Re: [DISCUSS] Future of the Hangul Word Processor, HWP, filter

2015-05-09 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 08/05/2015 Kay Schenk wrote: I didn't have any problems with my build after your changes. But, I did notice that the Hangul file type was still listed in the menu choices for import. I had taken a look at this too, and I think the examples I mentioned are very useful as a reference: the cl

Re: [DISCUSS] Future of the Hangul Word Processor, HWP, filter

2015-05-08 Thread Kay Schenk
On 05/03/2015 11:49 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 03/05/2015 Marcus wrote: >> that's great to see. :-) Didn't know that you had such deep knowledge of >> the code. > > Honestly, as someone (I think it was Pedro) once put it, to remove stuff > you just need an axe (sometimes a well-sharpened ax

Re: [DISCUSS] Future of the Hangul Word Processor, HWP, filter

2015-05-03 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 03/05/2015 Marcus wrote: that's great to see. :-) Didn't know that you had such deep knowledge of the code. Honestly, as someone (I think it was Pedro) once put it, to remove stuff you just need an axe (sometimes a well-sharpened axe), and not a deep knowledge of the code! I will test st

Re: [DISCUSS] Future of the Hangul Word Processor, HWP, filter

2015-05-03 Thread Marcus
Am 05/01/2015 07:33 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: On 29/04/2015 Andrea Pescetti wrote: The only reasonable solution indeed seems to remove the filter. I opened a 4.1.2 issue at https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126281 Seeing that we have lazy consensus on the idea of simply removing the

Re: [DISCUSS] Future of the Hangul Word Processor, HWP, filter

2015-05-01 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 29/04/2015 Andrea Pescetti wrote: The only reasonable solution indeed seems to remove the filter. I opened a 4.1.2 issue at https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126281 Seeing that we have lazy consensus on the idea of simply removing the filter, I've started the cleanup work. The fir

Re: [DISCUSS] Future of the Hangul Word Processor, HWP, filter

2015-04-29 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 28/04/2015 Marcus wrote: Am 04/28/2015 06:12 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: As we plan for the 4.1.2 release, should we give some thought to the importance of the HWP filter, Hangul Word Processor But Jeongkyu Kim on the L10n@ mailing list wrote that it is no longer relevant. So, maybe time to dele

Re: [DISCUSS] Future of the Hangul Word Processor, HWP, filter

2015-04-28 Thread Marcus
Am 04/28/2015 06:12 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: As we plan for the 4.1.2 release, should we give some thought to the importance of the HWP filter, Hangul Word Processor, that was recently involved in the latest security breach? Is this a filter we think should be maintained? Does anyone have any inf

Re: [DISCUSS] Future of the Hangul Word Processor, HWP, filter

2015-04-28 Thread jonathon
On 28/04/15 16:12, Kay Schenk wrote: > As we plan for the 4.1.2 release, should we give some thought to the > importance of the HWP filter, Hangul Word Processor, that was recently > involved in the latest security breach? How difficult/awkward would it be to strip that code from AOO, and then rew

[DISCUSS] Future of the Hangul Word Processor, HWP, filter

2015-04-28 Thread Kay Schenk
As we plan for the 4.1.2 release, should we give some thought to the importance of the HWP filter, Hangul Word Processor, that was recently involved in the latest security breach? Is this a filter we think should be maintained? Does anyone have any information on how much it is currently used, etc