4.1.11 can not use...

Any ideas?

Regards,
Pedro

> On 09/17/2021 6:49 PM Dave Fisher  wrote:
> 
>  
> Hi Pedro,
> 
> > On Sep 17, 2021, at 9:29 AM, Pedro Lino  
> > wrote:
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > AOO4111m1(Build:9808)  -  Rev. 8167b394bd
> > 2021-09-17 13:41 - Linux x86_64
> > 
> > Compiled successfully, installed and is working without any hitches
> 
> Try signing a document and then reopening.
> 
> Regards,
> Dave
> 
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Pedro
> > 
> >> On 09/17/2021 10:27 AM Dave Fisher  wrote:
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Yes
> >> 
> >> Sent from my iPhone
> >> 
> >>> On Sep 17, 2021, at 2:09 AM, Pedro Lino  
> >>> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> Hi Matthias
> >>> 
> >>>>> On 09/16/2021 10:35 PM Matthias Seidel  
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>> 
> >>>> Apparently we needed another fix...
> >>>> 
> >>>> I am doing a Test Build for Windows right now and will upload it to my
> >>>> Apache home directory tomorrow.
> >>> 
> >>> If I compile now from branch AOO41X will it include all these fixes?
> >>> 
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Pedro
> >>> 
> >>> -
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> > 
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> > 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: AOO41X: Time for RC1?

2021-09-17 Thread Pedro Lino
Thanks!

AOO4111m1(Build:9808)  -  Rev. 8167b394bd
2021-09-17 13:41 - Linux x86_64

Compiled successfully, installed and is working without any hitches

Regards,
Pedro

> On 09/17/2021 10:27 AM Dave Fisher  wrote:
> 
>  
> Yes
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> > On Sep 17, 2021, at 2:09 AM, Pedro Lino  
> > wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Matthias
> > 
> >>> On 09/16/2021 10:35 PM Matthias Seidel  wrote:
> >> 
> >> Apparently we needed another fix...
> >> 
> >> I am doing a Test Build for Windows right now and will upload it to my
> >> Apache home directory tomorrow.
> > 
> > If I compile now from branch AOO41X will it include all these fixes?
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Pedro
> > 
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> > 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: AOO41X: Time for RC1?

2021-09-17 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias

> On 09/16/2021 10:35 PM Matthias Seidel  wrote:

> Apparently we needed another fix...
> 
> I am doing a Test Build for Windows right now and will upload it to my
> Apache home directory tomorrow.

If I compile now from branch AOO41X will it include all these fixes?

Regards,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: OpenOffice needs better UI

2021-09-02 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Guy, Matthias

> On 09/02/2021 5:12 PM Guy Waterval  wrote:
> 
>  
> Hello,
> 
> @Matthias Seidel
> Here are some screenshots of IBM Lotus Symphony
> https://ibm-lotus-symphony.informer.com/screenshot/
> They had also reviewed some toolbars i.e. a single one to manage forms,
> asw..

That was a nice touch (I remembered it after looking at the screenshots). The 
UI is the same but it had an Eclipse wrapper 
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_Lotus_Symphony) that allowed to have a 
document on each tab.

If anyone is interested to try there is still a Deutsch version available at 
Chip
https://www.chip.de/downloads/IBM-Lotus-Symphony_28856679.html

and I still have the English installer (from back in 2012!) that I can upload 
somewhere.

Regards,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: A free project does not need distorting propaganda

2021-08-18 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Joerg

> On 08/18/2021 8:46 PM Jörg Schmidt  wrote:
 
> I hereby ask to remove the distorting statement from the page 
> https://live.froscon.de/partner/openoffice again.

I don't see any mention to StarOffice so correcting the sentence to "20 years" 
instead of 30 would solve the problem?

Regards,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: About OpenJDK

2021-08-16 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias, all

> On 08/16/2021 3:24 PM Matthias Seidel  wrote:

> Until then you can still download JDK 8 292 (x86) from:
> 
> https://adoptopenjdk.net/releases.html?variant=openjdk8=hotspot
>

Or 301 from Oracle

https://www.oracle.com/java/technologies/javase/javase-jdk8-downloads.html
 
> That said: Of course having AOO only a in 32-bit for Windows isn't optimal.

32-bit AOO is perfectly fine for most (all?) users. The problem is that 
Microsoft convinced users that 64 is better than 32 (using the same "bigger is 
better" logic vendors use to sell digital cameras, mobile phones, etc.)

I guess AOO has to adapt to the "logic"...

Regards,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: OpenOffice 4.1.10 crashes when loading .odm file

2021-08-06 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Michael

Just opened the ODM file without any problem under Ubuntu 18.04 x64 and Windows 
7 x64 so it seems to be a Mac specific problem.

Have you opened a bug report at https://bz.apache.org/ooo/ ?
If so, please share the link.

If you can test versions 4.1.3 and 4.1.4 that could help locating the 
regression.

Regards,
Pedro

> On 08/06/2021 9:09 AM Michael Bouschen  wrote:
> 
>  
> Hi
> 
> resending my message to dev@openoffice.apache.org (as proposed by Martin
> Groenescheij).
> 
> Regards Michael
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > the Apache JDO project (https://db.apache.org/jdo/) is using OpenOffice
> > for its specification document. We have a OpenDocument Master Document
> > JDO_master.odm and several .odt files for the chapters of the specification.
> >
> > OpenOffice crashes after a few seconds after opening the JDO_master.odm
> > document and clicking yes on "Update all links".
> >
> > I'm using OpenOffice 4.1.10
> > (Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.10_MacOS_x86-64_install_en-US.dmg) on a Mac with
> > BigSur version 11.5.You find the mac crash report
> > (OpenOfficeCrashReport.txt) attached below with some more details about
> > the system and the crash. The document JDO_master.odm and the other .odt
> > files may be found here:
> > https://github.com/apache/db-jdo/tree/0349ede94788be58f3ff2a439bf740a56833dee2/specification/OOO
> >
> > I tried other OpenOffice versions: 4.1.10, 4.1.8 and 4.1.5 do crash, but
> > versions 4.1.2 and 4.1.0 work fine. 
> >
> > I hope to get some help. For the time being i will will continue using
> > OpenOffice 4.1.2.
> >
> > Regards Michael
> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Some observations about AOO 4.1.10 and Windows 10 Pro 21H1

2021-07-19 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Jörg

> On 07/17/2021 9:42 AM Jörg Schmidt  wrote:

> JRE 1.8.0_291 is not recognized by OO and cannot be activated - even if I 
> first install JRE and then AOO it is like this.
> (In the forum http://de.openoffice.info it is however reported by a user that 
> he uses 1.8.0_291 in AOO 4.1.10, perhaps the problem occurs only with 21H1 of 
> Windows 10).

JRE 1.8.0.291 (32 bits) works perfectly on my Win 10 21H1 laptop and is 
recognized by AOO 4.1.10
Make sure that you download the i586 installer

Best regards,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: catalina branch waiting for reviews

2021-07-18 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Arrigo

> On 07/18/2021 3:54 PM Arrigo Marchiori  wrote:

> I did not change any code, therefore I do not think I changed anything
> for Linux and Windows.
> 
> However, I just uploaded the en-US builds in RPM and DEB format to the
> same directory, in case you or anyone else wants to test them anyway.

I got an error message while using your build to update 4.1.10 on Ubuntu 
18.04.5 x64

N: Download is performed unsandboxed as root as file 
'/home/pedro/Desktop/DEBS_4111_Arrigo/DEBS/openoffice-ure_4.1.11-1_amd64.deb' 
couldn't be accessed by user '_apt'. - pkgAcquire::Run (13: Permission denied)

AOO does work correctly and there are no problems when checking for updates

Hope the error message is useful/understandable :)

Best regards,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: catalina branch waiting for reviews [Was: [Mini] Setup of development environment]

2021-07-18 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Arrigo

I do not have any Apple devices :)

Did you build any Linux binaries (DEBs)? Can you share a link?

Thanks!
Pedro

> On 07/18/2021 2:00 PM Arrigo Marchiori  wrote:
> 
>  
> Dear All,
> 
> On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 03:27:54PM +0200, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
> 
> > Dear All,
> > 
> > I just committed the "catalina" branch:
> > https://github.com/apache/openoffice/tree/catalina
> > 
> > The required environment variables on our Mac Mini are the following:
> > 
> > export LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8
> > export LANG=en_US.UTF-8
> > export 
> > PATH=${HOME}/bin:/opt/local/bin:/opt/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:$PATH
> > export LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib
> > export C_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/local/include
> > export CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/local/include
> > export MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.7 
> > export 
> > SDKROOT=/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.11.sdk
> > export CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -mmacosx-version-min=10.7 -isysroot $SDKROOT" 
> > export CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS -mmacosx-version-min=10.7 -isysroot $SDKROOT"
> > export LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS -mmacosx-version-min=10.7 -isysroot $SDKROOT"
> > export PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig
> > 
> > I am testing the branch under Linux, and next Windows if I will find
> > time, to make sure I did not break anything.
> 
> I could build the branch successfully under Linux and Windows.
> 
> > Reviews are very welcome.
> 
> Anyone with a Mac is invited to kindly test this build:
> http://home.apache.org/~ardovm/openoffice/catalina/2021-07-18/
> 
> I opened a PR on GitHub:
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/135
> that gives a clear overview of all the edits.
> 
> The following note remains valid:
> 
> > > I met a problem with the writerfilter module. It was given by the
> > > proposed libxml and libxslt pair by the build script [1].
> > > The problem was reported here: [2].
> > > 
> > > Solution: use libxslt 1.34 instead of 1.33.
> > > Let's not forget to update the build script [1].
> > > 
> > > References:
> > > 
> > >   1: 
> > > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.1.10/unxmacos/build_aoo64bit_on_macos.sh?view=markup
> > > 
> > >   2: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/-/issues/66
> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> Arrigo
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: [GitHub] [openoffice] ardovm edited a comment on pull request #133: graphite: remove the -Werror option from debug builds

2021-06-20 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Arrigo, all

Development seems to be quite live at
https://github.com/silnrsi/graphite

Regards,
Pedro

> On 06/20/2021 9:08 PM GitBox  wrote:
> 
>  
> ardovm edited a comment on pull request #133:
> URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/133#issuecomment-864605285
> 
> 
>The first two warnings are IMHO bugs. The first one is a function 
> parameter type `bool` instead of `bool&` and the second is a mixup of return 
> values in a `switch` statement.
>
>Others are linked to assertions not being compiled (although we are 
> requesting a debug build). Some others are unused variables that are 
> explicitly marked `TODO` in the code.
>
>I stopped after checking the first four warnings.
>
>I suggest we allow this PR through so that at least the source becomes 
> compilable again. Then we could have a longer term plan for the replacement 
> of the graphite module with... whatever is better today.
>
>For what it's worth, both the [SourceForge project 
> page](http://silgraphite.sourceforge.net) and 
> [www.sil.org](https://software.sil.org/products/#supported) refer to 
> http://graphite.sil.org that does not seem to exist.
> 
> 
> -- 
> This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
> To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
> URL above to go to the specific comment.
> 
> For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
> us...@infra.apache.org
> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Enhancement request from Facebook

2021-06-17 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias

> On 06/17/2021 3:06 PM Matthias Seidel  wrote:
 
> I was not able to change the download link, 

Maybe someone from Infra can make 

https://extensions.openoffice.org/en/download/4963
redirect to
https://berma.pagesperso-orange.fr/HM/HistoryMaster-1.1.1.oxt

or add an option so admins can fix dead links?

> but this seems to be the
> official site now:
> 
> https://berma.pagesperso-orange.fr/index2.html
> 
> I added a link in the comments.

That is great that you could find the author's page!
 
> Maybe someone wants to contact the author and ask if he wants to develop
> it further?

Maybe someone who is Native French? In any case the latest version is from 
2011. Even if there aren't any features to add the author could fix the 
compatibility with LO... 

Regards,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Enhancement request from Facebook

2021-06-17 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias

> On 06/17/2021 10:42 AM Matthias Seidel  wrote:

> > I added some comments including a valid download link back in 2018 but they 
> > are not visible for some odd reason.
> 
> That's because comments with links need to be published by an admin. (You
> guess what sort of links we had in comments?)

That makes sense. Yes, I can imagine that they were not all linking to AOO 
related pages :)
 
> I will have a look at it!

As admin can you simply replace the outdated download link with the link to the 
file archived in your apache account?
It is more user friendly if the download button works (instead of a link in a 
comment)

Thanks!
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



RE: Enhancement request from Facebook

2021-06-17 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi all


> On 06/17/2021 6:46 AM Jörg Schmidt  wrote:

> https://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/history-master

History Master version 1.1.1 works on AOO 4.1.10
I added some comments including a valid download link back in 2018 but they are 
not visible for some odd reason.

An archived version of the extension is available from
https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/HistoryMaster-1.1.1.oxt

Regards,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: .uno:Reload button - a glitch

2021-06-14 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias, all

> On 06/14/2021 7:00 PM Matthias Seidel  wrote:

> > It occurs also in versions: 4.1.9 and 4.1.10.
> 
> Yes, looks weird. Cannot reproduce on Ubuntu, it seems to be Windows only.

I can reproduce with all 3 documents on Ubuntu 18.04.5 x64
(added this info on bugzilla)

Regards,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Hyperlink Warning Message

2021-06-12 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Carl

> On 06/12/2021 6:45 PM Carl Marcum  wrote:

> There is now a PR #132 if you're able to test it.

What do you mean test the PR? I already tested the resulting binary...

The only action available for me at github is "Merge pull request" :)

Cheers,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Hyperlink Warning Message

2021-06-12 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Carl, all

> On 06/12/2021 2:47 AM Carl Marcum  wrote:

> Can anyone on windows confirm with the file [1]?
> [1] http://home.apache.org/~cmarcum/hyperlink-tests/hyperlink-test-doc.odt

I confirm Francis' findings on AOO 4.1.11 running on Windows 7 x64.
There is no problem reopening the document.

I can also confirm that all links in the document behave as expected under AOO 
4.1.11, with warnings only on untrusted links.

All good news ;)

Cheers,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: rework the automated tests to not require an office build first

2021-06-12 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Carl, all

> On 06/12/2021 2:13 PM Carl Marcum  wrote:

> The one big thing about this would be it would require a tester to have 
> the SDK installed in the office under test.
> I think this is a much lower bar than building the office to get them.
> 
> Does anyone have an opinion one way or the other?

This sounds excellent. It would probably allow more Windows users (the most 
used PC OS and accordingly where there are more AOO users) to test it.

I volunteer to run any needed tests on Windows 7 x64.

Thanks!

Cheers,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Ubuntu 21.04 / dark mode

2021-05-30 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Andrea

Thank you for the links. FontAwesome requires a paid license to have access to 
the SVGs so I guess that excludes it.
Personally I would avoid using something from Google so my choice would be 
Remixicon. But I think we need to check which one has the most complete set. 
Maybe we need a combination of both themes.

Grazie mille!
Pedro

> On 05/30/2021 8:51 AM Andrea Pescetti  wrote:
> 
>  
> Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> > Pedro Lino wrote:
> >>> On 05/29/2021 9:32 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> >>> https://remixicon.com/
> >>
> >> This one is really interesting! Can you share the links to other 
> >> projects that you have found?
> > 
> > FontAwesome https://fontawesome.com/license/free is really popular and 
> > CC-BY (but recent versions include a "Pro" section that may have 
> > different terms).
> > 
> > Google's Material Design Icons ... are 
> > AL2, come in different styles and, although the set is already quite 
> > comprehensive, are extended by community projects.
> 
> I copy-pasted the same link twice... the correct link to Google's 
> Material Design Icons is https://fonts.google.com/icons
> 
> Regards,
>Andrea.
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Ubuntu 21.04 / dark mode

2021-05-29 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Andrea

> On 05/29/2021 9:32 PM Andrea Pescetti  wrote:

> Several other, more modern, icon 
> projects are available, like
> https://remixicon.com/
> (Apache License AL2, latest update July 2020). They are monochrome, so 
> they might work better in dark mode.

This one is really interesting! Can you share the links to other projects that 
you have found?

Regards,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



  1   2   3   4   5   6   >