Hi Raphael,
I am not sure if you forgot to write something? ;-)
Matthias
Am 20.05.2017 um 20:52 schrieb Raphael Bircher:
> Am .05.2017, 12:30 Uhr, schrieb Matthias Seidel
> :
>
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> That is alright with me...
>>
>> ...if we start working on a 4.2.0 branch as soon as possible! ;-)
>>
Am .05.2017, 12:30 Uhr, schrieb Matthias Seidel
:
Hi Jim,
That is alright with me...
...if we start working on a 4.2.0 branch as soon as possible! ;-)
Regards, Matthias
Am 17.05.2017 um 17:36 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
My plan is to hold off on accepting this...
On May 3, 2017, at 2:36 PM,
Hi Jim,
That is alright with me...
...if we start working on a 4.2.0 branch as soon as possible! ;-)
Regards, Matthias
Am 17.05.2017 um 17:36 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> My plan is to hold off on accepting this...
>
>> On May 3, 2017, at 2:36 PM, Marcus wrote:
>>
>> Am 03.05.2017 um 11:54 schri
My plan is to hold off on accepting this...
> On May 3, 2017, at 2:36 PM, Marcus wrote:
>
> Am 03.05.2017 um 11:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> An installer for Windows (and macOS) with an outdated ASF logo is
>> "broken" (in my eyes) ;-)
>>
>> 80% of our downloads are for Windows, 15% for macO
Just out of curiosity, I built the 4.1.4 branch locally with the updated
graphics for Windows.
First step was en-US and de. Later I will add pt and jp.
As expected there were no building problems, installation went fine and
functionality is normal.
Regards, Matthias
Am 03.05.2017 um 23:17 schrie
OK, let's keep this update small and simple.
I can "patch" those 2 graphics easily myself... ;-)
Matthias
Am 03.05.2017 um 23:17 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
> On 5/3/2017 2:36 PM, Marcus wrote:
>> Am 03.05.2017 um 11:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> An installer for Windows (and macOS) with an out
On 5/3/2017 2:36 PM, Marcus wrote:
> Am 03.05.2017 um 11:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> An installer for Windows (and macOS) with an outdated ASF logo is
>> "broken" (in my eyes) ;-)
>>
>> 80% of our downloads are for Windows, 15% for macOS. They should see the
>> new logo!
>
> the logos are visib
Obviously nobody looks at the splash screen, since the wrong URL has
been there for about 4 years now... ;-)
(When the splash screen was redesigned, the same URL was put in it again)
So I think now it is time for a change and to close this bug.
The ASF logos are also visible during installation on
Am 03.05.2017 um 13:45 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
I can't add a Target Milestone of 4.1.4 for BZ issue:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127253
strange, it wasn't existing for the "Installation" product but for
others. I've now added it. Please test if it works for you.
Marcus
Am 03.05.2017 um 11:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
An installer for Windows (and macOS) with an outdated ASF logo is
"broken" (in my eyes) ;-)
80% of our downloads are for Windows, 15% for macOS. They should see the
new logo!
the logos are visible just at 2 places:
- splash screen
--> With the mo
I can't add a Target Milestone of 4.1.4 for BZ issue:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127253
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.a
An installer for Windows (and macOS) with an outdated ASF logo is
"broken" (in my eyes) ;-)
80% of our downloads are for Windows, 15% for macOS. They should see the
new logo!
Apart from that, no code! Just some graphics...
Matthias
Am 03.05.2017 um 00:11 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 02.05.2017 um 23:51
Am 02.05.2017 um 23:51 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 02.05.2017 um 13:42 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
On Mar 22, 2017, at 8:43 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
If we decide to get the new ASF logos for the installer, we should also
update the setup icons for Windows/macOS and the Intro/About Dialog. But
th
Am 02.05.2017 um 13:42 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> On Mar 22, 2017, at 8:43 AM, Matthias Seidel
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Raphael,
>>
>> Thank you for your effort!
>> Hopefully Ariel will still be able to assist, but it is really time for a
>> 4.1.4 RC.
>>
>> May I suggest that these "release blocker" sh
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On May 2, 2017, at 7:42 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127341
(Update bundled dictionaries for AOO 4.1.4 release)
+1 as well...
r1784925 r1784961 r1785175 r1793216
Backported to 4.1.4...
It seems the Bugzilla bot was confused and d
Jim Jagielski wrote:
FWIW, I've kicked off a CentOS5.11 x64 build on my VM.
My CentOS 64 builds are online and confirmed to be working by others who
use it for daily tasks (see archives of this list, or just ask if you
need a link). Unless you see a reason for making alternate ones, I think
Am 02.05.2017 um 22:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Since I'm not doing a Windows build, I assume we don't need to install
> it and have it part of the SVN tag??
I am not so familiar with the procedure, but that sounds reasonable.
So whoever does the Windows builds has to make sure to include
msvcr10
Since I'm not doing a Windows build, I assume we don't need to install
it and have it part of the SVN tag??
> On May 2, 2017, at 3:35 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Am 02.05.2017 um 21:17 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> On May 2, 2017, at 3:01 PM, Matthias Seidel
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Jim,
>>>
Am 02.05.2017 um 21:17 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> On May 2, 2017, at 3:01 PM, Matthias Seidel
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127176#c24
>>
>> We only have to make sure, that we bundle the most recent msvcr100.dll
>> (32bit) for the windows build.
>> (see: .
> On May 2, 2017, at 3:01 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127176#c24
>
> We only have to make sure, that we bundle the most recent msvcr100.dll
> (32bit) for the windows build.
> (see: .../main/external/msvcp100/README_msvcX100.dll.txt)
Hi Jim,
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127176#c24
We only have to make sure, that we bundle the most recent msvcr100.dll
(32bit) for the windows build.
(see: .../main/external/msvcp100/README_msvcX100.dll.txt)
Regards, Matthias
P.S.: I will come back later with a full list of commits
Went OK... Will now kick off a x32 build...
These are test builds, since we still have 2 backports pending::
> On Mar 22, 2017, at 8:43 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Raphael,
>
> Thank you for your effort!
> Hopefully Ariel will still be able to assist, but it is really time for a
> 4.
> On May 2, 2017, at 7:42 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>>
>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127341
>> (Update bundled dictionaries for AOO 4.1.4 release)
>>
>
> +1 as well...
>
> r1784925 r1784961 r1785175 r1793216
>
Backported to 4.1.4...
--
FWIW, I've kicked off a CentOS5.11 x64 build on my VM.
I've updated the wiki build page
(https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step)
with some updates, most due to CentOS5 is now EOL and some urls
have changed. Plus, I needed to manually install File::Path
I have 2 CentOS5 VMs setup, one 32bit the other 64. Is anyone else on task
for doing 4.1.4 build for these platforms or should I give it a go?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands
> On Mar 22, 2017, at 8:43 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Raphael,
>
> Thank you for your effort!
> Hopefully Ariel will still be able to assist, but it is really time for a
> 4.1.4 RC.
>
> May I suggest that these "release blocker" should also be merged:
>
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/
I've confirmed that except for the '-with-build-version' param, all configure
options and params for 4.1.4 (and, fwiw, 4.1.3) are the same as was done for
4.1.2... I have gone ahead modified '-with-build-version', have committed the
script[1], and will use it.
1.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/open
Am 02.04.2017 um 19:25 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> On 20/03/2017 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>> I think I can provide
>> proper Linux-64 builds from the AOO414 branch matching the 4.1.3
>> specifications (this won't happen before end of March).
>
> I've built the current state of the AOO414 branch (again
On 20/03/2017 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
I think I can provide
proper Linux-64 builds from the AOO414 branch matching the 4.1.3
specifications (this won't happen before end of March).
I've built the current state of the AOO414 branch (again, this is not a
Release Candidate) for all languages for t
Am 02.04.2017 um 14:52 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
>>
>> "The builds linked on this page are intended to be used for *final
>> testing* of release candidates by community volunteers."
>> But th
Matthias Seidel wrote:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
"The builds linked on this page are intended to be used for *final
testing* of release candidates by community volunteers."
But the "Buildbot output area" links to a page with snapshots for AOO
Hi Andrea,
Thanks for the clarification!
I found this page:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
"The builds linked on this page are intended to be used for *final
testing* of release candidates by community volunteers."
But the "Buildbot output area
On 27/03/2017 Jim Jagielski wrote:
My AOO 4.1.4 builds are ready for upload.
Thanks! I've addressed the "where to upload" question separately. Note:
these are best defined as AOO414 (this is a name of a branch, not of a
product) builds since we are still not close to RC stage for OpenOffice
On 30/03/2017 Matthias Seidel wrote:
Unfortunately there is no location for RC described in our cWiki:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/How+to+Cook+a+Release
Definitely a point that should be added...
This is one of the processes where OpenOffice simply behaves as a normal
Hi Jim,
Unfortunately there is no location for RC described in our cWiki:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/How+to+Cook+a+Release
Definitely a point that should be added...
Regards, Matthias
P.S.: Did you also build 4.2.0?
Am 30.03.2017 um 14:54 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> O
> On Mar 27, 2017, at 1:17 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> My AOO 4.1.4 builds are ready for upload.
>
Just need a location to drop 'em off at :)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional co
My AOO 4.1.4 builds are ready for upload.
Configure settings were:
LANGS="ast bg ca ca-XR ca-XV cs da de el en-GB en-US es eu fi fr gd gl he hi hu
it ja kid km ko lt nb nl pl pt pt-BR ru sk sl sr sv ta th tr vi zh-CN zh-TW"
./configure \
--with-build-version="$(date +"%Y-%m-%d %H:%M")
Hi Andrea,
Am 24.03.2017 um 01:05 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> On 22/03/2017 Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hopefully Ariel will still be able to assist, but it is really time for
>> a 4.1.4 RC.
>
> I hope so too, so I would still wait for him as the (currently)
> appointed Release Manager to have the l
On 22/03/2017 Matthias Seidel wrote:
Hopefully Ariel will still be able to assist, but it is really time for
a 4.1.4 RC.
I hope so too, so I would still wait for him as the (currently)
appointed Release Manager to have the last word on blocker issues. This
doesn't stop anybody from going on a
Hi Jim, *
That's ok, I think. Andrea told that he would have the builds not befor
end march. And I'm happy if I have my Windows builds on Monday too.
Regards, Raphael
Am .03.2017, 12:59 Uhr, schrieb Jim Jagielski :
I can have this complete and uploaded by this Monday if that's OK...
I am c
I can have this complete and uploaded by this Monday if that's OK...
I am currently traveling and my AOO build system isn't accessible
from where I am.
> On Mar 22, 2017, at 7:52 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>
>> On Mar 21, 2017, at 9:49 AM, Raphael Bircher
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Is there someone
Hi Raphael,
Thank you for your effort!
Hopefully Ariel will still be able to assist, but it is really time for
a 4.1.4 RC.
May I suggest that these "release blocker" should also be merged:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127253
(Update the banners with the new ASF Logo)
https://bz.apa
Hi all
Am .03.2017, 12:52 Uhr, schrieb Jim Jagielski :
On Mar 21, 2017, at 9:49 AM, Raphael Bircher
wrote:
Is there someone who can do Mac OS X?
As mentioned previously, I can. In fact, I have, but it was not
a full-distclean rebuild, so will do again, just to make sure.
Once done, w
> On Mar 21, 2017, at 9:49 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote:
>
>
> Is there someone who can do Mac OS X?
>
As mentioned previously, I can. In fact, I have, but it was not
a full-distclean rebuild, so will do again, just to make sure.
Once done, will upload. Suggested upload locations appreciated :)
Raphael Bircher wrote:
Is there someone who can do Mac OS X?
And Linux 32bit?
Linux 32-bit is not substantially different from the 64-bit case (even
if it needs to be done on a 32-bit virtual machine). I can probably
setup a VM for Linux 32-bit too, further in April.
That said, Linux 32-bit
Hi all
Am .03.2017, 23:42 Uhr, schrieb Andrea Pescetti :
Raphael Bircher wrote:
@Ariel please give a comment, if you are able to create the Release or
not. If not, I'm willing to volunteer as release manager.
More than a Release Manager we need builds. Can you put builds online
for people
Raphael Bircher wrote:
@Ariel please give a comment, if you are able to create the Release or
not. If not, I'm willing to volunteer as release manager.
More than a Release Manager we need builds. Can you put builds online
for people to test? Even though it is (deliberately) complex to do so,
47 matches
Mail list logo