Re: Fwd: [HEADSUP] Phasing out old Windows versions and 32 bit support

Hi Arrigo, Am 30.10.21 um 15:22 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: > Hello Matthias, All, > > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 09:05:52PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote: > >> Hi Arrigo, >> >> Am 28.10.21 um 22:11 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: >>> Hello Matthias, All, >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 09:13:05PM +0200, Ma

Re: Fwd: [HEADSUP] Phasing out old Windows versions and 32 bit support

Hello Matthias, All, On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 09:05:52PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Arrigo, > > Am 28.10.21 um 22:11 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: > > Hello Matthias, All, > > > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 09:13:05PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> one positive effect

Re: Fwd: [HEADSUP] Phasing out old Windows versions and 32 bit support

Hi Arrigo, Am 28.10.21 um 22:11 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: > Hello Matthias, All, > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 09:13:05PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> one positive effect of Cygwin 3.3.0 seems to be that I can build with >> threads again! > That would be _very_ good! Indeed! > >>

Re: Fwd: [HEADSUP] Phasing out old Windows versions and 32 bit support

Hello Matthias, All, On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 09:13:05PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi all, > > one positive effect of Cygwin 3.3.0 seems to be that I can build with > threads again! That would be _very_ good! > That saves me a lot of hours. I am building AOO42X right now... > > @Arrigo:

Re: Fwd: [HEADSUP] Phasing out old Windows versions and 32 bit support

Hi all, one positive effect of Cygwin 3.3.0 seems to be that I can build with threads again! That saves me a lot of hours. I am building AOO42X right now... @Arrigo: Can you try AOO41X? Regards,    Matthias Am 28.10.21 um 15:24 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi Pedro, > > Am 28.10.21 um 15:06 sch

Re: Fwd: [HEADSUP] Phasing out old Windows versions and 32 bit support

Hi Pedro, Am 28.10.21 um 15:06 schrieb Pedro Lino: > Hi Matthias > > Not wanting to disregard Damjan's effort, wouldn't it be better if people who > can fix issues would focus on 4.2.x? Of course that would be better, but then we should start to fix the years old release blocker. I am +1 for re

Re: Fwd: [HEADSUP] Phasing out old Windows versions and 32 bit support

Hi Matthias Not wanting to disregard Damjan's effort, wouldn't it be better if people who can fix issues would focus on 4.2.x? I assume Cygwin 3.3.0 will be supported for some time, so we should use that time to focus on 4.2.x? Regards, Pedro > On 10/28/2021 1:57 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: >

Re: Fwd: [HEADSUP] Phasing out old Windows versions and 32 bit support

Hi all, Cygwin 3.3.0 will be available soon and it will be the last 32-bit version we can build AOO41X with. I remember, that Damjan longer ago posted a list of commits to make AOO41X buildable with Cygwin64. Can we have a look at it? Regards,    Matthias Am 27.10.21 um 18:25 schrieb Matthias

Re: Fwd: [HEADSUP] Phasing out old Windows versions and 32 bit support

Hi Pedro, This is not about a 64-bit version of AOO but about building AOO with Cygwin 64-bit. AOO41x needs Cygwin32 at the moment, trunk/AOO42X are already built with Cygwin64. Regards,    Matthias Am 27.10.21 um 18:16 schrieb Pedro Lino: > Hi Matthias > > I agree. Providing 64-bit Windows bi

Re: Fwd: [HEADSUP] Phasing out old Windows versions and 32 bit support

Hi Matthias I agree. Providing 64-bit Windows binaries must be the #1 priority for this Project (not because they are needed or better than the 32-bit builds but because they will not be supported by the compilers or the OS) This will also solve the problem of having to suggest the installation

Fwd: [HEADSUP] Phasing out old Windows versions and 32 bit support

Hi all, Looks like we need to get building AOO41X for Windows on Cygwin64 or get out AOO42X. Whatever comes first... ;-) Regards,    Matthias Weitergeleitete Nachricht Betreff:[HEADSUP] Phasing out old Windows versions and 32 bit support Datum: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 10: