On 10/10/2017 11:49 AM, Marcus wrote:
Am 10.10.2017 um 01:15 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I was wondering... what do people think about going from 4.1.x all the
way straight to 4.5.0...
Since this next "major" release is pretty major, maybe a
bigger step in number might be
Am 10.10.2017 um 01:15 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I was wondering... what do people think about going from 4.1.x all the
way straight to 4.5.0...
Since this next "major" release is pretty major, maybe a
bigger step in number might be justified. Especially if
we drop some
4.2.0 the idea is we could reference it to Douglas Adams answer 42.
Which is kinda funny.
However I would like to postpone the discussion towards 20ties since I have
.ore time then. Very unselfish of me I know. ;)
All the best
Peter
Am 10. Oktober 2017 01:00:36 MESZ schrieb Jim Jagielski
Hi -
It is worth letting the idea “percolate” while 4.1.4 release proceeds to
completion.
I like Jm’s thought. Announcing plans while announcing a release and then
executing on it would be the the best AOO marketing possible. We proceed with
whoever helps methodically.
My 2cts.
Regards,
> On Oct 9, 2017, at 7:15 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> I was wondering... what do people think about going from 4.1.x all the
>> way straight to 4.5.0...
>> Since this next "major" release is pretty major, maybe a
>> bigger step in number might be
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I was wondering... what do people think about going from 4.1.x all the
way straight to 4.5.0...
Since this next "major" release is pretty major, maybe a
bigger step in number might be justified. Especially if
we drop some older supported platforms.
We should focus on 4.1.4
I was wondering... what do people think about going from 4.1.x all the
way straight to 4.5.0...
Since this next "major" release is pretty major, maybe a
bigger step in number might be justified. Especially if
we drop some older supported platforms.