From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@gmail.com]
I believe a decision like the one in Berlin is always political
motivated. See for example the upcoming discussion about the
same topic
in Munich after changes in the administration.
You're absolutely right, but what can we do about it?
On 24/10/14 07:54, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
Hello,
From: Andreas Säger [mailto:saege...@t-online.de]
Being a customer, I do see things differently.
Every OOXML file is a vote against ODF.
theoretically correct, but practically?
One day in future LO will save ODF as a secondary
option.
Dňa 24.10.2014 o 09:59 Jürgen Schmidt napísal(a):
On 24/10/14 07:54, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
Hello,
From: Andreas Säger [mailto:saege...@t-online.de]
Being a customer, I do see things differently.
Every OOXML file is a vote against ODF.
theoretically correct, but practically?
One day in
Am 24.10.2014 um 09:59 schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
On 24/10/14 07:54, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
Hello,
For example:
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Berliner-Finanzaemter-wechseln-zurueck-auf-Microsoft-Office-2430961.html
I believe a decision like the one in Berlin is always political
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Jörg Schmidt joe...@j-m-schmidt.de wrote:
Hello,
From: Andreas Säger [mailto:saege...@t-online.de]
Being a customer, I do see things differently.
Every OOXML file is a vote against ODF.
theoretically correct, but practically?
One day in future LO will
On 10/24/2014 01:54 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
But where is the problem? Either OOXML *is* ISO standard or is not
ISO-standard. If the problem is however that MS is 'meddling' in the
standard, then it is a political issue that requires policy responses
- not a question of software development.
orcnote below.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Douglas Pitonyak [mailto:and...@pitonyak.org]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 06:18
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: OpenOffice lost again 6000 users (was: Improved OOXML support?)
On 10/24/2014 01:54 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote
On 10/24/2014 11:42 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
orcnote below.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Douglas Pitonyak [mailto:and...@pitonyak.org]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 06:18
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: OpenOffice lost again 6000 users (was: Improved OOXML support
orcnote below.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Douglas Pitonyak [mailto:and...@pitonyak.org]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 17:27
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Spam (9.566):Re: OpenOffice lost again 6000 users (was: Improved OOXML
support?)
On 10/24/2014 11:42 AM, Dennis E
OOXML
support?)
On 10/24/2014 11:42 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
orcnote below.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Douglas Pitonyak [mailto:and...@pitonyak.org]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 06:18
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: OpenOffice lost again 6000 users (was: Improved
Do you know off hand if this is through OLE or some other mechanism?
I have been handed a docx files with something embedded inside that
prevents viewing because I do not happen to have that particular
application installed on my computer.
On 10/25/2014 12:50 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Hello,
From: Andreas Säger [mailto:saege...@t-online.de]
Being a customer, I do see things differently.
Every OOXML file is a vote against ODF.
theoretically correct, but practically?
One day in future LO will save ODF as a secondary
option.
Possible.
But where is the problem?
12 matches
Mail list logo