> -Original Message-
> From: Jörg Schmidt [mailto:joe...@j-m-schmidt.de]
> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2021 6:39 AM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: RE: A free project does not need distorting propaganda
>
> Hello Pedro,
>
> > -Original Mes
Hello *,
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Phipps [mailto:si...@webmink.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2021 12:42 AM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: A free project does not need distorting propaganda
> The code demonstrably has starting points that are 30 year
Hello Pedro,
> -Original Message-
> From: Pedro Lino [mailto:pedro.l...@mailbox.org.INVALID]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2021 11:31 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: A free project does not need distorting propaganda
>
> Hi Joerg
>
> &
Hi!
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 9:38 PM Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>
> Any claim that a continuous code base down to StarWriter for DOS could
> exist is technically and factually absurd, because there is no technical
> continuation of the DOS code base of Starwriter and also the code base at
> the
Hi Joerg
> On 08/18/2021 8:46 PM Jörg Schmidt wrote:
> I hereby ask to remove the distorting statement from the page
> https://live.froscon.de/partner/openoffice again.
I don't see any mention to StarOffice so correcting the sentence to "20 years"
instead of 30 would solve the problem?
Hello,
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Phipps [mailto:si...@webmink.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2021 10:03 PM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: A free project does not need distorting propaganda
>
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 8:46 PM Jörg Schm
Hi!
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 8:46 PM Jörg Schmidt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> to my dismay I read, from a PMC member, on users...@openoffice.apache.org
> that they are trying to mix up our free OpenOffice with the former
> proprietary StarWriter. Obviously purely for the sake of show and obviously
>
