On 03/12/2014 Simon Phipps wrote:
I just spoke with the owner of the Apple developer account for the app. He
tells me it had been used by a subcontractor, that it was unrelated to his
real business (online TV) and that he would immediately remove the app from
the iTunes store now he's seen what
Am 12/03/2014 02:34 AM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Simon Phippssi...@webmink.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Rob Weirr...@robweir.com wrote:
Is there a way we could handle it even earlier, at the Apache server
level? Detect the incoming link based on
On 12/02/2014 05:34 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
Is there a way we could handle it even earlier, at the Apache server
level? Detect the incoming link based on
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
I just spoke with the owner of the Apple developer account for the app. He
tells me it had been used by a subcontractor, that it was unrelated to his
real business (online TV) and that he would immediately remove the app
Marcus wrote:
In general +1. But I would like to see the complete text that should be
used as general message when rejecting mails. @Andrea: Can you state
this in a separate paragraph?
Something like http://markmail.org/message/vsonyy6jhnrgn7uq (with the
obvious minor adjustments):
---
On 3 Dec 2014, at 9:15 am, Louis Suárez-Potts lui...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02 Dec2014, at 21:05, jonathon toki.kant...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/12/14 00:01, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
The ® name for them is “Quickoffice®-Pro”.
That is the name of the software.
I've seen three or four
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 11:23 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
I think we should be contacting Quick Office Pro about changing their
support information if we haven't already.
I just spoke with the owner of the Apple developer account for the app. He
tells me it had been used by a
+1 and +1 on Kay's idea.
2014-12-03 0:23 GMT+01:00 Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com:
On 12/02/2014 02:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
There's an app for Apple devices called Quick Office Pro. It is totally
unrelated to OpenOffice project and code. A link to it is
There's an app for Apple devices called Quick Office Pro. It is totally
unrelated to OpenOffice project and code. A link to it is
https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/quickoffice-pro/id889011512?mt=8
They link to http://openoffice.org for user support. This results in
many off-topic requests to
On 12/02/2014 02:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
There's an app for Apple devices called Quick Office Pro. It is totally
unrelated to OpenOffice project and code. A link to it is
https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/quickoffice-pro/id889011512?mt=8
They link to http://openoffice.org for user
On 02 Dec2014, at 18:23, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/02/2014 02:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
There's an app for Apple devices called Quick Office Pro. It is totally
unrelated to OpenOffice project and code. A link to it is
Am 12/03/2014 12:23 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On 12/02/2014 02:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
[...]
Since there are concerns that the power to decide what to reject can be
too subjective, I'm asking that we (subject to lazy consensus) agree
that Quick Office Pro posts can be rejected with the
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
There's an app for Apple devices called Quick Office Pro. It is totally
unrelated to OpenOffice project and code. A link to it is
https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/quickoffice-pro/id889011512?mt=8
They link to
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
Is there a way we could handle it even earlier, at the Apache server
level? Detect the incoming link based on the referrer as ones coming
from the offending website and then redirect that to a custom webpage
where we explain
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
Is there a way we could handle it even earlier, at the Apache server
level? Detect the incoming link based on the referrer as ones coming
from the
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
Is there a way we could handle it even earlier, at the Apache server
level? Detect
+1
-Original Message-
From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 15:23
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting Quick Office Pro messages
On 12/02/2014 02:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
[ ... ]
Since there are concerns
On 03/12/14 00:01, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
The ® name for them is “Quickoffice®-Pro”.
That is the name of the software.
I've seen three or four different names for the vendor.
Who then is getting this money?
Scammers.
jonathon
* English - detected
* English
* English
On 02 Dec2014, at 21:05, jonathon toki.kant...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/12/14 00:01, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
The ® name for them is “Quickoffice®-Pro”.
That is the name of the software.
I've seen three or four different names for the vendor.
Who then is getting this money?
On 03/12/14 02:15, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
Recall that Google owns Quickoffice.
I do not assume that any of the programs carrying the QuickOffice
moniker in the iTunes store is the same program that Google distributed.
Lee Elman is just as likely to be a victim as Apache OpenOffice is.
On 02 Dec2014, at 21:43, jonathon toki.kant...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/12/14 02:15, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
Recall that Google owns Quickoffice.
I do not assume that any of the programs carrying the QuickOffice
moniker in the iTunes store is the same program that Google
21 matches
Mail list logo
