Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-19 Thread Marcus
Am 08/19/2016 01:09 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: -Original Message- From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 14:46 To: q...@openoffice.apache.org; dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-18 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
> -Original Message- > From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net] > Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 14:46 > To: q...@openoffice.apache.org; dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > [ ... ] >

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-18 Thread Keith N. McKenna
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > >> -Original Message- >> From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net] >> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 21:05 >> To: q...@openoffice.apache.org; dev@openoffice.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying op

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-18 Thread Marcus
Message- From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org] Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 21:08 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Cc: q...@openoffice.apache.org Subject: RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows BETA 0.1.0 WITH AUTOMATED SCRIPTS IS NOW AVAILABLE The scr

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-15 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
> -Original Message- > From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net] > Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 21:05 > To: q...@openoffice.apache.org; dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > > > &g

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-15 Thread Keith N. McKenna
nt: Thursday, August 11, 2016 21:08 >> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org >> Cc: q...@openoffice.apache.org >> Subject: RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows >> >> BETA 0.1.0 WITH AUTOMATED SCRIPTS IS NOW AVAILABLE >> >> The scripts make

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-15 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
hursday, August 11, 2016 21:08 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Cc: q...@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > > BETA 0.1.0 WITH AUTOMATED SCRIPTS IS NOW AVAILABLE > > The scripts make life much easier, since users don

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-15 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
> -Original Message- > From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net] > Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2016 21:24 > To: q...@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > > Dennis; > Attached is a

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-14 Thread Marcus
Am 08/14/2016 07:10 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2016 13:20 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Cc: q...@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-14 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
, 2016 09:15 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > > Am 08/14/2016 05:26 PM, schrieb Joost Andrae: > > Hi, > > > > I've installed the patch from > > > >>>>>> > >>>

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-14 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
> -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2016 13:20 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Cc: q...@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > [ ... ] > PS:

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-14 Thread Marcus
Am 08/14/2016 05:26 PM, schrieb Joost Andrae: Hi, I've installed the patch from The material is available at . into my Win7Pro AOO 4.1.2 installation. Before applying the patch I've checked the md5sum and it

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-14 Thread Joost Andrae
Hi, I've installed the patch from The material is available at . into my Win7Pro AOO 4.1.2 installation. Before applying the patch I've checked the md5sum and it was correct. I'm not sure that all users

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-14 Thread Marcus
Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows Am 08/12/2016 06:07 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: BETA 0.1.0 WITH AUTOMATED SCRIPTS IS NOW AVAILABLE The scripts make life much easier, since users don't have to go hunting for anything and digging around in operating-system

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-14 Thread Marcus
ilto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 18:01 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Cc: q...@openoffice.apache.org Subject: RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows Beta version 0.1.0 is now nearing completion. It will include two scripts, one for applying the

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-13 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
Thanks for the checking, Marcus. > -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2016 13:20 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Cc: q...@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Win

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

2016-08-13 Thread Marcus
m: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2016 15:52 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows Am 08/05/2016 12:26 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: [ ... ] hmmm...well no zips for Mac, Linux32, or Linux 64 -- yet. Should

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

2016-08-13 Thread Kay Schenk
rything else should be >>>>>>> in the >>>>>>> various READMEs for each platform. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I should be done with all edits by this evening for a final review >>>>>>> before zipping and sign

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-13 Thread Marcus
a great help for the normal users. If you need more details or tests just tell me. Marcus -Original Message- From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 18:01 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Cc: q...@openoffice.apache.org Subject: RE: [TEST

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

2016-08-13 Thread Marcus
wrote: Branching off the part that is not about the Windows 4.1.2-patch1 [TESTING]. -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2016 15:52 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows A

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

2016-08-13 Thread Kay Schenk
Ok, I've now moved on to creating zip files, etc for Linux32, Linux64 >>>> and Mac. >>>> >>>> My openssl version on does NOT supply digest sha256. Is it OK to use >>>> sha1? MD5 already computed for each of these. >>>> >>> >>

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

2016-08-12 Thread Kay Schenk
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Marcus wrote: > Am 08/12/2016 10:01 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: > >> On 8/12/2016 12:22 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: >> ... >> >>> [Anecdotal Side Note: I just discovered that the MD5 hash for the >>> 4.1.2 Windows .exe fails to check on

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-12 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
> -Original Message- > From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net] > Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 13:49 > To: q...@openoffice.apache.org; dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > > At

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

2016-08-12 Thread Don Lewis
ries] (was RE: [TESTING] >> Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows) >> >> On 11 Aug, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote: >> > >> > >> > On 08/11/2016 12:50 PM, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> On 0

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-12 Thread Keith N. McKenna
@openoffice.apache.org Cc: q...@openoffice.apache.org Subject: RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows Beta version 0.1.0 is now nearing completion. It will include two scripts, one for applying the patch, the other for reverting the patch. The .zip will also have a copy

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

2016-08-12 Thread Marcus
Am 08/12/2016 10:01 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: On 8/12/2016 12:22 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: ... [Anecdotal Side Note: I just discovered that the MD5 hash for the 4.1.2 Windows .exe fails to check on my Windows system because of a defect in the .md5 file. For reasons unknown, the md5sum

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

2016-08-12 Thread Patricia Shanahan
On 8/12/2016 12:22 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: ... [Anecdotal Side Note: I just discovered that the MD5 hash for the 4.1.2 Windows .exe fails to check on my Windows system because of a defect in the .md5 file. For reasons unknown, the md5sum tool that I have requires exactly two spaces

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-12 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
> -Original Message- > From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net] > Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 12:47 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > > Replies in line > > Dennis E.

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-11 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
.org] > Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 18:01 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Cc: q...@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > > Beta version 0.1.0 is now nearing completion. > > It will include two scripts, o

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

2016-08-11 Thread Marcus
@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows Am 08/05/2016 12:26 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: [ ... ] hmmm...well no zips for Mac, Linux32, or Linux 64 -- yet. Should we get started on these? it depends what we want that they should contain. The

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

2016-08-11 Thread Don Lewis
On 11 Aug, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote: > > > On 08/11/2016 12:50 PM, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote: >> >> >> On 08/09/2016 02:12 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>> [top posting] >>> I'm in the process of trying to "sync" instructions for Linux32, >>> Linux64, and MacOSX at the moment. As far as

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

2016-08-11 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Kay Schenk wrote: My openssl version on does NOT supply digest sha256. Is it OK to use sha1? MD5 already computed for each of these. Guidelines recommend SHA256. But it should not be difficult for you to get a sha256sum binary or a generic shasum binary to run as "shasum -a256 FILENAME".

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

2016-08-11 Thread Kay sch...@apache.org
riginal Message- >>>> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] >>>> Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2016 15:52 >>>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org >>>> Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows >>>> >>>> Am

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

2016-08-11 Thread Kay sch...@apache.org
anching off the part that is not about the Windows 4.1.2-patch1 [TESTING]. >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] >>> Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2016 15:52 >>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: [TESTING]

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

2016-08-11 Thread Marcus
8 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: Branching off the part that is not about the Windows 4.1.2-patch1 [TESTING]. -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2016 15:52 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 fo

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-10 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
> -Original Message- > From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org] > Sent: Monday, August 8, 2016 09:58 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Cc: q...@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > > Alpha versi

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

2016-08-10 Thread Carl Marcum
On 08/10/2016 03:09 AM, Jan Høydahl wrote: 9. aug. 2016 kl. 13.23 skrev Carl Marcum : ... Could we use a cross-platform installer like izpack [1]? I started trying it out last weekend and it looks like it could do the job of running a rename script and copying in the

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

2016-08-10 Thread Jan Høydahl
> 9. aug. 2016 kl. 13.23 skrev Carl Marcum : > ... > Could we use a cross-platform installer like izpack [1]? > > I started trying it out last weekend and it looks like it could do the job of > running a rename script and copying in the library. I previously used izPack for

RE: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

2016-08-09 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
> -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2016 15:26 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] > Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows) > > Am 08/0

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

2016-08-09 Thread Kay Schenk
ng off the part that is not about the Windows 4.1.2-patch1 [TESTING]. > >> -Original Message- >> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] >> Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2016 15:52 >> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-p

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

2016-08-09 Thread Carl Marcum
] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows Am 08/05/2016 12:26 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: [ ... ] hmmm...well no zips for Mac, Linux32, or Linux 64 -- yet. Should we get started on these? it depends what we want that they should contain. The ZIP file for Windows contains a LICENSE and NOTICE file

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-08 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
Office 4.1.2. - Dennis > -Original Message- > From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org] > Sent: Tuesday, August 2, 2016 20:31 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Cc: q...@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Win

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-07 Thread Kay Schenk
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Marcus wrote: > Am 08/05/2016 12:26 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: > >> On 08/04/2016 02:21 PM, Marcus wrote: >> >>> Am 08/03/2016 05:31 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: >>> Testing of an Apache OpenOffice 4.1.2-patch1 procedure is requested.

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-07 Thread Marcus
Am 08/07/2016 07:30 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] Sent: Sunday, August 7, 2016 09:21 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Cc: q...@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows Feedback

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-07 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
> -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Sunday, August 7, 2016 09:21 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Cc: q...@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > > Feedback for the .zi

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-07 Thread Marcus
Feedback for the .zip file: Do you have a reason in mind for the "apply" in the file name? I would delete this as I don't see a benefit and it would shorten the file name. When extracting a ZIP file I cannot stand it when no subdirectory is included and the files are extracted where the

RE: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

2016-08-05 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
> -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 10:47 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] > Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows) > > Am 08/0

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-05 Thread Carl Marcum
inal Message- From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org] Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 03:30 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows On 08/04/2016 06:52 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 08/05/2016 12:26 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On 08/04/2016 02:21 PM,

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

2016-08-05 Thread Marcus
ch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows) On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton <dennis.hamil...@acm.org> wrote: Branching off the part that is not about the Windows 4.1.2-patch1 [TESTING]. -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:ma

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-05 Thread Marcus
Am 08/05/2016 12:30 PM, schrieb Carl Marcum: On 08/04/2016 06:52 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 08/05/2016 12:26 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On 08/04/2016 02:21 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 08/03/2016 05:31 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: Testing of an Apache OpenOffice 4.1.2-patch1 procedure is requested. The

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

2016-08-05 Thread Marcus
] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows Am 08/05/2016 12:26 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: [ ... ] hmmm...well no zips for Mac, Linux32, or Linux 64 -- yet. Should we get started on these? it depends what we want that they should contain. The ZIP file for Windows contains a LICENSE and NOTICE file

RE: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

2016-08-05 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
; > -Original Message- > > > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > > > Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2016 15:52 > > > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > > > Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > > > > >

[PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

2016-08-05 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
Branching off the part that is not about the Windows 4.1.2-patch1 [TESTING]. > -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2016 15:52 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-pat

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

2016-08-05 Thread Kay Schenk
August 4, 2016 15:52 > > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > > > > Am 08/05/2016 12:26 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: > [ ... ] > > > > > > hmmm...well no zips for Mac, Linux32, or Linux 64

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-05 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
cmar...@apache.org] > Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 03:30 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > > On 08/04/2016 06:52 PM, Marcus wrote: > > Am 08/05/2016 12:26 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: > >> On 08/04/2016 02

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-05 Thread Carl Marcum
On 08/04/2016 06:52 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 08/05/2016 12:26 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On 08/04/2016 02:21 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 08/03/2016 05:31 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: Testing of an Apache OpenOffice 4.1.2-patch1 procedure is requested. The files to be used in testing are at

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-04 Thread Kay Schenk
On 08/04/2016 02:21 PM, Marcus wrote: > Am 08/03/2016 05:31 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: >> Testing of an Apache OpenOffice 4.1.2-patch1 procedure is requested. >> >> The files to be used in testing are at >> .

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-04 Thread Marcus
Am 08/03/2016 05:31 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: Testing of an Apache OpenOffice 4.1.2-patch1 procedure is requested. The files to be used in testing are at . The files to be tested and reviewed are *

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-03 Thread Keith N. McKenna
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > > >> -Original Message- From: Keith N. McKenna >> [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 >> 12:47 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying >> openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-03 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
> -Original Message- > From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net] > Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 12:47 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > > Replies in line > > Dennis E.

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-03 Thread Keith N. McKenna
Replies in line Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > Testing of an Apache OpenOffice 4.1.2-patch1 procedure is requested. > > The files to be used in testing are at > . > > The files to be tested and reviewed are > > *

[TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-02 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
Testing of an Apache OpenOffice 4.1.2-patch1 procedure is requested. The files to be used in testing are at . The files to be tested and reviewed are * README-4.1.2-patch1-apply-Windows.txt The description of