Re: Critique of the Help/About box

2013-05-19 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 17/05/2013 Jürgen Schmidt wrote: 1. default version if vendor is Apache Software Foundation http://people.apache.org/~jsc/screenshots/About_default.png 2. if the vendor is somebody else http://people.apache.org/~jsc/screenshots/About_vendor.png ... the portion copyright... in 2 should be

Re: Critique of the Help/About box

2013-05-17 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 5/13/13 9:24 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 5/9/13 9:11 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 02:11:31PM -0400, Rob Weir wrote: It can still have some meaning: suppose someone in the ecosystem is building custom versions of AOO for their customers, they may want to

Re: Critique of the Help/About box

2013-05-17 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 5/17/13 6:03 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 5/13/13 9:24 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 5/9/13 9:11 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 02:11:31PM -0400, Rob Weir wrote: It can still have some meaning: suppose someone in the ecosystem is building custom versions of AOO for

Re: Critique of the Help/About box

2013-05-17 Thread Rob Weir
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote: On 5/13/13 9:24 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 5/9/13 9:11 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 02:11:31PM -0400, Rob Weir wrote: It can still have some meaning: suppose someone in the ecosystem is

Re: Critique of the Help/About box

2013-05-17 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 06:03:25PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: 1. default version if vendor is Apache Software Foundation http://people.apache.org/~jsc/screenshots/About_default.png 2. if the vendor is somebody else http://people.apache.org/~jsc/screenshots/About_vendor.png Looks like

Re: Critique of the Help/About box

2013-05-15 Thread Kevin Grignon
KG01 - see comments at base On May 10, 2013, at 1:40 AM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 05/09/2013 07:33 PM, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile: On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 07:21:49PM +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 05/09/2013 06:34 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: I wonder if we can make this be

Re: Critique of the Help/About box

2013-05-13 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 5/9/13 9:11 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 02:11:31PM -0400, Rob Weir wrote: It can still have some meaning: suppose someone in the ecosystem is building custom versions of AOO for their customers, they may want to configure with --with-vendor; they can even

Critique of the Help/About box

2013-05-09 Thread Rob Weir
I wonder if we can make this be more rational? For example, the About box currently says: Copyright © 2012 Apache Software Foundation. All rights reserved. That needs to be changed to 2013, right? It also says, This product was created by Apache Software Foundation, based on Apache OpenOffice.

Re: Critique of the Help/About box

2013-05-09 Thread janI
On May 9, 2013 6:34 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: I wonder if we can make this be more rational? For example, the About box currently says: Copyright © 2012 Apache Software Foundation. All rights reserved. That needs to be changed to 2013, right? +1 It also says, This product

Re: Critique of the Help/About box

2013-05-09 Thread Rob Weir
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:50 PM, janI j...@apache.org wrote: On May 9, 2013 6:34 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: I wonder if we can make this be more rational? For example, the About box currently says: Copyright © 2012 Apache Software Foundation. All rights reserved. That needs to

Re: Critique of the Help/About box

2013-05-09 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 05/09/2013 06:34 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: I wonder if we can make this be more rational? For example, the About box currently says: Copyright © 2012 Apache Software Foundation. All rights reserved. That needs to be changed to 2013, right? If you aren't happy to change this every year, just

Re: Critique of the Help/About box

2013-05-09 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
Hi Rob, On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 12:34:25PM -0400, Rob Weir wrote: I wonder if we can make this be more rational? For example, the About box currently says: Copyright © 2012 Apache Software Foundation. All rights reserved. That needs to be changed to 2013, right? Yes, please open a bug

Re: Critique of the Help/About box

2013-05-09 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 07:21:49PM +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 05/09/2013 06:34 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: I wonder if we can make this be more rational? For example, the About box currently says: Copyright © 2012 Apache Software Foundation. All rights reserved. That needs to be changed to

Re: Critique of the Help/About box

2013-05-09 Thread Rob Weir
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org wrote: Hi Rob, On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 12:34:25PM -0400, Rob Weir wrote: I wonder if we can make this be more rational? For example, the About box currently says: Copyright © 2012 Apache Software Foundation. All

Re: Critique of the Help/About box

2013-05-09 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 05/09/2013 08:11 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org wrote: Hi Rob, On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 12:34:25PM -0400, Rob Weir wrote: I wonder if we can make this be more rational? For example, the About box currently says: Copyright ©

Re: Critique of the Help/About box

2013-05-09 Thread Rob Weir
Here's BZ issue for the copyright statement update to 2013: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122265 -Rob On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: I wonder if we can make this be more rational? For example, the About box currently says: Copyright © 2012

Re: Critique of the Help/About box

2013-05-09 Thread Donald Whytock
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Yes, build time of course. Otherwise 4.0 could be a current version forever. ;-) Marcus Might yet be if no one gets around to putting out 4.1...

Re: Critique of the Help/About box

2013-05-09 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Rob Weir wrote: On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:50 PM, janI wrote: we should consider having the license en+local for national versions, with a note that the local version is a translation and the en version dominates. reasoning, our translators are not laywers and may unvolunterely change the