2013/7/31 Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org
On 30/07/2013 Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
If your extension is compatible with AOO 4.0, please take a moment to
update the extension's compatibility information so that end-users will
know it works
On 30/07/2013 Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
If your extension is compatible with AOO 4.0, please take a moment to
update the extension's compatibility information so that end-users will
know it works with the latest release. If your extension is not
Hi,
On 31.07.2013 13:12, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 30/07/2013 Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
If your extension is compatible with AOO 4.0, please take a moment to
update the extension's compatibility information so that end-users will
know it works
2013/7/29 Roberto Galoppini roberto.galopp...@gmail.com
2013/7/27 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Roberto Galoppini
roberto.galopp...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/7/27 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Hagar Delest
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Roberto Galoppini
roberto.galopp...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/7/29 Roberto Galoppini roberto.galopp...@gmail.com
2013/7/27 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Roberto Galoppini
roberto.galopp...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/7/27 Rob Weir
Top posting
Same as Rob.
Hagar
Le 30/07/2013 15:55, Rob Weir a écrit :
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Roberto Galoppini
roberto.galopp...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/7/29 Roberto Galoppini roberto.galopp...@gmail.com
2013/7/27 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 4:59 PM,
2013/7/27 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Roberto Galoppini
roberto.galopp...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/7/27 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Hagar Delest hagar.del...@laposte.net
wrote:
Le 26/07/2013 15:40, Roberto Galoppini a
On 26/07/2013 Hagar Delest wrote:
Here we are. The first messages (ML and forum) about incompatibility are
coming.
I'm keeping
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Extensions/Extensions_and_Apache_OpenOffice_4.0
up-to-date with what is reported on this list. Feel free to collect
further
2013/7/27 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Hagar Delest hagar.del...@laposte.net
wrote:
Le 26/07/2013 15:40, Roberto Galoppini a écrit :
A) a link to a version compatible with AOO 4.0 has been added for
http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/pdfimport
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Roberto Galoppini
roberto.galopp...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/7/27 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Hagar Delest hagar.del...@laposte.net
wrote:
Le 26/07/2013 15:40, Roberto Galoppini a écrit :
A) a link to a version compatible
Top posting.
Here we are. The first messages (ML and forum) about incompatibility are coming.
The identified extensions (with toolbar and not updated for 4.0) should be at
least tagged in the extension site as not compatible with 4.0.
A quick tutorial on how to update the extension in case
2013/7/26 Hagar Delest hagar.del...@laposte.net
Top posting.
Here we are. The first messages (ML and forum) about incompatibility are
coming.
The identified extensions (with toolbar and not updated for 4.0) should be
at least tagged in the extension site as not compatible with 4.0.
This
Le 26/07/2013 15:40, Roberto Galoppini a écrit :
A) a link to a version compatible with AOO 4.0 has been added for
http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/pdfimport and
http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/mysql_connector
B) 4.0 has been added to the list of possible compatibilities.
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Hagar Delest hagar.del...@laposte.net wrote:
Le 26/07/2013 15:40, Roberto Galoppini a écrit :
A) a link to a version compatible with AOO 4.0 has been added for
http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/pdfimport and
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/25/13 4:36 PM, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 2/21/13 10:05 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 09:22:34AM +0100,
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Herbert Dürr h...@apache.org wrote:
On 2013/03/07 11:41 AM, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
Below the list of Extensions top downloads during the last month:
#1 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/3620 Monthly: 1725
[...]
#50
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/21/13 10:05 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 09:22:34AM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
The first step should be a simple check if an Addons.xcu is
contained at all. Something like unzip -l
On 2/25/13 4:36 PM, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/21/13 10:05 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 09:22:34AM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
The first step should be a simple check if an Addons.xcu
On 2/20/13 8:14 PM, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.comwrote:
On 2/17/13 10:36 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 12/02/2013 Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
If we support both the
underlying code would be more complex, slower and more ugly to
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 09:22:34AM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
The first step should be a simple check if an Addons.xcu is contained at
all. Something like unzip -l extension | grep Addons.xcu should be
enough. The second step if an Addons.xcu is contained is to check for
the node
Hi,
It would also be interesting to know the last time the extension was
updated; besides that expecting unmaintained extensions to work on a new
major release might not be plausible, the extension is likely not be
adapted to any change if it is unmaintained, no matter how popular it is
On 2/21/13 10:05 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 09:22:34AM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
The first step should be a simple check if an Addons.xcu is
contained at all. Something like unzip -l extension | grep
Addons.xcu should be enough. The second step if an
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.comwrote:
On 2/17/13 10:36 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 12/02/2013 Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
If we support both the
underlying code would be more complex, slower and more ugly to maintain.
OK. I had understood this part, so
On 12/02/2013 Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
If we support both the
underlying code would be more complex, slower and more ugly to maintain.
OK. I had understood this part, so let's have a detailed description of
the impact before we see how to handle this.
The whole discussion is really based on
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
My impression was that even if we made no changes, from the user's
perspective, they would lose all extensions. This is due to the
change in base directory for the profile. So all extensions would be
lost and need to be
On 2/17/13 10:36 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 12/02/2013 Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
If we support both the
underlying code would be more complex, slower and more ugly to maintain.
OK. I had understood this part, so let's have a detailed description of
the impact before we see how to handle
On 2/12/13 12:03 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 11/02/2013 Hagar Delest wrote:
No real problem with reinstalling extensions after a major upgrade, I've
done that too.
But there is a difference between the mere inconvenience of reinstalling
extensions and losing them completely (waiting that
On 2/12/13 12:41 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Hagar Delest hagar.del...@laposte.net
wrote:
Le 11/02/2013 22:46, Rob Weir a écrit :
My impression was that even if we made no changes, from the user's
perspective, they would lose all extensions. This is due to the
On 2/12/13 1:42 PM, Joost Andrae wrote:
Hi,
in the moment I have just one question in mind:
Who's going to adapt the Sun/Oracle extensions that contain Addons.xcu
like presentation-minimizer.oxt ?
well the extensions where we have the source code can be changed by
volunteers. Maybe
On 2/12/13 2:15 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:07:59 +0100
Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/12/13 1:42 PM, Joost Andrae wrote:
Hi,
in the moment I have just one question in mind:
Who's going to adapt the Sun/Oracle extensions that contain Addons.xcu
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 01:42:42PM +0100, Joost Andrae wrote:
Hi,
in the moment I have just one question in mind:
Who's going to adapt the Sun/Oracle extensions that contain
Addons.xcu like presentation-minimizer.oxt ?
This extension does not provide a toolbar of its own, it uses only
Le 12/02/2013 13:05, Rob Weir a écrit :
I don't know. I was asking a question. But I think this is an
important question: Why would an extension author not update their
extension for AOO 4.0? Some hypothetical answers:
1) The extension is unmaintained
One of the top reasons I guess. I
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Hagar Delest hagar.del...@laposte.net wrote:
Le 12/02/2013 13:05, Rob Weir a écrit :
I don't know. I was asking a question. But I think this is an
important question: Why would an extension author not update their
extension for AOO 4.0? Some hypothetical
You certainly have seen from the 0^0 discussion that I have raised the problem
of the backward compatibility with 4.0 and extensions. In fact, it affects only
the extensions with a custom toolbar. But except the dictionaries, I guess that
it makes a good deal of them still.
The problem has
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Hagar Delest hagar.del...@laposte.net wrote:
You certainly have seen from the 0^0 discussion that I have raised the
problem of the backward compatibility with 4.0 and extensions. In fact, it
affects only the extensions with a custom toolbar. But except the
Le 11/02/2013 22:46, Rob Weir a écrit :
My impression was that even if we made no changes, from the user's
perspective, they would lose all extensions. This is due to the
change in base directory for the profile. So all extensions would be
lost and need to be reinstalled. So there will be no
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
On 11/02/2013 Hagar Delest wrote:
No real problem with reinstalling extensions after a major upgrade, I've
done that too.
But there is a difference between the mere inconvenience of reinstalling
extensions and losing
37 matches
Mail list logo
