Re: Bugzilla needs version 4.1.3 added

2016-10-20 Thread Marcus

Am 10/21/2016 12:26 AM, schrieb Pedro:

On 20/10/2016 19:05, Marcus wrote:

Am 10/20/2016 02:48 AM, schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:

Also what happened to 4.2.0-dev in the "Latest confirmation in:" field?


do we want to have dev-builds in this field? These builds are changing
day for day when using the install files from the build bots.


So if someone does use a master build (currently 4.2.0) and finds a bug
which version should be reported?
If people are not supposed to report bugs for daily builds what is the
point of having them uploaded to a public server?
If the goal of the buildbots is only to test if it is buildable, then
they only need to report success/failure.

Actually they are not changing daily... There hasn't been a successful
daily build (at least for Windows) for over a month (master or 4.1.x)


IMHO it doesn't make sense to be able to choose them as we then need
to ask everytime: Which x.y.z-dev version has been used?


People using daily builds are wise enough to report the Rev number (that
is why it is a selectable text in the About dialog). Day-to-day users
don't care about unstable daily builds and wouldn't install them anyway.


all corect. For this we have the "4.2.0-dev" item in the "Version" 
field. However, I think it doesn't make sense to offer "...-dev" items 
in the "Latest confirmation in" field.


Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Bugzilla needs version 4.1.3 added

2016-10-20 Thread Pedro

On 20/10/2016 19:05, Marcus wrote:

Am 10/20/2016 02:48 AM, schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:

Also what happened to 4.2.0-dev in the "Latest confirmation in:"  field?


do we want to have dev-builds in this field? These builds are changing 
day for day when using the install files from the build bots.


So if someone does use a master build (currently 4.2.0) and finds a bug 
which version should be reported?
If people are not supposed to report bugs for daily builds what is the 
point of having them uploaded to a public server?
If the goal of the buildbots is only to test if it is buildable, then 
they only need to report success/failure.


Actually they are not changing daily... There hasn't been a successful 
daily build (at least for Windows) for over a month (master or 4.1.x)


IMHO it doesn't make sense to be able to choose them as we then need 
to ask everytime: Which x.y.z-dev version has been used?


People using daily builds are wise enough to report the Rev number (that 
is why it is a selectable text in the About dialog). Day-to-day users 
don't care about unstable daily builds and wouldn't install them anyway.


Just my 2 cents.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Bugzilla needs version 4.1.3 added

2016-10-20 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Marcus  wrote:

> Am 10/20/2016 02:48 AM, schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
>
>> Also what happened to 4.2.0-dev in the "Latest confirmation in:"  field?
>>
>
> do we want to have dev-builds in this field? These builds are changing day
> for day when using the install files from the build bots.
>
> IMHO it doesn't make sense to be able to choose them as we then need to
> ask everytime: Which x.y.z-dev version has been used?
>
> My 2 ct.
>
>
>
Then I guess we should release more often - and release from closer to
trunk :-)


Re: Bugzilla needs version 4.1.3 added

2016-10-20 Thread Marcus

Am 10/20/2016 02:48 AM, schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:

Also what happened to 4.2.0-dev in the "Latest confirmation in:"  field?


do we want to have dev-builds in this field? These builds are changing 
day for day when using the install files from the build bots.


IMHO it doesn't make sense to be able to choose them as we then need to 
ask everytime: Which x.y.z-dev version has been used?


My 2 ct.

Marcus




On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 8:18 PM, Keith N. McKenna

Re: Bugzilla needs version 4.1.3 added

2016-10-19 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Also what happened to 4.2.0-dev in the "Latest confirmation in:"  field?


On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 8:18 PM, Keith N. McKenna  wrote:

> With the announcement of the Release of version 4.1.3 that revision
> should be added to Bugzilla so that bugs can be reported against it.
> Currently only 4.1.3-dev is active and for latest confirmation on the
> latest available is 4.1.2
>
> Regards
> Keith
>
>


Re: Bugzilla needs version 4.1.3 added

2016-10-14 Thread Marcus

Am 10/14/2016 01:19 AM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna:

Marcus wrote:

Am 10/13/2016 09:34 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna:

Marcus wrote:

Am 10/13/2016 08:18 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna:

With the announcement of the Release of version 4.1.3 that revision
should be added to Bugzilla so that bugs can be reported against it.
Currently only 4.1.3-dev is active and for latest confirmation on the
latest available is 4.1.2


right, I'll do this as next task. However, this needs definetely added
as important task to the cookbook. Will you do this?


Done


and BZ is also updated. :-)



The version drop down list for the Latest Confirmation In field also
needs to be updated with 4.1.3.


ACK, done.

Marcus




https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/How+to+Cook+a+Release


You just need to add some text. Don't care about formatting or order. We
will do this later when everything (hopefully ;-) ) is there.

Hey, it's a great idea when you would coordinate the creation of this
cookbook. Then you learn more about the whole process, can add opinions
from your point of view, etc.

What do you think?


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Bugzilla needs version 4.1.3 added

2016-10-14 Thread Matthias Seidel
+1 ;-)


Am 14.10.2016 um 01:19 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
> Marcus wrote:
>> Am 10/13/2016 09:34 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>>> Marcus wrote:
 Am 10/13/2016 08:18 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
> With the announcement of the Release of version 4.1.3 that revision
> should be added to Bugzilla so that bugs can be reported against it.
> Currently only 4.1.3-dev is active and for latest confirmation on the
> latest available is 4.1.2
 right, I'll do this as next task. However, this needs definetely added
 as important task to the cookbook. Will you do this?

>>> Done
>> and BZ is also updated. :-)
>>
> The version drop down list for the Latest Confirmation In field also
> needs to be updated with 4.1.3.
>
> Keith
>
>> Marcus
>>
>>
>>
 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/How+to+Cook+a+Release


 You just need to add some text. Don't care about formatting or order. We
 will do this later when everything (hopefully ;-) ) is there.

 Hey, it's a great idea when you would coordinate the creation of this
 cookbook. Then you learn more about the whole process, can add opinions
 from your point of view, etc.

 What do you think?
>




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: Bugzilla needs version 4.1.3 added

2016-10-13 Thread Keith N. McKenna
Marcus wrote:
> Am 10/13/2016 09:34 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>> Marcus wrote:
>>> Am 10/13/2016 08:18 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
 With the announcement of the Release of version 4.1.3 that revision
 should be added to Bugzilla so that bugs can be reported against it.
 Currently only 4.1.3-dev is active and for latest confirmation on the
 latest available is 4.1.2
>>>
>>> right, I'll do this as next task. However, this needs definetely added
>>> as important task to the cookbook. Will you do this?
>>>
>> Done
> 
> and BZ is also updated. :-)
> 

The version drop down list for the Latest Confirmation In field also
needs to be updated with 4.1.3.

Keith

> Marcus
> 
> 
> 
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/How+to+Cook+a+Release
>>>
>>>
>>> You just need to add some text. Don't care about formatting or order. We
>>> will do this later when everything (hopefully ;-) ) is there.
>>>
>>> Hey, it's a great idea when you would coordinate the creation of this
>>> cookbook. Then you learn more about the whole process, can add opinions
>>> from your point of view, etc.
>>>
>>> What do you think?




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Bugzilla needs version 4.1.3 added

2016-10-13 Thread Keith N. McKenna
Marcus wrote:
> Am 10/13/2016 09:34 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>> Marcus wrote:
>>> Am 10/13/2016 08:18 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
 With the announcement of the Release of version 4.1.3 that revision
 should be added to Bugzilla so that bugs can be reported against it.
 Currently only 4.1.3-dev is active and for latest confirmation on the
 latest available is 4.1.2
>>>
>>> right, I'll do this as next task. However, this needs definetely added
>>> as important task to the cookbook. Will you do this?
>>>
>> Done
> 
> and BZ is also updated. :-)
> 
> Marcus
> 
> 
> 
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/How+to+Cook+a+Release
>>>
>>>
>>> You just need to add some text. Don't care about formatting or order. We
>>> will do this later when everything (hopefully ;-) ) is there.
>>>
>>> Hey, it's a great idea when you would coordinate the creation of this
>>> cookbook. Then you learn more about the whole process, can add opinions
>>> from your point of view, etc.
>>>
>>> What do you think?
Great. Thanks Marcus.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Bugzilla needs version 4.1.3 added

2016-10-13 Thread Marcus

Am 10/13/2016 09:34 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna:

Marcus wrote:

Am 10/13/2016 08:18 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna:

With the announcement of the Release of version 4.1.3 that revision
should be added to Bugzilla so that bugs can be reported against it.
Currently only 4.1.3-dev is active and for latest confirmation on the
latest available is 4.1.2


right, I'll do this as next task. However, this needs definetely added
as important task to the cookbook. Will you do this?


Done


and BZ is also updated. :-)

Marcus




https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/How+to+Cook+a+Release

You just need to add some text. Don't care about formatting or order. We
will do this later when everything (hopefully ;-) ) is there.

Hey, it's a great idea when you would coordinate the creation of this
cookbook. Then you learn more about the whole process, can add opinions
from your point of view, etc.

What do you think?


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Bugzilla needs version 4.1.3 added

2016-10-13 Thread Keith N. McKenna
Marcus wrote:
> Am 10/13/2016 08:18 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>> With the announcement of the Release of version 4.1.3 that revision
>> should be added to Bugzilla so that bugs can be reported against it.
>> Currently only 4.1.3-dev is active and for latest confirmation on the
>> latest available is 4.1.2
> 
> right, I'll do this as next task. However, this needs definetely added
> as important task to the cookbook. Will you do this?
> 
Done

> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/How+to+Cook+a+Release
> 
> You just need to add some text. Don't care about formatting or order. We
> will do this later when everything (hopefully ;-) ) is there.
> 
> Hey, it's a great idea when you would coordinate the creation of this
> cookbook. Then you learn more about the whole process, can add opinions
> from your point of view, etc.
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Marcus




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Bugzilla needs version 4.1.3 added

2016-10-13 Thread Keith N. McKenna
Marcus wrote:
> Am 10/13/2016 08:18 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>> With the announcement of the Release of version 4.1.3 that revision
>> should be added to Bugzilla so that bugs can be reported against it.
>> Currently only 4.1.3-dev is active and for latest confirmation on the
>> latest available is 4.1.2
> 
> right, I'll do this as next task. However, this needs definetely added
> as important task to the cookbook. Will you do this?
> 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/How+to+Cook+a+Release
> 
> You just need to add some text. Don't care about formatting or order. We
> will do this later when everything (hopefully ;-) ) is there.
> 
> Hey, it's a great idea when you would coordinate the creation of this
> cookbook. Then you learn more about the whole process, can add opinions
> from your point of view, etc.
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Marcus
Can do for both.

Keith



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Bugzilla needs version 4.1.3 added

2016-10-13 Thread Marcus

Am 10/13/2016 08:18 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna:

With the announcement of the Release of version 4.1.3 that revision
should be added to Bugzilla so that bugs can be reported against it.
Currently only 4.1.3-dev is active and for latest confirmation on the
latest available is 4.1.2


right, I'll do this as next task. However, this needs definetely added 
as important task to the cookbook. Will you do this?


https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/How+to+Cook+a+Release

You just need to add some text. Don't care about formatting or order. We 
will do this later when everything (hopefully ;-) ) is there.


Hey, it's a great idea when you would coordinate the creation of this 
cookbook. Then you learn more about the whole process, can add opinions 
from your point of view, etc.


What do you think?

Thanks

Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Bugzilla needs version 4.1.3 added

2016-10-13 Thread Keith N. McKenna
With the announcement of the Release of version 4.1.3 that revision
should be added to Bugzilla so that bugs can be reported against it.
Currently only 4.1.3-dev is active and for latest confirmation on the
latest available is 4.1.2

Regards
Keith



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature