Re: A preservation hazard in OpenOffice

2013-01-08 Thread Joost Andrae

Hi,

Am 07.01.2013 22:53, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:

Joost Andrae wrote:

If somebody has a problem with linked
images within stored files then he/she can easily break these links by
using /edit/links...


Yes, this is the answer to the preservation hazard: just break links;
and there are several macros and perhaps extensions around that just add
a Break all links button to embed all images instead of linking to them.

That said, I think it would be quite reasonable (if there are no UX
problems or major development problems) to do the opposite in OpenOffice
4.0 and break links by default, since this happens to be the standard
expectation many users have.

For the record, the relevant issue is
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=37652



+1 but there should be a toggle to revert this behavior for those who 
know what they're doing...


Kind regards, Joost



A preservation hazard in OpenOffice

2013-01-07 Thread Rob Weir
Have you seen this:  http://fileformats.wordpress.com/2012/12/30/openoffice/ ???

(I'm cc'ing the author of that blog post, Gary McGrath)

This is from the perspective of a person interested in long-term
preservation/archiving of documents.

This looks like a feature that is working as designed, although it
does obscure the fact that the image is linked, not embedded in this
case.

It might be worth having a web page, or a document, about best
practices for creating documents in OpenOffice that are free of such
external dependencies.   Could probably also use the ODF Toolkit to
scan documents to identify such issues in a document.

Regards,

-Rob


Re: A preservation hazard in OpenOffice

2013-01-07 Thread Drew Jensen
Just read the article.

The article does not sound correct, if memory serves, checked using AOO 3.5.

Sure enough, copy an image from a web site and paste into a writer
document, the document has an embedded image, as I thought.

My guess is that the author did not copy the image, he copied the location
- common mistake.

As for AOO, hard to expect it not to do what the user told it to do.

Finally, checking for external links - isn't there already an extension
that does that, I know there was lots of talk about creating one ... didn't
find it with a quick search however.

Ciao,

//drew



On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:

 Have you seen this:
 http://fileformats.wordpress.com/2012/12/30/openoffice/ ???

 (I'm cc'ing the author of that blog post, Gary McGrath)

 This is from the perspective of a person interested in long-term
 preservation/archiving of documents.

 This looks like a feature that is working as designed, although it
 does obscure the fact that the image is linked, not embedded in this
 case.

 It might be worth having a web page, or a document, about best
 practices for creating documents in OpenOffice that are free of such
 external dependencies.   Could probably also use the ODF Toolkit to
 scan documents to identify such issues in a document.

 Regards,

 -Rob



Re: A preservation hazard in OpenOffice

2013-01-07 Thread Drew Jensen
Well, looks like it is not so easy to say that is wrong.

Tried this again, except instead of using Linux, using AOO 3.5 on Windows
and IE for the browser.

With writer it just craps out and you get nothing usable. But with draw,
yes the image is linked not embedded and I am absolutely sure I did a copy
(image) not copy (address).

//drew


On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Drew Jensen drewjensen.in...@gmail.comwrote:

 Just read the article.

 The article does not sound correct, if memory serves, checked using AOO
 3.5.

 Sure enough, copy an image from a web site and paste into a writer
 document, the document has an embedded image, as I thought.

 My guess is that the author did not copy the image, he copied the location
 - common mistake.

 As for AOO, hard to expect it not to do what the user told it to do.

 Finally, checking for external links - isn't there already an extension
 that does that, I know there was lots of talk about creating one ... didn't
 find it with a quick search however.

 Ciao,

 //drew



 On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:

 Have you seen this:
 http://fileformats.wordpress.com/2012/12/30/openoffice/ ???

 (I'm cc'ing the author of that blog post, Gary McGrath)

 This is from the perspective of a person interested in long-term
 preservation/archiving of documents.

 This looks like a feature that is working as designed, although it
 does obscure the fact that the image is linked, not embedded in this
 case.

 It might be worth having a web page, or a document, about best
 practices for creating documents in OpenOffice that are free of such
 external dependencies.   Could probably also use the ODF Toolkit to
 scan documents to identify such issues in a document.

 Regards,

 -Rob





Re: A preservation hazard in OpenOffice

2013-01-07 Thread Rob Weir
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Drew Jensen drewjensen.in...@gmail.com wrote:
 Well, looks like it is not so easy to say that is wrong.

 Tried this again, except instead of using Linux, using AOO 3.5 on Windows
 and IE for the browser.


There is no AOO 3.5.  What exactly are you running?  It should be
listed in the Help/About box.

 With writer it just craps out and you get nothing usable. But with draw,
 yes the image is linked not embedded and I am absolutely sure I did a copy
 (image) not copy (address).

 //drew


 On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Drew Jensen drewjensen.in...@gmail.comwrote:

 Just read the article.

 The article does not sound correct, if memory serves, checked using AOO
 3.5.

 Sure enough, copy an image from a web site and paste into a writer
 document, the document has an embedded image, as I thought.

 My guess is that the author did not copy the image, he copied the location
 - common mistake.

 As for AOO, hard to expect it not to do what the user told it to do.

 Finally, checking for external links - isn't there already an extension
 that does that, I know there was lots of talk about creating one ... didn't
 find it with a quick search however.

 Ciao,

 //drew



 On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:

 Have you seen this:
 http://fileformats.wordpress.com/2012/12/30/openoffice/ ???

 (I'm cc'ing the author of that blog post, Gary McGrath)

 This is from the perspective of a person interested in long-term
 preservation/archiving of documents.

 This looks like a feature that is working as designed, although it
 does obscure the fact that the image is linked, not embedded in this
 case.

 It might be worth having a web page, or a document, about best
 practices for creating documents in OpenOffice that are free of such
 external dependencies.   Could probably also use the ODF Toolkit to
 scan documents to identify such issues in a document.

 Regards,

 -Rob





Re: A preservation hazard in OpenOffice

2013-01-07 Thread Drew Jensen
Frick - daily builds and yes it says 3.5 and yes I know that is really
going to release as 4.0.


On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:

 On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Drew Jensen drewjensen.in...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Well, looks like it is not so easy to say that is wrong.
 
  Tried this again, except instead of using Linux, using AOO 3.5 on Windows
  and IE for the browser.
 

 There is no AOO 3.5.  What exactly are you running?  It should be
 listed in the Help/About box.

  With writer it just craps out and you get nothing usable. But with draw,
  yes the image is linked not embedded and I am absolutely sure I did a
 copy
  (image) not copy (address).
 
  //drew
 
 
  On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Drew Jensen drewjensen.in...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  Just read the article.
 
  The article does not sound correct, if memory serves, checked using AOO
  3.5.
 
  Sure enough, copy an image from a web site and paste into a writer
  document, the document has an embedded image, as I thought.
 
  My guess is that the author did not copy the image, he copied the
 location
  - common mistake.
 
  As for AOO, hard to expect it not to do what the user told it to do.
 
  Finally, checking for external links - isn't there already an extension
  that does that, I know there was lots of talk about creating one ...
 didn't
  find it with a quick search however.
 
  Ciao,
 
  //drew
 
 
 
  On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
 
  Have you seen this:
  http://fileformats.wordpress.com/2012/12/30/openoffice/ ???
 
  (I'm cc'ing the author of that blog post, Gary McGrath)
 
  This is from the perspective of a person interested in long-term
  preservation/archiving of documents.
 
  This looks like a feature that is working as designed, although it
  does obscure the fact that the image is linked, not embedded in this
  case.
 
  It might be worth having a web page, or a document, about best
  practices for creating documents in OpenOffice that are free of such
  external dependencies.   Could probably also use the ODF Toolkit to
  scan documents to identify such issues in a document.
 
  Regards,
 
  -Rob
 
 
 



Re: A preservation hazard in OpenOffice

2013-01-07 Thread Rob Weir
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Drew Jensen drewjensen.in...@gmail.com wrote:
 Frick - daily builds and yes it says 3.5 and yes I know that is really
 going to release as 4.0.


OK.  So generally speaking, when attempting to verify behavior that a
user sees, I wouldn't say that the issue does not exist on the basis
of testing done with unreleased code.  Certainly Gary was using a
released version of OpenOffice.  It is possible that it worked one way
in OOo 3.3.0 or AOO 3.4.x, and now works differently.

-Rob


 On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:

 On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Drew Jensen drewjensen.in...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Well, looks like it is not so easy to say that is wrong.
 
  Tried this again, except instead of using Linux, using AOO 3.5 on Windows
  and IE for the browser.
 

 There is no AOO 3.5.  What exactly are you running?  It should be
 listed in the Help/About box.

  With writer it just craps out and you get nothing usable. But with draw,
  yes the image is linked not embedded and I am absolutely sure I did a
 copy
  (image) not copy (address).
 
  //drew
 
 
  On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Drew Jensen drewjensen.in...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  Just read the article.
 
  The article does not sound correct, if memory serves, checked using AOO
  3.5.
 
  Sure enough, copy an image from a web site and paste into a writer
  document, the document has an embedded image, as I thought.
 
  My guess is that the author did not copy the image, he copied the
 location
  - common mistake.
 
  As for AOO, hard to expect it not to do what the user told it to do.
 
  Finally, checking for external links - isn't there already an extension
  that does that, I know there was lots of talk about creating one ...
 didn't
  find it with a quick search however.
 
  Ciao,
 
  //drew
 
 
 
  On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
 
  Have you seen this:
  http://fileformats.wordpress.com/2012/12/30/openoffice/ ???
 
  (I'm cc'ing the author of that blog post, Gary McGrath)
 
  This is from the perspective of a person interested in long-term
  preservation/archiving of documents.
 
  This looks like a feature that is working as designed, although it
  does obscure the fact that the image is linked, not embedded in this
  case.
 
  It might be worth having a web page, or a document, about best
  practices for creating documents in OpenOffice that are free of such
  external dependencies.   Could probably also use the ODF Toolkit to
  scan documents to identify such issues in a document.
 
  Regards,
 
  -Rob
 
 
 



Re: A preservation hazard in OpenOffice

2013-01-07 Thread Drew Jensen
Alright Rob.

back to the issue - it appears to be platform specific.

Checking again, w/ AOO (daily), under windows and using Chrome there is one
difference.
Copy/Paste to a writer document works - and it is linked, unless you select
copy special and then select bitmap.

Otherwise - I'll check the issue tracker about the win/ie/writer problem I
ran into and if it is not noted yet ad a issue.

Best wishes,

//drew


On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:

 On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Drew Jensen drewjensen.in...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Frick - daily builds and yes it says 3.5 and yes I know that is really
  going to release as 4.0.
 

 OK.  So generally speaking, when attempting to verify behavior that a
 user sees, I wouldn't say that the issue does not exist on the basis
 of testing done with unreleased code.  Certainly Gary was using a
 released version of OpenOffice.  It is possible that it worked one way
 in OOo 3.3.0 or AOO 3.4.x, and now works differently.

 -Rob

 
  On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
 
  On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Drew Jensen 
 drewjensen.in...@gmail.com
  wrote:
   Well, looks like it is not so easy to say that is wrong.
  
   Tried this again, except instead of using Linux, using AOO 3.5 on
 Windows
   and IE for the browser.
  
 
  There is no AOO 3.5.  What exactly are you running?  It should be
  listed in the Help/About box.
 
   With writer it just craps out and you get nothing usable. But with
 draw,
   yes the image is linked not embedded and I am absolutely sure I did a
  copy
   (image) not copy (address).
  
   //drew
  
  
   On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Drew Jensen 
 drewjensen.in...@gmail.com
  wrote:
  
   Just read the article.
  
   The article does not sound correct, if memory serves, checked using
 AOO
   3.5.
  
   Sure enough, copy an image from a web site and paste into a writer
   document, the document has an embedded image, as I thought.
  
   My guess is that the author did not copy the image, he copied the
  location
   - common mistake.
  
   As for AOO, hard to expect it not to do what the user told it to do.
  
   Finally, checking for external links - isn't there already an
 extension
   that does that, I know there was lots of talk about creating one ...
  didn't
   find it with a quick search however.
  
   Ciao,
  
   //drew
  
  
  
   On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
  
   Have you seen this:
   http://fileformats.wordpress.com/2012/12/30/openoffice/ ???
  
   (I'm cc'ing the author of that blog post, Gary McGrath)
  
   This is from the perspective of a person interested in long-term
   preservation/archiving of documents.
  
   This looks like a feature that is working as designed, although it
   does obscure the fact that the image is linked, not embedded in this
   case.
  
   It might be worth having a web page, or a document, about best
   practices for creating documents in OpenOffice that are free of such
   external dependencies.   Could probably also use the ODF Toolkit to
   scan documents to identify such issues in a document.
  
   Regards,
  
   -Rob
  
  
  
 



Re: A preservation hazard in OpenOffice

2013-01-07 Thread Drew Jensen
BTW - updated the windows vm to the latest snapshot build and the ie/writer
problem went away ;)


On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Joost Andrae joost.and...@gmx.de wrote:

 Hi,

 this is a great feature to be able to use linked images within documents
 eg. by dragging it from a browser into a document by using shift+ctrl. I
 answered this within the blog. If somebody has a problem with linked images
 within stored files then he/she can easily break these links by using
 /edit/links...

 Kind regards, Joost


 Am 07.01.2013 14:49, schrieb Rob Weir:

  Have you seen this:  http://fileformats.wordpress.**
 com/2012/12/30/openoffice/http://fileformats.wordpress.com/2012/12/30/openoffice/???

 (I'm cc'ing the author of that blog post, Gary McGrath)

 This is from the perspective of a person interested in long-term
 preservation/archiving of documents.

 This looks like a feature that is working as designed, although it
 does obscure the fact that the image is linked, not embedded in this
 case.





Re: A preservation hazard in OpenOffice

2013-01-07 Thread Andrea Pescetti

Joost Andrae wrote:

If somebody has a problem with linked
images within stored files then he/she can easily break these links by
using /edit/links...


Yes, this is the answer to the preservation hazard: just break links; 
and there are several macros and perhaps extensions around that just add 
a Break all links button to embed all images instead of linking to them.


That said, I think it would be quite reasonable (if there are no UX 
problems or major development problems) to do the opposite in OpenOffice 
4.0 and break links by default, since this happens to be the standard 
expectation many users have.


For the record, the relevant issue is
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=37652

Regards,
  Andrea.