On 13/10/20 Carl Marcum wrote:
Error: ERROR: More than one new package in directory
Using the
--with-epm-url=http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/epm-3.7.tar.gz
rather than the installed newer version worked for me.
Thank you Jim and Carl, I've added a note to the wiki
On 10/12/20 6:37 AM, Carl Marcum wrote:
Hi All,
On 10/11/20 6:31 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I do know that there were some changes in the official EPM (the
project is now "dead") which may have caused this, but I'm not sure.
FTR: I have used the old, old 3.7 version for the Linux builds. I
Hi All,
On 10/11/20 6:31 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I do know that there were some changes in the official EPM (the project is now
"dead") which may have caused this, but I'm not sure.
FTR: I have used the old, old 3.7 version for the Linux builds. I consider it a
build system variable that I
> On Oct 11, 2020, at 5:48 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> Am 11.10.20 um 23:31 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>> The code checks if it is a git repo and falls back to the assumption it is a
>> svn repo. I am not sure if there is a default.
>> It is a script called svnrevision I
I do know that there were some changes in the official EPM (the project is now
"dead") which may have caused this, but I'm not sure.
FTR: I have used the old, old 3.7 version for the Linux builds. I consider it a
build system variable that I did not want to modify... :)
> On Oct 11, 2020, at
Hi Peter,
Am 11.10.20 um 23:31 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> The code checks if it is a git repo and falls back to the assumption it is a
> svn repo. I am not sure if there is a default.
> It is a script called svnrevision I think.
Andrea is talking about the source tarball here.
Formerly if you
The code checks if it is a git repo and falls back to the assumption it is a
svn repo. I am not sure if there is a default.
It is a script called svnrevision I think.
Am 11. Oktober 2020 23:25:44 MESZ schrieb Don Lewis :
>On 11 Oct, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>> I've built the 4.1.8-RC2 sources
On 11 Oct, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> I've built the 4.1.8-RC2 sources from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.8-RC2/source/
> on a new CentOS 7 VM and generated "installed" (not packaged), RPM and
> DEB builds that I tested on a variety of Fedora and Ubuntu systems.
>
> All
I've built the 4.1.8-RC2 sources from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.8-RC2/source/
on a new CentOS 7 VM and generated "installed" (not packaged), RPM and
DEB builds that I tested on a variety of Fedora and Ubuntu systems.
All good, for the most part. I'm still catching
