On 1/2/2013 2:25 AM, janI wrote:
Andrea:
thx for your observations.
With the very low activity we have on trunk, there might be no reason for
statistics.
I am simply just used to a more comfortable and flexible build system. If I
want to check my l10n changes on different platforms I have to (
Andrea:
thx for your observations.
With the very low activity we have on trunk, there might be no reason for
statistics.
I am simply just used to a more comfortable and flexible build system. If I
want to check my l10n changes on different platforms I have to (or so I
have been told) merge it to
On 01.01.2013 23:07, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
janI wrote:
I might be wrong but do we e.g.
- get automatic mail when a build fails ?
- have a statistic over our build through time ?
Notifications are sent to openoffice-commits, see for example
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/openoffice-
janI wrote:
I might be wrong but do we e.g.
- get automatic mail when a build fails ?
- have a statistic over our build through time ?
Notifications are sent to openoffice-commits, see for example
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/openoffice-commits/201301.mbox/%3c20130101075333.41945c0
I did know that we use the machines for building:
http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/
But it seemed to me we could integrate deeper using e.g. continum and
sonar, to get better monitoring and reporting. I might be wrong but do we
e.g.
- get automatic mail when a build fails ?
- have a stati
Jan,
On Dec 31, 2012, at 12:11 PM, jan iversen wrote:
> excuse me I did NOT say that anybody did a bad job! on the contrary I
> think a lot of people do a real big job I simply try to make the job
> easier. but I do understand when a polite question is unwanted.
How did my answer to And
excuse me I did NOT say that anybody did a bad job! on the contrary I
think a lot of people do a real big job I simply try to make the job
easier. but I do understand when a polite question is unwanted.
sorry for suggestion a possible improvement that will not happen again.
Jan i
Den 31/
Hi Andrew,
On Dec 31, 2012, at 9:57 AM, Andrew Rist wrote:
>
> On 12/31/2012 2:09 AM, janI wrote:
>> Is there a reason why we use our own buildbot and not one of the infra
>> supported ones, like e.g. Continuum.
> We /are/ using the ASF buildbot infrastructure. So I'm kind of confused by
> the
On 12/31/2012 2:09 AM, janI wrote:
Is there a reason why we use our own buildbot and not one of the infra
supported ones, like e.g. Continuum.
We /are/ using the ASF buildbot infrastructure. So I'm kind of confused
by the question.
check http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/
Also, the dec
Is there a reason why we use our own buildbot and not one of the infra
supported ones, like e.g. Continuum.
Sharing servers with other and having other people maintain the build
routines should be to our advantage.
Or do I see life in the wrong light ?
rgds
Jan I
10 matches
Mail list logo