I have updated the Maven bundles with sources from AOO412 tag.
I re-created the javadocs from them because I couldn't find complete
docs in the SDK.
If everyone agrees we do not need a vote, how to proceed?
I could do a new lazy consensus topic until the end of next week to give
everyone
to:cmar...@apache.org]
>> Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 04:03
>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Maven Repo Release of Java UNO Jar Files
>>
>> I have updated the Maven bundles with sources from AOO412 tag.
>>
>> I re-created t
Thanks Dennis,
Comments below.
On 12/11/2015 12:42 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
I have no idea how much ceremony is needed for this. Let's see what others
have to say.
Thanks for the recreation of the JavaDocs.
I think the lazy consensus could work. It is a para-/quasi-distribution
Hi Dave,
https://www.openoffice.org/API/docs/java/ref/overview-summary.html
Any idea how the javadoc is integrated?
Thanks,
Carl
On 12/11/2015 06:29 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
Hi,
This is great work.
I'll note that the apidocs should be bundled into the website. See
ev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Maven Repo Release of Java UNO Jar Files
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> https://www.openoffice.org/API/docs/java/ref/overview-summary.html
>
> Any idea how the javadoc is integrated?
>
> Thanks,
> Carl
>
> On 12/11/2015 06:
t: Re: [DISCUSS] Maven Repo Release of Java UNO Jar Files
>
> I have updated the Maven bundles with sources from AOO412 tag.
>
> I re-created the javadocs from them because I couldn't find complete
> docs in the SDK.
>
> If everyone agrees we do not need a vote, how to proceed?
Carl Marcum wrote:
I thought these would be the most up to date. I understand now the
4.1.2 was on a branch and trunk may not be the latest.
Trunk is the latest, but in a different way. It was being developed
before and after 4.1.2, separately from 4.1.2 (where we just picked some
fixes
On 04/12/2015 Carl Marcum wrote:
I have created Maven bundles for the four Java UNO jar files previously
released by OpenOffice.org v3.2.1.
juh-4.1.2-bundle.jar [1], jurt-4.1.2-bundle.jar [2],
ridl-4.1.2-bundle.jar [3], unoil.jar-4.1.2-bundle.jar [4]
and additionally
...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2015 19:35
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] Maven Repo Release of Java UNO Jar Files
I have created Maven bundles for the four Java UNO jar files previously
released by OpenOffice.org v3.2.1.
juh-4.1.2-bundle.jar [1], jurt-4.1.2-bundle.jar [2
Hello Carl;
Great job so far!
I agree they should be voted as a bundle. In the future we should just build
this
stuff along with the release and it would be automatic part of the release
engineering process.
In that order of ideas, the .pom files should be uploaded to SVN even if they
are
Hi Pedro,
I still need to document the steps I took and hopefully someone
knowledgeable with the build process
could add in the extra steps during the Jar process.
Thanks,
Carl
On 12/04/2015 10:27 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hello Carl;
Great job so far!
I agree they should be voted as a
I have created Maven bundles for the four Java UNO jar files previously
released by OpenOffice.org v3.2.1.
juh-4.1.2-bundle.jar [1], jurt-4.1.2-bundle.jar [2],
ridl-4.1.2-bundle.jar [3], unoil.jar-4.1.2-bundle.jar [4]
and additionally officebean-4.1.2-bundle.jar [5]
The jar files were
e.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] Maven Repo Release of Java UNO Jar Files
>
> I have created Maven bundles for the four Java UNO jar files previously
> released by OpenOffice.org v3.2.1.
> juh-4.1.2-bundle.jar [1], jurt-4.1.2-bundle.jar [2],
> ridl-4.1.2-bundle.jar [3],
13 matches
Mail list logo
