Hi!
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 9:38 PM Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>
> Any claim that a continuous code base down to StarWriter for DOS could
> exist is technically and factually absurd, because there is no technical
> continuation of the DOS code base of Starwriter and also the code base at
> the
Hi!
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 8:46 PM Jörg Schmidt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> to my dismay I read, from a PMC member, on users...@openoffice.apache.org
> that they are trying to mix up our free OpenOffice with the former
> proprietary StarWriter. Obviously purely for the sake of show and obviously
>
On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 11:38 AM Peter Kovacs wrote:
>
> So what do you think? Should we promote the alternate link with this
> release more publicly maybe on Forums and go for a transition to a
> different download policy?
>
Nice work, Peter. It's clearly preferable to have downloads under
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 1:13 PM Peter Kovacs wrote:
>
> On 28.12.20 13:17, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > Playing devil's advocate here: does it make sense to actually post a blog
> > article about this and then, maybe a week later, have the article
> > moot with the actual release?
>
> Yes I think it
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 12:26 PM Joost Andrae wrote:
> regarding the documentliberation stuff:
> I know some of those filters for a longer time. AFAIK these where
> implementations from one of the Novell guys (Fridrich Strba as far as I
> remember; see http://fridrich.blogspot.com/ )
>
Yes, DLP
Hi Joost!
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 11:49 AM Joost Andrae wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> it's an honor to me to see a sign of life of you here. Welcome !
>
I've been a relatively active member here from the beginning!
Instead of user picking here to get users leave from AOO to LO a
> developer could
Hi! As Peter said, it seems unlikely this branch of OpenOffice.org will be
enhanced with the ability to write .DOCX format. However, another branch
has added this capability and offers all the other convenient options you
mention as well. You can get it from our "sister" community at
On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 5:32 PM Jörg Schmidt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > From: bmcs [mailto:b...@apache.org]
> > Authors to ODF Authors. The idea being that it would be one of the few
> > shared areas where AOO and LO could work cooperatively
> > together
>
> I don't believe that at that time, after
On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 8:55 AM M. A. Hook wrote:
>
> as M$ is taking over
> LibreOffice and already has their program dependent upon some of
> Windows' parts.
>
This is not a true statement and I'd encourage you not to repeat it.
S.
Hi Peter - Thanks for the update and also for your service as PMC Chair all
this time! You definitely deserve a break!
(FWIW, I asked not as a criticism but because previous chair rotations were
discussed here (as far as I remember!) and I wondered why this one was done
privately.)
Cheers,
On Thu, 21 Nov 2019, 21:48 Patricia Shanahan, wrote:
> One of the resolutions passed at the last board meeting was:
>
> "Change the Apache OpenOffice Project Chair (Jim Jagielski, VP)"
>
> Jim,
>
> I don't know whether congratulation or commiseration is more
> appropriate, so you get whichever
would be nice.
>
> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Events/2018/FOSDEM#Social_Dinner <
> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Events/2018/FOSDEM#Social_Dinner>
>
> Gav…
>
>
> > On 23 Jan 2018, at 4:07 am, Simon Phipps <si...@webmink.com> wrote:
> >
Just a reminder that everyone on this list is invited for dinner at FOSDEM
as below. Cheers!
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 12:38 PM, Simon Phipps <si...@webmink.com> wrote:
> Dear AOO developers,
>
> The board of directors of The Document Foundation have asked me to extend
> their
Dear AOO developers,
The board of directors of The Document Foundation have asked me to extend
their invitation to join the LibreOffice developers for an informal dinner
on the Saturday evening at FOSDEM (February 3rd, 8pm) in Brussels. If you
would like to attend, please add your name and
Jörg
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>
> Today the TDF is not independent, but depends on several companies,
> instead of one. These companies may also be very community-friendly, but
> again there is dependency and this dependency is actively
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 9:29 PM, Marcus wrote:
>
>
> the 404 is now gone.
But so is the usable table of downloads, which is completely lost. I
believe that is an unwelcome step backwards.
S.
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 8:04 PM, Hagar Delest
wrote:
> Le 10/05/2017 à 23:21, Marcus a écrit :
>
> I've deleted the webpage that is mentioned in the result page the user has
>> posted in the screenshot. As soon as Google is re-indexing our website I
>> expect that this
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 11:29 PM, Marcus wrote:
> Or choose the item "Older releases" if you need a way older version. Then
> you can get it - by clicking on the Archive link - from our archive.
>
Except you just deleted the page that the dropdown points to for v3.4.1 -
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:21 PM, Marcus wrote:
>
> However, it doesn't matter. There is no reason to provide download pages
> to offer outdated versions - based on w.oo.o. Of course we cannot influence
> what others are offering on their webpages.
>
I disagree. I and
Hi all,
There have been a large number of reports on the Users mailing list of
people getting Access Denied messages when they attempt to access any of
the templates at http://templates.openoffice.org/ or
http://templates.services.openoffice.org/. This situation has been
previously reported here
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 5:21 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>
> > From: toki [mailto:toki.kant...@gmail.com]
>
> > * GoOo: The fork that wasn't.
>
> Oh, that was a fork! A fork against OpenOffice.
>
In fact Go-OO was started by Ximian in 2003, long before Novell bought
them, as
Hi Dave, all.
On 12 Jan 2017 22:50, "Dave Fisher" wrote:
Please correct the specific non Apache licenses if I get them wrong. As far
as I know the sequence of events is:
OpenOffice.org was originally dual licensed under LGPLv2 and SISSL (OSI
approved but now retired).
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
> We do need to get control of templates.openoffice.org, either direct
> control or a SourceForge contact to whom we can pass this sort of request.
More than that, the site looks like it has more than just the OP using it
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:44 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton <
dennis.hamil...@acm.org> wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: toki [mailto:toki.kant...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 11:30
> > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Independent Entity to Develop and
Those of us who were also part of the former OpenOffice.org project will be
shocked to hear of the sudden and untimely death of John McCreesh, who used
to be the (volunteer) marketing lead for the project. I have written more
in [a public post on Facebook][1] which also includes a newspaper report
to Patricia. Java developers are
> > particularly welcome at this stage!
> >
> > Just IMHO, the C++ side of AOO is either under-control or
> > too-ugly-to care-about, so we would do good focus more on the
> > Java parts, which are also somewhat ugly but still promising.
> [ ... ]
>
>
>
/memorials/ian_lynch.html
>
> Regards,
> Andrea.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>
--
*Simon Phipps* http://webmink.com
*Office:* +1 (41
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 4:26 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org
wrote:
Until further notice, the AOO Report to the Board will be developed by the
Chair privately with the PMC and will not be made or discussed in public
before its submission and acceptance by the Board. Subsequent to
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 11:06 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
I thought ODF 1.2 was relative old, but I might be wrong.
While it was approved as an OASIS standard in 2011, it only became an
official and approved ISO standard in mid-June. More at
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 12:51 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
Hi.
It is again time to make a board report, you can find my proposal at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/2015+July
comments and changes are welcome.
Should the fact CVE-2015-1774 is still unresolved in the
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 1:38 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
On 30 June 2015 at 13:54, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 12:51 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
Hi.
It is again time to make a board report, you can find my proposal at
https
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
wrote:
THE TL;DR:
I agree. The extensive lag to availability of 4.1.2 is far more pertinent
at the level of the Board Report. The existence of CVE-2015-1774 does not
change that and should not overshadow it.
I
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org
wrote:
Note: as discussed several times on this list, replacing this with a link
to the SourceForge statistics is wrong, since the scripts do the right
thing in terms of accounting for all downloads and reducing duplicates
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 15:25:01 +0100
Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
Hi Rory,
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie
wrote:
Just to note that the OO download statistics haven't been
Hi Rory,
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote:
Just to note that the OO download statistics haven't been updated in a
long time.
Which ones are you referring to? The ones at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stats/timeline
or
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Marcus marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 06/26/2015 06:27 PM, schrieb Simon Phipps:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Rory O'Farrellofarr...@iol.ie wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 15:25:01 +0100
Simon Phippssi...@webmink.com wrote:
Hi Rory,
On Fri, Jun 26
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Marcus marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 06/26/2015 08:33 PM, schrieb Simon Phipps:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Marcusmarcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 06/26/2015 06:27 PM, schrieb Simon Phipps:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Rory O'Farrellofarr
Dear Naomi,
Following Internet norms, my reply to your message is below.
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Naomi naomiobine...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Hi there,
I googled my name to find that your company has saved my messages to two
mail archives without my consent. Could you please remove my
working with VeriSign iDefense Labs.
--
*Simon Phipps* http://webmink.com
*Office:* +1 (415) 683-7660 *or* +44 (238) 098 7027
*Mobile*: +44 774 776 2816 *or Telegram https://telegram.me/webmink*
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org
wrote:
Simon Phipps wrote:
Given this problem is not fixed in the current download, should the
project
suspend downloads until it can be addressed?
This looks like a very extreme measure to take. The severity
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Nguyễn Đình Văn dinhva...@gmail.com
wrote:
Dear all,
I have 2 question, please ask me:
1. Can [Apache open office] view office on Android?
There's no work in progress on this at Apache, but there are two related
serious activities.
* A direct port of AOO to
It's likely that your best approach will involve using CMIS, which is the
interface standard most CMS offer. While there has been some experimental
work done with CMIS in AOO, it's fully implemented in LibreOffice and there
are reports on the web of interaction with a variety of CMS. Try searching
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Gavin McDonald ga...@16degrees.com.au
wrote:
I suggested (that is the word suggested; and yes it was me!) that some
sentences be
reworded slightly - to say the same thing, but in a more positive light,
in such a way
as that it might actually encourage more
On 5 Apr 2015 02:05, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
I can
replace the report with a short note stating the I (as chair) have removed
it, because the community need more
time to discuss the content.
That seems crazy, given the long review window and the absence of criticism
on this list. The
You will want to refer to http://openoffice.apache.org/mailing-lists.html
before you make the personal choice to send any further messages to this
public, archived mailing list.
S.
(I am just a member of the public who subscribes to the list along with
around 450 other subscribers and public
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org
wrote:
You are suggesting a usage pattern of the private list that is far beyond
reality.
I am not. I am pointing out there is no way for me to know, and that the
strong reactions to Dave's original (modest reasonable)
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 7:45 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
wrote:
I'll ask one more time. What action is expected here on dev@ to impact
how the PMC uses private@ ?
I don't think there is any action that can be taken on dev@ beyond pointing
out to others here that, when one
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 12:00 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org
wrote:
On 06/03/2015 Dave Barton wrote:
OK! One last attempt to clarify and resolve a trivial issue, that has
become clouded in misunderstanding and mistranslated into some kind of
bike-shedding subject.
...and
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Dave Barton d...@tasit.net wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 10:02 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com
wrote:
I just updated the PMC FAQ page on the project website.
I see this page has now been updated and the names of all the list
moderators have been
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 11:03 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
On 5 March 2015 at 11:42, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Dave Barton d...@tasit.net wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 10:02 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com
wrote:
I
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Marcus marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
IMHO this is an invaluable source of our history that we shouldn't loose.
I agree with this -- it's history for every derivative of OO.o, not just
AOO.
Please save it at a location where it cannot be deleted by accident.
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 10:02 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
I just updated the PMC FAQ page on the project website.
Please let us know if there are further changes to the persons listed as
e-mail moderators, wiki admins, or anything else.
I'm pretty sure there are others - I
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:26 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org
wrote:
The connection to this web site is not fully secure
because it contains unencrypted elements (such as
images).
Perhaps
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote:
Why not just take it down, and re-publish it when there is a more
agreeable content on it.
That sounds smart to me, +1.
I note that on legal-discuss Jim [called the page][1] misrepresentation -
maybe he has comments
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:01 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Keith N. McKenna
keith.mcke...@comcast.net
wrote:
jan i wrote:
On 19 February 2015 at 14:14, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com
javascript:; wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:26 AM, jan i j
On 30/01/2015 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Who of the two candidates do you prefer to replace Andrea Pescetti as
the OpenOffice project PMC Chair?
[X] Jan Iversen (jani)
S.
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 3:09 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
On 30/01/2015 Rob Weir wrote:
1) Companies that use commercially licensed software are exposed to
compliance risk that can be mitigated with time and expense.
2) Companies that use copyleft software are also exposed
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 3:09 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org
wrote:
The page provides relevant information in a bad way (tone and wording
On 3 Feb 2015 03:29, Louis Suárez-Potts lui...@gmail.com wrote:
Simon,
This is OT.
What is? I am participating in a discussion of the page referred to
legal-discuss by someone else. My last contribution was a
question/suggestion in response to Andrea. As far as I can remember,
nothing I have
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 8:01 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org
wrote:
We had to reject a interesting submission about community metrics in the
past since FOSDEM is not the place for it.
Conveniently, Biturgia is running an EU edition of its FLOSS Metrics event
adjacent to FOSDEM:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
I just spoke with the owner of the Apple developer account for the app. He
tells me it had been used by a subcontractor, that it was unrelated to his
real business (online TV) and that he would immediately remove the app
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 11:23 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
I think we should be contacting Quick Office Pro about changing their
support information if we haven't already.
I just spoke with the owner of the Apple developer account for the app. He
tells me it had been used by a
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
Is there a way we could handle it even earlier, at the Apache server
level? Detect the incoming link based on the referrer as ones coming
from the offending website and then redirect that to a custom webpage
where we explain
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
Is there a way we could handle it even earlier, at the Apache server
level? Detect
64 matches
Mail list logo