Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote (Mar 10):
Changing entry of Field Version from an older version to a newer one
should not happen.
When a user submits a new issue the Field Version should contain the
version on which the user observes the issue. Experienced community
members, primarily by QA
Here is the analysis of possible cases for bugs in query [1], together with
the proposed instructions to review them, any comments and suggestions,
please let me know.
1. New issue happens on new feature in 4.1, or migration issue only applies
to 4.1(e.g. *Issue
Yuzhen Fan schrieb:
Here is the analysis of possible cases
Hi,
plausible description of the task, I'm more or less proceeding so.
I will send you bug list for your review
Difficult - I currently prefer to check issues where I have knowledge
first, not to proceed a list. Other volunteers
Hi,
and we need help of an an experienced MAC user for [1], it seems we have
some MAC-Only issues in the list.
CU
Rainer
Hyperlinks:
[1]
On 3/19/14 9:58 AM, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
Hi,
and we need help of an an experienced MAC user for [1], it seems we have
some MAC-Only issues in the list.
CU
Rainer
Hyperlinks:
[1]
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Rainer Bielefeld
rainerbielefeld_ooo...@bielefeldundbuss.de wrote:
Yuzhen Fan schrieb:
Here is the analysis of possible cases
Hi,
plausible description of the task, I'm more or less proceeding so.
I will send you bug list for your review
Difficult
how about the defects already have value in QA Contact
Hi,
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=doremlist_id=133813namedcmd=410_RegressionTest_woQAremaction=runsharer_id=8583
Shows the possible regressions without someone in QA, only 5 found. Not
many left ...
Let's wait
On 3/11/14 6:33 PM, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
Hi,
I think Bugzilla Help
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/describekeywords.cgi tells it all.
There only is no common sense whether key word should be used also for
very old regressions (regression in OOo 1.0.1 compared to OOo 1.0.0),
from
Hi,
I think Bugzilla Help
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/describekeywords.cgi tells it all.
There only is no common sense whether key word should be used also for
very old regressions (regression in OOo 1.0.1 compared to OOo 1.0.0),
from developer's point of view only regressions in AOO 3.4-dev
, of course, have to be done, too!).
I am used to do a query for regressions in trunk, what will allow to
check whether there are known 4.1 regressions affecting my daily work.
And fascinating, my query showed 1 Regression in 200 Bugs with Version
4.1 (I forgot what one it was). That sounds good
test than testing with prepared testcases
(what, of course, have to be done, too!).
I am used to do a query for regressions in trunk, what will allow to check
whether there are known 4.1 regressions affecting my daily work. And
fascinating, my query showed 1 Regression in 200 Bugs with Version 4.1
a query for regressions in trunk, what will allow to
check whether there are known 4.1 regressions affecting my daily work.
And fascinating, my query showed 1 Regression in 200 Bugs with Version
4.1 (I forgot what one it was). That sounds good, but it is completely
implausible that our 200 unfixed
12 matches
Mail list logo
