+1 to move forward.
For the next snapshot without stlport, we need to plan testing on all the
platforms (Windows/Redhat/Suse/Ubuntu/Mac). But I agree that acceptance
level testing will be enough.
- Shenfeng (Simon)
2013/5/31 Jürgen Schmidt
> On 5/31/13 9:16 AM, Herbert Dürr wrote:
> > [regar
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On May 31, 2013, at 3:16 AM, "Herbert Dürr" wrote:
>
> > [regarding dropping stlport4]
> >
> > The changes to make the codebase ready for native STL support are done.
> Builds with stlport4 enabled will continue to work as before.
> >
> > I sug
On May 31, 2013, at 3:16 AM, "Herbert Dürr" wrote:
> [regarding dropping stlport4]
>
> The changes to make the codebase ready for native STL support are done.
> Builds with stlport4 enabled will continue to work as before.
>
> I suggest to use the --without-stlport option for all new builds thou
On 5/31/13 9:16 AM, Herbert Dürr wrote:
> [regarding dropping stlport4]
>
> The changes to make the codebase ready for native STL support are done.
> Builds with stlport4 enabled will continue to work as before.
>
> I suggest to use the --without-stlport option for all new builds though:
> Stlpor
[regarding dropping stlport4]
The changes to make the codebase ready for native STL support are done.
Builds with stlport4 enabled will continue to work as before.
I suggest to use the --without-stlport option for all new builds though:
Stlport is a great project, but the versions that OOo de
On 5/27/13 5:17 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to discuss our further schedule towards AOO 4.0 and the
> problems I see. And I would like to discuss a proposal how to address
> these problems.
>
> We are behind our schedule a little bit and we have identified some
> problems reg
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:49 AM, Juergen Schmidt wrote:
> Am Montag, 27. Mai 2013 um 23:38 schrieb Rob Weir:
>> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Jürgen Schmidt
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I would like to discuss our further schedule towards AOO 4.0 and the
>> > problems I see. And I would like
On Tue, 28 May 2013 13:57:42 +0200
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 5/28/13 1:03 PM, janI wrote:
> > On 28 May 2013 09:38, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >
> >> On 5/27/13 11:46 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> >>> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:58 PM, janI wrote:
> On 27 May 2013 17:17, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >>>
On 5/28/13 1:03 PM, janI wrote:
> On 28 May 2013 09:38, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>
>> On 5/27/13 11:46 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:58 PM, janI wrote:
On 27 May 2013 17:17, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to discuss our further schedule towa
On 28 May 2013 09:38, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 5/27/13 11:46 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> > On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:58 PM, janI wrote:
> >> On 27 May 2013 17:17, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I would like to discuss our further schedule towards AOO 4.0 and the
> >>> problems I
On 5/27/13 11:46 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:58 PM, janI wrote:
>> On 27 May 2013 17:17, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I would like to discuss our further schedule towards AOO 4.0 and the
>>> problems I see. And I would like to discuss a proposal how to address
>>>
Am Montag, 27. Mai 2013 um 23:38 schrieb Rob Weir:
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Jürgen Schmidt
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to discuss our further schedule towards AOO 4.0 and the
> > problems I see. And I would like to discuss a proposal how to address
> > these problems.
> >
On May 27, 2013, at 2:46 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:58 PM, janI wrote:
>> On 27 May 2013 17:17, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I would like to discuss our further schedule towards AOO 4.0 and the
>>> problems I see. And I would like to discuss a proposal how to
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:58 PM, janI wrote:
> On 27 May 2013 17:17, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to discuss our further schedule towards AOO 4.0 and the
>> problems I see. And I would like to discuss a proposal how to address
>> these problems.
>>
>> We are behind our sched
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to discuss our further schedule towards AOO 4.0 and the
> problems I see. And I would like to discuss a proposal how to address
> these problems.
>
> We are behind our schedule a little bit and we have identified some
>
Am Montag, 27. Mai 2013 um 19:47 schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 06:58:54PM +0200, janI wrote:
> > On 27 May 2013 17:17, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I would like to discuss our further schedule towards AOO 4.0 and the
> > > problems I see. And I wou
Am Montag, 27. Mai 2013 um 18:58 schrieb janI:
> On 27 May 2013 17:17, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to discuss our further schedule towards AOO 4.0 and the
> > problems I see. And I would like to discuss a proposal how to address
> > these problems.
> >
> > We are beh
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 06:58:54PM +0200, janI wrote:
> On 27 May 2013 17:17, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to discuss our further schedule towards AOO 4.0 and the
> > problems I see. And I would like to discuss a proposal how to address
> > these problems.
> >
> > We are b
On 27 May 2013 17:17, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to discuss our further schedule towards AOO 4.0 and the
> problems I see. And I would like to discuss a proposal how to address
> these problems.
>
> We are behind our schedule a little bit and we have identified some
> problems r
Hi,
I would like to discuss our further schedule towards AOO 4.0 and the
problems I see. And I would like to discuss a proposal how to address
these problems.
We are behind our schedule a little bit and we have identified some
problems regarding the 64bit port on MacOS that I will try to explain
20 matches
Mail list logo
