Hi Damjan,
Am 06.11.23 um 18:50 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
I've now pushed commit 61a74f2854935294cdc5bceabf0de6a4347799ae which
changes that file to use instead of , which should work far
better, as it's already used in other javadoc comments.
Thanks, that sounds like a solution!
Buildbot
Am 06.11.23 um 18:50 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
I've now pushed commit 61a74f2854935294cdc5bceabf0de6a4347799ae which
changes that file to use instead of , which should work far
better, as it's already used in other javadoc comments.
thanks, that's great.
I've commented the mail thread with
Am 04.11.23 um 11:05 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Of course, I could disable building of the SDK to get builds of trunk
again, but this does not solve the problem.
What do we want to do?!
what is the problem with ?
Does the compiler complain?
Damjan has exchanged with .
Maybe there is also
I've now pushed commit 61a74f2854935294cdc5bceabf0de6a4347799ae which
changes that file to use instead of , which should work far
better, as it's already used in other javadoc comments.
Regards
Damjan
On Sat, Nov 4, 2023 at 10:06 AM Matthias Seidel
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Of course, I could
Hi All,
Of course, I could disable building of the SDK to get builds of trunk
again, but this does not solve the problem.
What do we want to do?!
Regards,
Matthias
Am 31.10.23 um 22:25 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Hi Damjan,
Am 29.10.23 um 16:44 schrieb dam...@apache.org:
This is an
Hi Damjan,
Am 29.10.23 um 16:44 schrieb dam...@apache.org:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
damjan pushed a commit to branch trunk
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/trunk by
