Re: Release coordination proposal

On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Am 07/23/2013 02:46 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> >> >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Kay Schenk >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Rob Weir wrote: >>

Re: Release coordination proposal

Am 07/23/2013 02:46 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Rob Weir wrote: Can we do something like this? Two stage: release and announce. Release == put the 4.0

Re: Release coordination proposal

Am 07/23/2013 10:48 AM, schrieb Hagar Delest: I don't understand: the banner on the AOO website says that 4.0 has been released but there is no download link. Going manually to Sourceforge still leads to 3.4.1. I've fixed the defaults on SourceForge while the day. Pssst, don't tell my boss. ;-

Re: Release coordination proposal

OK, works fine now. Maybe a cache issue on my side. Hagar Le 23/07/2013 10:48, Hagar Delest a écrit : I don't understand: the banner on the AOO website says that 4.0 has been released but there is no download link. Going manually to Sourceforge still leads to 3.4.1. Hagar Le 23/07/2013 0

Re: Release coordination proposal

I don't understand: the banner on the AOO website says that 4.0 has been released but there is no download link. Going manually to Sourceforge still leads to 3.4.1. Hagar Le 23/07/2013 02:46, Kay Schenk a écrit : On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 a

Re: Release coordination proposal

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Rob Weir wrote: >> >>> Can we do something like this? >>> >>> Two stage: release and announce. >>> >>> Release == put the 4.0 files into produ

Re: Release coordination proposal

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > >> Can we do something like this? >> >> Two stage: release and announce. >> >> Release == put the 4.0 files into production on SourceForge, update >> our download web page to serve 4.0 fi

Re: Release coordination proposal

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Am 07/22/2013 09:35 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): > > Am 07/22/2013 08:00 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): >> >>> OK, I've updated the DL webpages. >>> >>> After fixing some broken links, I think it's OK and ready for a review: >>> >>> http://ooo-site.

Re: Release coordination proposal

Am 07/22/2013 09:35 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): Am 07/22/2013 08:00 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): OK, I've updated the DL webpages. After fixing some broken links, I think it's OK and ready for a review: http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/index.html The last hints are fixed. So, when noth

Re: Release coordination proposal

Am 07/22/2013 11:40 PM, schrieb Donald Whytock: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 07/22/2013 09:45 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: 2) What should the "legacy" link go to now? Is 3.3.0 still "legacy"? If so, what is "3.4.1"? We might need to reword and restructure that destin

Re: Release coordination proposal

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Am 07/22/2013 09:45 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: > > 2) What should the "legacy" link go to now? Is 3.3.0 still "legacy"? >> If so, what is "3.4.1"? We might need to reword and restructure that >> destination page, but I think it is OK for now.

Re: Release coordination proposal

Am 07/22/2013 10:03 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Il 22/07/2013 Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 07/22/2013 08:00 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): After fixing some broken links, I think it's OK and ready for a review: http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/index.html The last hints are fixed. So, when not

Re: Release coordination proposal

Il 22/07/2013 Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 07/22/2013 08:00 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): After fixing some broken links, I think it's OK and ready for a review: http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/index.html The last hints are fixed. So, when nothing else comes in we should be ready to go live w

Re: Release coordination proposal

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Am 07/22/2013 08:00 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): > > OK, I've updated the DL webpages. >> >> After fixing some broken links, I think it's OK and ready for a review: >> >> http://ooo-site.staging.**apache.org/download/index.html

Re: Release coordination proposal

Am 07/22/2013 09:45 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: OK, I've updated the DL webpages. After fixing some broken links, I think it's OK and ready for a review: http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/index.html The small print under the download

Re: Release coordination proposal

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > OK, I've updated the DL webpages. > > After fixing some broken links, I think it's OK and ready for a review: > > http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/index.html > The small print under the download box has two lines for me: Get all p

Re: Release coordination proposal

Am 07/22/2013 08:00 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): OK, I've updated the DL webpages. After fixing some broken links, I think it's OK and ready for a review: http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/index.html The last hints are fixed. So, when nothing else comes in we should be ready to go liv

Re: Release coordination proposal

Am 07/22/2013 09:17 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 07/22/2013 08:28 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: OK, I've updated the DL webpages. After fixing some broken links, I think it's OK and rea

Re: Release coordination proposal

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Am 07/22/2013 08:28 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: > >> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Marcus (OOo) >> wrote: >> >> OK, I've updated the DL webpages. >>> >>> After fixing some broken links, I think it's OK and ready for a review: >>> >>> http:

Re: Release coordination proposal

Am 07/22/2013 08:24 PM, schrieb Manuel del Valle: Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 20:00:21 +0200 From: marcus.m...@wtnet.de To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Release coordination proposal OK, I've updated the DL webpages. After fixing some broken links, I think it's OK and ready fo

Re: Release coordination proposal

Am 07/22/2013 08:28 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: OK, I've updated the DL webpages. After fixing some broken links, I think it's OK and ready for a review: http://ooo-site.staging.**apache.org/download/index.html

Re: Release coordination proposal

Am 07/22/2013 08:30 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Manuel del Valle wrote: Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 20:00:21 +0200 From: marcus.m...@wtnet.de To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Release coordination proposal OK, I've updated the DL webpages. After fixing

Re: Release coordination proposal

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Manuel del Valle wrote: > > Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 20:00:21 +0200 > > From: marcus.m...@wtnet.de > > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Release coordination proposal > > > > OK, I've updated the DL webpages.

Re: Release coordination proposal

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > OK, I've updated the DL webpages. > > After fixing some broken links, I think it's OK and ready for a review: > > http://ooo-site.staging.**apache.org/download/index.html > > Only then

RE: Release coordination proposal

> Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 20:00:21 +0200 > From: marcus.m...@wtnet.de > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Release coordination proposal > > OK, I've updated the DL webpages. > > After fixing some broken links, I think it's OK and r

Re: Release coordination proposal

OK, I've updated the DL webpages. After fixing some broken links, I think it's OK and ready for a review: http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/index.html Only then I will publish to the live server. Marcus Am 07/22/2013 07:08 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 9:18 AM,

Re: Release coordination proposal

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Am 07/22/2013 05:49 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Rob Weir wrote: >> >> Can we do something like this? >>> >>> Two stage: release and announce. >>> >> > This was already planned to do. > > > Release == put

Re: Release coordination proposal

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > >> Can we do something like this? >> >> Two stage: release and announce. >> >> Release == put the 4.0 files into production on SourceForge, update >> our download web page to serve 4.0 files

Release coordination proposal

Can we do something like this? Two stage: release and announce. Release == put the 4.0 files into production on SourceForge, update our download web page to serve 4.0 files by default. Announce == go live with news on front page, header announcement on every page (branding.mdtext), announcement

Re: Release coordination proposal

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Am 07/22/2013 05:49 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: > >> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Rob Weir wrote: >> >>> Can we do something like this? >>> >>> Two stage: release and announce. > > > This was already planned to do. > > >>> Release == put th

Re: Release coordination proposal

Am 07/22/2013 05:49 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Rob Weir wrote: Can we do something like this? Two stage: release and announce. This was already planned to do. Release == put the 4.0 files into production on SourceForge, update our download web page to serve

Re: Release coordination proposal

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > Can we do something like this? > > Two stage: release and announce. > > Release == put the 4.0 files into production on SourceForge, update > our download web page to serve 4.0 files by default. > > Announce == go live with news on front page, h