Hi Don,
Am 05.02.19 um 03:36 schrieb Don Lewis:
> On 3 Feb, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Thanks Peter,
>>
>> Am 03.02.19 um 10:31 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>>> Bump this topic. As we are aproaching a new version, can we try this?
>> We should try to incorporate this in trunk.
>>
>> In my opinion it
On 3 Feb, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Thanks Peter,
>
> Am 03.02.19 um 10:31 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>> Bump this topic. As we are aproaching a new version, can we try this?
>
> We should try to incorporate this in trunk.
>
> In my opinion it would be a win-win situation for both projects
When I
Thanks Peter,
Am 03.02.19 um 10:31 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> Bump this topic. As we are aproaching a new version, can we try this?
We should try to incorporate this in trunk.
In my opinion it would be a win-win situation for both projects
Regards,
Matthias
>
> On 20.12.18 19:35, Matthias
Bump this topic. As we are aproaching a new version, can we try this?
On 20.12.18 19:35, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Branko,
>
> Am 11.12.18 um 21:12 schrieb Branko Čibej:
>> On 15.11.2018 21:17, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>> On 15.11.2018 20:28, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Hi Pedro,
Am
Hi Branko,
Am 11.12.18 um 21:12 schrieb Branko Čibej:
> On 15.11.2018 21:17, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 15.11.2018 20:28, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> Hi Pedro,
>>>
>>> Am 13.11.18 um 23:20 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> On November 13, 2018 at 10:08 PM Andrea Pescetti
> wrote:
> 2. All WebDAV
On 15.11.2018 21:17, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 15.11.2018 20:28, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi Pedro,
>>
>> Am 13.11.18 um 23:20 schrieb Pedro Lino:
On November 13, 2018 at 10:08 PM Andrea Pescetti
wrote:
2. All WebDAV operations. You can find somewhere in Bugzilla a patch
On 15.11.2018 20:28, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Pedro,
>
> Am 13.11.18 um 23:20 schrieb Pedro Lino:
>>> On November 13, 2018 at 10:08 PM Andrea Pescetti
>>> wrote:
>>> 2. All WebDAV operations. You can find somewhere in Bugzilla a patch
>>> that didn't make it to 4.1.2 due to excessive
Hi Pedro,
Am 13.11.18 um 23:20 schrieb Pedro Lino:
>> On November 13, 2018 at 10:08 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>> 2. All WebDAV operations. You can find somewhere in Bugzilla a patch
>> that didn't make it to 4.1.2 due to excessive complexity (build
>> requirements). The Serf upgrade was meant
Yea platform specific code should be avoided. But in my humble opinion that is
not an issue of the build system itself but of suboptimal usage.
Thanks for your view! :)
Am 14. November 2018 13:08:21 MEZ schrieb "Branko Čibej" :
>On 14.11.2018 08:16, Peter kovacs wrote:
>> How about trying to
> On Nov 13, 2018, at 4:40 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>
>
> That's OK, any kind of testing, even with OO trunk, would be welcome.
> The only other Serf consumer I can test is Subversion, adding even one
> more would make out real-life testing increase by 100%. :)
>
OT: IMO, Serf would have a
On 14.11.2018 08:16, Peter kovacs wrote:
> How about trying to open an URL as a test case?
>
> Is serf moving away from SCONs?
I surely hope so.
> I ask since we want to move to SCONs. An experience exchange would be great.
Well ... SCons looks amazingly good in tiny examples, but when it comes
How about trying to open an URL as a test case?
Is serf moving away from SCONs? I ask since we want to move to SCONs. An
experience exchange would be great.
All the best
Peter
Am 13. November 2018 22:43:03 MEZ schrieb Matthias Seidel
:
>Hi Andrea,
>
>Am 13.11.18 um 22:23 schrieb Andrea
> On November 13, 2018 at 10:08 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> 2. All WebDAV operations. You can find somewhere in Bugzilla a patch
> that didn't make it to 4.1.2 due to excessive complexity (build
> requirements). The Serf upgrade was meant to supplement WebDAV fixes in
> 4.1.2.
>
> So you
Matthias Seidel wrote:
I forgot to mention that I indeed build with trunk. And the build is
still going on, so anything can happen... ;-)
The current lack of time only allows me to contribute with memories from
the past when I was actually able to do stuff... but if I recall
correctly there
Hi Andrea,
Am 13.11.18 um 22:23 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> I think it would be a good idea to upgrade Serf in our builds.
>> What about the others (real developers)? ;-)
>
> Years ago, we had to avoid upgrading Serf in 4.1.x as Serf had started
> to require SCons for the
On 13.11.2018 22:23, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> I think it would be a good idea to upgrade Serf in our builds.
>> What about the others (real developers)? ;-)
>
> Years ago, we had to avoid upgrading Serf in 4.1.x as Serf had started
> to require SCons for the build and we
Matthias Seidel wrote:
I think it would be a good idea to upgrade Serf in our builds.
What about the others (real developers)? ;-)
Years ago, we had to avoid upgrading Serf in 4.1.x as Serf had started
to require SCons for the build and we didn't want to introduce yet
another build system
On 13.11.2018 21:49, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Branko, Hi all,
>
> Am 13.11.18 um 12:39 schrieb Branko Čibej:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm writing here because I believe OpenOffice uses Serf as its HTTP
>> client; at least I did find version 1.2.1 mentioned in the patch files
>> in ext_libraries/serf.
>
Hi Branko, Hi all,
Am 13.11.18 um 12:39 schrieb Branko Čibej:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm writing here because I believe OpenOffice uses Serf as its HTTP
> client; at least I did find version 1.2.1 mentioned in the patch files
> in ext_libraries/serf.
It is even mentioned on your project page. ;-)
> I
Hi all,
I'm writing here because I believe OpenOffice uses Serf as its HTTP
client; at least I did find version 1.2.1 mentioned in the patch files
in ext_libraries/serf.
I would like to ask for help from the OpenOffice developers to test the
next release of Serf. We — the Apache Serf project —
20 matches
Mail list logo
