Re: Is there still someone who build for Solaris/Openindiana

2016-12-11 Thread Peter Kovacs
Updating external code is vital. But for me we need a better build
environment for this.
At least we need to understand the current one.
However it would be great to note down the task in our road map.

To clear out stuff we can not maintain is always a good thing.

Pedro Giffuni  schrieb am Mi., 7. Dez. 2016, 20:58:

>
> -1
> I doubt the "simplifications" are sufficient to make the code any more
> readable.
> Much better to spend time on something else, like updating hunspell.
>
> Pedro.
>
> On 06.12.2016 18:31, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
> > On 12/6/2016 1:55 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote:
> >> Hi all
> >>
> >> I'm going to the configure script and I recognize that there are still
> >> parts for solaris. As far as I know, the last version who build with
> >> solaris was the AOO 3.4.x. My question is, if we should ride off the
> >> Solaris stuff or we should keep it. Well it won't hurt to keep it, but
> >> it makes also no sense to keep a platform no one build.
> >
> > I did make some moves towards Solaris building, but I feel at this
> > time that learning AOO internals and working on debug is a better use
> > of my AOO time.
> >
> > I tend to assume that anything that is not being actively maintained
> > and tested does not work. We need to simplify the build process. I
> > suggest getting rid of the Solaris stuff, as a separate commit with
> > "Solaris" in the log message. That way, if anyone decides to pick it
> > up they will be able to find the last state easily.
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >
>
>
> --

Disclaimer: Diese Nachricht stammt aus einem Google Account. Ihre Antwort
wird in der Google Cloud Gespeichert und durch Google Algorythmen zwecks
werbeanaöysen gescannt. Es ist derzeit nicht auszuschließen das ihre
Nachricht auch durch einen NSA Mitarbeiter geprüft wird. Durch
kommunikation mit diesen Account stimmen Sie zu das ihre Mail, ihre
Kontaktdaten und die Termine die Sie mit mir vereinbaren online zu Google
konditionen in der Googlecloud gespeichert wird. Sollten sie dies nicht
wünschen kontaktieren sie mich bitte Umgehend um z.B. alternativen zu
verhandeln.


Re: Is there still someone who build for Solaris/Openindiana

2016-12-07 Thread Pedro Giffuni


-1
I doubt the "simplifications" are sufficient to make the code any more 
readable.

Much better to spend time on something else, like updating hunspell.

Pedro.

On 06.12.2016 18:31, Patricia Shanahan wrote:

On 12/6/2016 1:55 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote:

Hi all

I'm going to the configure script and I recognize that there are still
parts for solaris. As far as I know, the last version who build with
solaris was the AOO 3.4.x. My question is, if we should ride off the
Solaris stuff or we should keep it. Well it won't hurt to keep it, but
it makes also no sense to keep a platform no one build.


I did make some moves towards Solaris building, but I feel at this
time that learning AOO internals and working on debug is a better use
of my AOO time.

I tend to assume that anything that is not being actively maintained
and tested does not work. We need to simplify the build process. I
suggest getting rid of the Solaris stuff, as a separate commit with
"Solaris" in the log message. That way, if anyone decides to pick it
up they will be able to find the last state easily.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org






Re: Is there still someone who build for Solaris/Openindiana

2016-12-06 Thread Peter Kovacs

+1

On 06.12.2016 18:31, Patricia Shanahan wrote:

On 12/6/2016 1:55 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote:

Hi all

I'm going to the configure script and I recognize that there are still
parts for solaris. As far as I know, the last version who build with
solaris was the AOO 3.4.x. My question is, if we should ride off the
Solaris stuff or we should keep it. Well it won't hurt to keep it, but
it makes also no sense to keep a platform no one build.


I did make some moves towards Solaris building, but I feel at this 
time that learning AOO internals and working on debug is a better use 
of my AOO time.


I tend to assume that anything that is not being actively maintained 
and tested does not work. We need to simplify the build process. I 
suggest getting rid of the Solaris stuff, as a separate commit with 
"Solaris" in the log message. That way, if anyone decides to pick it 
up they will be able to find the last state easily.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Is there still someone who build for Solaris/Openindiana

2016-12-06 Thread Patricia Shanahan

On 12/6/2016 1:55 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote:

Hi all

I'm going to the configure script and I recognize that there are still
parts for solaris. As far as I know, the last version who build with
solaris was the AOO 3.4.x. My question is, if we should ride off the
Solaris stuff or we should keep it. Well it won't hurt to keep it, but
it makes also no sense to keep a platform no one build.


I did make some moves towards Solaris building, but I feel at this time 
that learning AOO internals and working on debug is a better use of my 
AOO time.


I tend to assume that anything that is not being actively maintained and 
tested does not work. We need to simplify the build process. I suggest 
getting rid of the Solaris stuff, as a separate commit with "Solaris" in 
the log message. That way, if anyone decides to pick it up they will be 
able to find the last state easily.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Is there still someone who build for Solaris/Openindiana

2016-12-06 Thread L'oiseau de mer
since build failed in AOO 4.0, i haven't try to build it anymore...

2016-12-06 17:55 GMT+08:00 Raphael Bircher :

> Hi all
>
> I'm going to the configure script and I recognize that there are still
> parts for solaris. As far as I know, the last version who build with
> solaris was the AOO 3.4.x. My question is, if we should ride off the
> Solaris stuff or we should keep it. Well it won't hurt to keep it, but it
> makes also no sense to keep a platform no one build.
>
> Regards Raphael
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>


Re: Is there still someone who build for Solaris/Openindiana

2016-12-06 Thread Pedro Giffuni

FWIW;

I think OpenIndiana still ships an older version of AOO:

https://www.openindiana.org/

You may ask Alexander Pyhalov: I did merge a bunch of his patches (with 
changes) into AOO so it may be easier to build nowadays although it is 
surely a bumpy road.


Pedro.



Is there still someone who build for Solaris/Openindiana

2016-12-06 Thread Raphael Bircher

Hi all

I'm going to the configure script and I recognize that there are still 
parts for solaris. As far as I know, the last version who build with 
solaris was the AOO 3.4.x. My question is, if we should ride off the 
Solaris stuff or we should keep it. Well it won't hurt to keep it, but 
it makes also no sense to keep a platform no one build.


Regards Raphael


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org